Author(s):
Martin Berg
Abstract:
Self-tracking devices and apps often measure and provide interpretations of personal data in a rather straightforward way, for instance by visualising the speed and distance of a run or the quality of sleep during night. There is, however, a growing number of devices claiming to support increased wellbeing by extensive data analysis to provide insights and algorithmic advice about unseen and neglected dimensions of our lives, bodies, and experiences. This article engages with two devices of this kind, namely the Moodmetric and the ŌURA which are two recently released ‘smart’ rings with associated smartphone apps that claim to measure emotions and rest, promote happiness and help users to perform better. Focusing on how certain values, visions and ideas are used to frame and explain the potential functionality of these devices, this article approaches the discursive underpinnings of their design as deeply intertwined with the temporalities of late modernity. Empirically, the article is based on a discourse analysis of blog posts, marketing materials and user guides from the ŌURA and Moodmetric companies along with video recordings of the public appearances and sales pitches of company representatives.
Document:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2055207617699767
References:
| 1. | Williamson B. Algorithmic skin: Health-tracking technologies, personal analytics and the biopedagogies of digitized health and physical education. Sport Educ Soc 2014; 20: 133–151. Google Scholar |
| 2. | Ruckenstein, M, Pantzar, M. Beyond the quantified self: Thematic exploration of a dataistic paradigm. New Media & Soc 2015; 19: 401–418. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 3. | Simmel, G The metropolis and mental life. In: Frisby, D, Featherstone, M (eds). Simmel on culture: selected writings, London: Sage, 1997, pp. 174–186. Google Scholar |
| 4. | Rosa, H, Scheuerman, WE. High-speed society: social acceleration, power, and modernity, University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009. Google Scholar |
| 5. | Tomlinson, J . The culture of speed: the coming of immediacy, London: Sage, 2007. Google Scholar |
| 6. | Osbaldeston N. Slow culture: An introduction. In: Osbaldeston N (ed) Culture of the Slow: Social Deceleration in an Accelerated World. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–18. Google Scholar |
| 7. | Beck, U . Risk society: towards a new modernity, London: Sage, 1992. Google Scholar |
| 8. | Virilio, P . Open sky, London: Verso, 1997. Google Scholar |
| 9. | Sennett, R . The corrosion of character: the personal consequences of work in the new capitalism, New York: W.W. Norton, 1998. Google Scholar |
| 10. | Bauman, Z . The individualized society, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001. Google Scholar |
| 11. | Agger, B . Speeding up fast capitalism: cultures, jobs, families, schools, bodies, Boulder: Paradigm, 2004. Google Scholar |
| 12. | Ritzer, G . Enchanting a disenchanted world: continuity and change in the cathedrals of consumption, Los Angeles: Pine Forge Press, 2010. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 13. | Rosa, H . The speed of global flows and the pace of democratic politics. New Polit Sci 2005; 27: 445–459. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 14. | Rosa, H . Alienation and acceleration: Towards a critical theory of late modern temporality, Malmö: NSU Press, 2010. Google Scholar |
| 15. | Rosa, H . Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity, New York: Columbia University Press, 2013. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 16. | Rosa, H . Acceleration, modernitet och identitet. Tre essäer, Göteborg: Daidalos, 2013. Google Scholar |
| 17. | Hochschild, AR . The time bind: when work becomes home and home becomes work, New York: Owl, 2001. Google Scholar |
| 18. | Honoré, C . In praise of slowness: how a worldwide movement is challenging the cult of speed, San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 2004. Google Scholar |
| 19. | Hochschild, AR . The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling, Berkeley, California: University of California Press, 2012. Google Scholar |
| 20. | Lupton, D . M-health and health promotion: The digital cyborg and surveillance society. Soc Theory Health 2012; 10: 229–244. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 21. | Lupton, D . Quantifying the body: Monitoring and measuring health in the age of m-Health technologies. Crit Public Health 2013; 23: 393–403. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 22. | Ruckenstein, M . Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies 2014; 4: 68–84. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 23. | Lupton, D . The quantified self: A sociology of self-tracking, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016. Google Scholar |
| 24. | Sumartojo, S, Pink, S, Lupton, D. The affective intensities of datafied space. Emot Space Soc 2016; 21: 33–40. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 25. | Pink, S, Fors, V. Being in a mediated world: Self-tracking and the mind–body–environment. Cult Geogr 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474016684127. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 26. | Lupton, D . Apps as artefacts: Towards a critical perspective on mobile health and medical apps. Societies 2014; 4: 606–622. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 27. | Fors, V, Berg, M, Pink, S Capturing the ordinary: Imagining the user in designing automatic photographic lifelogging technologies. In: Selke, S (ed). Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and lifelogging – between disruptive technology and cultural transformation, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2016, pp. 111–128. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 28. | Cross, N . Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Des Issues 2001; 17: 49–55. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 29. | MacKenzie, D, Wajcman, J Introductory essay: The social shaping of technology. In: MacKenzie, D, Wajcman, J (eds). The social shaping of technology: How the refrigerator got its hum, Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1985, pp. 2–25. Google Scholar |
| 30. | Woolgar, S . Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. Sociological Review 1990; 38(Suppl. 1): 58–99. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
| 31. | Woolgar, S . The turn to technology in social studies of science. Sci Technol Human Values 1991; 16: 20–50. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 32. | Oudshoorn, N, Rommes, E, Stienstra, M. Configuring the user as everybody: gender and design cultures in information and communication technologies. Sci Technol Human Values 2004; 29: 30–63. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 33. | Akrich, M The de-scription of technical objects. In: Bijker, WE, Law, J (eds). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1992, pp. 205–224. Google Scholar |
| 34. | Rose, N . The politics of life itself: biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century, Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2007. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 35. | Light, B, Burgess, J, Duguay, S. The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Soc 2016, pp. 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438. Google Scholar |
| 36. | Du Gay, P, Hall, S, Janes, L. Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman, London: SAGE, 1997. Google Scholar |
| 37. | Arnould, EJ, Thompson, CJ. Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. J Cons Res 2005; 31: 868–882. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 38. | Kitchin, R, Dodge, M. Code/space: Software and everyday life, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2011. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 39. | Nafus, D The data economy of biosensors. In: Ni Scanaill, C, McGrath, MJ (eds). Sensor technologies: Healthcare, wellness and environmental applications, New York: Springer, 2013, pp. 137–156. Google Scholar |
| 40. | Andrejevic, M, Burdon, M. Defining the sensor society. Telev New Media 2015; 16: 19–36. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 41. | Giddens, A . Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1991. Google Scholar |
| 42. | Schüll, ND . Data for life: Wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties 2016; 11: 317–333. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 43. | Schüll, ND . Sensor technology and the time-series self. Continent 2016; 5: 24–29. Google Scholar |
| 44. | Beck, U, Beck-Gernsheim, E. Individualization, London: Sage, 2002. Google Scholar |
| 45. | Mackenzie, A . Programming subjects in the regime of anticipation: Software studies and subjectivity. Subjectivity 2013; 6: 391–405. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 46. | Viseu, A, Suchman, L Wearable augmentations: Imaginaries of the informed body. In: Edwards, J, Harvey, P, Wade, P (eds). Technologized images, technologized bodies: Anthropological approaches to a new politics of vision, New York & Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2010, pp. 161–184. Google Scholar |
| 47. | Williams, SJ, Coveney, C, Meadows, R. ‘M-apping’ sleep? Trends and transformations in the digital age. Sociol Health Illn 2015; 37: 1039–1054. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 48. | Nafus D and Sherman J. This one does not go up to 11: The quantified self movement as an alternative big data practice. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2014; 8: 1784–1794. Google Scholar |
| 49. | Neff, G, Nafus, D. Self-tracking, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2016. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 50. | Beer, D . Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Soc 2009; 11: 985–1002. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 51. | Berg, M . Participatory trouble: Towards an understanding of algorithmic structures on Facebook. Cyberpsychology 2014; 8. Article 2. Google Scholar |
| 52. | Berg, M . Netnografi: Att forska om och med Internet, Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2015. Google Scholar |
| 53. | Kozinets RV. Netnography: Redefined. 2nd ed. London: SAGE, 2015. Google Scholar |
| 54. | Markham A. Charting ethical questions by data and type, http://ethics.aoir.org/images/2012aoirgraphic.pdf (2012, accessed 12 March 2017). Google Scholar |
| 55. | Markham A and Buchanan E. Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR Ethics Working Committee (version 2.0), http://aoir.org/reports/ethics2.pdf (2012, accessed 12 March 2017). Google Scholar |
| 56. | Potter, J, Wetherell, M. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour, London: Sage, 1987. Google Scholar |
| 57. | Parker, I . Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology, London: Routledge, 1992. Google Scholar |
| 58. | Peräkylä, A Analyzing talk and text. In: Denzin, NK, Lincoln, YS (eds). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed. London: SAGE, 2005, pp. 869–881. Google Scholar |
| 59. | Willig, C Discourses and discourse analysis. In: Flick, U (ed). The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, London: SAGE, 2013, pp. 341–353. Google Scholar |
| 60. | Summit B. Biohacker Summit ‘15, http://biohackersummit.com/2015-event/ (2015, accessed 12 March 2017). Google Scholar |
| 61. | Moodmetric. The Moodmetric ring and app are the simplest solution to measure stress and recovery, http://www.moodmetric.com (2016, accessed 13 November 2016). Google Scholar |
| 62. | ŌURA. ŌURA Ring is the world’s first wellness ring + app, https://ouraring.com (2016, accessed 13 November 2016). Google Scholar |
| 63. | Summit B. Biohacker Summit - panel: Future of wearables for health & wellness, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juSm_kCQ2MM (2015, accessed 12 March 2017). Google Scholar |
| 64. | Slush. Product launch: Moodmetric, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1HNLQSrjP4 (2014, accessed 13 March 2017). Google Scholar |
| 65. | Moodmetric. The Moodmetric ring measures stress real-time, http://www.moodmetric.com/portfolio/tool/.2016 (2016, accessed 13 November 2016). Google Scholar |
| 66. | Dietrich, M, Van Laerhoven, K Reflect yourself! Opportunities and limits of wearable activity recognition for self-tracking. In: Selke, S (ed). Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and lifelogging – between disruptive technology and cultural transformation, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2016, pp. 213–233. Google Scholar |