Author(s):

  • Sofia Yfantidou
  • Pavlos Sermpezis
  • Athena Vakali

Abstract:

Despite the indisputable personal and societal benefits of regular physical activity, a large portion of the population does not follow the recommended guidelines, harming their health and wellness. The World Health Organization has called upon governments, practitioners, and researchers to accelerate action to address the global prevalence of physical inactivity. To this end, an emerging wave of research in ubiquitous computing has been exploring the potential of interactive self-tracking technology in encouraging positive health behavior change. Numerous findings indicate the benefits of personalization and inclusive design regarding increasing the motivational appeal and overall effectiveness of behavior change systems, with the ultimate goal of empowering and facilitating people to achieve their goals. However, most interventions still adopt a “one-size-fits-all” approach to their design, assuming equal effectiveness for all system features in spite of individual and collective user differences. To this end, we analyze a corpus of 12 years of research in self-tracking technology for health behavior change, focusing on physical activity, to identify those design elements that have proven most effective in inciting desirable behavior across diverse population segments. We then provide actionable recommendations for designing and evaluating behavior change self-tracking technology based on age, gender, occupation, fitness, and health condition. Finally, we engage in a critical commentary on the diversity of the domain and discuss ethical concerns surrounding tailored interventions and directions for moving forward.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1145/3511047.3538029

References:
  1. 2020. Critical Reflections on Technology to Support Physical Activity among Older Adults. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 13, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3374660
  2. Noora Aldenaini, Oladapo Oyebode, Rita Orji, and Srinivas Sampalli. 2020. Mobile Phone-Based Persuasive Technology for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Computer Science 2 (2020), 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.00019
  3. Noora Fahad Aldenaini, Felwah Alqahtani, Rita Orji, and Srinivas Sampalli. 2020. Trends in Persuasive Technologies for Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3 (2020), 7.
  4. Mohammed Alsaqer and Samir Chatterjee. 2017. Helping the elderly with physical exercise: Development of persuasive mobile intervention sensitive to elderly cognitive decline. In 2017 IEEE 19th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom). IEEE, 1–6.
  5. Danielle Arigo, Leah M Schumacher, Emilie Pinkasavage, and Meghan L Butryn. 2015. Addressing barriers to physical activity among women: A feasibility study using social networking-enabled technology. Digital health 1(2015), 2055207615583564.
  6. Yash Babar, Jason Chan, and Ben Choi. 2018. “Run forrest run!”: Measuring the impact of App-enabled performance and social feedback on running performance. In International Conference on Information Systems 2018, ICIS 2018, Vol. 2023. Association for Information Systems (AIS), San Francisco, California, United States, 1–17.
  7. Shlomo Berkovsky, Mac Coombe, Jill Freyne, Dipak Bhandari, and Nilufar Baghaei. 2010. Physical activity motivating games: virtual rewards for real activity. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 243–252.
  8. Timothy W Bickmore, Rebecca A Silliman, Kerrie Nelson, Debbie M Cheng, Michael Winter, Lori Henault, and Michael K Paasche-Orlow. 2013. A randomized controlled trial of an automated exercise coach for older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 61, 10 (2013), 1676–1683.
  9. Kacie CA Blackman, Jamie Zoellner, Adil Kadir, Brandon Dockery, Sallie Beth Johnson, Fabio A Almeida, D Scott McCrickard, Jennie L Hill, Wen You, and Paul A Estabrooks. 2015. Examining the feasibility of smartphone game applications for physical activity promotion in middle school students. Games for health journal 4, 5 (2015), 409–419.
  10. Susan Weber Buchholz, Joellen Wilbur, Diana Ingram, and Louis Fogg. 2013. Physical activity text messaging interventions in adults: a systematic review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing 10, 3 (2013), 163–173.
  11. Neel P Chokshi, Srinath Adusumalli, Dylan S Small, Alexander Morris, Jordyn Feingold, Yoonhee P Ha, Marta D Lynch, Charles AL Rareshide, Victoria Hilbert, and Mitesh S Patel. 2018. Loss-framed financial incentives and personalized goal-setting to increase physical activity among ischemic heart disease patients using wearable devices: the ACTIVE REWARD randomized trial. Journal of the American Heart Association 7, 12 (2018), e009173.
  12. Fabio Ciravegna, Jie Gao, Neil Ireson, Robert Copeland, Joe Walsh, and Vitaveska Lanfranchi. 2019. Active 10: Brisk walking to support regular physical activity. In Proceedings of the 13th EAI International Conference on pervasive computing technologies for healthcare. 11–20.
  13. Rekesh Corepal, Paul Best, Roisin O’Neill, Frank Kee, Jennifer Badham, Laura Dunne, Sarah Miller, Paul Connolly, Margaret E Cupples, Esther MF Van Sluijs, 2019. A feasibility study of ‘The StepSmart Challenge’to promote physical activity in adolescents. Pilot and feasibility studies 5, 1 (2019), 1–15.
  14. Prabu David, Janet Buckworth, Michael L Pennell, Mira L Katz, Cecilia R DeGraffinreid, and Electra D Paskett. 2012. A walking intervention for postmenopausal women using mobile phones and interactive voice response. Journal of telemedicine and telecare 18, 1 (2012), 20–25.
  15. Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 2008. Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health.Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne 49, 3 (2008), 182.
  16. Steriani Elavsky, Lenka Knapova, Adam Klocek, and David Smahel. 2019. Mobile health interventions for physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep in adults aged 50 years and older: a systematic literature review. Journal of aging and physical activity 27, 4 (2019), 565–593.
  17. Daniel A. Epstein, Clara Caldeira, Mayara Costa Figueiredo, Xi Lu, Lucas M. Silva, Lucretia Williams, Jong Ho Lee, Qingyang Li, Simran Ahuja, Qiuer Chen, Payam Dowlatyari, Craig Hilby, Sazeda Sultana, Elizabeth V. Eikey, and Yunan Chen. 2020. Mapping and Taking Stock of the Personal Informatics Literature. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 4, 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3432231
  18. Daniel A. Epstein, Bradley H. Jacobson, Elizabeth Bales, David W. McDonald, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. From ”nobody cares” to ”way to go!”: A design framework for social sharing in personal informatics. CSCW 2015 – Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (2015), 1622–1636. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675135
  19. Joseph Finkelstein, McKenzie Bedra, Xuan Li, Jeffrey Wood, and Pamela Ouyang. 2015. Mobile App to Reduce Inactivity in Sedentary Overweight Women.. In MedInfo. 89–92.
  20. Malay Gandhi. 2015. Deconstructing the Fitbit IPO and S-1. Rock Health. Retrieved July 28, 2020 from https://rockhealth.com/deconstructing-fitbit-s-1/
  21. Ainara Garde, Aryannah Umedaly, S Mazdak Abulnaga, Leah Robertson, Anne Junker, Jean Pierre Chanoine, J Mark Ansermino, and Guy A Dumont. 2015. Assessment of a mobile game (“MobileKids Monster Manor”) to promote physical activity among children. Games for health journal 4, 2 (2015), 149–158.
  22. Juho Hamari, Jonna Koivisto, and Harri Sarsa. 2014. Does gamification work?–a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE, Washington, DC, United States, 3025–3034.
  23. Eric B. Hekler, Predrag Klasnja, Jon E. Froehlich, and Matthew P. Buman. 2013. Mind the theoretical gap: Interpreting, using, and developing behavioral theory in HCI research. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings (2013), 3307–3316. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466452
  24. Christoph Höchsmann, Denis Infanger, Christopher Klenk, Karsten Königstein, Steffen P Walz, and Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss. 2019. Effectiveness of a behavior change technique–based smartphone game to improve intrinsic motivation and physical activity adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes: randomized controlled trial. JMIR serious games 7, 1 (2019), e11444.
  25. Bang Hyun Kim and Karen Glanz. 2013. Text messaging to motivate walking in older African Americans: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 44, 1 (2013), 71–75.
  26. SangBin Kim, SinJae Lee, and JungHyun Han. 2018. StretchArms: Promoting stretching exercise with a smartwatch. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 34, 3(2018), 218–225.
  27. Barbara Kitchenham and Stuart Charters. 2007. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Technical Report. Keele University and Durham University.
  28. Susanne Hwiid Klausen, Lars L Andersen, Lars Søndergaard, Janus Christian Jakobsen, Vibeke Zoffmann, Kasper Dideriksen, Anne Kruse, Ulla Ramer Mikkelsen, and Jørn Wetterslev. 2016. Effects of eHealth physical activity encouragement in adolescents with complex congenital heart disease: the PReVaiL randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Cardiology 221 (2016), 1100–1106.
  29. Thea JM Kooiman, Martijn De Groot, Klaas Hoogenberg, Wim P Krijnen, Cees P Van Der Schans, and Adriaan Kooy. 2018. Self-tracking of physical activity in people with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 36, 7 (2018), 340–349.
  30. Jan-Niklas Kramer, Peter Tinschert, Urte Scholz, Elgar Fleisch, and Tobias Kowatsch. 2019. A cluster-randomized trial on small incentives to promote physical activity. American journal of preventive medicine 56, 2 (2019), e45–e54.
  31. Mounia Lalmas, Heather O’Brien, and Elad Yom-Tov. 2014. Measuring user engagement. Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services 6, 4(2014), 1–132.
  32. Deborah Lupton. 2014. Self-tracking cultures: towards a sociology of personal informatics. In Proceedings of the 26th Australian computer-human interaction conference on designing futures: The future of design. 77–86.
  33. Mia Liza A Lustria, Seth M Noar, Juliann Cortese, Stephanie K Van Stee, Robert L Glueckauf, and Junga Lee. 2013. A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. Journal of health communication 18, 9 (2013), 1039–1069.
  34. John Matthews, Khin Than Win, Harri Oinas-Kukkonen, and Mark Freeman. 2016. Persuasive technology in mobile applications promoting physical activity: a systematic review. Journal of medical systems 40, 3 (2016), 72.
  35. Jason A Mendoza, K Scott Baker, Megan A Moreno, Kathryn Whitlock, Mark Abbey-Lambertz, Alan Waite, Trina Colburn, and Eric J Chow. 2017. A Fitbit and Facebook mHealth intervention for promoting physical activity among adolescent and young adult childhood cancer survivors: A pilot study. Pediatric blood & cancer 64, 12 (2017), e26660.
  36. Susan Michie, Michelle Richardson, Marie Johnston, Charles Abraham, Jill Francis, Wendy Hardeman, Martin P Eccles, James Cane, and Caroline E Wood. 2013. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of behavioral medicine 46, 1 (2013), 81–95.
  37. Francisco Monteiro-Guerra, Octavio Rivera-Romero, Luis Fernandez-Luque, and Brian Caulfield. 2019. Personalization in Real-Time Physical Activity Coaching using Mobile Applications: A Scoping Review. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 24, 6(2019), 1738–1751.
  38. Andre Matthias Müller, Stephanie Alley, Stephanie Schoeppe, and Corneel Vandelanotte. 2016. The effectiveness of e-& mHealth interventions to promote physical activity and healthy diets in developing countries: a systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 13, 1(2016), 109.
  39. Elizabeth L. Murnane, Tara G. Walker, Beck Tench, Stephen Voida, and Jaime Snyder. 2018. Personal informatics in interpersonal contexts: Towards the design of technology that supports the social ecologies of long-term mental health management. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW(2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274396
  40. Francisco Nunes, Nervo Verdezoto, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Morten Kyng, Erik Grönvall, and Cristiano Storni. 2015. Self-care technologies in HCI: Trends, tensions, and opportunities. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 22, 6(2015), 1–45.
  41. Harri Oinas-Kukkonen and Marja Harjumaa. 2009. Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24, 1(2009), 28.
  42. World Health Organization. 2019. Global action plan on physical activity 2018-2030: more active people for a healthier world. World Health Organization.
  43. Endeavour Partners. 2014. Inside Wearables Part 1: How behavior change unlocks long-term engagement. Endeavour Partners. Retrieved July 28, 2020 from https://medium.com/@endeavourprtnrs/inside-wearable-how-the-science-of-human-behavior-change-offers-the-secret-to-long-term-engagement-a15b3c7d4cf3
  44. James O Prochaska and Wayne F Velicer. 1997. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American journal of health promotion 12, 1 (1997), 38–48.
  45. Susan B Quelly, Anne E Norris, and Jessica L DiPietro. 2016. Impact of mobile apps to combat obesity in children and adolescents: a systematic literature review. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing 21, 1 (2016), 5–17.
  46. Vanessa Ratten and Hamish Ratten. 2007. Social cognitive theory in technological innovations. European Journal of Innovation Management 10, 1 (2007), 90–108.
  47. Anna L Roberts, Abigail Fisher, Lee Smith, Malgorzata Heinrich, and Henry WW Potts. 2017. Digital health behaviour change interventions targeting physical activity and diet in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 11, 6 (2017), 704–719.
  48. Georgios Spanos and Lefteris Angelis. 2016. The impact of information security events to the stock market: A systematic literature review. Computers & Security 58(2016), 216–229.
  49. Katta Spiel, Christopher Frauenberger, Os Keyes, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2019. Agency of autistic children in technology research—A critical literature review. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 26, 6(2019), 1–40.
  50. Kelley Strohacker, Omar Galarraga, and David M Williams. 2014. The impact of incentives on exercise behavior: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 48, 1 (2014), 92–99.
  51. Anja Thieme, Danielle Belgrave, and Gavin Doherty. 2020. Machine Learning in Mental Health: A Systematic Review of the HCI Literature to Support the Development of Effective and Implementable ML Systems. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 27, 5(2020), 1–53.
  52. Sofia Yfantidou. 2020. syfantid/PAST-SELF-Framework-Data: Paper Release. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4063377
  53. Sofia Yfantidou, Pavlos Sermpezis, and Athena Vakali. 2021. Self-Tracking Technology for mHealth: A Systematic Review and the PAST SELF Framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.11483(2021).
  54. Jingwen Zhang and John B Jemmott III. 2019. Mobile app-based small-group physical activity intervention for young African American women: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science 20, 6 (2019), 863–872.