Beyond the body: Moving past the metricised bodily goal in self-tracking

by | Jun 15, 2022 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Kim Snooks
  • Roger Whitham
  • Daniel Richards
  • Joseph Lindley

Abstract:

Currently self-tracking systems, that sense and infer data about an individual or ‘the self’, focus on gathering quantitative data about the body. The social features present in these systems measure data about the body against other bodies or ‘the other’. However, focus on these metrics is causing harm. In this paper we discuss relations between the self and the other and more-than-human perspectives to pose questions for moving beyond the body and acknowledging potential harm in self-tracking systems. Throughout we draw on work from across Design Research, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Philosophy and Sociology, to high-light challenges and opportunities for Designers in the self-tracking space and discuss how the future of these systems needs to change.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.501

References:
  • Ayobi, A., Marshall, P., Cox, A. L., & Chen, Y. (2017). Quantifying the body and caring for the mind:Self-tracking in multiple sclerosis. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -Proceedings, 2017-May, 6889–6901. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025869
  • BBC. (2018). Fitness app Strava lights up staff at military bases. BBC News.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-42853072
  • Bogost, I. (2012). Alien Phenomenology, Or, What It’s Like to be a Thing. University of MinnesotaPress.
  • Boyd, D. (2001). Faceted Id/entity: Managing representation in a digital world [MassachusettsInstitute of Technology]. https://www.media.mit.edu/publications/faceted-identity-managing-representation-in-a-digital-world/
  • Coulton, P., & Lindley, J. G. (2019). More-Than Human Centred Design: Considering Other Things. TheDesign Journal, 22(4), 463–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1614320
  • Coulton, P., Lindley, J., Sturdee, M., & Stead, M. (2017). Design Fiction as World Building. Research through Design (RTD).
  • Crawford, K., Lingel, J., & Karppi, T. (2015). Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device: European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415584857
  • Desjardins, A., Biggs, H. R., Key, C., & Viny, J. E. (2020). IoT Data in the Home: Observing Entanglements and Drawing New Encounters. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376342
  • Dourish, P., & Gómez Cruz, E. (2018). Datafication and data fiction: Narrating data and narrating withdata. Big Data and Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718784083
  • Ebert, G. (2020). Japanese Aquariums Track Penguins’ Dramatic, Salacious Love Lives ThroughComplex Flowcharts. Colossal. https://www.thisiscolossal.com/2020/07/penguin-flowcharts-kyoto-sumida-aquariums/
  • Eikey, E. V., & Reddy, M. C. (2017). “It’s definitely been a journey”: A qualitative study on how women with eating disorders use weight loss apps. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings, 2017-May, 642–654. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025591
  • Elsden, C., Kirk, D. S., & Durrant, A. C. (2016). A Quantified Past: Toward Design for Remembering With Personal Informatics. Human–Computer Interaction, 31(6), 518–557.https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2015.1093422
  • Elsden, C., Kirk, D., Selby, M., & Speed, C. (2015). Beyond Personal Informatics: Designing for Experiences with Data. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2341–2344. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702632
  • Epstein, D. A., Dontcheva, M., Fogarty, J., & Munson, S. A. (2020). Yarn: Adding Meaning to Shared Personal Data through Structured Storytelling. Graphics Interface.
  • Epstein, D. A., Silva, L. M., Lee, J. H., Hilby, C., Eikey, E. V, Caldeira, C., Costa Figueiredo, M., Lu, X.,Williams, L., Ho Lee, J., Li, Q., Ahuja, S., Chen, Q., Dowlatyari, P., Sultana, S., & Chen, Y. (2020).Mapping and Taking Stock of the Personal Informatics Literature. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob.Wearable Ubiquitous Technol, 4(4), 126. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432231
  • Figueiredo, M. C., Caldeira, C., Eikey, E., Mazmanian, M., & Chen, Y. (2018). Engaging with health data: The interplay between self-tracking activities and emotions in fertility struggles.Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1145/3274309
  • FitBark. (2021). FitBark GPS Dog Trackers & Activity Monitors | Healthy Together.https://www.fitbark.com/Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. University of Massachusetts Press.
  • Gabriels, K., & Moerenhout, T. (2018). Exploring entertainment medicine and professionalization of self-care: Interview study among doctors on the potential effects of digital self-Tracking. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(1), e8040. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8040
  • Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trendsin Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5
  • Giaccardi, E., & Redström, J. (2020). Technology and More-Than-Human Design.Gross, S., Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., & Stallings, M. (2017). Persuasive Anxiety: Designing and Deploying Material and Formal Explorations of Personal Tracking Devices. Human–Computer Interaction,32(5–6), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1287570
  • Gulotta, R., Kelliher, A., & Forlizzi, J. (2017). Digital systems and the experience of legacy. DIS 2017 -Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, 663–674.https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064731
  • Gulotta, R., Sciuto, A., Kelliher, A., & Forlizzi, J. (2015). Curatorial agents: How systems shape ourunderstanding of personal and familial digital information. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings, 2015-April, 3453–3462.https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702297
  • Hancı, E., Ruijten, P. A. M., Lacroix, J., Kersten-van Dijk, E. T., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2019). Are trackers social actors? The role of self-tracking on self-evaluation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics),11433 LNCS, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17287-9_3
  • Haraway, D. J. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness (Vol.1). Prickly Paradigm Press Chicago.Hong, S. (2020). Technologies of Speculation: The Limits of Knowledge in a Data-Driven Society. NYUPress.
  • Jayawardene, W., Huber, L., McDonnell, J., Curran, L., Larson, S., Dickinson, S., Chen, X., Pena, E.,Carson, A., & Johnston, J. (2021). ‘Tracking Together’—Simultaneous Use of Human and Dog Kim Snooks, Roger Whitham, Daniel Richards, Joseph Lindley14Activity Trackers: Protocol for a Factorial, Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2021, Vol. 18, Page 1561, 18(4), 1561.https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH18041561
  • Jenka. (2018). Good for your health: Design Philosophy from the technology of healing. Medium.https://uxdesign.cc/good-for-your-health-designphilosophy-from-the-technology-of-healing-e467b0883139
  • Jørgensen, M. S., Nissen, F. K., Paay, J., Kjeldskov, J., & Skov, M. B. (2016). Monitoring Children’s Physical Activity and Sleep: A Study of Surveillance and Information Disclosure. Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, 50–58.https://doi.org/10.1145/3010915.3010936
  • Kersten – van Dijk, E., Beute, F., Westerink, J., & Ijsselsteijn, W. (2015). Unintended effects of self-tracking. ACM CHI Workshop on “Beyond Personal Informatics: Designing for Experiences of Data.”
  • Kersten – van Dijk, E. T., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2016). Design beyond the numbers: sharing, comparing,storytelling and the need for a Quantified Us. Interaction Design and Architecture(S), 2016(29),121–135.
  • Lawson, S., Kirman, B., Linehan, C., Feltwell, T., & Hopkins, L. (2015). Problematising upstream technology through speculative design: The case of quantified cats and dogs. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings, 2015-April, 2663–2672.https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702260
  • Leong, J., Hjorth, L., & Choi, J. H. J. (2020). Inventive Approaches to Data Tracking in More-Than-Human Worlds. The Routledge Companion to Mobile Media Art, 259–269.https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429242816-31
  • Li, I., Dey, A., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings.https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753409
  • Lockton, D., Zea-Wolfson, T., Chou, J., Song, Y., Ryan, E., & Walsh, C. J. (2020). Sleep ecologies: Toolsfor snoozy autoethnography. DIS 2020 – Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 1579–1591. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395482
  • Lupton, D. (2017). Feeling your data: Touch and making sense of personal digital data. New Mediaand Society, 19(10), 1599–1614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817717515
  • Lupton, D. (2018). How do data come to matter? Living and becoming with personal data. Big Dataand Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718786314
  • Lupton, D. (2020). Data Selves: more-than-human perspectives. Polity.Morley, J., Machado, C., Burr, C., Cowls, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2019). The Debate on the Ethicsof AI in Health Care: a Reconstruction and Critical Review. SSRN Electronic Journal.https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3486518
  • Murnane, E. L., Snyder, J., Voida, S., Bietz, M. J., Matthews, M., Munson, S., & Pina, L. R. (2018).Social issues in personal informatics: Design, data, and infrastructure. Proceedings of the ACMConference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW, 471–478.https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3273016
  • Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat. Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, 1, 159–168.
  • Pina, L. R., Sien, S.-W., Ward, T., Yip, J. C., Munson, S. A., Fogarty, J., & Kientz, J. A. (2017). FromPersonal Informatics to Family Informatics: Understanding Family Practices around HealthMonitoring. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 2300–2315. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998362
  • Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A., & Chalmers, M. (2014). Personal tracking as lived informatics.Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – Proceedings.https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557039
  • Shane, J. (2019). You Look Like a Thing and I Love You. Wildfire, Headline Publishing Group.
  • Snooks, K., Lindley, J., Richards, D., & Whitham, R. (2021). Context-Aware Wearables: The Last Thing We Need is a Pandemic of Stray Cats. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450367
  • Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication.Cambridge university press.
  • Tan, N.-A. H., Sha, H., Celen, E., Tran, P., Wang, K., Cheung, G., Hinch, P., & Huang, J. (2018). Rewind:Automatically Reconstructing Everyday Memories with First-Person Perspectives. Proc. ACMInteract. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287069
  • Tolmie, P., Crabtree, A., Rodden, T., Colley, J., & Luger, E. (2016). This has to be the cats – Personal data legibility in networked sensing systems. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819992
  • Tractive. (2021). Tractive – No. 1 GPS Tracker for Cats and Dogs – Worldwide.https://tractive.com/en/c/gps-tracker-cat
  • Turkle, S. (2005). The second self : computers and the human spirit. MIT Press.
  • Van der Linden, D. (2021). Interspecies information systems. Requirements Engineering 2021, 1, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00766-021-00355-3
  • Van der Linden, D., Zamansky, A., Hadar, I., Craggs, B., & Rashid, A. (2019). Buddy’s Wearable Is Not Your Buddy: Privacy Implications of Pet Wearables. IEEE Security and Privacy, 17(3), 28–39.https://doi.org/10.1109/MSEC.2018.2888783
  • Wang, J., O’Kane, A. A., Newhouse, N., Sethu-Jones, G. R., & De Barbaro, K. (2017). Quantified Baby:Parenting and the Use of a Baby Wearable in the Wild. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 108. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134743
  • Whistle. (2021). Whistle GPS Pet Tracker and Activity Monitor for Pets | Whistle Store.https://www.whistle.com/
  • Wolf, C. T., Ringland, K. E., Gao, I. M., & Dourish, P. (2018). Participating through data: Chartingrelational tensions in multiplatform data flows. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW). https://doi.org/10.1145/3274453
  • Wolf, G. (n.d.). Quantified Self. Retrieved November 1, 2021, from https://quantifiedself.com/
  • Zamansky, A., Linden, D. Van der, Hadar, I., & Bleuer-Elsner, S. (2019). Log my dog: Perceived impact of dog activity tracking. Computer, 52(9), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.2889637