Author(s):
Laura Maria König
Christiane Attig
Thomas Franke
Britta Renner
Abstract:
Background: Nutrition apps are effective in changing eating behavior and diet-related health risk factors. However, while they may curb growing overweight and obesity rates, widespread adoption is yet to be achieved. Hence, profound knowledge regarding factors motivating and hindering (long-term) nutrition app use is crucial for developing design guidelines aimed at supporting uptake and prolonged use of nutrition apps.
Objective: In this systematic review, we synthesized the literature on barriers to and facilitators for nutrition app use across disciplines including empirical qualitative and quantitative studies with current users, ex-users, and nonusers of nutrition apps.
Methods: A systematic literature search including 6 databases (PubMed, Web of Science, PsychINFO, PSYNDEX, PsycArticles, and SPORTDiscus) as well as backward and forward citation search was conducted. Search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the planned data extraction process were preregistered. All empirical qualitative and quantitative studies published in German or English were eligible for inclusion if they examined adolescents (aged 13-18) or adults who were either current users, ex-users, and nonusers of nutrition apps. Based on qualitative content analysis, extracted individual barriers and facilitators were grouped into categories.
Results: A total of 28 publications were identified as eligible. A framework with a 3-level hierarchy was designed which grouped 328 individual barriers and facilitators into 23 subcategories, 12 categories, and 4 clusters that focus on either the individual user (goal setting and goal striving, motivation, routines, lack of awareness of knowledge), different aspects of the app and the smartphone (features, usability of the app or food database, technical issues, data security, accuracy/trustworthiness, costs), positive and negative outcomes of nutrition app use, or interactions between the user and their social environment.
Conclusions: The resulting conceptual framework underlines a pronounced diversity of reasons for (not) using nutrition apps, indicating that there is no “one-size-fits-all” approach for uptake and prolonged use of nutrition apps. Hence, tailoring nutrition apps to needs of specific user groups seems promising for increasing engagement.
Documentation:
https://doi.org/10.2196/20037
References:
- World Health Organization. Controllng the global obesity epidemic. URL: https://www.who.int/nutrition/topics/obesity/en/ [accessed 2021-06-13]
- Mitchell NS, Catenacci VA, Wyatt HR, Hill JO. Obesity: Overview of an Epidemic. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 2011 Dec;34(4):717-732. [CrossRef]
- Borrell LN, Samuel L. Body Mass Index Categories and Mortality Risk in US Adults: The Effect of Overweight and Obesity on Advancing Death. Am J Public Health 2014 Mar;104(3):512-519. [CrossRef]
- Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH. The Disease Burden Associated With Overweight and Obesity. JAMA 1999 Oct 27;282(16):1523-1529. [CrossRef]
- Lim S, Vos T, Flaxman A, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. The Lancet 2012;380(9859):2224-2260. [CrossRef]
- Withrow D, Alter D. The economic burden of obesity worldwide: a systematic review of the direct costs of obesity. Obesity reviews 2011;12(2):131-141. [CrossRef]
- Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, Thomson B, Graetz N, Margini C, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. The Lancet 2014;384(9960):2107-2108. [CrossRef]
- Statista. Number of smartphone users worldwide from 2016 to 2021 (in billions). de.statista.com. 2019. URL: https://www.statista.com/statistics/330695/number-of-smartphone-users-worldwide/ [accessed 2019-08-28]
- Abroms L, Padmanabhan P, Evans W. Mobile phones for health communication to promote behavior change. eHealth applications: Promising strategies for behavior change 2012:147-166. [CrossRef]
- Nacinovich M. Defining mHealth. Journal of Communication in Healthcare 2013 Jul 18;4(1):1-3. [CrossRef]
- Müller AM, Maher CA, Vandelanotte C, Hingle M, Middelweerd A, Lopez ML, et al. Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, and Diet-Related eHealth and mHealth Research: Bibliometric Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2018 Apr 18;20(4):e122. [CrossRef]
- IQVIA Institute. The Growing Value of Digital Health. Durham, NC: IQVIA Institute; 2017.
- Sama PR, Eapen ZJ, Weinfurt KP, Shah BR, Schulman KA. An evaluation of mobile health application tools. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2014;2(2):e19 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Aitken M, Gauntlett C. Patient Apps for Improved Healthcare: From Movelty to Mainstream. Parsnippany, NJ: IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics; 2013.
- Villinger K, Wahl DR, Boeing H, Schupp HT, Renner B. The effectiveness of app-based mobile interventions on nutrition behaviours and nutrition-related health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2019 Oct;20(10):1465-1484. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Conway N, Campbell I, Forbes P, Cunningham S, Wake D. mHealth applications for diabetes: User preference and implications for app development. Health Informatics J 2016 Dec;22(4):1111-1120. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- König LM, Sproesser G, Schupp HT, Renner B. Describing the Process of Adopting Nutrition and Fitness Apps: Behavior Stage Model Approach. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 Mar 13;6(3):e55 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ernsting C, Dombrowski SU, Oedekoven M, O’Sullivan JL, Kanzler M, Kuhlmey A, et al. Using Smartphones and Health Apps to Change and Manage Health Behaviors: A Population-Based Survey. J Med Internet Res 2017 Apr 05;19(4):e101 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Simblett S, Greer B, Matcham F, Curtis H, Polhemus A, Ferrão J, et al. Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement With Remote Measurement Technology for Managing Health: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Findings. J Med Internet Res 2018 Jul 12;20(7):e10480 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Attig C, Franke T. Abandonment of personal quantification: A review and empirical study investigating reasons for wearable activity tracking attrition. Computers in Human Behavior 2020 Jan;102:223-237. [CrossRef]
- Fuchs K, Haldimann M, Vuckovac D, Ilic A. Automation of data collection techniques for recording food intake: a review of publicly available and well-adopted diet apps. : IEEE; 2018 Presented at: 2018 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC); 17-19 Oct. 2018; Jeju, Korea (South). [CrossRef]
- Sharpe EE, Karasouli E, Meyer C. Examining Factors of Engagement With Digital Interventions for Weight Management: Rapid Review. JMIR Res Protoc 2017 Oct 23;6(10):e205 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Lyzwinski LN, Caffery LJ, Bambling M, Edirippulige S. Consumer perspectives on mHealth for weight loss: a review of qualitative studies. J Telemed Telecare 2017:290-302. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Krebs P, Duncan DT. Health App Use Among US Mobile Phone Owners: A National Survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015;3(4):e101 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Jones M, Maddox J, Benavides-Espinoza C, Finnicum P. Use of Fitness and Nutrition Applications by College Students. Missouri Journal of Health, Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 2017;27:63-71.
- Eikey E, Reddy M. It’s Definitely Been a Journey: A Qualitative Study on How Women with Eating Disorders Use Weight Loss Apps. : ACm; 2017 Presented at: 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems; 6-11 May 2017; Denver, CO p. 642-654. [CrossRef]
- König LM, Attig C. Work package 1: Conducting a scoping review on barriers to and facilitators for using nutrition apps. 2019 Jun 12. URL: https://osf.io/64d2h/ [accessed 2021-06-06]
- Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097. [CrossRef]
- Murnane E, Huffaker D, Kossinets G. Mobile health apps: adoption, adherence, and abandonment. : ACM; 2015 Presented at: UbiComp/ISWC’15; 7-11 Seotember 2015; Osaka, Japan. [CrossRef]
- Haithcox-Dennis M, Brinkley J, Richman A, DeWeese A, Byrd IJ. Mhealth on campus: assessing undergraduates attitudes and utilization of mobile health applications. Global Journal of Health Education and Promotion 2012;15(1):134-144.
- Mayring P. Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt: SSOAR Open Access Repository; 2014.
- Sarcona A, Kovacs L, Wright J, Williams C. Differences in Eating Behavior, Physical Activity, and Health-related Lifestyle Choices between Users and Nonusers of Mobile Health Apps. American Journal of Health Education 2017 Jul 11;48(5):298-305. [CrossRef]
- Lieffers JRL, Arocha JF, Grindrod K, Hanning RM. Experiences and Perceptions of Adults Accessing Publicly Available Nutrition Behavior-Change Mobile Apps for Weight Management. J Acad Nutr Diet 2018 Feb;118(2):229-239.e3. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- West JH, Belvedere LM, Andreasen R, Frandsen C, Hall PC, Crookston BT. Controlling Your “App”etite: How Diet and Nutrition-Related Mobile Apps Lead to Behavior Change. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017 Jul 10;5(7):e95 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Gowin M, Cheney M, Gwin S, Franklin Wann T. Health and Fitness App Use in College Students: A Qualitative Study. American Journal of Health Education 2015 Jul 06;46(4):223-230. [CrossRef]
- Flaherty SJ, McCarthy MB, Collins AM, McAuliffe FM. A different perspective on consumer engagement: exploring the experience of using health apps to support healthier food purchasing. Journal of Marketing Management 2019 Feb 18;35(3-4):310-337. [CrossRef]
- Tang J, Abraham C, Stamp E, Greaves C. How can weight-loss app designers’ best engage and support users? A qualitative investigation. Br J Health Psychol 2015 Feb;20(1):151-171. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Solbrig L, Jones R, Kavanagh D, May J, Parkin T, Andrade J. People trying to lose weight dislike calorie counting apps and want motivational support to help them achieve their goals. Internet Interv 2017 Mar;7:23-31 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Choe E, Lee N, Lee B, Pratt W, Kientz J. Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collectingexploring personal data. 2014 Presented at: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 26 April – 1 May 2014; Toronto, Canada. [CrossRef]
- Yuan S, Ma W, Kanthawala S, Peng W. Keep Using My Health Apps: Discover Users’ Perception of Health and Fitness Apps with the UTAUT2 Model. Telemed J E Health 2015 Apr 28:735-741. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Bhuyan SS, Lu N, Chandak A, Kim H, Wyant D, Bhatt J, et al. Use of Mobile Health Applications for Health-Seeking Behavior Among US Adults. J Med Syst 2016 Jun;40(6):153. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Oh J, Lee U. Exploring UX issues in Quantified Self technologies. 2015 Presented at: Eighth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU); 20-22 Jan. 2015; Hakodate, Japan. [CrossRef]
- Peng W, Kanthawala S, Yuan S, Hussain SA. A qualitative study of user perceptions of mobile health apps. BMC Public Health 2016 Nov 14;16(1):1158 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Cordeiro F, Bales E, Cherry E, Fogarty J. Rethinking the mobile food journal: Exploring opportunities for lightweight photo-based capture. 2015 Presented at: 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 18-23 April 2015; Seoul, South Korea. [CrossRef]
- Chan A, Kow R, Cheng JK. Adolescents’ Perceptions on Smartphone Applications (Apps) for Health Management. Journal of Mobile Technology in Medicine 2017 Aug;6(2):47-55. [CrossRef]
- Aljuraiban GS. Use of Weight-Management Mobile Phone Apps in Saudi Arabia: A Web-Based Survey. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019 Feb 22;7(2):e12692 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Dennison L, Morrison L, Conway G, Yardley L. Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(4):e86 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Woldeyohannes H, Ngwenyama O. Factors influencing acceptance and continued use of mHealth apps. 2017 Presented at: International Conference on HCI in Business, Government, and Organizations; July 9-14, 2017; Vancouver, BC, Canada. [CrossRef]
- Cordeiro F, Epstein D, Thomaz E, Bales E, Jagannathan A, Abowd G, et al. Barriers and Negative Nudges: Exploring Challenges in Food Journaling. 2015 Presented at: 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 18-23 April 2015; Seoul, South Korea. [CrossRef]
- Anderson K, Burford O, Emmerton L. Mobile Health Apps to Facilitate Self-Care: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences. PLoS One 2016;11(5):e0156164 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Zhou L, Bao J, Watzlaf V, Parmanto B. Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Mobile Health Apps From a Security Perspective: Mixed-Methods Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019 Apr 16;7(4):e11223 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Warnick JL, Pfammatter A, Champion K, Galluzzi T, Spring B. Perceptions of Health Behaviors and Mobile Health Applications in an Academically Elite College Population to Inform a Targeted Health Promotion Program. Int J Behav Med 2019 Apr;26(2):165-174. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Wang Q, Egelandsdal B, Amdam GV, Almli VL, Oostindjer M. Diet and Physical Activity Apps: Perceived Effectiveness by App Users. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016;4(2):e33 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Kwon M, Mun K, Lee JK, McLeod DM, D’Angelo J. Is mobile health all peer pressure? The influence of mass media exposure on the motivation to use mobile health apps. Convergence 2016 Apr 10;23(6):565-586. [CrossRef]
- Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Schoeppe S, Alley S, Van Lippevelde W, Bray NA, Williams SL, Duncan MJ, et al. Efficacy of interventions that use apps to improve diet, physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2016 Dec 07;13(1):127 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Ghelani DP, Moran LJ, Johnson C, Mousa A, Naderpoor N. Mobile Apps for Weight Management: A Review of the Latest Evidence to Inform Practice. Front. Endocrinol 2020 Jun 24;11:412. [CrossRef]
- Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol 2008 May;27(3):379-387. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Direito A, Dale LP, Shields E, Dobson R, Whittaker R, Maddison R. Do physical activity and dietary smartphone applications incorporate evidence-based behaviour change techniques? BMC Public Health 2014;14:646 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Turner-McGrievy GM, Wilcox S, Boutté A, Hutto BE, Singletary C, Muth ER, et al. The Dietary Intervention to Enhance Tracking with Mobile Devices (DIET Mobile) Study: A 6-Month Randomized Weight Loss Trial. Obesity 2017 Dec;25(8):1336-1342 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Dunn CG, Turner-McGrievy GM, Wilcox S, Hutto B. Dietary Self-Monitoring Through Calorie Tracking but Not Through a Digital Photography App Is Associated with Significant Weight Loss: The 2SMART Pilot Study-A 6-Month Randomized Trial. J Acad Nutr Diet 2019 Sep;119(9):1525-1532. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- König LM, Renner B. Boosting healthy food choices by meal colour variety: results from two experiments and a just-in-time Ecological Momentary Intervention. BMC Public Health 2019 Jul 22;19(1):975 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Gerke S, Stern AD, Minssen T. Germany’s digital health reforms in the COVID-19 era: lessons and opportunities for other countries. npj Digit. Med 2020 Jul 10;3(1):1-6. [CrossRef]
- Weinstein ND, Lyon JE, Sandman PM, Cuite CL. Experimental evidence for stages of health behavior change: the precaution adoption process model applied to home radon testing. Health Psychol 1998 Sep;17(5):445-453. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Attig C, Franke T. I track, therefore I walk – Exploring the motivational costs of wearing activity trackers in actual users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2019 Jul;127:211-224. [CrossRef]
- Lally P, Gardner B. Promoting habit formation. Health Psychology Review 2013 May;7(sup1):S137-S158. [CrossRef]
- Stawarz K, Cox A, Blandford A. Beyond self-tracking and reminders: designing smartphone apps that support habit formation. : ACM; 2015 Presented at: 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems; 18-23 April 2015; Seoul, South Korea. [CrossRef]
- Schembre SM, Liao Y, O’Connor SG, Hingle MD, Shen S, Hamoy KG, et al. Mobile Ecological Momentary Diet Assessment Methods for Behavioral Research: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 Nov 20;6(11):e11170 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Burke LE, Warziski M, Starrett T, Choo J, Music E, Sereika S, et al. Self-monitoring dietary intake: current and future practices. J Ren Nutr 2005 Jul;15(3):281-290. [Medline]
- Ziesemer K, König L, Boushey C, Villinger K, Wahl D, Butscher S, et al. Occurrence of and Reasons for “Missing Events” in Mobile Dietary Assessments: Results From Three Event-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2020;8(10):e15430. [CrossRef]
- Thomas JG, Bond DS, Ryder BA, Leahey TM, Vithiananthan S, Roye GD, et al. Ecological momentary assessment of recommended postoperative eating and activity behaviors. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2011;7(2):206-212. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Boushey CJ, Spoden M, Zhu FM, Delp EJ, Kerr DA. New mobile methods for dietary assessment: review of image-assisted and image-based dietary assessment methods. Proc Nutr Soc 2016 Dec 12:1-12. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, McAteer J, Gupta S. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol 2009 Nov;28(6):690-701. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Lyons EJ, Lewis ZH, Mayrsohn BG, Rowland JL. Behavior change techniques implemented in electronic lifestyle activity monitors: a systematic content analysis. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(8):e192 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Perski O, Blandford A, West R, Michie S. Conceptualising engagement with digital behaviour change interventions: a systematic review using principles from critical interpretive synthesis. Transl Behav Med 2016 Dec 13:254-267. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007 Jul;133(4):673-693. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Klusmann V, Musculus L, Sproesser G, Renner B. Fulfilled Emotional Outcome Expectancies Enable Successful Adoption and Maintenance of Physical Activity. Front Psychol 2016;6:1990 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Gellert P, Ziegelmann JP, Schwarzer R. Affective and health-related outcome expectancies for physical activity in older adults. Psychol Health 2012;27(7):816-828. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Wahl DR, Villinger K, König LM, Ziesemer K, Schupp HT, Renner B. Healthy food choices are happy food choices: Evidence from a real life sample using smartphone based assessments. Scientific Reports 2017 Dec 06;7(1):17069. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Bandura A. Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol 2001 Feb;52(1):1-26. [CrossRef]
- Schwarzer R. Modeling Health Behavior Change: How to Predict and Modify the Adoption and Maintenance of Health Behaviors. Applied Psychology 2008 Jan;57(1):1-29. [CrossRef]
- Cowan LT, Van Wagenen SA, Brown BA, Hedin RJ, Seino-Stephan Y, Hall PC, et al. Apps of Steel: Are Exercise Apps Providing Consumers With Realistic Expectations? Health Educ Behav 2012 Sep 17;40(2):133-139. [CrossRef]
- Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 1989 Aug;35(8):982-1003. [CrossRef]
- Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991;50(2):179-211. [CrossRef]
- Vandelanotte C, Müller AM, Short CE, Hingle M, Nathan N, Williams SL, et al. Past, Present, and Future of eHealth and mHealth Research to Improve Physical Activity and Dietary Behaviors. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 2016 Mar;48(3):219-228.e1. [CrossRef]
- Kelley CCG, Neufeld JM, Musher-Eizenman DR. Drive for thinness and drive for muscularity: opposite ends of the continuum or separate constructs? Body Image 2010 Jan;7(1):74-77. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Petticrew M, Egan M, Thomson H, Hamilton V, Kunkler R, Roberts H. Publication bias in qualitative research: what becomes of qualitative research presented at conferences? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 2008;62(6):552-554. [CrossRef]
- Franke T, Attig C, Wessel D. A Personal Resource for Technology Interaction: Development and Validation of the Affinity for Technology Interaction (ATI) Scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 2018;35(6):456-467. [CrossRef]
- DiClemente C, Carbonari J, Velasquez M. Alcoholism treatment mismatching from a process of change perspective. In: Alcohol abuse treatment. Totowa, NJ: The Humana Press; 1992:115-142.
- Graham AK, Lattie EG, Mohr DC. Experimental Therapeutics for Digital Mental Health. JAMA Psychiatry 2019 Aug 21;76(12):1223-1224. [CrossRef] [Medline]
- Baretta D, Perski O, Steca P. Exploring Users’ Experiences of the Uptake and Adoption of Physical Activity Apps: Longitudinal Qualitative Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019;7(2):e11636 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
- European Commission. eHealth Action Plan 2012-2020 – Innovative healthcare for the 21st century. Brussels: European Commission; 2012.
- European Commission. eHealth: Digital health and care. 2017. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/health/ehealth/policy_en [accessed 2021-06-14]