Author(s):
- Manal Almalki
- Kathleen Gray
- Fernando Martin-Sanchez
Abstract:
Background:
Self-quantification (SQ) is a way of working in which, by using tracking tools, people aim to collect, manage, and reflect on personal health data to gain a better understanding of their own body, health behavior, and interaction with the world around them. However, health SQ lacks a formal framework for describing the self-quantifiers’ activities and their contextual components or constructs to pursue these health related goals. Establishing such framework is important because it is the first step to operationalize health SQ fully. This may in turn help to achieve the aims of health professionals and researchers who seek to make or study changes in the self-quantifiers’ health systematically.
Objective:
The aim of this study was to review studies on health SQ in order to answer the following questions: What are the general features of the work and the particular activities that self-quantifiers perform to achieve their health objectives? What constructs of health SQ have been identified in the scientific literature? How have these studies described such constructs? How would it be possible to model these constructs theoretically to characterize the work of health SQ?
Methods:
A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted. A total of 26 empirical studies were included. The content of these studies was thematically analyzed using Activity Theory as an organizing framework. Results: The literature provided varying descriptions of health SQ as data-driven and objective-oriented work mediated by SQ tools. From the literature, we identified two types of SQ work: work on data (ie, data management activities) and work with data (ie, health management activities). Using Activity Theory, these activities could be characterized into 6 constructs: users, tracking tools, health objectives, division of work, community or group setting, and SQ plan and rules. We could not find a reference to any single study that accounted for all these activities and constructs of health SQ activity.
Conclusions:
A Health Self-Quantification Activity Framework is presented, which shows SQ tool use in context, in relation to the goals, plans, and competence of the user. This makes it easier to analyze issues affecting SQ activity, and thereby makes it more feasible to address them. This review makes two significant contributions to research in this field: it explores health SQ work and its constructs thoroughly and it adapts Activity Theory to describe health SQ activity systematically.
Document: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27234343/
References
1. Almalki M, Gray K, Sanchez F. The use of self-quantification systems for personal health information: big data management activities and prospects. Health Information Science and Systems. 2015;3(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/2047-2501-3-S1-S1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
2. Fox S, Duggan M. Tracking for health. Washington: Pew Research Center; 2013. Jan 28, [2016-05-14]. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Tracking-for-Health.aspx webcite. [Google Scholar]
3. Lupton D. SSRN: Social Science Research Network. 2014. Dec 04, [2016-05-11]. You are your data: self-tracking practices and concepts of data http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2534211 webcite.
4. Li I. Personal informatics and context: using context to reveal factors that affect behavior. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments. 2012;4(1):71–2. doi: 10.3233/AIS-2011-0130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
5. Choe E, Lee N, Lee B, Pratt W, Kientz J. Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. CHI ’14 Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems; SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems; April 26 – May 1, 2014; Toronto, Ontario. New York: ACM; 2014. pp. 1143–52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
6. Rooksby J, Rost M, Morrison A, Chalmers M. Personal tracking as lived informatics. CHI ’14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Toronto, Ontario, Canada; SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; April 26 – May 1, 2014; Toronto, Ontario. New York: ACM; 2014. pp. 1163–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
7. De Maeyer C, Jacobs A. Sleeping with technology – designing for personal health. In: Matsumura N, editor. Shikakeology – designing triggers for behavior change: Papers from the 2013 AAAI Spring Symposium. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press; 2013. pp. 11–16. [Google Scholar]
8. Ancker JS, Witteman HO, Hafeez B, Provencher T, Van de Graaf Mary. Wei E. “You Get Reminded You’re a Sick Person”: Personal Data Tracking and Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug;17(8):e202. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4209. http://www.jmir.org/2015/8/e202/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
9. Lee VR, Drake J. Digital Physical Activity Data Collection and Use by Endurance Runners and Distance Cyclists. Tech Know Learn. 2013 Apr 27;18(1-2):39–63. doi: 10.1007/s10758-013-9203-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
10. FIORE-SILFVAST B, NEFF G. What we talk about when we talk data: Valences and the social performance of multiple metrics in digital health. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings. 2014 Feb 11;2013(1):74–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-8918.2013.00007.x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
11. Saunders W, Krynicki F, Sugarman V. Sisyphorest: maintenance goal support by responding to trends. CHI EA ’14 CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems; CHI ’14 ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; April 26 – May 1, 2014; Toronto, Ontario. New York: ACM; 2014. pp. 215–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
12. Kim J. A qualitative analysis of user experiences with a self-tracker for activity, sleep, and diet. Interact J Med Res. 2014 Mar;3(1):e8. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.2878. http://www.i-jmr.org/2014/1/e8/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
13. Gimpe H, Nißen M, Görlitz R. Quantifying the quantified self: A study on the motivations of patients to track their own health. International Conference on Information Systems ICIS 2013; 34th International Conference on Information Systems ICIS; 2013; Milan. Milan, Italy: Association for Information Systems (AIS); 2013. [Google Scholar]
14. Kaptelinin V. Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction. In: Nardi B, editor. Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995. pp. 103–116. [Google Scholar]
15. Kuutti K. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In: Nardi B, editor. Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996. pp. 17–44. [Google Scholar]
16. Wilson TD. Activity theory and information seeking. Ann Rev Info Sci Tech. 2008;42(1):119–161. doi: 10.1002/aris.2008.1440420111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
17. van Gemert-Pijnen Julia E W C. Nijland N, van LM, Ossebaard HC, Kelders SM, Eysenbach G, Seydel ER. A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec;13(4):e111. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1672. http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e111/ [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
18. Nardi B. Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In: Nardi B, editor. Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996. pp. 69–102. [Google Scholar]
19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/19622551. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Andrieu B. L’osmose technique avec son corps viv@nt : une auto-santé connectée du patient immersif (Technical osmosis with the living body: Health self-tracking of the immersive patient) L’Évolution Psychiatrique. 2016 Apr;81(2):253–265. doi: 10.1016/j.evopsy.2015.07.004. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
21. Banos O, Amin M, Khan W, Afzel M, Ahmad M, Ali M. An innovative platform for person-centric health and wellness support. In: Ortuno F, Rojas I, editors. Bioinformatics and biomedical engineering. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 131–140. [Google Scholar]
22. Barricelli B, Valtolina S. Designing for end-user development in the internet of things. In: Diaz P, Pipek V, Ardito C, Jensen C, Aedo I, Boden A, editors. End-User Development. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 9–24. [Google Scholar]
23. Chamberlain A, Schraefel M, Poole E, Munson S, Danis C, Churchill E. Moving beyond e-health and the quantified self: the role of CSCW in collaboration, community and practice for technologically-supported proactive health and wellbeing. CSCW’15 Companion: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing; CSCW ’15: 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing; 14-18 March, 2015; Vancouver, BC, Canada. New York: the role of CSCW in collaboration, community and practice for technologically-supported proactive health and wellbeing. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW; 2015. pp. 273–276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
24. Davies N, Friday A, Clinch S, Sas C, Langheinrich M, Ward G, Schmidt A. Security and Privacy Implications of Pervasive Memory Augmentation. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2015 Jan;14(1):44–53. doi: 10.1109/MPRV.2015.13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
25. Doryab A, Frost M, Faurholt-Jepsen M, Kessing LV, Bardram JE. Impact factor analysis: combining prediction with parameter ranking to reveal the impact of behavior on health outcome. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 2014 Sep 21;19(2):355–365. doi: 10.1007/s00779-014-0826-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
26. Dudley JT, Listgarten J, Stegle O, Brenner SE, Parts L. Personalized medicine: from genotypes, molecular phenotypes and the quantified self, towards improved medicine. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2015:342–6. http://psb.stanford.edu/psb-online/proceedings/psb15/abstracts/2015_p342.html. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Forsdyke DR. Doctor-scientist-patients who barketh not: the quantified self-movement and crowd-sourcing research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;21(6):1024–7. doi: 10.1111/jep.12425. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
28. Giones-Valls A, Giones F. Quantifying the self to live through data: big data applied to the personal sphere. BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació 2015;(34):3. doi: 10.1344/BiD2015.34.16. (forthcoming) http://bid.ub.edu/34/giones.htm. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
29. Hachem S, Mathioudakis G, Pathak A, Issarny V, Bhatia R. Sense2Health a quantified self application for monitoring personal exposure to environmental pollution. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Sensor Networks, SENSORNETS; 4th International Conference on Sensor Networks, SENSORNETS 2015; February 11-13, 2015; Angers, Loire Valley, France. Scitepress; 2015. pp. 36–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
30. Hood L, Lovejoy JC, Price ND. Integrating big data and actionable health coaching to optimize wellness. BMC Med. 2015;13:4. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0238-7. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
31. Issa H, Shafaee A, Agne S, Baumann S, Dengel A. Evaluation of Fitbit One, Jawbone Up and Nike+ Fuelband based on Amazon.com customer reviews. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health; ICT4AgeingWell 2015; May 20-22, 2015; Lisbon. SciTePress; 2015. pp. 171–179. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
32. Janssen CP, Gould SJ, Li SY, Brumby DP, Cox AL. Integrating knowledge of multitasking and interruptions across different perspectives and research methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2015 Jul;79:1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.03.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
33. Jones DH. self-archiving from Christian Boltanski to lifelogging. Archives and Records. 2015 Feb 26;36(1):29–41. doi: 10.1080/23257962.2015.1010149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
34. Lavalliere M, Arezes P, Burstein A, Coughlin J. The quantified-self and wearable technologies in the workplace: implications and challenges for their implementations. Sho2015: International Symposium on Occupational Safety and Hygiene; Sho: International Symposium on Occupational Safety and Hygiene; February 12-13, 2015; Guimarães, Portugal. 2015. pp. 161–3. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/38579 webcite. [Google Scholar]
35. Lupton D, Jutel A. ‘It’s like having a physician in your pocket!’ A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps. Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;133:128–35. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
36. Lupton D. Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Cult Health Sex. 2015 Jun;17(4):440–53. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2014.920528. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
37. Majmudar MD, Colucci LA, Landman AB. The quantified patient of the future: Opportunities and challenges. Healthc (Amst) 2015 Sep;3(3):153–6. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2015.02.001. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
38. Ohlin F, Olsson C. Intelligent computing in personal informatics: Key design considerations. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces; IUI ’15 – 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces; 29 March – 1 April, 2015; Atlanta, GA. New York: ACM; 2015. pp. 263–274. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
39. Olivier B, Vilcocq-Merjagnan C. Online administration of a quantified self-questionnaire for elderly people: a user satisfaction survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jan;63(1):194–5. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13222. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
40. Picard R, Wolf G. Guest Editorial Sensor Informatics and Quantified Self. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2015 Sep;19(5):1531. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2462372. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
41. Rüping S. [Big data in medicine and healthcare] Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015 Aug;58(8):794–8. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2181-y. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
42. Thornquist E, Kirkengen AL. The quantified self: closing the gap between general knowledge and particular case? J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Jun;21(3):398–403. doi: 10.1111/jep.12239. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
43. Tory M, Carpendale S. Personal Visualization and Personal Visual Analytics [Guest editors’ introduction] IEEE Comput. Grap. Appl. 2015 Jul;35(4):26–27. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2015.88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
44. Van den Bulck Jan Sleep apps and the quantified self: blessing or curse? J Sleep Res. 2015 Apr;24(2):121–3. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12270. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
45. Williams SJ, Coveney C, Meadows R. ‘M-apping’ sleep? Trends and transformations in the digital age. Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Sep;37(7):1039–54. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12283. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
46. Zandi AS, Boudreau P, Boivin DB, Dumont GA. Identification of scalp EEG circadian variation using a novel correlation sum measure. J Neural Eng. 2015 Oct;12(5):056004. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/5/056004. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
47. Appelboom G, LoPresti M, Reginster J, Sander CE, Dumont Emmanuel P L The quantified patient: a patient participatory culture. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Dec;30(12):2585–7. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2014.954032. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
48. Becker BW. The Quantified Self: Balancing Privacy and Personal Metrics. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian. 2014 Nov 10;33(4):212–215. doi: 10.1080/01639269.2014.964595. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
49. Brennan C, McCullagh P, Lightbody G, Galway L, Trainor D. Quantifying brain activity for task engagement. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM; IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM; November 2 – 5, 2014; Belfast. IEEE; 2014. pp. 8–11. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
50. Bushhousen E. The Quantified Self movement and hospital librarians. Journal of Hospital Librarianship. 2014 Feb 12;14(1):88–93. doi: 10.1080/15323269.2014.861705. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
51. Caldwell T. The quantified self: a threat to enterprise security? Computer Fraud & Security. 2014 Nov;2014(11):16–20. doi: 10.1016/S1361-3723(14)70549-4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
52. Calikli G, Andersen M, Bandara A, Price B, Nuseibeh B. Personal informatics for non-geeks: lessons learned from ordinary people. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication; UbiComp ’14: 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing; September 13 – 17, 2014; Seattle, WA. 2014. pp. 683–686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
53. Cena F, Likavec S, Rapp A, Deplano M, Marcengo A. Ontologies for quantified self: a semantic approach. Hypertext 2014 extended proceedings of the 25th ACM Hypertext and Social Media conference; Hypertext 2014; September 1 – 4, 2014; Santiago, Chile. CEUR-WS; 2014. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1210/LQS_01.pdf webcite. [Google Scholar]
54. Clifford GD, Gederi E. Out of touch : from audio recordings to phone apps to mattress sensors, noncontact systems offer a less cumbersome way to monitor sleep. IEEE Pulse. 2014 Sep;5(5):19–21. doi: 10.1109/MPUL.2014.2339253. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
55. Cuttone A, Larsen J. The long tail issue in large scale deployment of personal informatics. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication; UbiComp ’14 – ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing; September 13 – 17, 2014; Seattle, WA. 2014. pp. 691–694. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
56. Cuttone A, Petersen M, Larsen J. Four data visualization heuristics to facilitate reflection in personal informatics. In: Stephanidis C, Antona M, editors. Universal access in human-computer interaction. Design for all and accessibility practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2014. pp. 541–52. [Google Scholar]
57. De Croon R, De Buyser T, Klerkx J, Duval E. Applying a user-centered, rapid-prototyping methodology with quantified self: A case study with triathletes. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM); IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM); November, 2 – 5, 2014; Belfast. 2014. pp. 12–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
58. Duarte F, Lourenço A, Abrantes A. Classification of physical activities using a smartphone: Evaluation study using multiple users. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Electronics, Telecommunications and Computers; CETC 2013 – Conference on Electronics, Telecommunications and Computers – CETC . Procedia Technology; December 5 – 6, 2013; Lisbon. Elsevier; 2014. pp. 239–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
59. Gastaldi M. Integration of mobile, big data, sensors, and social media: impact on daily life and business. Proceedings of the 2014 IST-Africa Conference and Exhibition; 2014 IST-Africa Conference and Exhibition; May 7 – 9, 2014; Le Meridien Ile Maurice. IEEE; 2014. pp. 1–10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
60. Gaunt K, Nacsa L, Penz M. Baby Lucent: pitfalls of applying quantified self to baby products. CHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems; CHI ’14: Human Factors in Computing Systems; April 26 – May 1, 2014; Toronto, Ont. New York: ACM; 2014. pp. 263–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
61. Gurrin C, Smeaton AF, Doherty AR. LifeLogging: Personal Big Data. FNT in Information Retrieval. 2014;8(1):1–125. doi: 10.1561/1500000033. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
62. Harrison D, Marshall P, Berthouze N, Bird J. Tracking physical activity: problems related to running longitudinal studies with commercial devices. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication; UbiComp ’14 – 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing; September 13 – 17, 2014; Seattle, WA. New York: ACM; 2014. pp. 699–702. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
63. Hirsch JA, James P, Robinson Jamaica R M. Eastman KM, Conley KD, Evenson KR, Laden F. Using MapMyFitness to Place Physical Activity into Neighborhood Context. Front Public Health. 2014 Mar;2:19. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00019. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
64. Hogenboom A, Smit I, Kröse B. Demonstration: a digital coach for self-tracking athletes. Haptics: Neuroscience, Devices, Modeling, and Applications – Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on EuroHaptics; EuroHaptics 2014; June 24 – 26, 2014; Versailles. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2014. pp. 430–431. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
65. Huang S, Sano A, Kwan C. The moment: a mobile tool for people with depression or bipolar disorder. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: Adjunct Publication; UbiComp ’14 – ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing; September 13 – 17, 2014; Seattle, WA. 2014. pp. 235–238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
66. Jain R, Jalali L. Objective Self. IEEE MultiMedia. 2014 Oct;21(4):100–110. doi: 10.1109/MMUL.2014.63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
67. Jones C. Tell all. Innovations in Pharmaceutical Technology. 2014. pp. 14–7. http://www.iptonline.com/synopsis.asp?cat=1&article=986 webcite.
68. Jordan M, Pfarr N. MDDI. [2015-07-12]. From data to decisions-the path to a meaningful quantified self medical device and diagnostic industry news products and suppliers; MDDI 2014 http://www.mddionline.com/article/data-decisions-path-meaningful-quantified-self webcite.
69. Keary A, Walsh P. How affective computing could complement and advance the quantified self. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM; IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM; November 2 – 5, 2014; Belfast. IEEE; 2014. pp. 24–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
70. Khorakhun C, Bhatti S. Wellbeing as a proxy for a mHealth study. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM; IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine, BIBM; May 2 – 5, 2014; Belfast. IEEE; 2014. pp