Data Every Day: Designing and Living with Personal Situated Visualizations

by | Apr 21, 2022 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Nathalie Bressa
  • Jo Vermeulen
  • Wesley Willett

Abstract:

We explore the design and utility of situated manual self-tracking visualizations on dedicated displays that integrate data tracking into existing practices and physical environments. Situating self-tracking tools in relevant locations is a promising approach to enable reflection on and awareness of data without needing to rely on sensorized tracking or personal devices. In both a long-term autobiographical design process and a co-design study with six participants, we rapidly prototyped and deployed 30 situated self-tracking applications over a ten month period. Grounded in the experience of designing and living with these trackers, we contribute findings on logging and data entry, the use of situated displays, and the visual design and customization of trackers. Our results demonstrate the potential of customizable dedicated self-tracking visualizations that are situated in relevant physical spaces, and suggest future research opportunities and new potential applications for situated visualizations.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517737

References:

  1. Parastoo Abtahi, Victoria Ding, Anna C. Yang, Tommy Bruzzese, Alyssa B. Romanos, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Sean Follmer, and James A. Landay. 2020. Understanding Physical Practices and the Role of Technology in Manual Self-Tracking. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 4, Article 115 (Dec. 2020), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432236Google ScholarDigital Library
  2. Phil Adams, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Michael Elfenbein, Elaine Wethington, and Geri Gay. 2017. Supporting the Self-Management of Chronic Pain Conditions with Tailored Momentary Self-Assessments. In Proc. of CHI ’17. ACM, 1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025832Google ScholarDigital Library
  3. Amid Ayobi, Paul Marshall, Anna L. Cox, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Quantifying the Body and Caring for the Mind: Self-Tracking in Multiple Sclerosis. In Proc. of CHI ’17. ACM, 6889–6901. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025869Google ScholarDigital Library
  4. Amid Ayobi, Tobias Sonne, Paul Marshall, and Anna L. Cox. 2018. Flexible and Mindful Self-Tracking: Design Implications from Paper Bullet Journals. In Proc. of CHI ’18. ACM, Article 28, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173602Google ScholarDigital Library
  5. Dominikus Baur. 2017. Silent Augmented Reality. Hacker Noon (18 Aug 2017). https://hackernoon.com/silent-augmented-reality-f0f7614cab32 https://hackernoon.com/silent-augmented-reality-f0f7614cab32.Google Scholar
  6. Frank Bentley and Konrad Tollmar. 2013. The Power of Mobile Notifications to Increase Wellbeing Logging Behavior. In Proc. of CHI ’13. ACM, 1095–1098. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466140Google ScholarDigital Library
  7. Susanne Bødker, Kaj Grønbæk, and Morten Kyng. 1993. Cooperative design: Techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene. In Participatory design. Principles and practices, Doug Schuler and Aki Namioka (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 157–176.Google Scholar
  8. Michael Bostock, Vadim Ogievetsky, and Jeffrey Heer. 2011. D3: Data-Driven Documents. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Comp. Graphics (Proc. InfoVis) (2011). http://vis.stanford.edu/papers/d3Google Scholar
  9. Nathalie Bressa, Kendra Wannamaker, Henrik Korsgaard, Wesley Willett, and Jo Vermeulen. 2019. Sketching and Ideation Activities for Situated Visualization Design. In Proc. of DIS ’19. ACM, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322326Google ScholarDigital Library
  10. Gharad Bryan, Dean Karlan, and Scott Nelson. 2010. Commitment devices. Annu. Rev. Econ. 2, 1 (2010), 671–698.Google Scholar
  11. Scott Carter and Jennifer Mankoff. 2005. When Participants Do the Capturing: The Role of Media in Diary Studies. In Proc. of CHI ’05. ACM, 899–908. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055098Google ScholarDigital Library
  12. Keith Cheverst, Alan Dix, Daniel Fitton, Mark Rouncefield, and Connor Graham. 2007. Exploring Awareness Related Messaging through Two Situated-Display-Based Systems. Human–Computer Interaction 22, 1-2 (May 2007), 173–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370020701307955Google Scholar
  13. Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Matthew Kay, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. SleepTight: Low-Burden, Self-Monitoring Technology for Capturing and Reflecting on Sleep Behaviors. In Proc. of Ubicomp ’15. ACM, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804266Google ScholarDigital Library
  14. Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Haining Zhu, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Dominikus Baur. 2017. Understanding Self-Reflection: How People Reflect on Personal Data through Visual Data Exploration. In Proc. of PervasiveHealth ’17. ACM, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/3154862.3154881Google ScholarDigital Library
  15. Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B. Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2014. Understanding Quantified-Selfers’ Practices in Collecting and Exploring Personal Data. In Proc. of CHI ’14. ACM, 1143–1152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557372Google ScholarDigital Library
  16. Chia-Fang Chung, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Sonali Mishra, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2017. When Personal Tracking Becomes Social: Examining the Use of Instagram for Healthy Eating. In Proc. of CHI ’17. ACM, 1674–1687. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025747Google ScholarDigital Library
  17. Sandy Claes, Jorgos Coenen, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2018. Conveying a Civic Issue Through Data via Spatially Distributed Public Visualization and Polling Displays. In Proc. of NordiCHI ’18. ACM, 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240206Google ScholarDigital Library
  18. Sandy Claes and Andrew Vande Moere. 2013. Street Infographics: Raising Awareness of Local Issues Through a Situated Urban Visualization. In Proc. of PerDis ’13. ACM, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491568.2491597Google ScholarDigital Library
  19. Jorgos Coenen, Maarten Houben, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2019. Citizen Dialogue Kit: Public Polling and Data Visualization Displays for Bottom-Up Citizen Participation. In Proc. of DIS ’19 Companion. ACM, 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3325160Google ScholarDigital Library
  20. Jorgos Coenen, Eslam Nofal, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2019. How the Arrangement of Content and Location Impact the Use of Multiple Distributed Public Displays. In Proc. of DIS ’19. ACM, 1415–1426. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322294Google ScholarDigital Library
  21. Sunny Consolvo, Katherine Everitt, Ian Smith, and James A. Landay. 2006. Design Requirements for Technologies That Encourage Physical Activity. In Proc. of CHI 06’. ACM, 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124840Google ScholarDigital Library
  22. Nigel Davies, Sarah Clinch, and Florian Alt. 2014. Pervasive Displays: Understanding the Future of Digital Signage. Synthesis Lectures on Mobile and Pervasive Computing 8, 1 (2014), 1–128. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00558ED1V01Y201312MPC011Google ScholarDigital Library
  23. Audrey Desjardins and Aubree Ball. 2018. Revealing Tensions in Autobiographical Design in HCI. In Proc. of DIS ’18. ACM, 753–764. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196781Google ScholarDigital Library
  24. Audrey Desjardins and Ron Wakkary. 2016. Living In A Prototype: A Reconfigured Space. In Proc. of CHI ’16. ACM, 5274–5285. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858261Google ScholarDigital Library
  25. Audrey Desjardins, Ron Wakkary, and William Odom. 2015. Investigating Genres and Perspectives in HCI Research on the Home. In Proc. CHI ’15. ACM, 3073–3082. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702540Google ScholarDigital Library
  26. Laura Devendorf, Kristina Andersen, and Aisling Kelliher. 2020. The Fundamental Uncertainties of Mothering: Finding Ways to Honor Endurance, Struggle, and Contradiction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 4, Article 26 (September 2020), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3397177Google ScholarDigital Library
  27. Laura Devendorf, Joanne Lo, Noura Howell, Jung Lin Lee, Nan-Wei Gong, M. Emre Karagozler, Shiho Fukuhara, Ivan Poupyrev, Eric Paulos, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2016. “I Don’t Want to Wear a Screen”: Probing Perceptions of and Possibilities for Dynamic Displays on Clothing. In Proc. of CHI ’16. ACM, 6028–6039. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858192Google ScholarDigital Library
  28. Christine Dierk, Molly Jane Pearce Nicholas, and Eric Paulos. 2018. AlterWear: Battery-Free Wearable Displays for Opportunistic Interactions. In Proc. of CHI ’18. ACM, Article 220, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173794Google ScholarDigital Library
  29. Alix Ducros, Clemens N. Klokmose, and Aurélien Tabard. 2019. Situated Sketching and Enactment for Pervasive Displays. In Proc. of ISS ’19. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 217–228. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343055.3359702Google ScholarDigital Library
  30. Niklas Elmqvist and Pourang Irani. 2013. Ubiquitous Analytics: Interacting with Big Data Anywhere, Anytime. Computer 46, 04 (apr 2013), 86–89. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2013.147Google ScholarDigital Library
  31. Daniel A. Epstein, Monica Caraway, Chuck Johnston, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2016. Beyond Abandonment to Next Steps: Understanding and Designing for Life after Personal Informatics Tool Use. In Proc. of CHI ’16. ACM, 1109–1113. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858045Google ScholarDigital Library
  32. Daniel A. Epstein, Nicole B. Lee, Jennifer H. Kang, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Laura R. Pina, James Fogarty, Julie A. Kientz, and Sean Munson. 2017. Examining Menstrual Tracking to Inform the Design of Personal Informatics Tools. In Proc. of CHI ’17. ACM, 6876–6888. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025635Google ScholarDigital Library
  33. Daniel A. Epstein, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2015. A Lived Informatics Model of Personal Informatics. In Proc. of Ubicomp ’15. ACM, 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804250Google ScholarDigital Library
  34. Pauline Gourlet and Thierry Dassé. 2017. Cairn: A Tangible Apparatus for Situated Data Collection, Visualization and Analysis. In Proc. of DIS ’17. ACM, 247–258. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064794Google ScholarDigital Library
  35. Rúben Gouveia, Evangelos Karapanos, and Marc Hassenzahl. 2015. How Do We Engage with Activity Trackers? A Longitudinal Study of Habito. In Proc. of Ubicomp ’15. ACM, 1305–1316. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804290Google ScholarDigital Library
  36. Tobias Grosse-Puppendahl, Steve Hodges, Nicholas Chen, John Helmes, Stuart Taylor, James Scott, Josh Fromm, and David Sweeney. 2016. Exploring the Design Space for Energy-Harvesting Situated Displays. In Proc. of UIST ’16. ACM, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984513Google ScholarDigital Library
  37. Kyle Wm. Hall, Adam J. Bradley, Uta Hinrichs, Samuel Huron, Jo Wood, Chris Collins, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2020. Design by Immersion: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Problem-Driven Visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1(2020), 109–118.Google ScholarCross Ref
  38. Daniel Harrison, Paul Marshall, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, and Jon Bird. 2015. Activity Tracking: Barriers, Workarounds and Customisation. In Proc. of Ubicomp ’15. ACM, 617–621. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2805832Google ScholarDigital Library
  39. Yasamin Heshmat, Carman Neustaedter, and Brendan DeBrincat. 2017. The Autobiographical Design and Long Term Usage of an Always-On Video Recording System for the Home. In Proc. of DIS ’17. ACM, 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064759Google ScholarDigital Library
  40. Sarah Homewood, Harvey Bewley, and Laurens Boer. 2019. Ovum: Designing for Fertility Tracking as a Shared and Domestic Experience. In Proc. of DIS ’19. ACM, 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3323692Google ScholarDigital Library
  41. Sarah Homewood, Amanda Karlsson, and Anna Vallgårda. 2020. Removal as a Method: A Fourth Wave HCI Approach to Understanding the Experience of Self-Tracking. In Proc. of DIS ’20. ACM, 1779–1791. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395425Google ScholarDigital Library
  42. Steven Houben, Connie Golsteijn, Sarah Gallacher, Rose Johnson, Saskia Bakker, Nicolai Marquardt, Licia Capra, and Yvonne Rogers. 2016. Physikit: Data Engagement Through Physical Ambient Visualizations in the Home. In Proc. of CHI ’16. ACM, 1608–1619. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858059Google ScholarDigital Library
  43. Yen-Chia Hsu, Paul Dille, Jennifer Cross, Beatrice Dias, Randy Sargent, and Illah Nourbakhsh. 2017. Community-Empowered Air Quality Monitoring System. In Proc. of CHI ’17. ACM, 1607––1619. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025853Google ScholarDigital Library
  44. Dandan Huang, Melanie Tory, Bon Adriel Aseniero, Lyn Bartram, Scott Bateman, Sheelagh Carpendale, Anthony Tang, and Robert Woodbury. 2015. Personal Visualization and Personal Visual Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 21, 3 (March 2015), 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2359887Google ScholarDigital Library
  45. Samuel Huron, Sheelagh Carpendale, Alice Thudt, Anthony Tang, and Michael Mauerer. 2014. Constructive Visualization. In Proc. of DIS ’14. ACM, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598510.2598566Google Scholar
  46. ReporterApp Inc.2020. Reporter App. Web. Retrieved January 31, 2020 from http://reporter-app.com/.Google Scholar
  47. Yvonne Jansen and Pierre Dragicevic. 2013. An Interaction Model for Visualizations Beyond The Desktop. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (Dec 2013), 2396–2405. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.134Google ScholarDigital Library
  48. Thorsten Karrer, Moritz Wittenhagen, Leonhard Lichtschlag, Florian Heller, and Jan Borchers. 2011. Pinstripe: Eyes-Free Continuous Input on Interactive Clothing. In Proc. of CHI ’11. ACM, 1313–1322. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979137Google ScholarDigital Library
  49. Maria Karyda, Merja Ryöppy, Jacob Buur, and Andrés Lucero. 2020. Imagining Data-Objects for Reflective Self-Tracking. In Proc. of CHI ’20. ACM, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376844Google ScholarDigital Library
  50. Fahim Kawsar, Jo Vermeulen, Kevin Smith, Kris Luyten, and Gerd Kortuem. 2011. Exploring the Design Space for Situated Glyphs to Support Dynamic Work Environments. In Proc. of Pervasive ’11. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21726-5_5Google ScholarCross Ref
  51. Matthew Kay, Eun Kyoung Choe, Jesse Shepherd, Benjamin Greenstein, Nathaniel Watson, Sunny Consolvo, and Julie A. Kientz. 2012. Lullaby: A Capture & Access System for Understanding the Sleep Environment. In Proc. of Ubicomp ’12. ACM, 226–234. https://doi.org/10.1145/2370216.2370253Google ScholarDigital Library
  52. Christina Kelley, Bongshin Lee, and Lauren Wilcox. 2017. Self-Tracking for Mental Wellness: Understanding Expert Perspectives and Student Experiences. In Proc. of CHI ’17. ACM, 629–641. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025750Google ScholarDigital Library
  53. Nam Wook Kim, Hyejin Im, Nathalie Henry Riche, Alicia Wang, Krzysztof Gajos, and Hanspeter Pfister. 2019. DataSelfie: Empowering People to Design Personalized Visuals to Represent Their Data. In Proc. of CHI ’19. ACM, Article 79, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300309Google ScholarDigital Library
  54. Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, KwonHyun Kim, and Jinwook Seo. 2016. TimeAware: Leveraging Framing Effects to Enhance Personal Productivity. In Proc. of CHI ’16. ACM, 272–283. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858428Google ScholarDigital Library
  55. Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Bongshin Lee, Eun Kyoung Choe, and Jinwook Seo. 2017. OmniTrack: A Flexible Self-Tracking Approach Leveraging Semi-Automated Tracking. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 67 (Sept. 2017), 28 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130930Google ScholarDigital Library
  56. Lisa Koeman, Vaiva Kalnikaité, and Yvonne Rogers. 2015. “Everyone Is Talking about It!”: A Distributed Approach to Urban Voting Technology and Visualisations. In Proc. CHI ’15. ACM, 3127–3136. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702263Google ScholarDigital Library
  57. Amanda Lazar, Christian Koehler, Joshua Tanenbaum, and David H. Nguyen. 2015. Why We Use and Abandon Smart Devices. In Proc. of Ubicomp ’15. ACM, 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804288Google ScholarDigital Library
  58. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A Stage-Based Model of Personal Informatics Systems. In Proc. of CHI ’10. ACM, 557–566. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753409Google ScholarDigital Library
  59. Ian Li, Anind K. Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2012. Using Context to Reveal Factors That Affect Physical Activity. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 19, 1, Article 7 (May 2012), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2147783.2147790Google ScholarDigital Library
  60. Yuhan Luo, Peiyi Liu, and Eun Kyoung Choe. 2019. Co-Designing Food Trackers with Dietitians: Identifying Design Opportunities for Food Tracker Customization. In Proc. of CHI ’19. ACM, Article 592, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300822Google ScholarDigital Library
  61. Giorgia Lupi and Stefanie Posavec. 2016. Dear Data. Chronicle Books.Google Scholar
  62. Nicolas Maisonneuve, Matthias Stevens, Maria E. Niessen, and Luc Steels. 2009. NoiseTube: Measuring and Mapping Noise Pollution with Mobile Phones. In Information Technologies in Environmental Engineering. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88351-7_16Google Scholar
  63. Kim Marriott, Falk Schreiber, Tim Dwyer, Karsten Klein, Nathalie Henry Riche, Takayuki Itoh, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, and Bruce H. Thomas. 2018. Immersive Analytics. Vol. 11190. Springer.Google Scholar
  64. Matthew Mauriello, Michael Gubbels, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2014. Social Fabric Fitness: The Design and Evaluation of Wearable E-Textile Displays to Support Group Running. In Proc. of CHI ’14. ACM, 2833–2842. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557299Google ScholarDigital Library
  65. Mollie McKillop, Lena Mamykina, and Noémie Elhadad. 2018. Designing in the Dark: Eliciting Self-Tracking Dimensions for Understanding Enigmatic Disease. In Proc. of CHI ’18. ACM, Article 565, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174139Google ScholarDigital Library
  66. Miriah Meyer and Jason Dykes. 2020. Criteria for Rigor in Visualization Design Study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26, 1(2020), 87–97.Google Scholar
  67. Elizabeth L. Murnane, Tara G. Walker, Beck Tench, Stephen Voida, and Jaime Snyder. 2018. Personal Informatics in Interpersonal Contexts: Towards the Design of Technology That Supports the Social Ecologies of Long-Term Mental Health Management. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 127 (nov 2018), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274396Google ScholarDigital Library
  68. Carman Neustaedter, Tejinder K. Judge, and Phoebe Sengers. 2014. Autobiographical design in the home. In Studying and Designing Technology for Domestic Life: Lessons from Home. Vol. 135. Morgan Kaufmann Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
  69. Carman Neustaedter and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Autobiographical Design in HCI Research: Designing and Learning through Use-It-Yourself. In Proc. of DIS ’12. ACM, 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318034Google ScholarDigital Library
  70. Kenton O’Hara, Mark Perry, Elizabeth Churchill, and Daniel Russell. 2003. Public and situated displays: Social and interactional aspects of shared display technologies. Vol. 2. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  71. Simon Olberding, Jürgen Steimle, Suranga Nanayakkara, and Pattie Maes. 2015. CloudDrops: Stamp-Sized Pervasive Displays for Situated Awareness of Web-Based Information. In Proc. of PerDis ’15. ACM, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1145/2757710.2757718Google ScholarDigital Library
  72. Juan Pablo, Piyum Fernando, Priyashri Sridhar, Anusha Withana, Suranga Nanayakkara, Jurgen Steimle, and Pattie Maes. 2016. PostBits: Using Contextual Locations for Embedding Cloud Information in the Home. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 20, 6 (Nov. 2016), 1001–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0967-zGoogle ScholarDigital Library
  73. Gaurav Paruthi, Shriti Raj, Seungjoo Baek, Chuyao Wang, Chuan-che Huang, Yung-Ju Chang, and Mark W. Newman. 2018. Heed: Exploring the Design of Situated Self-Reporting Devices. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 3, Article 132 (Sept. 2018), 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264942Google ScholarDigital Library
  74. Laura Pina, Sang-Wha Sien, Clarissa Song, Teresa M. Ward, James Fogarty, Sean A. Munson, and Julie A. Kientz. 2020. DreamCatcher: Exploring How Parents and School-Age Children Can Track and Review Sleep Information Together. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW1, Article 070 (May 2020), 25 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3392882Google ScholarDigital Library
  75. Bernd Ploderer, Wolfgang Reitberger, Harri Oinas-Kukkonen, and Julia Gemert-Pijnen. 2014. Social Interaction and Reflection for Behaviour Change. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 18, 7 (Oct. 2014), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0779-yGoogle ScholarDigital Library
  76. Henning Pohl, Andreea Muresan, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2019. Charting Subtle Interaction in the HCI Literature. In Proc. of CHI ’19. ACM, Article 418, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300648Google ScholarDigital Library
  77. Ivan Poupyrev, Nan-Wei Gong, Shiho Fukuhara, Mustafa Emre Karagozler, Carsten Schwesig, and Karen E. Robinson. 2016. Project Jacquard: Interactive Digital Textiles at Scale. In Proc. of CHI ’16. ACM, 4216–4227. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858176Google ScholarDigital Library
  78. Zachary Pousman, John Stasko, and Michael Mateas. 2007. Casual Information Visualization: Depictions of Data in Everyday Life. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13, 6 (Nov. 2007), 1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70541Google ScholarDigital Library
  79. Ruth Ravichandran, Sang-Wha Sien, Shwetak N. Patel, Julie A. Kientz, and Laura R. Pina. 2017. Making Sense of Sleep Sensors: How Sleep Sensing Technologies Support and Undermine Sleep Health. In Proc. of CHI ’17. ACM, 6864–6875. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025557Google ScholarDigital Library
  80. Jonathan C Roberts, Panagiotis D Ritsos, Sriram Karthik Badam, Dominique Brodbeck, Jessie Kennedy, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2014. Visualization beyond the Desktop–the Next Big Thing. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 34, 6 (Nov 2014), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2014.82Google ScholarCross Ref
  81. Johnny Rodgers and Lyn Bartram. 2011. Exploring Ambient and Artistic Visualization for Residential Energy Use Feedback. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (Dec 2011), 2489–2497. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.196Google ScholarDigital Library
  82. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2014. Personal Tracking as Lived Informatics. In Proc. of CHI ’14. ACM, 1163–1172. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557039Google ScholarDigital Library
  83. Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign 4, 1 (2008), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068Google ScholarCross Ref
  84. Arvind Satyanarayan, Domink Moritz, Kanit Wongsuphasawat, and Jeffrey Heer. 2017. Vega-Lite: A Grammar of Interactive Graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan 2017), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2599030Google ScholarDigital Library
  85. Samarth Singhal, Carman Neustaedter, William Odom, Lyn Bartram, and Yasamin Heshmat. 2018. Time-Turner: Designing for Reflection and Remembrance of Moments in the Home. In Proc. of CHI ’18. ACM, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173753Google ScholarDigital Library
  86. John Stasko, Todd Miller, Zachary Pousman, Christopher Plaue, and Osman Ullah. 2004. Personalized Peripheral Information Awareness Through Information Art. In Proc. of UbiComp ’04. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 18–35.Google ScholarCross Ref
  87. Alex S. Taylor, Siân Lindley, Tim Regan, David Sweeney, Vasillis Vlachokyriakos, Lillie Grainger, and Jessica Lingel. 2015. Data-in-Place: Thinking through the Relations Between Data and Community. In Proc. of CHI ’15. ACM, 2863–2872. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702558Google ScholarDigital Library
  88. Bruce H. Thomas, Gregory F. Welch, Pierre Dragicevic, Niklas Elmqvist, Pourang Irani, Yvonne Jansen, Dieter Schmalstieg, Aurélien Tabard, Neven A. M. ElSayed, Ross T. Smith, and Wesley Willett. 2018. Situated Analytics. In Immersive Analytics. Springer International Publishing, 185–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01388-2_7Google Scholar
  89. Alice Thudt, Uta Hinrichs, Samuel Huron, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2018. Self-Reflection and Personal Physicalization Construction. In Proc. of CHI ’18. ACM, Article 154, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173728Google ScholarDigital Library
  90. Jo Vermeulen, Fahim Kawsar, Adalberto L. Simeone, Gerd Kortuem, Kris Luyten, and Karin Coninx. 2012. Informing the Design of Situated Glyphs for a Care Facility. In Proc. of IEEE VL/HCC ’12. 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2012.6344490Google ScholarCross Ref
  91. Kendra A. Wannamaker, Sandeep Zechariah George Kollannur, Marian Dörk, and Wesley Willett. 2021. I/O Bits: User-Driven, Situated, and Dedicated Self-Tracking. In Proc. of DIS ’21. ACM, 523–537. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462138Google ScholarDigital Library
  92. Sean White and Steven Feiner. 2009. SiteLens: Situated Visualization Techniques for Urban Site Visits. In Proc. of CHI ’09. ACM, 1117–1120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1518871Google ScholarDigital Library
  93. Wesley Willett, Yvonne Jansen, and Pierre Dragicevic. 2017. Embedded Data Representations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 1 (Jan. 2017), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598608Google ScholarDigital Library
  94. Kaiton Williams. 2015. An Anxious Alliance. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives(CA ’15). Aarhus University Press, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21146Google ScholarDigital Library
  95. Nadia Campo Woytuk, Marie Louise Juul Sondergaard, Marianela Ciolfi Felice, and Madeline Balaam. 2020. Touching and Being in Touch with the Menstruating Body. In Proc. of CHI ’20. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376471Google Scholar
  96. Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Keiji Hirata, Takashi Kudo, Eiji Aramaki, and Kazuki Hattori. 2017. Changing Moods: How Manual Tracking by Family Caregivers Improves Caring and Family Communication. In Proc. of CHI ’17. ACM, 158–169. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025843Google ScholarDigital Library
  97. Rayoung Yang, Eunice Shin, Mark W. Newman, and Mark S. Ackerman. 2015. When Fitness Trackers Don’t “Fit”: End-User Difficulties in the Assessment of Personal Tracking Device Accuracy. In Proc. of Ubicomp ’15. ACM, 623–634. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804269Google ScholarDigital Library