Satisfaction with Life and Hope: A Look at Age and Marital Status

by | Jun 2, 2017 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Bailey, Thomas C
  • Snyder, C R

Abstract:

The Adult Trait Hope Scale (Snyder et al., 1991) typically has been administered to samples of college students, and previous researchers have not explored key demographic variables. In a large sample of community persons who were not in college (N = 215), significant differences were detected in Hope Scale scores across differing age groups and marital status. Specifically, hope was lower for the older cohort (age 54–65) and for those who were separated, divorced, or widowed. Comparative results between Hope and Satisfaction with Life measures indicate somewhat similar outcomes, except with age. These findings are discussed. of privacy.

Document:

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395574

References:
  1. ARRINDELL, W. A., MEEUWESEN, L., & HUYSE, F. J. (1991). The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties in a non-psychiatric medical outpatients sample. Personality & Individual Differences, 12, 117–123.Article  Google Scholar 
  2. BAILEY, T. C., ENG, W., FRISCH, M. B., & SNYDER, C. R. (2006). Hope and optimism as related to life satisfaction. Manuscript submitted. Google Scholar 
  3. BENZEIN, E. G., & BERG, A. C. (2005). The level of and relationship between hope, hopelessness and fatigue in patients and family members in palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 19, 234–240.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  4. CHEAVENS, J., GUM, A., & SNYDER, C. R. (2000). The Trait Hope Scale. In J. Maltby, C. A. Lewis, & A. Hill (Eds.), Handbook of psychological tests (Vol. 1) (pp. 248–258). Lampeter, Wales, U. K.: Mellen Press. Google Scholar 
  5. CURRY, L. A., SNYDER, C. R., COOK, D. L., RUBY, B. C., & REHM, M. (1997). Role of hope in academic and sport achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1257–1267.Article  Google Scholar 
  6. DIENER, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a National index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  7. DIENER, E., EMMONS, R. A., LARSEN, R. J., & GRIFFIN, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  8. DIENER, E., GOHM, C. L., SUH, E., & OISHI, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 419–436.Article  Google Scholar 
  9. DIENER, E., SAPYTA, J. J., & SUH, E. (1998). Subjective well-being is essential to well-being. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 33–37.Article  Google Scholar 
  10. DIENER, E., SUH, E. M., LUCAS, R. E., & SMITH, H. L. (1999). Subjective wellbeing: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.Article  Google Scholar 
  11. ESBENSEN, B. A., ØSTERLIND, K., ROER, O., & HALLBERG, I. R. (2004). Quality of life of elderly persons with newly diagnosed cancer. European Journal of Cancer Care, 13, 443–453.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  12. FERRARO, F. R., & NEISIUS, L. (2002). Caregiving in young and middle-age adults. Psychology and Education, 39(3/4), 22–24. Google Scholar 
  13. KAHNEMAN, D., DIENER, E., & SCHWARTZ, N. (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Google Scholar 
  14. LYKKEN, D. (1999). Happiness: The nature and nurture of joy and contentment. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Google Scholar 
  15. MAGALETTA, P. R., & OLIVER, J. M. (1999). The hope construct, will and ways: Their relations with self-efficacy, optimism, and general well-being. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(5), 539–551.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  16. MASTEKAASA, A. (1995). Age variations in the suicide rates and self-reported subjective well-being of married and never married persons. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 5, 21–39.Article  Google Scholar 
  17. MERTENS, D. M. (2005). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. Google Scholar 
  18. MYERS, D. G., & DIENER, E. (1995). Who is happy? Psychological Science, 6, 10–18.Article  Google Scholar 
  19. NUNNALLY, J. C., & BERNSTEIN, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Google Scholar 
  20. PAVOT, W., & DIENER, E. (1993). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Psychological Assessments, 5, 164–172.Article  Google Scholar 
  21. SNYDER, C. R. (1994). The psychology of hope: You can get there from here. New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar 
  22. SNYDER, C. R. (1995). Conceptualizing, measuring, and nurturing hope. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 355–360.Article  Google Scholar 
  23. SNYDER, C. R. (2000). The past and possible futures of hope. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 11–28.Article  Google Scholar 
  24. SNYDER, C. R. (2002). Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 13(4), 249–275.Article  Google Scholar 
  25. SNYDER, C. R., HARRIS, C., ANDERSON, J. R., HOLLERAN, S. A., IRVING, L. M., SIGMON, S. T., et al. (1991). The will and the ways: Development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 570–585.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  26. WESTBURG, N. G. (2001). Hope in older women: The importance of past and current relationships. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20(3), 354–365.Article  Google Scholar