Applying quantified self approaches to support reflective learning

by | Apr 27, 2012 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Rivera-Pelayo, Verónica
  • Zacharias, Valentin
  • Müller, Lars
  • Braun, Simone

Abstract:

This paper presents a framework for technical support of reflective learning, derived from a unification of reflective learning theory with a conceptual framework of Quantified Self tools — tools for collecting personally relevant information for gaining self-knowledge. Reflective learning means returning to and evaluating past experiences in order to promote continuous learning and improve future experiences. Whilst the reflective learning theories do not sufficiently consider technical support, Quantified Self (QS) approaches are rather experimental and the many emergent tools are disconnected from the goals and benefits of their use. This paper brings these two strands into one unified framework that shows how QS approaches can support reflective learning processes on the one hand and how reflective learning can inform the design of new QS tools for informal learning purposes on the other hand.

Document:

https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330631

References:
  1. D. Boud, R. Keogh, and D. Walker. Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, chapter Promoting Reflection in Learning: a Model., pages 18–40. Routledge Falmer, New York, 1985.
  2. J. Brophy-Warren. The New Examined Life. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122852285532784401.html, Dec. 2008.
  3. J. Dewey. Experience and Education. Macmillan, London & New York, 1938.
  4. A. K. Dey. Understanding and using context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 5:4–7, 2001.
  5. L. Festinger. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford Univ. Press, 1957.
  6. R. Fleck. Supporting reflection on experience with sensecam. In CHI Workshop on Designing for Reflection on Experience, 2009.
  7. D. A. Kolb. Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1984.
  8. B. Krogstie and M. Divitini. Shared timeline and individual experience: Supporting retrospective reflection in student software engineering teams. In Proc. of CESEET 2009, pages 85–92, Washington, DC, USA, 2009. IEEE Computer Society.
  9. I. Li, A. Dey, and J. Forlizzi. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proc. of CHI 2010, pages 557–566, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
  10. L. Müller, B. Krogstie, and A. Schmidt. Towards capturing learning experiences. In ConTEL: Theory, methodology and design, ECTEL 2011, 2011.
  11. L. Müller, V. Rivera-Pelayo, and A. Schmidt. MIRROR D3.1 – User studies, requirements, and design studies for capturing learning experiences. MIRROR project deliverable D3.1, June 2011.
  12. D. A. Schön. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco, 1 edition, 1987.
  13. K. Strampel and R. Oliver. Using technology to foster reflection in higher education. In Proc. of ascilite Singapore 2007, 2007.