Individuals on alert: digital epidemiology and the individualization of surveillance

by | Jun 14, 2018 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Samerski, Silja

Abstract:

This article examines how digital epidemiology and eHealth coalesce into a powerful health surveillance system that fundamentally changes present notions of body and health. In the age of Big Data and Quantified Self, the conceptual and practical distinctions between individual and population body, personal and public health, surveillance and health care are diminishing. Expanding on Armstrong’s concept of “surveillance medicine” to “quantified self medicine” and drawing on my own research on the symbolic power of statistical constructs in medical encounters, this article explores the impact of digital health surveillance on people’s perceptions, actions and subjectivities. It discusses the epistemic confusions and paradoxes produced by a health care system that increasingly treats patients as risk profiles and prompts them to do the same, namely to perceive and manage themselves as a bundle of health and security risks. Since these risks are necessarily constructed in reference to epidemiological data that postulate a statistical gaze, they also construct or make-up disembodied “individuals on alert”.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-018-0076-z

References:
  1. Armstrong D. The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness. 1995;17:393–404.Article Google Scholar 
  2. Armstrong D. The invention of patient centered medicine. Social Theory & Health. 2011;9:410–8.Article Google Scholar 
  3. Bauer S, Olsén JE. Observing the others, watching over oneself: themes of medical surveillance in society. Surveillance & Society. 2009;6(2):116–27.Google Scholar 
  4. Beck U. Risk society: towards a new modernity. New Delhi: Sage; 1992.Google Scholar 
  5. Bernard, A. 2017. Komplizen des Erkennungsdienstes. Das Selbst in der digitalen Kultur. Frankfurt a.M.: S. Fischer.
  6. Cakici B, Pedro S. Detecting the visible: the discursive construction of health threats in a syndromic surveillance system design. Societies. 2014;4:399–413.Article Google Scholar 
  7. Ewald F. Insurance and risk. In: The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality, ed. Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter miller. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991. p. 197–210.Google Scholar 
  8. Ewald, F. 1993. Der Vorsorgestaat, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp (in the original: L’Etat providence, Paris: Editions Gasset & Fasquelle; 1986).
  9. Foucault M. In: Bertani M, Fontana A, editors. Society must be defended. Lectures at the college De France, 1975–1976. London: Penguin; 2004.Google Scholar 
  10. French MA. Woven of war-time fabrics: the globalization of public health surveillance. Surveillance & Society. 2009;6(2):101–15.Google Scholar 
  11. Gifford S. The meaning of lumps; a case study of the ambiguities of risk. In: Janes CR, Stall R, Gifford SM, editors. Anthropology and epidemiology: interdisciplinary approaches to the study of health and disease. Dodrecht: Reidel; 1986. p. 213–46.Google Scholar 
  12. Goodman K. Ethics, information technology and public health: new challenges fort he clinician-patient relationship. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics. 2010;2010:58–63.
  13. Grätzel, Philip (2016) Estland: Medizin in einer digitalen Gesellschaft. Medizintechnologie.de., Nationale Informationsplattform Medizintechnik. Online: https://medizintechnologie.de/fileadmin/pdfs/1305.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2018.
  14. Jensen PB, Peter B, Jensen Lars J, Brunak S. Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care. Nature reviews. 2012;13:395–405.Article Google Scholar 
  15. Kavanagh AM, Broom DH. Embodied risk: my body, myself? Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:437–44.Article Google Scholar 
  16. Kraft, Daniel. 2017. Quantified self to quantified health. How tech helps doctors fill gaps in patient records. Wired: the wired world in 2017. Online: www.wired.co.uk/article/hospital-prescribing-tech. Accessed 28 May 2018.
  17. Lupton D. Apps as artefacts: towards a critical perspective on mobile health and medical apps. Societies. 2014;4:606–22.Article Google Scholar 
  18. Lyon D. Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society. 2014;1(2) https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861.
  19. Martin, E. 1987. The Woman in the Body. A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar 
  20. Martin, E. 1994. Flexible Bodies. Tracking Immunity in American Culture – from the Days of Polio to the Age of AIDS. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar 
  21. Monahan T, Wall T. Somatic surveillance: corporeal control through information networks. Surveillance & Society Special Issue on ‘surveillance and criminal justice. Part 1. 2007;4(3):154–73.Google Scholar 
  22. NSF. 2017. Award Abstract #1534120 PFI:BIC – A Smart, “Always-on” Health Monitoring System. https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1534120&HistoricalAwards=false. Accessed 28 May 2018.
  23. Ruppert E. Making populations: from censuses to metrics. In: Hempel L, Ulrich SK, editors. Sichtbarkeitsregime: Überwachung, Sicherheit und Privatheit im 21. Jahrhundert. Wiesbaden: Springer VS; 2011. p. 157–73.Google Scholar 
  24. Salathé M, Bengtsson L, Bodnar T, et al. Digital Epidemiology. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002616. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002616.Article Google Scholar 
  25. Salathé M, Khandelwal S. Assessing vaccination sentiments with online social media: implications for infectious disease dynamics and control. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:e1002199. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002199.Article Google Scholar 
  26. Samerski, Silja. 2002. Die verrechnete Hoffnung. Von der selbstbestimmten Entscheidung durch genetische Beratung. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
  27. Samerski, Silja. 2015. The decision trap. Genetic Education and its Social Consequences. Exeter, Devon: Imprint Academic.
  28. Turner JRG. Self-made men (Review). Times Literary Supplement. 2001;5142:8.Google Scholar 
  29. Velasco E, Agheneza T, Denecke K, Kirchner G, Eckmanns T. Social media and internet-based data in global Systems for Public Health Surveillance: a systematic review. The Milbank Quarterly. 2014;92:7–33.Article Google Scholar 
  30. Weir L. Pregnancy, risk, and biopolitics: on the threshold of the living subject. London: Routledge; 2006.Google Scholar 
  31. Weir L. Inventing Global Health security, 1994-2005. In: Rushton S, Youde J, editors. Routledge handbook of Global Health security. London, New York: Routledge; 2015.Google Scholar 
  32. Weir L, Mykhalovskiy E. Global public health vigilance. Creating a world on alert. New York: Routledge; 2010.Google Scholar