Algorithmic skin: health-tracking technologies, personal analytics and the biopedagogies of digitized health and physical education

Author(s):

• Ben Williamson

Abstract:

The emergence of digitized health and physical education, or ‘eHPE’, embeds software algorithms in the organization of health and physical education pedagogies. Particularly with the emergence of wearable and mobile activity trackers, biosensors and personal analytics apps, algorithmic processes have an increasingly powerful part to play in how people learn about their own bodies and health. This article specifically considers the ways in which algorithms are converging with eHPE through the emergence of new health-tracking and biophysical data technologies designed for use in educational settings. The first half of the article provides a conceptual account of how algorithms ‘do things’ in the social world, and considers how algorithms are interwoven with practices of health tracking. In the second half, three key issues are articulated for further exploration: (1) health tracking as a ‘biopedagogy’ of bodily optimization based on data-led and algorithmically mediated understandings of the body; (2) health tracking as a form of pleasurable self-surveillance utilizing data analytics technologies to predict future bodily probabilities and (3) the ways that health-tracking produces a body encased in an ‘algorithmic skin’, connected to a wider ‘networked cognitive system’. These developments and issues suggest the need for greater attention to how algorithmic systems are embedded in emerging eHPE technologies and pedagogies.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2014.962494

References:

• Amoore, L. (2009). Algorithmic war: Everyday geographies of the war on terror. Antipode, 41(1), 49–69. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00655.x [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol: Policy Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media and Society, 11, 985–1002. doi:10.1177/1461444809336551 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Beer, D. (2013). Popular culture and new media: The politics of circulation. London: Palgrave Macmillan. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity (Rev. ed.). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield. [Google Scholar]
• Boessel, W. E. (2013, September 26). Return of the Quantrepreneurs. The Society Pages: Cyborgology. Retrieved from http://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2013/09/26/return-of-the-quantrepreneurs/#more-17136 [Google Scholar]
• Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. London: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
• Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 1164–1180. doi:10.1177/1461444812440159 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011). A new algorithmic identity: Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture & Society, 28, 164–181. doi:10.1177/0263276411424420 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Evans, J., & Davies, B. (2014). Physical education PLC: Neoliberalism, curriculum and governance. New directions for PESP research. Sport, Education and Society, 19, 869–884. doi:10.1080/13573322.2013.850072 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Evans, J., & Rich, E. (2011). Body policies and body pedagogies: Every child matters in totally pedagogised schools? Journal of Education Policy, 26, 361–379. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Gard, M. (2014). eHPE: A history of the future. Sport, Education and Society, 19, 827–845. doi:10.1080/13573322.2014.938036 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Gillespie, T. (2014a). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality and society. 167–194. London: MIT Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Gillespie, T. (2014b, June 25). Algorithm. Culture Digitally. Retrieved from http://culturedigitally.org/2014/06/algorithm-draft-digitalkeyword/ [Google Scholar]
• Hall, G. (2013). #Mysubjectivation. New Formations, 79(1), 83–103. doi:10.3898/NEWF.79.05.2013 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. London: University of Chicago Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Hswen, Y., Murti, V., Vormawor, A. A., Bhattacharjee, R., & Naslund, J. A. (2013). Virtual avatars, gaming, and social media: Designing a mobile health app to help children choose healthier food options. Journal of Mobile Technologies in Medicine, 2, 8–14. doi:10.7309/jmtm.2.4S.6 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. London: MIT Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Lash, S. (2007). Power after hegemony: Cultural studies in mutation? Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3), 55–78. doi:10.1177/0263276407075956 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Lemke, T. (2011). Biopolitics: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press. [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2013). Understanding the human machine. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 32(4), 25–30. doi:10.1109/MTS.2013.2286431 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2014, August 27). Self-tracking modes: Reflexive self-monitoring and data practices. Paper presented at the ‘Imminent Citizenships: Personhood and Identity Politics in the Informatic Age’ workshop, ANU, Canberra. [Google Scholar]
• MacCormick, J. (2012). Nine algorithms that changed the future: The ingenious ideas that drive today’s computers. Oxford: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
• Macdonald, D. (2014). Is global neo-liberalism shaping the future of physical education? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19, 494–499. doi:10.1080/17408989.2014.920496 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Mackenzie, A. (2006). Cutting code: Software and sociality. Oxford: Peter Lang. [Google Scholar]
• Mackenzie, A. (2013). Programming subjects in the regime of anticipation: Software studies and subjectivity. Subjectivity, 6, 391–405. doi:10.1057/sub.2013.12 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Mager, A. (2012). Algorithmic ideology: How capitalist society shapes search engines. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 769–787. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2014). Learning from big data: The future of education. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. [Google Scholar]
• Nafus, D., & Sherman, J. (2014). This one does not go up to 11: The quantified self movement as an alternative big data practice. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1784–1794. [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Nesta. (2014). Six futures for health data. Retrieved from http://www.nesta.org.uk/six-futures-health-data [Google Scholar]
• Neyland, D. (2014). On organizing algorithms. Theory, Culture & Society. doi:10.1177/0263276414530477 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Pykett, J. (2012). The pedagogic state: Education, citizenship, governing. In J. Pykett (Ed.), Governing through pedagogy: Re-educating citizens (pp. 1–20). London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
• Raley, R. (2013). Dataveillance and counterveillance. In L. Gitelman (Ed.), ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron (pp. 121–146). London: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
• Rich, E., & Miah, A. (2014). Understanding digital health as public pedagogy: A critical framework. Societies, 4, 296–315. doi:10.3390/soc4020296 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Free Association. [Google Scholar]
• Rose, N., & Abi-Rached, J. (2013). Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Oxford: Princeton University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Ruckenstein, M. (2014). Visualized and interacted life: personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies, 4(1), 68–84. doi:10.3390/soc4010068 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Schaefer, C. E., Van Loan, German, (2014). A feasibility study of wearable activity monitors for pre-adolescent school-age children. Preventing Chronic Disease, 11(130262). [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
• Selwyn, N. (2014). Data entry: Towards the critical study of digital data and education. Learning, Media & Technology. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.921628 [Google Scholar]
• Sqord. (2014). About Sqord. Retrieved from http://sqord.com/ [Google Scholar]
• Swan, M. (2012). Sensor mania! The internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 1, 217–253. Retrieved from http://www.mdpi.com/2224-2708/1/3/217/pdf [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Thrift, N. (2014). The promise of urban informatics: Some speculations. Environment & Planning A, 46, 1263–1266. doi:10.1068/a472c. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Vander Schee, C. (2009). Fruit, vegetables, fatness, and Foucault: Governing students and their families through school health policy. Journal of Education Policy, 24, 557–574. doi:10.1080/02680930902823047 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Whitson, J. R. (2013). Gaming the quantified self. Surveillance & Society, 11, 163–176. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Williams, B. J., Hay, P. J., & Macdonald, D. (2011). The outsourcing of health, sport and physical educational work: A state of play. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 16, 399–415. doi:10.1080/17408989.2011.582492 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Williamson, B. (2014a). Governing software: networks, databases and algorithmic power in the digital governance of education. Learning, Media & Technology. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.924527 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Williamson, B. (2014b). Knowing public services: Cross-sector intermediaries and algorithmic governance in public sector reform. Public Policy & Administration, 29(4), 292–312. doi:10.1177/0952076714529139 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Williamson, E. (2014, June 6). Baby tech: Will new gadgets result in paranoid parents? BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-27669210 [Google Scholar]
• Wolf, G. (2010, April 28). The data-driven life. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/magazine/02self-measurement-t.html [Google Scholar]