Author(s):

  • Lupton, Deborah

Abstract:

With the advent of apps, other software and wearable devices designed to enable people to easily monitor and measure details about their bodies, much attention has been paid to the phenomenon of health self-tracking. In this article, findings from a study involving interviews with 40 Australian self-trackers are discussed and analysed from a feminist new materialist perspective, focusing on relational dimensions, affective forces and agential capacities. Analysis of their accounts identified several major agential capacities generated by self-tracking health and illness, including achieving knowledge, awareness and problem-solving; taking control; and feeling better. Affective forces were strongly evident in the ways the participants talked about their practices and rationales for health self-tracking, including the pleasure and satisfaction they experienced, as well as the demoralising or burdensome elements they described. Relational dimensions included interpersonal and biographical contexts as well as enactments of embodied and technological sensing and recording.

Document:

https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X19844042

References:
Accenture Consulting (2016) Accenture 2016 Consumer Survey on Patient Engagement. Accenture Consulting.
Google Scholar
Bennett, J (2009) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar
Braidotti, R (2018) A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society. Epub ahead of print 4 May 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0263276418771486.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Depper, A, Howe, PD (2017) Are we fit yet? English adolescent girls’ experiences of health and fitness apps. Health Sociology Review 26: 98–112.
Google Scholar
Didžiokaitė, G, Saukko, P, Greiffenhagen, C (2018) The mundane experience of everyday calorie trackers: beyond the metaphor of quantified self. New Media & Society 20(4): 1470–1487.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Epstein, DA, Lee, NB, Kang, JH. (2017) Examining menstrual tracking to inform the design of personal informatics tools. In: CHI ’17 Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, CO, 6–11 May, pp. 6876–6888. New York: ACM Press.
Google Scholar
Fors, V, Pink, S (2017) Pedagogy as possibility: health interventions as digital openness. Social Sciences 6. Available at: http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/6/2/59/htm (accessed 5 May 2018).
Google Scholar
Fotopoulou, A, O’Riordan, K (2017) Training to self-care: fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review 26(1): 54–68.
Google Scholar | ISI
Fox, N (2017) Personal health technologies, micropolitics and resistance: a new materialist analysis. Health 21(2): 136–153.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Fox, S, Duggan, M (2013) Tracking for Health. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
Google Scholar
Lupton, D (2014) Apps as artefacts: towards a critical perspective on mobile health and medical apps. Societies 4(4): 606–622.
Google Scholar
Lupton, D (2016a) Digitized health promotion: risk and personal responsibility for health in the Web 2.0 era. In: Davis, J, Gonzalez, AM (eds) To Fix or to Heal? New York: New York University Press, pp. 152–176.
Google Scholar
Lupton, D (2016b) The diverse domains of quantified selves: self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Society 45(1): 101–122.
Google Scholar | ISI
Lupton, D (2016c) The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-tracking. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Lupton, D (2018a) How do data come to matter? Living and becoming with personal data. Big Data & Society. Epub ahead of print 5 July. DOI: 10.1177/2053951718786314.
Google Scholar
Lupton, D (2018b) ‘I just want it to be done, done, done!’ Food tracking apps, affects, and agential capacities. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2: 29. Available at: http://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/2/2/29/htm (accessed 15 December 2018).
Google Scholar
Lupton, D, Maslen, S (2018) The more-than-human sensorium: sensory engagements with digital self-tracking technologies. The Senses and Society 13(2): 190–202.
Google Scholar
Lupton, D, Smith, GJD (2018) ‘A much better person’: the agential capacities of self-tracking practices. In: Ajana, B (ed.) Metric Culture: Ontologies of Self-tracking Practices. London: Emerald Publishing, pp. 57–73.
Google Scholar
Lupton, D, Pink, S, LaBond, CH. (2018) Personal data contexts, data sense and self-tracking cycling. International Journal of Communication 12: 647–665. Available at: http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5925/2258 (accessed 5 December 2018).
Google Scholar
Lyall, B, Robards, B (2017) Tool, toy and tutor: subjective experiences of digital self-tracking. Journal of Sociology 54: 108–124.
Google Scholar
Matviyenko, S (2014) Introduction. In: Miller, PD, Matviyenko, S (eds) The Imaginary App. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. xvii–xxxvi.
Google Scholar
Morozov, E (2013) To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don’t Exist. London: Allen Lane.
Google Scholar
Nafus, D, Sherman, J (2014) This one does not go up to 11: the quantified self movement as an alternative big data practice. International Journal of Communication 8: 1785–1794.
Google Scholar | ISI
Pink, S, Fors, V (2017) Self-tracking and mobile media: new digital materialities. Mobile Media & Communication 5: 219–238.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Pink, S, Sumartojo, S, Lupton, D. (2017a) Empathetic technologies: digital materiality and video ethnography. Visual Studies 32(4): 371–381.
Google Scholar
Pink, S, Sumartojo, S, Lupton, D. (2017b) Mundane data: the routines, contingencies and accomplishments of digital living. Big Data & Society. Epub ahead of print 27 March 2017. DOI: 10.1177/2053951717700924.
Google Scholar | Medline
Piras, EM, Miele, F (2017) Clinical self-tracking and monitoring technologies: negotiations in the ICT-mediated patient–provider relationship. Health Sociology Review 26: 38–53.
Google Scholar | ISI
Piwek, L, Ellis, DA, Andrews, S. (2016) The rise of consumer health wearables: promises and barriers. PLoS Medicine 13(1): e1001953.
Google Scholar | Medline
Research 2 Guidance (2017) Mhealth App Economics 2017: Current Status and Future Trends in Mobile Health. Berlin: Research 2 Guidance.
Google Scholar
Schüll, ND (2016) Data for life: wearable technology and the design of self-care. Biosocieties 11: 317–333.
Google Scholar | ISI
Sharon, T, Zandbergen, D (2017) From data fetishism to quantifying selves: self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media & Society 19(11): 1695–1709.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sumartojo, S, Pink, S, Lupton, D. (2016) The affective intensities of datafied space. Emotion, Space and Society 21: 33–40.
Google Scholar | ISI
Urban, M (2017) ‘This really takes it out of you!’ The senses and emotions in digital health practices of the elderly. Digital Health 3: PMC6001245.
Google Scholar | Medline
Wicklund, E (2016) Doctors still don’t trust mHealth apps. Mhealth Intelligence, 22 April. Available at: http://mhealthintelligence.com/news/doctors-still-dont-trust-mhealth-apps# (accessed 25 February 2017).
Google Scholar