Exploratory study of the implications of research on the use of smart connected devices for prevention: A scoping review

by | Jul 11, 2016 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Petit, Audrey
  • Cambon, Linda

Abstract:

Background: Smart devices and mobile applications are now an integral part of all aspects of everyday life. They are particularly numerous in the field of health, contributing to the movement called ehealth. What is the potential role of these devices as prevention supports? The purpose of this article is to provide an exploratory analysis of the use, efficacy and contribution to conventional prevention strategies.

Methods: To address this issue, we conducted a scoping-review on the basis of 105 publications from the fields of medicine and human sciences. Results: Three dimensions of the use of smart devices in the field of health were identified: 1/a quantification tool allowing the users to measure their activities; 2/a tool of self-positioning in the community; 3/an interface between the medical world and the population, modifying the hierarchy of knowledge. However, few published studies have investigated the determinants of the efficacy of these devices and their impact on individual behaviours and professional health practices.

Conclusion: Based on the hypothesis of possible integration of these devices in prevention policies, it would be interesting to investigate two research issues: how and under what psycho-socio-environmental conditions can smart devices contribute to the adoption of positive health behaviours? To what degree does the use of smart devices modify the health care professional-patient relationship? Finding answers to these questions could help to define the real place of these devices in prevention strategies by determining their complementarity with respect to other prevention strategies, and the conditions of their efficacy on behaviours and inequalities.

Document:

https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-016-3225-4#Bib1

References:
  1. Benferhat D. Conception d’un système de communication tolérant la connectivité intermittente pour capteurs mobiles biométriques. Application à la supervision médicale de l’activité cardiaque de marathoniens [Thèse de doctorat en informatique]. Université de Bretagne Sud; 2013.
  2. 2.Swan M. Sensor mania! The internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. J Sens Actuator Netw. 2012;1(3):217–53.Article  Google Scholar 
  3. 3.Lendrevie J, Lévy J. Mercator 11e édition – Tout le marketing à l’ère numérique. Avec e-book. 11th ed. Paris: Dunod; 2014. p. 1040. Google Scholar 
  4. 4.Bellanger-Trely M-V. Vade-Mecum des objets connectés. Réalités, tendances et futur proche. APSSIS. APSSIS; 2014.
  5. 5.IREPS Bretagne. Santé connectée…que la magie opère! Horiz Plur. 2015;(28).
  6. 6.Dupagne D. E-santé. Communications. 2011;n° 88(1):57–65.Article  Google Scholar 
  7. 7.Robin J-Y. L’urgence numérique. Faire de la France un leader de l’e-santé. L’Harmattan. 2014. p. 214.
  8. 8.Wiederhold BK. Self-tracking: better medicine through pattern recognition. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012;15(5):235–6.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  9. 9.CATEL. Préconisations e-santé 2014. Catel; 2014. p. 69
  10. 10.Conseil national de l’Ordre des médecins. Santé connectée. De la e-santé à la santé connectée. Le livre blanc du Conseil National de l’Ordre des Médecins. 2015. Google Scholar 
  11. 11.Eysenbach G. What is e-health? J Med Internet Res [Internet]. 2001;3(2):E20 [cited 2015 Oct 9].CAS  Article  Google Scholar 
  12. 12.Garel P. Systèmes d’information en santé et TIC. E-Santé Etat Lieux Eur. 2011;539:78–80. Google Scholar 
  13. 13.Eysenbach G. Medecine 2.0 : social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation and openness. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e22.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  14. 14.Salmon FD, Tallec LL. La e-santé: de nouveaux usages pour les technologies individuelles en santé publique. Ann Mines – Réal Ind. 2014;2014(4):70–5.Article  Google Scholar 
  15. 15.Benhamou P-Y, Muller M, Lablanche S, Debaty I. La télémédecine au service de la prise en charge des patients diabétiques; développements actuels et conditions du succès. Eur Res Telemed Rech Eur En Télémédecine. 2013;2(1):23–8.Article  Google Scholar 
  16. 16.Hazebroucq V, Fery-Lemmonier E. Apports de la téléradiologie dans la prise en charge des urgences neuroradiologiques./data/revues/01509861/00310004/334/[Internet]. 2008 [cited 2015 Oct 22]. Google Scholar 
  17. 17.Avraam M, Horodinca M, Letier P, Preumont A. Portable smart wrist rehabilitation device driven by rotational MR-fluid brake actuator for telemedecine applications. In: IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2008 IROS 2008. 2008. p. 1441–6. Google Scholar 
  18. 18.Bignolas G. Filieris: un modèle organisationnel des soins. Gerontol Soc. 2012;HS 1(5):137–48. Google Scholar 
  19. 19.Dubey G. Les nouvelles technologies en autonomie et santé : un déplacement des frontières de la connaissance. Ann Mines – Réal Ind. 2014;4:82–8.Article  Google Scholar 
  20. 20.Giustini D. How Web 2.0 is changing medicine. BMJ. 2006;333(7582):1283–4.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  21. 21.Merloz P. À quoi servent les nouvelles technologies en médecine et en chirurgie ? Ann Mines – Réal Ind. 2014;2014(4):12–6.Article  Google Scholar 
  22. 22.Vial A. Les technologies s’opposent-elles à la médecine humaniste ? une (fausse) question vieille comme le monde. Ann Mines – Réal Ind. 2014;4:6–11.Article  Google Scholar 
  23. 23.Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci IS. 2010;5:69.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  24. 24.Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada. Guide sur la synthèse des connaissances – IRSC [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2015 Nov 12]. Google Scholar 
  25. 25.Mother L, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.Article  Google Scholar 
  26. 26.Babineau J. Product review: covidence (Systematic Review Software). J Can Health Libr Assoc J Assoc Bibl Santé Can. 2014;35(2):68–71.Article  Google Scholar 
  27. 27.Beauchet O, Launay CP, Merjagnan C, Kabeshova A, Annweiler C. Quantified self and comprehensive geriatric assessment: older adults are able to evaluate their own health and functional status. Plos One. 2014;9(6):e100636.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  28. 28.Swan M. Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6(2):492–525.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  29. 29.Cotteret M-A. Mesurez vous de la métrologie à l’autonomie. Ovadia. 2008. 130p.
  30. 30.Gadenne E, Devesa F, Wolf M. Guide pratique du Quantified Self. Mieux gérer sa vie, sa santé, sa productivité. Limoges: Editions Fyp; 2012. p. 224. Google Scholar 
  31. 31.Ahmadvand A, Whittaker R, Lim MSC. Placing prevention in the pockets: the role of mHealth. In: Adibi S, editor. Preventive medical services. Boca Raton: Crc Press-Taylor & Francis Group; 2015. Google Scholar 
  32. 32.Pharabond A-S, Nikolski V, Granjon F. La mise en chiffres de soi: une approche compréhensive des mesures personnelles. Réseaux. 2013;177(1):97–129.Article  Google Scholar 
  33. 33.Laguna P, Thakor NV, Caminal P, Jané R, Yoon H-R, de Luna AB, et al. New algorithm for QT interval analysis in 24-hour Holter ECG: performance and applications. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990;28(1):67–73.CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  34. 34.Reiter H, Naujokat E, Pinter R, Devot S. TakeCare: A Home-based Sensor System for the Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors Primary prevention by monitoring vital body signs, analysing the data and closing the loop by feedback, coaching, and motivation. New York: Ieee; 2008. Google Scholar 
  35. 35.CNIL. Le corps, nouvel objet connecté. Cahiers Innovation et Prospective n°2. 2014. Google Scholar 
  36. 36.Canguilhem G. Le normal et le pathologique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France; 1966. Google Scholar 
  37. 37.Arruabarrena B, Quettier P. Des rituels de l’automesure numérique à la fabrique autopoïétique de soi. Cah Numér. 2013;9(3):41–62.Article  Google Scholar 
  38. 38.Mondoux A. À propos du social dans les médias sociaux. Termin Technol Inf Cult Société. 2012;111:69–79. Google Scholar 
  39. 39.Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e11.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  40. 40.Manski CF. Identification of endogenous social effects: the reflection problem. Rev Econ Stud. 1993;60(3):531–42.Article  Google Scholar 
  41. 41.Granjon F, Denouël J. Exposition de soi et reconnaissance de singularités subjectives sur les sites de réseaux sociaux. Sociologie. 2010;1(1):25–43.Article  Google Scholar 
  42. 42.Cardon D, Delaunay-Téterel H. La production de soi comme technique relationnelle. Réseaux. 2006;138(4):15–71.Article  Google Scholar 
  43. 43.Aguiton C, Cardon D, Castelain A, Fremaux P, Girard H, Granjon F, et al. Does Showing Off Help to Make Friends? Experimenting a Sociological Game on Self-Exhibition and Social Networks. In: Third International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2015 Oct 9]. Google Scholar 
  44. 44.Caldwell T. The quantified self: a threat to enterprise security? Comput Fraud Secur. 2014;11:16–20.Article  Google Scholar 
  45. 45.Delmotte H. De la e-santé à la santé connectée: accompagner la transformation de notre modèle de santé. Hegel. 2015;2(5):123–6. Google Scholar 
  46. 46.Casilli A. Usages numériques en santé : conflictualité épistémique et sociale dans les communautés de patients en ligne. In: n Claude-Marie Laedlein-Greilsammer (dir) Internet: des promesses pour la santé? Actes des Journée 2011 Euro Cos Humanisme et Santé [Internet]. Paris: Editions de santé; 2011. p. 181–91 [cited 2015 Oct 22]. Google Scholar 
  47. 47.van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Shaw BR, Seydel ER, van de Laar MAFJ. Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia. Qual Health Res. 2008;18(3):405–17.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  48. 48.Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ. 1999;319(7212):780–2.CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  49. 49.Vallancien G. La médecine sans médecin ? Le numérique au service du malade. Paris: Gallimard; 2015. Google Scholar 
  50. 50.Wernette F. L’e-santé, un colosse aux pieds d’argile. Actual Pharm. 2015;54(544):23–30. Google Scholar 
  51. 51.Caniard E. Avant-propos. Ann Mines – Réal Ind. 2014;4:3–5.Article  Google Scholar 
  52. 52.Jouet E, Flora L, Las Vergnas O. Construction et reconnaissance des savoirs expérentiels. Note de synthèse. Pratique de formation- analyses. Université Paris 7 (France) Centre de recherche éducation et formation; 2010.
  53. 53.Brouard B. Les nouvelles technologies de la communication au service de la santé. Actual Pharm. 2015;54(544):18–22. Google Scholar 
  54. 54.Frost JH, Massagli MP. Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another’s data. J Med Internet Res. 2008;10(3):e15.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  55. 55.Laubie R. Le patient connecté ou les métamorphoses de la santé. Expans Manag Rev. 2011;143(4):24–31.Article  Google Scholar 
  56. 56.Akrich M, Méadel C. Les échanges entre patients sur l’Internet. Presse Med. 2009;38(10):1484–90.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  57. 57.Mayoh J. Will the development of Web 2.0 technology result in a preference for quantity over quality? In Toronto, Canada; 2008 [cited 2015 Oct 23].
  58. 58.Valdez RS, Brennan PF. Exploring patients’ health information communication practices with social network members as a foundation for consumer health IT design. Int J Med Inf. 2015;84(5):363–74.Article  Google Scholar 
  59. 59.Magnezi R, Grosberg D, Novikov I, Ziv A, Shani M, Freedman LS. Characteristics of patients seeking health information online via social health networks versus general Internet sites: a comparative study. Inform Health Soc Care. 2015;40(2):125–38.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  60. 60.Magnezi R, Bergman YS, Grosberg D. Online activity and participation in treatment affects the perceived efficacy of social health networks among patients with chronic illness. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(1):e12.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  61. 61.Medina EL, Loques Filho O, Mesquita CT. Health social networks as online life support groups for patients with cardiovascular diseases. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013;101(2):E39–44.PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  62. 62.Delory-Momberger C, Tourette-Turgis C. Vivre avec la maladie. Sujet Dans Cité. 2014;5(2):33–8. Google Scholar 
  63. 63.Mitchell S. Women Wading Through the Web: providing women with the tools to evaluate online health information. Med 20 Conf [Internet]. 2008 Nov 6 [cited 2015 Oct 23].
  64. 64.Béranger J, Bouadi R. Approche éthico-juridique de l’usage des données médicales à caractère personnel. Cah Numér. 2014;10(2):93–123.Article  Google Scholar 
  65. 65.Lucas J. Diffusion des informations médicales à l’épreuve des usagers de l’Internet: quelques réflexions d’éthique et de déontologie. Presse Med. 2009;38(10):1451–5.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  66. 66.Gagnon M-P, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, Car J, Pagliari C, Pluye P, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst. 2012;36(1):241–77.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  67. 67.Gund A, Lindecrantz K, Schaufelberger M, Patel H, Arne B. Attitudes among healthcare professionals towards ICT and home follow-up in chronic heart failure care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:138.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  68. 68.Ward R, Stevens C, Brentnall P, Briddon J. The attitudes of health care staff to information technology: a comprehensive review of the research literature. Health Inf Libr J. 2008;25(2):81–97.Article  Google Scholar 
  69. 69.Dünnebeil S, Sunyaev A, Blohm I, Leimeister JM, Krcmar H. Determinants of physicians’ technology acceptance for e-health in ambulatory care. Int J Med Inf. 2012;81(11):746–60.Article  Google Scholar 
  70. 70.Eley R, Fallon T, Soar J, Buikstra E, Hegney D. Barriers to use of information and computer technology by Australia’s nurses: a national survey. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(8):1151–8.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  71. 71.Richards H, King G, Reid M, Selvaraj S, McNicol I, Brebner E, et al. Remote working: survey of attitudes to eHealth of doctors and nurses in rural general practices in the United Kingdom. Fam Pract. 2005;22(1):2–7.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  72. 72.Sandrin-Berthon B. L’éducation du patient au secours de la médecine. PUF. 2010. 198 p. (Education et formation).
  73. 73.Eymard C, Gatto F, Dodo J, Plat F. Exister avec le diabète de type 1 : l’éducation à la santé face aux savoirs expérientiel des patients. Diabètes Educ. 2005;2(15):8–16. Google Scholar 
  74. 74.Gros J. Santé et nouvelles technologies de l’information. Note d’Iéna. 2002 avril No.: 98.
  75. 75.Dattakumar A, Gray K, Maeder A, Butler-Henderson K. Ehealth Education for Future Clinical Health Professionals: An Integrated Analysis of Australian Expectations and Challenges. In: Lehmann CU, Ammenwerth E, Nohr C, editors. Medinfo 2013: Proceedings of the 14th World Congress on Medical and Health Informatics, Pts 1 and 2. Amsterdam: Ios Press; 2013. p. 954. Google Scholar 
  76. 76.Lapao LV, Gregorio J, Ferreira T, Cavaco A, Lovis C, Russo G, et al. eHealth Services for Enhanced Pharmaceutical care Provision: From Counseling to Patient Education. 2013, Ieee 2nd Int Conf Serious Games Appl Health Segah. 2013. Google Scholar 
  77. 77.Bygholm A, Gunther J, Bertelsen P, Nohr C. eHealth Education of Professionals in the Baltic Sea Area. In: Mantas J, Andersen SK, Mazzoleni MC, Blobel B, Quaglini S, Moen A, editors. Quality of Life Through Quality of Information. Amsterdam: Ios Press; 2012. p. 934–8. Google Scholar 
  78. 78.Stellefson M, Hanik B, Chaney B, Chaney D, Tennant B, Chavarria EA. eHealth literacy among college students: a systematic review with implications for eHealth education. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):e102.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  79. 79.Clark J, Baker B, Baker D. Getting eHealth into Basic Nursing Education: Report of the RCN Information in Nursing Project. In: Saranto K, Brennan PF, Park HA, Tallberg M, Ensio A, editors. Connecting Health and Humans. Amsterdam: I O S Press; 2009. p. 534–9. Google Scholar 
  80. 80.Zvarova J. Education in Biomedical Informatics and eHealth. In: Blobel B, Pharow P, Nerlich M, editors. Ehealth: combining health telematics, telemedicine, biomedical engineering and bioinformatics to the edge: global experts summit textbook. Amsterdam: Ios Press; 2008. p. 27–32. Google Scholar 
  81. 81.Moulin T, Retel O, Chavot D. Impacts des nouvelles technologies informatiques et de communication (NTIC) sur l’organisation hospitalière et la prise en charge des patients : Réseau d’Aide au Diagnostic et aux Soins des Urgences Neurologiques (RAIDS-UN). Santé Publique. 2003;Vol. 15(HS):191–200. Google Scholar 
  82. 82.Mathieu-Fritz A, Esterle L. Les transformations des pratiques professionnelles lors des téléconsultations médicales. Coopération interprofessionnelle et délégation des tâches. Rev Fr Sociol. 2013;54(2):303–29.Article  Google Scholar 
  83. 83.Esterle L, Mathieu-Fritz A, Espinoza P. L’impact des consultations à distance sur les pratiques médicales : vers un nouveau métier de médecin? Rev Fr Aff Soc. 2011;2–3:63–79. Google Scholar 
  84. 84.Strauss AL. La trame de la négociation: sociologie qualitative et interactionnisme. Paris: L’Harmattan; 1992. Google Scholar 
  85. 85.Andrieu B. L’autosanté : Vers une médecine réflexive. Armand Colin; 2012. p. 256.
  86. 86.Silber D. Médecine 2.0; les enjeux de la médecine participative. Presse Med. 2009;38(10):1456–62.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  87. 87.Silber D. L’Internet et le partage de la décision médicale entre patients et professionnels de santé. Presse Med. 2009;38(10):1491–3.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  88. 88.Martin B. La quantification de soi dans les réseaux socionumériques [Mémoire de maîtrise en communication]. [Montréal]: Université du Québac; 2014. Google Scholar 
  89. 89.Thornquist E, Kirkengen AL. The quantified self: closing the gap between general knowledge and particular case? J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21(3):398–403.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  90. 90.Shull P, Jirattigalachote W, Hunt MA, Cutkosky MR, Delp SL. Quantified self and human movement : a review on the clinical impact of wearable sensing and feedback for gait analysis and intervention. Gait Posture. 2014;40:11–9.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  91. 91.Van den Bulck J. Sleep apps and the quantified self : blessing or curse? J Sleep Res. 2015;2(24):121–3.Article  Google Scholar 
  92. 92.Goyal S, Morita P, Lewis GF, Yu C, Seto E, Cafazzo JA. The systematic design of a behavioural mobile health application for the self-management of type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2016;40(1):95–104.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  93. 93.Hutchesson MJ, Rollo ME, Krukowski R, Ells L, Harvey J, Morgan PJ, et al. eHealth interventions for the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(5):376–92.CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  94. 94.Tate EB, Spruijt-Metz D, O’Reilly G, Jordan-Marsh M, Gotsis M, Pentz MA, et al. mHealth approaches to child obesity prevention: successes, unique challenges, and next directions. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(4):406–15.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  95. 95.Odeny TA, Newman M, Bukusi EA, McClelland RS, Cohen CR, Camlin CS. Developing content for a mHealth intervention to promote postpartum retention in prevention of Mother-To-Child HIV transmission programs and early infant diagnosis of HIV: a qualitative study. Plos One. 2014;9(9):e106383.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  96. 96.Muessig KE, Bien CH, Wei C, Lo EJ, Yang M, Tucker JD, et al. A mixed-methods study on the acceptability of using eHealth for HIV prevention and sexual health care among men who have sex with men in China. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(4):e100.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  97. 97.Noar SM, Willoughby JF. eHealth interventions for HIV prevention. Aids Care-Psychol Socio-Med Asp AidsHiv. 2012;24(8):945–52.Article  Google Scholar 
  98. 98.Sanchez MA, Rabin BA, Gaglio B, Henton M, Elzarrad MK, Purcell P, et al. A systematic review of eHealth cancer prevention and control interventions: new technology, same methods and designs? Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(4):392–401.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  99. 99.Elliot DL, Lindemulder SJ, Goldberg L, Stadler DD, Smith J. Health promotion for adolescent childhood leukemia survivors: building on prevention science and ehealth. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60(6):905–10.Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 
  100. 100.Davis SW, Oakley-Girvan I. mHealth education applications along the cancer continuum. J Cancer Educ Off J Am Assoc Cancer Educ. 2015;30(2):388–94.Article  Google Scholar 
  101. 101.Pacaud D, Kelley H, Downey AM, Chiasson M. Successful delivery of diabetes self-care education and follow-up through eHealth media. Can J Diabetes. 2012;36(5):257–62.Article  Google Scholar 
  102. 102.Steinberg DM, Levine EL, Lane I, Askew S, Foley PB, Puleo E, et al. Adherence to self-monitoring via interactive voice response technology in an eHealth intervention targeting weight gain prevention among black women: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):105–16.Article  Google Scholar 
  103. 103.Atkinson NL, Saperstein SL, Desmond SM, Gold RS, Billing AS, Tian J. Rural eHealth nutrition education for limited-income families: an iterative and user-centered design approach. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(2):e21.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 
  104. 104.Granjon F. Fracture numérique. Communications. 2011;88(1):67–74.Article  Google Scholar 
  105. 105.Zhang X, Yu P, Yan J, Spil ITAM. Using diffusion of innovation theory to understand the factors impacting patient acceptance and use of consumer e-health innovations: a case study in a primary care clinic. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):71.Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar