Author(s):

  • Heyen, Nils B.

Abstract:

This article explores the production and type of knowledge acquired in the course of specific digital self-tracking activities that resemble research and are common among followers of the Quantified Self movement. On the basis of interviews with self-trackers, it is shown that this knowledge can be characterised as a verified and practical self-knowledge, and that science in the form of scientific sources, methods and quality criteria plays a key role in its production. It is argued that this self-related knowledge can be conceptualised as self-expertise, and its production as personal science. The article then discusses the implications for the science-society relationship. In contrast to self-tracking data, so far self-knowledge has hardly caused any resonance in science, although science currently appears open to the insights from single subject (N-of-1) research. As a new mode of public engagement with science, personal science instead mainly leads to an individual self-expertisation.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519888757

References:
Abend, P, Fuchs, M (eds) (2016) Quantified selves and statistical bodies. Digital Culture & Society 2(1). Bielefeld: Transcript. 
Google Scholar
Altman, LK (1987) Who Goes First? The Story of Self-Experimentation in Medicine. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 
Google Scholar
Bains, W (2008) Truly personalised medicine: Self-experimentation in medical discovery. Medical Hypotheses 70(4): 714–718. 
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Bauer, MW (2009) The evolution of public understanding of science – Discourse and comparative evidence. Science, Technology and Society 14(2): 221–240. 
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bonney, R, Ballard, H, Jordan, R, McCallie, E, Phillips, T, Shirk, J, et al. (2009) Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education. 
Google Scholar
Bonney, R, Phillips, TB, Ballard, HL, Enck, JW (2016) Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science 25(1): 2–16. 
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Brossard, D, Lewenstein, BV (2010) A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science. In: Kahlor, LA, Stout, PA (eds) Communicating Science: New Agendas in Communication. London; New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 11–39. 
Google Scholar
Collins, HM, Evans, R (2002) The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science 32(2): 235–296. 
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Collins, HM, Evans, R (2007) Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press. 
Google Scholar | Crossref
Collins, HM, Evans, R, Weinel, M (2017) Interactional expertise. In: Felt, U, Fouché, R, Miller, CA, Smith-Doerr, L (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 765–792. 
Google Scholar
Cooper, CB, Lewenstein, BV (2016) Two meanings of citizen science. In: Cavalier, D, Kennedy, EB (eds) The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science. Tempe, AZ: Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, pp. 51–61. 
Google Scholar
De Groot, M, Drangsholt, M, Martin-Sanchez, FJ, Wolf, G (2017) Single subject (N-of-1) research design, data processing, and personal science. Methods of Information in Medicine 56(6): 416–418. 
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Delfanti, A (2010) Users and peers. From citizen science to P2P science. Journal of Science Communication 9(1): 42–56. 
Google Scholar | Crossref
Delgado, A, Callén, B (2017) Do-it-yourself biology and electronic waste hacking: A politics of demonstration in precarious times. Public Understanding of Science 26(2): 179–194. 
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Drangsholt, M, De Groot, M, Martin-Sanchez, F, Wolf, G (2016) Call for papers: N-of-1. Available at: https://quantifiedself.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/N-of-1-Call-For-Papers.pdf (accessed 24 July 2019). 
Google Scholar
Duttweiler, S, Passoth, JH (2016) Self-Tracking als Optimierungsprojekt? [Self-tracking as an optimisation project?] In: Duttweiler, S, Gugutzer, R, Passoth, JH, Strübing, J (eds) Leben nach Zahlen. Self-Tracking als Optimierungsprojekt? [Living by numbers. Self-tracking as an optimisation project?] Bielefeld: Transcript, pp. 9–42. 
Google Scholar | Crossref
Epstein, S (1995) The construction of lay expertise: AIDS activism and the forging of credibility in the reform of clinical trials. Science, Technology, & Human Values 20(4): 408–437. 
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Falzon, MA (ed.) (2009) Multi-Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research. Farnham: Ashgate. 
Google Scholar
Ferretti, F (2019) Mapping do-it-yourself science. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 15(1): 1–23. 
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Gibbons, M, Limoges, C, Nowotny, H, Schwartzman, S, Scott, P, Trow, M (1994) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: SAGE. 
Google Scholar
Heyen, NB (2016a) Digitale Selbstvermessung und Quantified Self. Potenziale, Risiken und Handlungsopti-onen [Digital self-tracking and Quantified Self: Potentials, risks and options for action]. Policy paper, Fraunhofer ISI, Karlsruhe, December. 
Google Scholar
Heyen, NB (2016b) Self-tracking as knowledge production: Quantified self between prosumption and citizen science. In: Selke, S (ed.) Lifelogging: Digital Self-Tracking and Lifelogging – Between Disruptive Technology and Cultural Transformation. Wiesbaden: Springer, pp. 283–301. 
Google Scholar | Crossref
Heyen, NB (2017) Quantified self as personal (citizen) science. Havard Bill of Health, 11 May. Available at: http://blogs.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2017/05/11/quantified-self-as-personal-citizen-science/ (accessed 24 July 2019). 
Google Scholar
Heyen, NB (2018) Mehr Gesundheit durch Quantified Self? Zu den Folgen der digitalen Selbstvermessung und möglichen Szenarien für 2030 [Better health through Quantified Self? Implications of digital self-tracking and scenarios for 2030]. In: Decker, M, Lindner, R, Lingner, S, Scherz, C, Sotoudeh, M (eds) Grand Challenges meistern – der Beitrag der Technikfolgenabschätzung. [Mastering Grand Challenges: The contribution of technology assessment] Berlin: Edition Sigma, pp. 259–270. 
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hitzler, R, Honer, A, Maeder, C (eds) (1994) Expertenwissen: die institutionalisierte Kompetenz zur Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit. [Expert knowledge: The institutionalised competence for the construction of reality] Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. 
Google Scholar | Crossref
Irwin, A (1995) Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London; New York, NY: Routledge. 
Google Scholar
Kalligas, K (2014) Analyzing my weight and sleep [Video]. Available at: https://quantifiedself.com/show-and-tell/?project=15 (accessed 24 July 2019). 
Google Scholar
Kasperowski, D, Kullenberg, C (2019) The many modes of citizen science. Science & Technology Studies 32(2): 2–7. 
Google Scholar
Lillie, EO, Patay, B, Diamant, J, Issell, B, Topol, EJ, Schork, NJ(2011) The n-of-1 clinical trial: The ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? Personalized Medicine 8(2): 161–173. 
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Lupton, D (2016) The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Cambridge: Polity Press. 
Google Scholar
Maiwald, KO (2005) Competence and praxis: Sequential analysis in German sociology. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6(3): 31. 
Google Scholar
Neff, G, Nafus, D (2016) Self-Tracking. Cambridge: MIT Press. 
Google Scholar | Crossref
Neuringer, A (1981) Self-experimentation: A call for change. Behaviorism 9(1): 79–94. 
Google Scholar
Prior, L (2003) Belief, knowledge and expertise: The emergence of the lay expert in medical sociology. Sociology of Health & Illness 25(3): 41–57. 
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Quantified Self (QS) (2019) Available at: https://quantifiedself.com/ (accessed 24 July 2019). 
Google Scholar
Research2Guidance (2017) mHealth Economics 2017/2018: Current Status and Future Trends in Mobile Health. Berlin: Research2Guidance. 
Google Scholar
Roberts, S (2004) Self-experimentation as a source of new ideas: Ten examples about sleep, mood, health, and weight. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2): 227–262. 
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Roberts, S (2010) The unreasonable effectiveness of my self-experimentation. Medical Hypotheses 75(6): 482–489. 
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Ruckenstein, M, Schüll, ND (2017) The datafication of health. Annual Review of Anthropology 46(1): 261–278. 
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sanders, R (2017) Self-tracking in the digital era: Biopower, patriarchy, and the new biometric body projects. Body & Society 23(1): 36–63. 
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Schork, NJ (2015) Time for one-person trials. Nature 520(7549): 609–611. 
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Schütz, A (1946) The well-informed citizen: An essay on the social distribution of knowledge. Social Research 13(4): 463–478. 
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Selke, S (ed.) (2016) Lifelogging: Digital Self-Tracking and Lifelogging – Between Disruptive Technology and Cultural Transformation. Wiesbaden: Springer. 
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sharon, T (2017) Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philosophy & Technology 30(1): 93–121. 
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sharon, T, Zandbergen, D (2017) From data fetishism to quantifying selves: Self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media & Society 19(11): 1695–1709. 
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Stilgoe, J, Lock, SJ, Wilsdon, J (2014) Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science 23(1): 4–15. 
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Strasser, BJ, Baudry, J, Mahr, D, Sanchez, G, Tancoigne, E (2019) ‘Citizen science’? Rethinking science and public participation. Science & Technology Studies 32(2): 52–76. 
Google Scholar
Swan, M (2009) Emerging patient-driven health care models: An examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 6(2): 492–525. 
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Swan, M (2012) Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. Journal of Personalized Medicine 2(3): 93–118. 
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Wehling, P (2012) From invited to uninvited participation (and back?): Rethinking civil society engagement in technology assessment and development. Poiesis & Praxis – International Journal of Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment 9(1–2): 43–60. 
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Weingart, P (1983) Verwissenschaftlichung der Gesellschaft – Politisierung der Wissenschaft. [Scientification of society – politisation of science] Zeitschrift für Soziologie 12(3): 225–241. 
Google Scholar
Whitson, JR (2014) Foucault’s fitbit: Governance and gamification. In: Walz, SP, Deterding, S (eds) The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press, pp. 339–358. 
Google Scholar
Williams, J (2014) Exploring my data [Video]. Available at: https://quantifiedself.com/blog/jamie-williams-exploring-data/ (accessed 24 July 2019). 
Google Scholar
Wynne, B (2007) Public participation in science and technology: Performing and obscuring a political-conceptual category mistake. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 1(1): 99–110. 
Google Scholar | Crossref