Author(s):

  • Amon Rapp
  • Federica Cena

Abstract:

Personal Informatics (PI), also known as Quantified Self (QS), is a school of thought which aims to use technology for acquiring and collecting data on different aspects of the daily lives of people. These data can be internal states (such as mood or glucose level in the blood) or indicators of performance (such as the kilometers run). Some research was conducted in order to discover the problems related to the usage of PI tools, although none investigated how common users use these tools for tracking their behavior. The goal of this paper is to provide some insights about challenges and open issues regarding the usage of PI tools from the point of view of a common user. To this aim, we provide a theoretical background of personal informatics and a brief review on the previous studies that have investigated the usage pattern of PI tools.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07509-9_58

References:
  • 1.Li, I., Dey, A.K., Forlizzi, J.: A Stage-Based Model of Personal Informatics Systems. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 557–566. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  • 2.Li, I., Dey, A.K., Forlizzi, J.: Understanding My Data, Myself: Supporting Self-Reflection with Ubicomp Technologies. In: The 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 405–414. ACM, NY (2011)Google Scholar
  • 3.Khovanskaya, V., Baumer, E.P.S., Cosley, D., Voida, S., Gay, G.K.: “Everybody Knows What You’re Doing”: A Critical Design Approach to Personal Informatics. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 3403–3412. ACM, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 4.Miltenberger, R.G.: Behavior modification: Principles and procedures, 4th edn. Wadsworth, Belmont (2007)Google Scholar
  • 5.Karoly, P.: Mechanisms of self-regulation: A systems view. Annual Review of Psychology 44, 23–52 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 6.Bandura, A.: Social Cognitive Theory of Self-Regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 248–287 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 7.Prochaska, J.O., Velicer, W.F.: The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change. American Journal of Health Promotion 12(1), 38–48 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 8.Rosal, M.C., Ebbeling, C.B., Lofgren, I., Ockene, J.K., Ockene, I.S., Hébert, J.R.: Facilitating dietary change: the patient-centered counseling model. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 101(3), 332–341 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 9.Cooper, J.O., Heron, T.E., Heward, W.L.: Applied behavior analysis, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  • 10.Kanfer, F.H.: The many faces of self-control, or behavior modification changes its focus. In: Stuart, R.B. (ed.) Behavioral Self-management: Strategies, Techniques, and Outcomes, pp. 1–48. Brunner/Mazel, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  • 11.Malott, R.W.: Notes from a radical behaviorist. Author, Kalamazoo (1981)Google Scholar
  • 12.Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology. Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)Google Scholar
  • 13.Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Landay, J.: The design of eco-feedback technology. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1999–2008. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  • 14.Brynjarsdóttir, H., Håkansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., Di Salvo, C., Sengers, P.: Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 947–956. ACM, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  • 15.Nakajima, T., Lehdonvirta, V., Tokunaga, E., Kimura, H.: Reflecting Human Behavior to Motivate Desirable Lifestyle. In: Conference of Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 405–414 (2008)Google Scholar
  • 16.Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 17.Brown, L.R.: Eco-Economy: Building an Economy for the Earth. Earthscan, London (2001)Google Scholar
  • 18.Korotitisch, W.J., Nelson-Gray, R.O.: An overview of self-monitoring research in assessment and treatment. Psychological Assessment 11, 415–425 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 19.Foster, S.L., Laverty-Finch, C., Gizzo, D.P., Osantowski, J.: Practical issues in self-observation. Psychological Assessment 11, 426–438 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 20.Froehlich, J., Dillahunt, T., Klasnja, P., Mankoff, J., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., Landay, J.: UbiGreen: Investigating a Mobile Tool for Tracking and Supporting Green Transportation Habits. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1043–1052. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  • 21.Matthews, M., Doherty, G.: In the mood: engaging teenagers in psychotherapy using mobile phones. In: The SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2947–2956. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  • 22.Kay, M., Choe, E.K., Shepherd, J., Greenstein, B., Watson, N., Consolvo, S., Kientz, J.A.: Lullaby: a capture & access system for understanding the sleep environment. In: The 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 226–234. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 23.Maitland, J., Chalmers, M.: Self-monitoring, self-awareness, and self-determination in cardiac rehabilitation. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1213–1222. ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  • 24.Marcengo, A., Rapp, A.: Visualization of Human Behavior Data: The Quantified Self. In: Huang, L.H., Huang, W. (eds.) Inovative Approaches of Data Visualization and Visual Analytics, pp. 236–265. IGI Global, Hershey (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 25.Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., Nacke, L.: From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “Gamification”. In: 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, pp. 9–15. ACM, New York (2011c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 26.Deci, E.L., Koestner, R., Ryan, R.M.: A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin 125(6), 627–668 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 27.Ferrara, J.: Playful Design. Creating Game Experiences in Everyday Interfaces. Rosenfeld Media, New York (2012b)Google Scholar
  • 28.McGonigal, J.: Reality is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. Penguin, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  • 29.Gershon, N.D., Page, W.: What storytelling can do for information visualization. Communications of the ACM 44(8), 31–37 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 30.Eccles, R., Kapler, T., Harper, R., Wright, W.: Stories in geotime. In: IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, pp. 19–26 (2007)Google Scholar
  • 31.Heer, J., Mackinlay, J., Stolte, C., Agrawala, M.: Graphical histories for visualization: Supporting analysis, communication, and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 14(6), 1189–1196 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  • 32.Rapp, A.: Beyond Gamification. Enhancing user engagement through meaningful game elements. In: 8th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, pp. 485–487 (2013)Google Scholar