The Quantified Self

by | Jan 1, 2015 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Russo, Celementina R.

Abstract:

Gamification combines the playful design and feedback mechanisms from games with users’ social profiles (e.g. Facebook, twitter, and LinkedIn) in non-game applications. Successful gamification practices are reliant on encouraging playful subjectivities so that users voluntarily expose their personal information, which is then used to drive behavioural change (e.g. weight loss, workplace productivity, educational advancement, consumer loyalty, etc.). The pleasures of play, the promise of a ‘game’, and the desire to level up and win are used to inculcate desirable skill sets and behaviours. Gamification is rooted in surveillance; providing real-time feedback about users’ actions by amassing large quantities of data and then simplifying this data into modes that easily understandable, such as progress bars, graphs and charts. This article provides an introduction to gamification for surveillance scholars. I first provide brief definitions of gamification, games and play, linking the effectiveness of gamification to the quantification of everyday life. I then explain how the quantification in gamification is different from the quantification in both analog spaces and digital non-game spaces. Next, I draw from governmentality studies to show how quantification is leveraged in terms of surveillance. I employ three examples to demonstrate the social effects and impacts of gamified behaviour. These examples range from using self-surveillance to gamify everyday life, to the participatory surveillance evoked by social networking services, to the hierarchical surveillance of the gamified call-centre. Importantly, the call-centre example becomes a limit case, emphasizing the inability to gamify all spaces, especially those framed by work and not play. This leads to my conclusion, arguing that without knowing first what games and play are, we cannot accurately respond to and critique the playful surveillant technologies leveraged by gamification.

Document:

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-20816-9_49#Abs1

References:
  1. 1.Cummings, M.: Technology impedances to augmented cognition. Ergonomics in Design (Views & Provocations), 25–27 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.Hurley, D.: Wired: Diabetes patients are hacking their way toward a bionic pancreas (2014). http://www.wired.com/2014/12/diabetes-patients-hacking-together-diy-bionic-pancreases/
  3. 3.Fox, S., Duggan, M.: Tracking for health (2013). http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/28/tracking-for-health/
  4. 4.Gevins, A., Smith, M.: Neurophysiological measures of cognitive workload during human-computer interaction. Theor. Issues in Ergon. Sci. 4, 113–131 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Ikehara, C., Crosby, M.: Assessing cognitive load with physiological sensors. In: Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences – 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.Lewington, L.: BBC: Why activity trackers deliver mismatched fitness data (2015). http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-31113602
  7. 7.Life Stream (2013). http://lifestreamblog.com/lifelogging
  8. 8.Hoskins, M.: Healthline: newsflash: Dexcom SHARE gets FDA clearance! (2015). http://www.healthline.com/diabetesmine/newsflash-dexcom-share-gets-fda-clearance/
  9. 9.Marshall, S.P.: The index of cognitive activity: measuring cognitive workload. In: IEEE 7 Human Factors Meeting, Scottsdale, Arizona, pp. 7–5–7–9, August 2002Google Scholar
  10. 10.Matsangas, P., McCauley, M.: Sopite syndrome: a revised definition. Aviati. Space Environ. Med. 85, 672–673 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Matsangas, P., McCauley, M.: Yawning as a behavioral marker of mild motion sickness and sopite syndrome. Aviati. Space Environ. Med. 85, 658–661 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Matthews, R., McDonald, N., Hervieux, P., Turner, P., Steindorf, M.: A wearable physiological sensor suite for unobtrusive monitoring of physiological and cognitive state. In: 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2007, pp. 5276–5281, August 2007Google Scholar
  13. 13.Matthews, R., Turner, P., McDonald, N., Ermolaev, K., Manus, T., Shelby, R., Steindorf, M.: Real time workload classification from an ambulatory wireless eeg system using hybrid eeg electrodes. In: 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2008, pp. 5871–5875, August 2008Google Scholar
  14. 14.Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Coughlin, J.: Sensitivity of physiological measures for detecting systematic variations in cognitive demand from a working memory task: An on-road study across three age groups. Hum. Factors 54, 396–412 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Orbach, T.: Methods and systems for physiological and psycho-physiological monitoring and uses thereof, U.S. Patent App. 11/884,775, 4 September 2008. http://www.google.com/patents/US20080214903
  16. 16.Paulus, M., Stein, M.: Interoception in anxiety and depression. Brain Struct. Funct. 214, 451–463 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Ryu, K., Ayung, M.: Evaluation of mental workload with a combined measure based on physiological indices during a dual task of tracking and mental arithmetic. Int. J. Industr. Ergon. 35, 991–1009 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Skinner, A., Russo, C., Baraniecki, L., Maloof, M.: Ubiquitous augmented cognition (2014). http://2014.hci.international/index.php
  19. 19.Swan, M.: Sensor mania! the internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. J. Sensor. Actuator Netw. 1, 217–253 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.The BodyTrack Team (2015). http://fluxstream.org
  21. 21.Tomaka, J., Blascovitch, J., KIbler, J., Earnst, J.: Cognitive and physiological antecedents of of threat and challenge appraisal. J. Personailty Soc. Psychol. 1, 63–72 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.Weintraub, K.: Quantified self: The tech based route to a better life? (2013). http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20130102-self-track-route-to-a-better-life
  23. 23.Widerhiold, B., Jang, D., Kim, S., Wiederhold, M.D.: Physiological monitoring as an objective tool in virtual reality therapy. Cyberpychology Behav. 5, 77–82 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.Winzce, J., Hoon, P., Soon, E.: Sexual arousal in women: a comparison of cognitive and physiological responses by continuous measurement. Arch. Sex Behav. 2, 121–133 (1977)Google Scholar
  25. 25.Winzce, J., Vendetti, E., Barlow, D., Mavissakalian, M.: The effects of a subjective monitoring task in the physiological measure of genital response to erotic stimulation. Arch. Sex Behav. 9, 533–545 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.Zaki, J., Davis, J., Ochsner, K.: Overlapping activity in anterior insult during interoception and emotional experience. NeuroImage 62, 493–499 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar