Author(s):

  • Mirou Jaana
  • Guy Paré

Abstract:

Background: The burden of population aging and chronic conditions has been reported worldwide. Older adults, especially those with high needs, experience social isolation and have high rates of emergency visits and limited satisfaction with the care they receive. Mobile health (mHealth) technologies present opportunities to address these challenges. To date, limited information is available on Canadian older adults’ attitudes toward and use of mHealth technologies for self-tracking purposes—an area that is increasingly important and relevant during the COVID-19 era.

Objective: This study presents contributions to an underresearched area on older adults and mHealth technology use. The aim of this study was to compare older adults’ use of mHealth technologies to that of the general adult population in Canada and to investigate the factors that affect their use.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey on mHealth and digital self-tracking was conducted. A web-based questionnaire was administered to a national sample of 4109 Canadian residents who spoke either English or French. The survey instrument consisted of 3 sections assessing the following items: (1) demographic characteristics, health status, and comorbidities; (2) familiarity with and use of mHealth technologies (ie, mobile apps, consumer smart devices/wearables such as vital signs monitors, bathroom scales, fitness trackers, intelligent clothing); and (3) factors influencing the continued use of mHealth technologies.

Results: Significant differences were observed between the older adults and the general adult population in the use of smart technologies and internet (P<.001). Approximately 47.4% (323/682) of the older adults in the community reported using smartphones and 49.8% (340/682) indicated using digital tablets. Only 19.6% (91/463) of the older adults using smartphones/digital tablets reported downloading mobile apps, and 12.3% (47/383) of the older adults who heard of smart devices/wearables indicated using them. The majority of the mobile apps downloaded by older adults was health-related; interestingly, their use was sustained over a longer period of time (P=.007) by the older adults compared to that by the general population. Approximately 62.7% (428/682) of the older adults reported tracking their health measures, but the majority did so manually. Older adults with one or more chronic conditions were mostly nontrackers (odds ratio 0.439 and 0.431 for traditional trackers and digital trackers, respectively). No significant differences were observed between the older adults and the general adult population with regard to satisfaction with mHealth technologies and their intention to continue using them.

Conclusions: Leveraging mHealth technologies in partnership with health care providers and sharing of health/well-being data with health care professionals and family members remain very limited. A culture shift in the provision of care to older adults is deemed necessary to keep up with the development of mHealth technologies and the changing demographics and expectations of patients and their caregivers.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.2196/24718

References:
  1. Bloom DE. 7 billion and counting. Science 2011 Jul 29;333(6042):562-569. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. Osborn R, Doty MM, Moulds D, Sarnak DO, Shah A. Older Americans Were Sicker And Faced More Financial Barriers To Health Care Than Counterparts In Other Countries. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017 Dec;36(12):2123-2132. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. United N. World population ageing 2017. 2017.   URL: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2017_Report.pdf [accessed 2020-10-25] [WebCite Cache]
  4. GBD 2016 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1211-1259 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. The Commonwealth Fund. 2017 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey of Older Adults in 11 Countries.   URL: https:/​/www.​commonwealthfund.org/​publications/​infographic/​2017/​dec/​2017-commonwealth-fund-international-health-policy-survey-older [accessed 2020-10-25]
  6. Goethals L, Barth N, Guyot J, Hupin D, Celarier T, Bongue B. Impact of Home Quarantine on Physical Activity Among Older Adults Living at Home During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Aging 2020 May 07;3(1):e19007 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Goodman-Casanova JM, Dura-Perez E, Guzman-Parra J, Cuesta-Vargas A, Mayoral-Cleries F. Telehealth Home Support During COVID-19 Confinement for Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Mild Dementia: Survey Study. J Med Internet Res 2020 May 22;22(5):e19434 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Li HO, Huynh D. Long-term social distancing during COVID-19: A social isolation crisis among seniors? CMAJ 2020 May 25;192(21):E588. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci 2015 Mar;10(2):227-237. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Palmer K, Monaco A, Kivipelto M, Onder G, Maggi S, Michel J, et al. The potential long-term impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on patients with non-communicable diseases in Europe: consequences for healthy ageing. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020 Jul;32(7):1189-1194 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Canadian Institute for Health Information. How Canada Compares: Results From The Commonwealth Fund’s 2016 International Health Policy Survey of Adults in 11 Countries. 2017.   URL: https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/text-alternative-version-2016-cmwf-en-web.pdf
  12. Health Care in Canada, 2011-a Focus on Seniors and Aging. Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2011.   URL: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/HCIC_2011_seniors_report_en.pdf
  13. Statistics Canada. Canada’s population estimates: Age and sex, July 1, 2018. 2019.   URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/daily-quotidien/190125/dq190125a-eng.pdf
  14. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Infographic: Canada’s Seniors Population Outlook: Uncharted Territory. : CIHI; 2017.   URL: https://www.cihi.ca/en/infographic-canadas-seniors-population-outlook-uncharted-territory
  15. World Health Organization. mHealth: new horizons for health through mobile technologies: second global survey on eHealth. 2011.   URL: http://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_mhealth_web.pdf [accessed 2020-09-25]
  16. Czaja SJ. Long-term care services and support systems for older adults: The role of technology. Am Psychol 2016;71(4):294-301. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  17. Heinz M, Martin P, Margrett JA, Yearns M, Franke W, Yang H, et al. Perceptions of technology among older adults. J Gerontol Nurs 2013 Jan;39(1):42-51. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. McMurtrey M, Zeltmann S, Downey J, McGaughey R. Seniors and technology: results from a field study. J Comput Inf Syst 2011;51(4):22-30. [CrossRef]
  19. Jaana M, Paré G. Home telemonitoring of patients with diabetes: a systematic assessment of observed effects. J Eval Clin Pract 2007 Apr;13(2):242-253. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Jaana M, Pare G, Sicotte C. Hypertension Home Telemonitoring. 2007;15(1):19-31. [CrossRef]
  21. Jaana M, Paré G, Sicotte C. Home telemonitoring for respiratory conditions: a systematic review. Am J Manag Care 2009 May;15(5):313-320 [FREE Full text] [Medline]
  22. Jaana M, Sherrard H, Paré G. A prospective evaluation of telemonitoring use by seniors with chronic heart failure: Adoption, self-care, and empowerment. Health Informatics J 2019 Dec;25(4):1800-1814. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Jaana M, Sherrard H. Rural-Urban Comparison of Telehome Monitoring for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure. Telemed J E Health 2019 Feb;25(2):101-108. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  24. Kitsiou S, Paré G, Jaana M, Gerber B. Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for patients with diabetes: An overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One 2017;12(3):e0173160 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Paré G, Jaana M, Sicotte C. Systematic review of home telemonitoring for chronic diseases: the evidence base. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14(3):269-277 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  26. Kavandi H, Jaana M. Factors that affect health information technology adoption by seniors: A systematic review. Health Soc Care Community 2020 May 07. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  27. Fox S. The Self-Tracking Data Explosion. Pew Research Center. 2013 Jun 03.   URL: https://www.pewinternet.org/2013/06/04/the-self-tracking-data-explosion/ [accessed 2020-09-25]
  28. Lupton D. Self-tracking, health and medicine. Health Sociology Review 2016 Nov 21;26(1):1-5. [CrossRef]
  29. McMahon SK, Lewis B, Oakes M, Guan W, Wyman JF, Rothman AJ. Older Adults’ Experiences Using a Commercially Available Monitor to Self-Track Their Physical Activity. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016 Apr 13;4(2):e35 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  30. Seifert A, Schlomann A, Rietz C, Schelling HR. The use of mobile devices for physical activity tracking in older adults’ everyday life. Digit Health 2017;3:2055207617740088. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  31. Ringeval M, Wagner G, Denford J, Paré G, Kitsiou S. Fitbit-Based Interventions for Healthy Lifestyle Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2020 Oct 12;22(10):e23954 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  32. Caldeira C, Chen Y. Seniors and Self-tracking Technology. In: Sayago S, editor. Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction Research with Older People. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2019:67-79.
  33. Ancker JS, Witteman HO, Hafeez B, Provencher T, Van de Graaf M, Wei E. “You Get Reminded You’re a Sick Person”: Personal Data Tracking and Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions. J Med Internet Res 2015 Aug 19;17(8):e202 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  34. Sacco G, Lléonart S, Simon R, Noublanche F, Annweiler C, TOVID Study Group. Communication Technology Preferences of Hospitalized and Institutionalized Frail Older Adults During COVID-19 Confinement: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020 Sep 18;8(9):e21845 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  35. Siette J, Wuthrich V, Low L. Social Preparedness in Response to Spatial Distancing Measures for Aged Care During COVID-19. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020 Jul;21(7):985-986 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  36. Paré G, Leaver C, Bourget C. Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey. J Med Internet Res 2018 May 02;20(5):e177 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  37. Bhattacherjee A. Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model. MIS Quarterly 2001 Sep;25(3):351. [CrossRef]
  38. Hong S, Thong JY, Tam KY. Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decision Support Systems 2006 Dec;42(3):1819-1834. [CrossRef]
  39. Oliver RL. A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research 1980 Nov;17(4):460 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
  40. Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 1989 Sep;13(3):319. [CrossRef]
  41. Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  42. Accenture C.. Patients want a heavy dose of digital. 2016.   URL: https:/​/www.​accenture.com/​t20160629T045303__w__/​us-en/​_acnmedia/​PDF-6/​Accenture-Patients-Want-A-Heavy-Dose-of-Digital-Infographic.​pdf [accessed 2017-10-26]
  43. Brown B. 2016 Connected Patient Report. Health Tech Insider.   URL: https://healthtechinsider.com/2016/08/25/2016-connected-patient-report/ [accessed 2019-06-14]
  44. Growth from Knowledge (GfK). Health and Fitness tracking: Global GfK Survey. 2016 Aug 25.   URL: https:/​/cdn2.​hubspot.net/​hubfs/​2405078/​cms-pdfs/​fileadmin/​user_upload/​country_one_pager/​nl/​documents/​global-gfk-survey_health-fitness-monitoring_2016.​pdf
  45. IFOP. Objets connectes et usage des donnees: la perception des Francais. Published online. 2015 Dec 1.   URL: https:/​/www.​hiscox.fr/​sites/​france/​files/​wordpress/​2015/​09/​ifop-rapport-de-synthese-hiscox-objets-connectes.​pdf [accessed 2020-11-06]
  46. Bowling A. Just one question: If one question works, why ask several? J Epidemiol Community Health 2005 May;59(5):342-345. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  47. Nunnally J. Psychometric Theory. In: Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
  48. Fischer SH, David D, Crotty BH, Dierks M, Safran C. Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders. Int J Med Inform 2014 Sep;83(9):624-635 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  49. Morris ME, Adair B, Ozanne E, Kurowski W, Miller KJ, Pearce AJ, et al. Smart technologies to enhance social connectedness in older people who live at home. Australas J Ageing 2014 Sep;33(3):142-152. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  50. Khosravi P, Ghapanchi AH. Investigating the effectiveness of technologies applied to assist seniors: A systematic literature review. Int J Med Inform 2016 Jan;85(1):17-26. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  51. de Veer AJE, Peeters JM, Brabers AEM, Schellevis FG, Rademakers JJDJM, Francke AL. Determinants of the intention to use e-Health by community dwelling older people. BMC Health Serv Res 2015 Mar 15;15:103 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  52. Claes V, Devriendt E, Tournoy J, Milisen K. Attitudes and perceptions of adults of 60 years and older towards in-home monitoring of the activities of daily living with contactless sensors: an explorative study. Int J Nurs Stud 2015 Jan;52(1):134-148. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  53. Ministry of Health. COVID-19 Temporary Fee Schedule Codes Implemented-Physicians Can Begin to Submit Claims for COVID-19 on May 1, 2020. Claims Services Branch, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. 2020 Apr 30.   URL: http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/ohip/bulletins/4000/bul4755.pdf [accessed 2020-10-26]
  54. Savoli A, Barki H, Pare G. Examining How Chronically Ill Patients’ Reactions to and Effective Use of Information Technology Can Influence How Well They Self-Manage Their Illness. MISQ 2020 Jan 01;44(1):351-389. [CrossRef]