Author:

Deborah Lupton

Abstract:

The concept of affective atmospheres has recently emerged in cultural geography to refer to the feelings that are generated by the interactions and movements of human and nonhuman actors in specific spaces and places. Affective atmospheres can have profound effects on the ways in which people think and feel about and sense the spaces they inhabit and through which they move and the other actors in those spaces. Thus far, very little research has adopted this concept to explore the ways in which digital health technologies are used. As part of seeking to redress this lacuna, in this essay I draw on previously published literature on affective atmospheres to demonstrate and explain the implications of this scholarship for future theoretical and empirical scholarship about digital health practices that pays attention to their affective and sensory elements. The article is structured into six parts. The first part outlines the concepts and research practices underpinning affective atmospheres scholarship. In the second part, I review some of the research that looks at place, space and mobilities in relation to affective atmospheres. In the third part I focus more specifically on the affective atmospheres of medical encounters, and then move on to digital technology use in the fourth part. I then address in the fifth part, some relevant scholarship on digital health technologies. I end the essay with some reflections of directions in which future research taking up the concept of affective atmospheres in the context of digital health technologies can go. The key research question that these topics all work towards is that asking ‘How does digital health feel?’

Document:

https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617701276

References:
1.Anderson, B, Ash, J Atmospheric methods. In: Vannini, P (ed). Non-representational methodologies: re-envisioning research, London: Routledge, 2015, pp. 34–51.
Google Scholar
2.Vannini, P . Non-representational methodologies: re-envisioning research, London: Routledge, 2015.
Google Scholar | Crossref
3.Bissell D. Passenger mobilities: affective atmospheres and the sociality of public transport. Environ Plan D 2010; 28: 270–289.
Google Scholar
4.Thrift, N . Non-representational theory: space, politics, affect, London: Routledge, 2008.
Google Scholar | Crossref
5.Simpson P. A sense of the cycling environment: felt experiences of infrastructure and atmospheres. Environ Plan A 2017; 49: 426–447.
Google Scholar
6.Anderson, B . Affective atmospheres. Emot Space Soc 2009; 2: 77–81.
Google Scholar | Crossref
7.Merleau-Ponty, M . Phenomenology of perception, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962.
Google Scholar
8.Merleau-Ponty, M . The visible and the invisible, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1968.
Google Scholar
9.Coole, DH, Frost, S. New materialisms: ontology, agency, and politics, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.
Google Scholar | Crossref
10.Whatmore, S . Materialist returns: practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cult Geogr 2006; 13: 600–609.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
11.Labanyi, J . Doing things: emotion, affect, and materiality. J Spanish Cultural Studies 2010; 11: 223–233.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
12.Ash, J . Rethinking affective atmospheres: technology, perturbation and space times of the non-human. Geoforum 2013; 49: 20–28.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
13.Ash, J, Simpson, P. Geography and post-phenomenology. Prog Hum Geogr 2016; 40: 48–66.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
14.Spinney, J . Close encounters? Mobile methods, (post)phenomenology and affect. Cult Geogr 2015; 22: 231–246.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
15.Anderson, B, Harrison, P The promise of non-representational theories. In: Anderson, B, Harrison, P (eds). Taking-place: non-representational theories and geography, London: Routledge, 2016, pp. 1–34.
Google Scholar
16.Ellis, D, Tucker, I, Harper, D. The affective atmospheres of surveillance. Theory Psychol 2013; 23: 716–731.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
17.Bissell, D . Thinking habits for uncertain subjects: movement, stillness, susceptibility. Environ Plan A 2011; 43: 2649.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
18.Moores, S . Media, place and mobility, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Google Scholar | Crossref
19.Jones, P . Sensory indiscipline and affect: a study of commuter cycling. Soc Cult Geogr 2012; 13: 645–658.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
20.Bissell, D . Encountering stressed bodies: slow creep transformations and tipping points of commuting mobilities. Geoforum 2014; 51: 191–201.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
21.Merriman, P . Mobility infrastructures: modern visions, affective environments and the problem of car parking. Mobilities 2016; 11: 83–98.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
22.Duff, C . On the role of affect and practice in the production of place. Environ Plan D 2010; 28: 881–895.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
23.Shaw, R . Beyond night-time economy: affective atmospheres of the urban night. Geoforum 2014; 51: 87–95.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
24.Edensor, T . Illuminated atmospheres: anticipating and reproducing the flow of affective experience in Blackpool. Environ Plan D 2012; 30: 1103–1122.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
25.James, V, Gabe, J. Health and the sociology of emotions, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
Google Scholar
26.Lupton, D . Consumerism, reflexivity and the medical encounter. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45: 373–381.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
27.Tucker, I . Mental health service user territories: enacting ‘safe spaces’ in the community. Health 2010; 14: 434–448.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
28.Maslen, S . Sensory work of diagnosis: a crisis of legitimacy. Senses Soc 2016; 11: 158–176.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
29.Harris, A . Listening-touch, affect and the crafting of medical bodies through percussion. Body Soc 2016; 22: 31–61.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
30.Goodwin, D Sensing the way: embodied dimensions of diagnostic work. In: Büscher, M, Goodwin, D, Mesman, J (eds). Ethnographies of diagnostic work: dimensions of transformative practice, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010, pp. 73–92.
Google Scholar | Crossref
31.Prentice, R . Bodies in formation: an ethnography of anatomy and surgery education, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013.
Google Scholar
32.Gesler, WM . Therapeutic landscapes: medical issues in light of the new cultural geography. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34: 735–746.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
33.Conradson, D . Landscape, care and the relational self: therapeutic encounters in rural England. Health Place 2005; 11: 337–348.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
34.Bell, SL, Wheeler, BW, Phoenix, C. Using geonarratives to explore the diverse temporalities of therapeutic landscapes: perspectives from ‘green’ and ‘blue’ settings. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 2017; 107: 93–108.
Google Scholar | ISI
35.Van Hout, A, Pols, J, Willems, D. Shining trinkets and unkempt gardens: on the materiality of care. Sociol Health Illn 2015; 37: 1206–1217.
Google Scholar | ISI
36.Mol, A . The logic of care: health and the problem of patient choice, London: Routledge, 2008.
Google Scholar | Crossref
37.Mol, A . Living with diabetes: care beyond choice and control. Lancet 2009; 373: 1756–1757.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
38.Moores, S . Digital orientations: “ways of the hand” and practical knowing in media uses and other manual activities. Mobile Media Comm 2014; 2: 196–208.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
39.Krajina, Z, Moores, S, Morley, D. Non-media-centric media studies: A cross-generational conversation. Euro J Cult Stud 2014; 17: 682–700.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
40.Lupton, D Donna Haraway: the digital cyborg assemblage and the new digital health technologies. In: Collyer, F (ed). The palgrave handbook of social theory in health, illness and medicine, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, pp. 567–581.
Google Scholar | Crossref
41.Lupton, D Digital bodies. In: Andrews, D, Silk, M, Thorpe, H (eds). Routledge handbook of physical cultural studies, London: Routledge, 2017, pp. 200–208.
Google Scholar | Crossref
42.Lupton, D . Digital companion species and eating data: implications for theorising digital data–human assemblages. BD&S 2016; 3, http://bds.sagepub.com/spbds/3/1/2053951715619947.full.pdf.
Google Scholar
43.Lupton, D . The quantified self: a sociology of self-tracking, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016.
Google Scholar
44.Pink, S, Sinanan, J, Hjorth, L, Horst, H. Tactile digital ethnography: Researching mobile media through the hand. Mobile Media Comm 2016; 4: 237–251.
Google Scholar | ISI
45.Cooley, HR . It’s all about the fit: the hand, the mobile screenic device and tactile vision. J Visual Culture 2004; 3: 133–55.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
46.Colt, S . Tim Cook gave his most in-depth interview to date - here’s what he said. Bus Insider Aus, http://www.businessinsider.com.au/tim-cook-full-interview-with-charlie-rose-with-transcript-2014-9 (2014).
Google Scholar
47.Apple. Watch technology 2014.
Google Scholar
48.Van Dijck, J . Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveill Soc 2014; 12: 197–208.
Google Scholar | Crossref
49.Rosenzweig, P . Whither privacy? Surveill Soc 2012; 10: 344–347.
Google Scholar | Crossref
50.Raley, R Dataveillance and countervailance. In: Gitelman, L (ed). “Raw data” is an oxymoron, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013, pp. 121–145.
Google Scholar
51.Esposti, SD . When big data meets dataveillance: the hidden side of analytics. Surveill Soc 2014; 12: 209–225.
Google Scholar | Crossref
52.Sumartojo, S, Pink, S, Lupton, D, LaBond, CH. The affective intensities of datafied space. Emot Space Soc 2016; 21: 33–40.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
53.Lupton, D, Michael, M. Big data seductions and ambivalences. Discover Society, http://discoversociety.org/2015/07/30/big-data-seductions-and-ambivalences/ (2015).
Google Scholar
54.Lupton, D Personal data practices in the age of lively data. In: Daniels, J, Gregory, K, McMillan Cottom, T (eds). Digital sociologies, Bristol: Policy Press, 2016, pp. 335–350.
Google Scholar | Crossref
55.Stark, L . The emotional context of information privacy. Inform Soc 2016; 32: 14–27.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
56.Pols, J . Care at a distance: on the closeness of technology, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2012.
Google Scholar | Crossref
57.Oudshoorn, N . The vulnerability of cyborgs: the case of ICD shocks. Sci Technol Human Values 2016; 41: 767–792.
Google Scholar | ISI
58.Forlano, L . Hacking the feminist disabled body. J Peer Production, http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-8-feminism-and-unhacking/peer-reviewed-papers/hacking-the-feminist-disabled-body/ (2016).
Google Scholar
59.Pols, J, Willems, D. Innovation and evaluation: taming and unleashing telecare technology. Sociol Health Illn 2011; 33: 484–98.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
60.Oudshoorn, N . Telecare technologies and the transformation of healthcare, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Google Scholar | Crossref
61.Oudshoorn, N, Neven, L, Stienstra, M. How diversity gets lost: age and gender in design practices of information and communication technologies. J Women Aging 2016; 28: 170–185.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
62.Maathuis, IJH, Oudshoorn, N. Technologies of compliance? Telecare technologies and self-management of COPD patients. EA Journal 2015; 7. , https://issuu.com/eajournal/docs/4-oudshoornmaathuis.
Google Scholar
63.Piras, EM, Miele, F. Clinical self-tracking and monitoring technologies: negotiations in the ICT-mediated patient-provider relationship. Health Sociol Rev 2017; 26: 38–53.
Google Scholar | ISI
64.Ruckenstein, M . Visualized and interacted life: personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies 2014; 4: 68–84.
Google Scholar | Crossref
65.Fotopoulou, A, O’Riordan, K. Training to self-care: fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociol Rev 2017; 26: 54–68.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
66.Hortensius, J, Kars, M, Wierenga, W. Perspectives of patients with type 1 or insulin-treated type 2 diabetes on self-monitoring of blood glucose: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 167, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/167.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
67.Ancker, J, Witteman, H, Hafeez, B. “You get reminded you’re a sick person”: personal data tracking and patients with multiple chronic conditions. J Med Internet Res 2015; 17, http://www.jmir.org/2015/8/e202/?trendmd-shared=0.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
68.Kuntsman, A Introduction: affective fabrics of digital cultures. In: Karatzogianni, A, Kuntsman, A (eds). Digital cultures and the politics of emotion: feelings, affect and technological change, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, pp. 1–17.
Google Scholar | Crossref
69.Chambers, D . Social media and personal relationships: online intimacies and networked friendship, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Google Scholar | Crossref
70.Lambert, A . Intimacy and friendship on Facebook, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Google Scholar | Crossref
71.Van Dijck, J . The culture of connectivity: a critical history of social media, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Google Scholar | Crossref
72.Nash, A . Affect and the medium of digital data. Fibreculture J 2012; 21: 10–30.
Google Scholar
73.John, N . Sharing and Web 2.0: the emergence of a keyword. New Media Soc 2013; 15: 167–182.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
74.Gonzalez-Polledo, E, Tarr, J. The thing about pain: The remaking of illness narratives in chronic pain expressions on social media. New Media Soc 2016; 18: 1455–1472.
Google Scholar | ISI
75.Lupton D. Digital media and body weight, shape, and size: an introduction and review. Fat Studies. Epub ahead of print 2016. DOI: org/10.1080/21604851.2017.1243392.
Google Scholar
76.Stark, L, Crawford, K. The conservatism of emoji: work, affect, and communication. Social Media Soc 2015; 1, http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2056305115604853.
Google Scholar
77.Lupton, D, Pedersen, S, Thomas, GM. Parenting and digital media: from the early days of the web to contemporary digital society. Sociol Compass 2016; 10: 730–743.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
78.Lupton, D . The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociol Health Illn 2014; 36: 856–869.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
79.Mazanderani, F, Locock, L, Powell, J. Being differently the same: the mediation of identity tensions in the sharing of illness experiences. Soc Sci Med 2012; 74: 546–553.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
80.Ziebland, S, Wyke, S. Health and illness in a connected world: how might sharing experiences on the internet affect people’s health? Milbank Quart 2012; 90: 219–249.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
81.Stragier, J, Evens, T, Mechant, P. Broadcast yourself: an exploratory study of sharing physical activity on social networking sites. Media Int Aus 2015; 155: 120–129.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
82.Lupton, D Lively data, social fitness and biovalue: the intersections of health self-tracking and social media. In: Burgess, J, Marwick, A, Poell, T (eds). The Sage handbook on social media, London: Sage, 2017.
Google Scholar
83.Hollett, T, Ehret, C. ‘Bean’s World’: (Mine)Crafting affective atmospheres of gameplay, learning, and care in a children’s hospital. New Media Soc 2015; 17: 1849–1866.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI