A Life of Data: Characteristics and Challenges of Very Long Term Self-Tracking for Health and Wellness

by | Mar 14, 2020 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Jochen Meyer
  • Judy Kay
  • Daniel A. Epstein
  • Parisa Eslambolchilar
  • Lie Ming Tang

Abstract:

As self-tracking has evolved from a niche movement to a mass-market phenomenon, it has become possible for people to track a broad range of activities and vital parameters over years, even decades. The associated opportunities, as well as the challenges, have had very little research attention so far. With the phenomenon of long-term tracking becoming widespread and important, we have identified its key characteristics by drawing on work from UbiComp, HCI, and health informatics. We identify important differences between long- and short-term tracking, and discuss consequences for the tracking process. Going beyond previous models for short-term tracking, we now present a model for long-term tracking, integrating its distinctive characteristics in purposeful and incidental tracking. Finally, we present major topics for future research.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1145/3373719

References:
  1. Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Bongshin Lee, Eun Kyoung Choe, and Jinwook Seo. 2017. OmniTrack: A flexible self-tracking approach leveraging semi-automated tracking. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable, and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (Sept. 2017), Article 67, 28 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3130930
  2. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’10). ACM, New York, NY, 557. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753409
  3. Jochen Meyer, Elke Beck, Merlin Wasmann, and Susanne Boll. 2017. Making sense in the long run: Long-term health monitoring in real lives. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI’17). 285–294. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHI.2017.11
  4. Jochen Meyer, Daniel Epstein, Parisa Eslambolchilar, Judy Kay, and Lie Ming Tang. 2018. A short workshop on next steps towards long term self tracking. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’18). ACM, New York, NY, Article W05, 8 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3170605
  5. Tamar Sharon. 2017. Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philosophy 8 Technology 30, 1 (2017), 93–121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5
  6. Grace Shin, Yuanyuan Feng, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, and Nicci Gafinowitz. 2018. Beyond novelty effect: A mixed-methods exploration into the motivation for long-term activity tracker use. JAMIA Open 2, 1 (2018), 62–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy048
  7. Statista. 2019. Wearables Unit Shipments Worldwide by Vendor from 2014 to 2018. Retrieved February 15, 2020 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/515634/wearables-shipments-worldwide-by-vendor/.
  8. Lie Ming Tang, Jochen Meyer, Daniel A. Epstein, Kevin Bragg, Lina Engelen, Adrian Bauman, and Judy Kay. 2018. Defining adherence: Making sense of physical activity tracker data. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 1 (March 2018), Article 37, 22 pages. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3191769