Author(s):

  • Julie Passanante Elman

Abstract: 

By examining advertisements, technological design, workplace wellness programs, and legal discourses involving Fitbit activity trackers, this article examines how cultural ideas about disability infuse the representation, use, study, and implementation of wearable technology. Although Fitbit features wheelchair users prominently in advertising, Fitbit only measures movements in steps, and its use in workplace wellness programs has been accompanied by legal concerns about wellness programs’ potential weakening of workplace protections afforded to US workers by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). This article shows that inspirational and tragic representations of disability work to depoliticize wearable technology and argues that disability needs to be a more central category of analysis for cultural studies and sociological studies of the cultural impacts of fitness tracking and wellness culture.

Document:

https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818760312

References: 

Abelson, R (2016) AARP sues over rules for wellness programs. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/25/business/employee-wellness-programs-prompt-aarp-lawsuit.html?_r=0 (accessed 22 September 2017).

Google Scholar

Alper, M (2017) Giving Voice: Mobile Communication, Disability, and Inequality. Amherst, MA: MIT Press.

Google Scholar | Crossref

Begley, S (2015) Coming soon to a workplace near you: “Wellness or else.” Reuters. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-healthcare-wellness-insight/coming-soon-to-a-workplace-near-you-wellness-or-else-idUSKBN0KM17C20150113 (accessed September 2017).

Google Scholar

Begley, S (2017) House republicans would let employers demand workers’ genetic test results. STAT. Available at: https://www.statnews.com/2017/03/10/workplace-wellness-genetic-testing/ (accessed September 2017).

Google Scholar

Brownlee, J (2017) How Apple made the watch work for wheelchair users—Where business and design collide. Available at: https://www.fastcodesign.com/3061283/how-apple-made-the-watch-work-for-wheelchair-users (accessed September 2017).

Google Scholar

Butler-Wall, K (2015) Risky measures: digital technologies and the governance of child obesity. Women’s Studies Quarterly 43(1–2): 228–245.

Google Scholar

Clare, E (1999) Exile and Pride: Disability, Queerness, and Liberation. Boston, MA: South End Press.

Google Scholar

Clare, E (2017) Brilliant Imperfection: Grappling with Cure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Google Scholar

Community.fitbit.com (2017) Using Fitbit in a wheelchair. Available at: https://community.fitbit.com/t5/Flex/Using-Fitbit-in-a-wheelchair/td-p/2115100?nobounce (accessed September 2017).

Google Scholar

Comstock, J (2015) Fitbit becomes HIPAA-compliant, signs Target, unveils large-scale challenge feature. Available at: http://www.mobihealthnews.com/46824/fitbit-becomes-hipaa-compliant-signs-target-unveils-large-scale-challenge-feature (accessed September 2017).

Google Scholar

Cramer, JM (2009) Critical discourse analysis. In: Littlejohn, SW, Foss, KA (eds) Encyclopedia of Communication Theory. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, pp. 220–223.

Google Scholar

Ellcessor, E (2016) Restricted Access: Media, Disability, and the Politics of Participation. New York: NYU Press.

Google Scholar

Ellcessor, E, Kirkpatrick, B (2017) Disability Media Studies. New York: NYU Press.

Google Scholar | Crossref

Ellis, K, Kent, M (2017) Disability and Social Media: Global Perspectives. London: Routledge.

Google Scholar

Elman, JP (2014) Chronic Youth: Disability, Sexuality, and U.S. Media Cultures of Rehabilitation. New York: NYU Press.

Google Scholar

Evenson, KR, Goto, MM, Furberg, RD (2015) Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. Available at: https://ijbnpa.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12966-015-0314-1 (accessed September 2017).

Google Scholar

Garland-Thomson, R (1997) Extraordinary Bodies. New York: Columbia University Press.

Google Scholar

Gilmore, J (2016) Everywear: the quantified self and wearable fitness technologies. New Media & Society 18(11): 2524–2539.

Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Goggin, G (2016) Disability and mobilities: evening up social futures. Mobilities 11(4): 533–541.

Google Scholar

Goode, A, Hall, KS, Batch, BC. (2016) The impact of interventions that integrate accelerometers on physical activity and weight loss: a systematic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 51(1): 79–93.

Google Scholar

Gouge, C, Jones, J (2016) Wearable rhetorics: bodies, cities, collectives. Rhetorical Studies Quarterly 46(3): 199–283.

Google Scholar

Hamraie, A (2012) Universal design research as a new materialist practice. Disability Studies Quarterly 32(4). Available at: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3246/3185.

Google Scholar

Hamraie, A (2017) Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Google Scholar

Haraway, D (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York: Routledge.

Google Scholar

Hayles, N (2010 [1999]) How We Became Posthuman. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Google Scholar

Jain, S (1999) The prosthetic imagination: enabling and disabling the prosthesis trope. Science, Technology, & Human Values 24(1): 31–54.

Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Jakicic, J, Davis, KK, Rogers, RJ. (2016) Effect of wearable technology combined with a lifestyle intervention on long-term weight loss. Journal of the American Medical Association 316(11): 1161–1171.

Google Scholar | Medline | ISI

Kafer, A (2013) Feminist, Queer, Crip. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Google Scholar

Kirkland, A (2008) Fat Rights: Dilemmas of Difference and Personhood. New York: New York University Press.

Google Scholar

Lamkin, P (2016) Wearable tech market to be worth $34 billion by 2020. Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/paullamkin/2016/02/17/wearable-tech-market-to-be-worth-34-billion-by-2020/#f94d0313cb55 (accessed January 2018).

Google Scholar

Langan, C (2001) Mobility disability. Public Culture 13(3): 459–484.

Google Scholar

Lebesco, K (2003) Revolting Bodies: The Struggle to Redefine Fat Identity. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.

Google Scholar

Locklear, M (2017) Fitbit’s Ionic smartwatch will help diabetics track glucose levels. Engadget. Available at: https://www.engadget.com/2017/09/07/fitbit-ionic-smartwatch-help-diabetics-track-glucose/ (accessed September 2017).

Google Scholar

Lunney, A, Cunningham, NR, Eastin, MS (2016) Wearable fitness technology: a structural investigation into acceptance and perceived fitness outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior 65: 114–120.

Google Scholar | ISI

Lupton, D (2016) The Quantified Self. New York: Polity.

Google Scholar

McRuer, R (2006) Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York: New York University Press.

Google Scholar

McRuer, R (2018) Crip Times: Disability, Globalization, and Resistance. New York: New York University Press.

Google Scholar

Mauldin, L (2014) On dialogue: disability studies and science & technology studies. Somatosphere. Available at: http://somatosphere.net/2014/05/on-dialogue-disability-studies-and-science-technology-studies.html (accessed September 2017).

Google Scholar

Michaels, KE (2016) Flambeau Inc. wellness program testing falls within ADA safe harbor. Available at: https://www.mwe.com/en/thought-leadership/publications/2016/01/flambeau (accessed September 2017).

Google Scholar

Mitchell, D, Snyder, S (2006) Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Google Scholar

Mole, B (2016) Wellness programs strong-arm employees into giving up health info, suit says. Ars Technica UK. Available at: https://arstechnica.com/science/2016/10/wellness-programs-strong-arm-employees-into-giving-up-health-info-suit-says/ (accessed September 2017).

Google Scholar

Molteni, M (2017) Bored with your Fitbit? These cancer researchers aren’t. Wired. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/bored-with-your-fitbit-these-cancer-researchers-arent/ (accessed September 2017).

Google Scholar

Mulvaney, E (2017) EEOC warns of “chaos” if workplace wellness rules are vacated. The National Law Journal. Available at: http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202797774314/EEOC-Warns-of-Chaos-If-Workplace-Wellness-Rules-Are-Vacated?slreturn=20170823140525

Google Scholar

Naslund, JA, Aschbrenner, KA, Scherer, EA. (2016) Wearable devices and mobile technologies for supporting behavioral weight loss among people with serious mental illness. Psychiatry Research 244: 139–144.

Google Scholar | Medline

Neff, G, Nafus, D (2016) Self-Tracking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Google Scholar

Nelson, EC, Verhagen, T, Noordzij, ML (2016) Health empowerment through activity trackers: an empirical smart wristband study. Computers in Human Behavior 62: 364–374.

Google Scholar

Promis, D, Erevelles, N, Matthews, J (2001) Reconceptualizing inclusion: the politics of university sports and recreation programs for students with mobility impairments. Sociology of Sport 18(1): 37–50.

Google Scholar

Pullin, G (2011) Design Meets Disability. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Google Scholar

Rose, N (2006) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Google Scholar

Sedaris, D (2014) Stepping out: living the Fitbit life. The New Yorker. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/06/30/stepping-out-3 (accessed August 2014).

Google Scholar

Sheller, M (2015) Uneven mobility futures. Mobilities 11(1): 15–31.

Google Scholar

Somashekar, S (2016) The disturbing reason some African American patients may be undertreated for pain. The Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/04/04/do-blacks-feel-less-pain-than-whites-their-doctors-may-think-so/?utm_term=.4919911e939b (accessed May 2017).

Google Scholar

Teston, C (2016) Rhetoric, precarity, and mHealth technologies. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 46(3): 251–268.

Google Scholar

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2016) EEOC issues final rules on employer wellness programs. Available at: https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/5-16-16.cfm (accessed 15 September 2017).

Google Scholar

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (2017) Wisconsin employer resolves EEOC case involving wellness program and retaliation. Available at: https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/4-5-17a.cfm (accessed 15 September 2017).

Google Scholar

Virilio, P (1997) Open Sky. New York: Verso.

Google Scholar

Weber, L (2014) Wellness programs get a health check. The Wall Street Journal. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/wellness-programs-get-a-health-check-1412725776 (accessed September 2014).

Google Scholar

Weiman, D (2016) EEOC versus Honeywell International. Huffington Post. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/darryl-s-weiman-md-jd/eeoc-versus-honeywell-int_b_12385442.html (accessed 22 September 2017).

Google Scholar

Whitson, JR (2013) Gaming the quantified self. Surveillance and Society 11(1–2): 163–176.

Google Scholar

YouTube (2014) Find Your Fit—2014. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0qVi_nF6y8 (accessed 25 September 2017).

Google Scholar

YouTube (2015) Lovefit—2015. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sU5aEh9TyAw (accessed 25 September 2017).

Google Scholar

YouTube (2016) Gen-pep—Pep Talk by Stephen Hawking. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A92o9O4FZ7Y&t=1s (accessed 13 February 2017).

Google Scholar