Author:

  • Btihaj Ajana

Abstract:

Recent years have witnessed an intensive growth of systems of measurement and an increasing integration of data processes into various spheres of everyday life. From smartphone apps that measure our activity and sleep, to digital devices that monitor our health and performance at the workplace, the culture of measurement is currently on the rise. Encouraged by movements such as the Quantified Self, whose motto is ‘self knowledge through numbers’, a growing number of people across the globe are embracing practices of self-quantification and tracking in the spirit of improving their wellbeing and productivity or charting their fitness progress. In this article, I examine the biopolitical aspects of the Quantified Self practices, exploring some of the ideologies and rationalities underlying self-tracking culture. I argue that such practices represent an instantiation of a ‘biopolitics of the self’ whereby the body is made amenable to management and monitoring techniques that often echo the ethos of neoliberalism. Rather than being restricted to an individualized form, self-tracking practices are also becoming part of a biosocial and communal phenomenon in which individuals are incited to share with others information about their physical activities and biodata. In exploring some examples of this data sharing culture, I critically address the extent to which the sharing of personal physical data can be seen as a ‘solidaristic’ act that can contribute to a larger Big Data ecosystem and inform the wider medical community and healthcare research and policy. I link this discussion to debates on ‘data philanthropy’, highlighting the emerging tension between philanthropic discourses of data sharing and issues of privacy. From here, I go on to discuss further ethical and political concerns, particularly in relation to data security and the marked shifts in healthcare responsibilities.

Document:

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2055207616689509

References:
1.Lupton D. Digitized health promotion: Personal responsibility for health in the Web 2.0 era, p.3, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237608665_Digitized_health_promotion_personal_responsibility_for_health_in_the_Web_20_era (2013).
Google Scholar
2.Cohen J. Quantified Self: The algorithm of life. http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/arts-and-books/quantified-self-the-algorithm-of-life, (2014).
Google Scholar
3.McFedries P. Tracking the Quantified Self, http://spectrum.ieee.org/at-work/test-and-measurement/tracking-the-quantified-self (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
4.Topol E. How technology is transforming health care, http://health.usnews.com/health-news/hospital-of-tomorrow/articles/2013/07/12/how-technology-is-transforming-health-care (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
5.Fox S and Duggan M. Health online 2013. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
6.Swan, M . Sensor mania: The internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. J Sens Actuator Networks 2012; 1: 217–253.
Google Scholar | Crossref
7.Shin G and Jarrahi M. Studying the role of wearable health-tracking devices in raising users’ self-awareness and motivating physical activities, https://wish2014.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/sub-12-shin_jarrahi_wish_workshop_paper_2014.pdf (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
8.Patel M. Self-tracking and self-change: What’s the connection?, http://www.responsiblegambling.org/docs/default-source/Discovery-2015/disc2015_self-tracking_patel.pdf?sfvrsn=2 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
9.Singer N. Technology that prods you to take action, not just collect data,. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/19/technology/technology-that-prods-you-to-take-action-not-just-collect-data.html?_r=0 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
10.Fogg BJ. Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity., http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=763957 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
11.Pantzar M and Shove E. Metering everyday life: Feedback, feed forward and the dynamics of practice,. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/staff/shove/choreography/meteringdraft.pdf (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
12.Rettberg JW. Seeing ourselves through technology, http://jilltxt.net/books/Seeing-Ourselves-Through-Technology-full-book.pdf (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
13.The Economist. The Quantified Self: Counting every moment. The Economist Technology Quarterly, http://www.economist.com/node/21548493 (2012).
Google Scholar
14.Crawford, K. Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self- tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. Eur J Cultural Studies 2015; 18: 479–496.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
15.Crawford, K. Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self- tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. Eur J Cultural Studies 2015; 18: 480.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
16.BCC Research. Mobile devices driving unprecedented growth in self-monitoring technologies markets, according to BCC Research, http://www.bccresearch.com/pressroom/hlc/mobile-devices-driving-unprecedented-growth-in-self-monitoring-technologies-markets (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
17.Rettberg JW. Seeing ourselves through technology, p.64, http://jilltxt.net/books/Seeing-Ourselves-Through-Technology-full-book.pdf (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
18.Lupton, D . Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Cult Health Sex 2014; 17: 1–14.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
19.De Souza P. Self-tracking and body hacking: The biopolitics of the Quantified Self in the age of neoliberalism, https://bodycartography.wordpress.com/2013/06/11/self-tracking-and-body-hacking-the-biopolitics-of-the-quantified-self-in-the-age-of-neoliberalism/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
20.Martin M. Mind-body problems, http://havenscenter.wisc.edu/files/mind_body.pdf (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
21.Wolf G. The data-driven life, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/magazine/02self-measurement-t.html?_r=0 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
22.Kelly K. In: Takahashi D. Quantifying our lives will be a top trend of 2012, http://venturebeat.com/2012/01/21/quantifying-our-lives-will-be-a-top-trend-of-2012/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
23.Whitson J. Gaming The Quantified Self, http://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/gaming (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
24.Till, C . Exercise as labour: Quantified Self and the transformation of exercise into labour. Societies 2014; 4: 446–462.
Google Scholar | Crossref
25.Moore, P, Robinson, A. The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media Soc 2015; 18(11): 1–19. .
Google Scholar | ISI
26.Bloomberg. Target to offer Fitbits to 335,000 Employees, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-09-15/target-to-offer-health-tracking-fitbits-to-335-000-employees (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
27.Bloomberg. Wear this device so the boss knows you’re losing weight, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-08-21/wear-this-device-so-the-boss-knows-you-re-losing-weight (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
28.Till C. Why do companies want us to be healthy? Corporate wellness, self-tracking and philanthrocapitalism, https://christopherharpertill.wordpress.com/2016/04/06/why-do-companies-want-us-to-be-healthy-corporate-wellness-self-tracking-and-philanthrocapitalism/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
29.Dentzer, S . Rx for the ‘blockbuster drug’ of patient engagement. Health Affairs 2013; 32: 202.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
30.Lupton D. Digitized health promotion: Personal responsibility for health in the Web 2.0 era, 3, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237608665_Digitized_health_promotion_personal_responsibility_for_health_in_the_Web_20_era (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
31.Corporate Wellness Magazine. Business attire: Wearable devices FIT corporate wellness strategies, http://www.corporatewellnessmagazine.com/features/business-attire-wearable-devices-fit-corporate-wellness-strategies/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
32.Lupton D and Selinger E. How obsessive self-tracking is eroding privacy for everyone, http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Passcode/Passcode-Voices/2015/0923/How-obsessive-self-tracking-is-eroding-privacy-for-everyone (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
33.Ajana, B . Recombinant identities: Biometrics and narrative bioethics. J Bioethical Inquiry 2010; 7: 241.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
34.Aas, KF . The body does not lie: Identity, risk and trust in technoculture. Crime Media Culture 2006; 2: 143–158.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
35.Wolf G. The data-driven life, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/magazine/02self-measurement-t.html?_r=0 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
36.Quantid. 5 Reasons why you should be self-tracking, http://www.quantid.co/category/quantified-self/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
37.Moore, P, Robinson, A. The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media Soc 2015, pp. 7.
Google Scholar | ISI
38.Moore, P, Robinson, A. The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media Soc 2015, pp. 7.
Google Scholar | ISI
39.Aas, KF . The body does not lie: Identity, risk and trust in technoculture. Crime Media Culture 2006; 2: 153.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
40.Ajana, B . Governing through biometrics: The biopolitics of identity, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013, pp. 89.
Google Scholar | Crossref
41.Pugliese, J . Biometrics: Bodies, technologies, biopolitics New York: Routledge, 2010.
Google Scholar
42.Magnet . When biometrics fail: Gender, race, and the technology of identity London: Duke University Press, 2011.
Google Scholar
43.Ajana, B . Governing through biometrics: The biopolitics of identity, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
Google Scholar | Crossref
44.Rowse LM. Statistics of the self: Shaping the self through quantified self-tracking. Scripps Senior Thesis, Claremont Colleges, USA, 2015, p.39, http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1656&context=scripps_theses.
Google Scholar
45.Foucault, M . The history of sexuality volume 1: An introduction, New York: Random House, 1978. (1976).
Google Scholar
46.Foucault, M . Society must be defended, lectures at College de France 1975–1976, New York: Picador, 2003.
Google Scholar
47.Foucault, M . Security, territory, and population, lectures at College de France 1977–1978, New York: Picador, 2009.
Google Scholar
48.Foucault, M . The birth of biopolitics, lectures at College de France 1978–1979, New York: Picador, 2010.
Google Scholar
49.Hille L. The Quantified Self – ubiquitous control, http://www.digital-development-debates.org/issue-16-food-farming–trend–the-quantified-self-ubiquitous-control.html (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
50.Hille L. The Quantified Self – ubiquitous control, http://www.digital-development-debates.org/issue-16-food-farming–trend–the-quantified-self-ubiquitous-control.html (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
51.World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health, http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_recommendations/en/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
52.Cooper BB. Is 10,000 steps really the best measurement of our health?, http://thenextweb.com/apps/2013/11/29/10000-steps-really-best-measurement-health/#gref (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
53.Rowse LM. Statistics of the self: Shaping the self through quantified self-tracking. Scripps Senior Thesis, Claremont Colleges, USA, 2015, p.49, http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1656&context=scripps_theses (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
54.Foucault, M . The subject and power. Critical inquiry. 781.
Google Scholar | ISI
55.Vanderbilt T. How Strava is changing the way we ride, http://www.outsideonline.com/1912501/how-strava-changing-way-we-ride (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
56.Hille L. The Quantified Self – ubiquitous control, http://www.digital-development-debates.org/issue-16-food-farming–trend–the-quantified-self-ubiquitous-control.html(accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
57.Wolf G. The data-driven life, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/magazine/02self-measurement-t.html?_r=0 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
58.Lupton, D . The Quantified Self, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2016.
Google Scholar
59.Rabinow, P . Essays on the anthropology of reason, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1996, pp. 99.
Google Scholar
60.Valle CG and Gibbon S. Introduction: Health/illness, biosocialities and culture, http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412015000100067. (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
61.Hagen N. From biosociality to digital biosociality, https://tycho5s.wordpress.com/2010/10/03/from-biosociality-to-digital-biosociality/ (2010).
Google Scholar
62.Lupton D. Lively data, social fitness and biovalue: The intersections of health self-tracking and social media. p.12. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2666324 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
63.Sharon, T . Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philos Technol 2016, pp. 1–29. .
Google Scholar
64.Sharon, T . Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philos Technol 2016, pp. 1–29.
Google Scholar
65.Sharon, T . Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philos Technol 2016, pp. 1–29.
Google Scholar
66.Scholz, SJ . Seeking solidarity. Philos Compass 2015; 10: 725.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
67.Swan, M . Crowdsourced health research studies: An important emerging complement to clinical trials in the public health research ecosystem. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14: e46.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
68.Paton, C. Self-tracking, social media and personal health records for patient empowered self-care. Yearb Med Inform 2012; 7: 16–24. .
Google Scholar | Medline
69.Lupton D. Lively data, social fitness and biovalue: The intersections of health self-tracking and social media, p.10. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2666324 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
70.Patients Like Me. PatientsLikeMe launches “Data for Good” campaign to encourage health data sharing to advance medicine, http://news.patientslikeme.com/press-release/patientslikeme-launches-data-good-campaign-encourage-health-data-sharing-advance-medic (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
71.Patients Like Me. PatientsLikeMe launches “Data for Good” campaign to encourage health data sharing to advance medicine, http://news.patientslikeme.com/press-release/patientslikeme-launches-data-good-campaign-encourage-health-data-sharing-advance-medic (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
72.Rhodes H. Accessing and using data from wearable fitness devices, http://bok.ahima.org/doc?oid=107442#.V5ePSY5zogs (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
73.Patients Like Me. Data for Good, https://www.patientslikeme.com/join/dataforgood (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
74.Baum S. PatientsLikeMe wants to convince patients to share health data through social media campaign, http://medcitynews.com/2014/03/patientslikeme-social-media-campaign-hopes-encourage-patients-share-data/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
75.UNGP. Data philanthropy: Public & private sector data sharing for global resilience, http://www.unglobalpulse.org/blog/data-philanthropy-public-private-sector-data-sharing-global-resilience (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
76.Kirkpatrick R. A new type of philanthropy: Donating data, https://hbr.org/2013/03/a-new-type-of-philanthropy-don&cm_sp=Article-_-Links-_-Top%20of%20Page%20Recirculation (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
77.Raghupathi W and Raghupathi V. Big data analytics in healthcare: Promise and potential, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4341817/#CR14 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
78.Rhodes H. Accessing and using data from wearable fitness devices, http://bok.ahima.org/doc?oid=107442#.V5ePSY5zogs (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
79.Swan, M . Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. J Pers Med 2012; 2: 93.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
80.Verel D. UnitedHealthcare piloting fitness app that pays for healthy behaviour, http://medcitynews.com/2015/03/unitedhealth-piloting-fitness-app-actually-pays/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
81.Hille L. The Quantified Self – ubiquitous control, http://www.digital-development-debates.org/issue-16-food-farming–trend–the-quantified-self-ubiquitous-control.html (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
82.Lupton, D . The Quantified Self, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 2016, pp. 131.
Google Scholar
83.Jordan M and Pfarr N. Forget the Quantified Self. We need to build the Quantified Us, http://www.wired.com/2014/04/forget-the-quantified-self-we-need-to-build-the-quantified-us/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
84.Jordan M and Pfarr N. The Quantified Us: Where small data meets Big Data, https://www.artefactgroup.com/articles/the-quantified-us/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
85.McGonigle, IV . The collective nature of personalized medicine. Genet Res Cambridge 2016; 98: e3.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
86.Quantified Self. The 2015 Quantified Self Public Health Symposium, UCSD campus, 14 May 2015. https://medium.com/quantified-self-public-health/the-2015-quantified-self-public-health-symposium-e8cab0be1dd1#.lj5hjjetq (2015).
Google Scholar
87.Wolf G and Ramirez E. Quantified Self/Public Health Symposium, UCSD campus, 14 May 2015, p.22. http://quantifiedself.com/symposium/Symposium-2014/QSPublicHealth2014_Report.pdf (2014).
Google Scholar
88.Wolf G and Ramirez E. Quantified Self/Public Health Symposium, UCSD campus, 14 May 2015, p.10. http://quantifiedself.com/symposium/Symposium-2014/QSPublicHealth2014_Report.pdf (2014).
Google Scholar
89.Health Data Exploration Project. Personal data for the public good: Final report, p.12. http://hdexplore.calit2.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/hdx_final_report_small.pdf (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
90.Health Data Exploration Project. Personal data for the public good: Final report, p.34. http://hdexplore.calit2.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/hdx_final_report_small.pdf (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
91.Babe A. Wearable fitness devices: Who owns your data? http://www.safebee.com/tech/wearable-fitness-devices-who-owns-your-data (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
92.Lee MS. Who owns your steps?, https://www.buzzfeed.com/stephaniemlee/who-owns-your-steps?utm_term=.btOENXamgr#.utj6P2XzOQ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
93.Fitbit. Privacy policy, https://www.fitbit.com/dk/privacy (accessed 1 July 2016).
Google Scholar
94.Kirkpatrick R. A new type of philanthropy: donating data, https://hbr.org/2013/03/a-new-type-of-philanthropy-don&cm_sp=Article-_-Links-_-Top%20of%20Page%20Recirculation (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
95.Yakowitz J. Tragedy of the data commons, https://works.bepress.com/jane_yakowitz/1/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
96.Leetaru K. Are research ethics obsolete in the era of Big Data?, http://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2016/06/17/are-research-ethics-obsolete-in-the-era-of-big-data/#5ee60571cb9a (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
97.Peppet, S . Unraveling privacy: The personal prospectus & the threat of a full disclosure. Northwest Univ Law Rev 2011; 105(3): 1153–1204.
Google Scholar | ISI
98.Wartenberg D and Thompson WD. Privacy versus public health: the impact of current confidentiality rules, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2820076/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
99.O’Keefe CM and Rubin DB. Individual privacy versus public good: Protecting confidentiality in health research, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26045214 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
100.Bernal P. ‘Individual privacy vs collective security?’ No!, https://paulbernal.wordpress.com/2013/10/17/individual-privacy-vs-collective-security-no/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
101.Fairfield JAT and Engel C. Privacy as a public good, https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3824&context=dlj (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
102.Bernal P. Privacy isn’t selfish, https://paulbernal.wordpress.com/2014/01/21/privacy-isnt-selfish/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
103.Symantec. How safe is your quantified self?, https://www.symantec.com/content/dam/symantec/docs/white-papers/how-safe-is-your-quantified-self-en.pdf (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
104.Pennic F. Is your self-tracking health app or device really secure?, http://hitconsultant.net/2014/08/21/is-your-self-tracking-health-app-or-device-really-secure/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
105.Fitbit. Privacy policy, https://www.fitbit.com/dk/privacy (accessed 1 July 2016).
Google Scholar
106.Fitbit. Privacy policy, https://www.fitbit.com/dk/privacy (accessed 1 July 2016).
Google Scholar
107.Olson P. Fitbit data now being used in the courtroom, http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2014/11/16/fitbit-data-court-room-personal-injury-claim/#147232c2209f (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
108.Alba A. Police, attorneys are using fitness trackers as court evidence, http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/police-attorneys-fitness-trackers-court-evidence-article-1.2607432 (accessed 1 July 2016).
Google Scholar
109.Alba A. Police, attorneys are using fitness trackers as court evidence, http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/police-attorneys-fitness-trackers-court-evidence-article-1.2607432 (accessed 1 July 2016).
Google Scholar
110.DataFloq. The problem with de-identification as a privacy control, https://datafloq.com/read/problem-de-identification-privacy-control/140 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
111.Schoen S. What Information is “Personally Identifiable”?, https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/09/what-information-personally-identifiable (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
112.Narayanan A and Shmatikov V. Robust de-anonymization of large datasets (how to break anonymity of the Netflix prize dataset), http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/0610105.pdf?utm_source=datafloq&utm_medium=ref&utm_campaign=datafloq (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
113.DataFloq. The problem with de-identification as a privacy control, https://datafloq.com/read/problem-de-identification-privacy-control/140 (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
114.Van der Ploeg I. The politics of biometric identification: Normative aspects of automated social categorization, p.13, www.biteproject.org/documents/politics_of_biometric_identity%20.pdf (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
115.Ajana, B . Augmented borders: Big Data and the ethics of immigration control. J Inform Commun Ethics Soc 2015; 13: 58–78.
Google Scholar | Crossref
116.Dwork C and Mulligan DK. It’s not privacy, and it’s not fair, www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/privacy-and-big-data/its-not-privacy-and-its-not-fair (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar
117.De Souza P. Self-tracking and body hacking: The biopolitics of the Quantified Self in the age of neoliberalism, https://bodycartography.wordpress.com/2013/06/11/self-tracking-and-body-hacking-the-biopolitics-of-the-quantified-self-in-the-age-of-neoliberalism/ (accessed 1 February 2016).
Google Scholar