Knowing (with) the body: Sensory knowing in contraceptive self-tracking

Author(s):

• Ellen Algera

Abstract:

Scholars have criticised reproductive self-tracking software applications (apps) for reducing embodied experiences to objective quantifications and leading to user self-alienation. Building on scholarly work that underscores the sensory and affective dimension of self-tracking, this ethnographic study explores how users of contraceptive self-tracking apps come to know their bodies during their everyday tracking practices. By relating tracking data to embodied experiences and relating their experiences back to the data, users produce knowledge of their own lived hormonal physiology. Users learn to articulate how their body feels and acts, foregrounding their body as an instrument of knowing alongside technical devices used. Users also articulate how their body is affected by everyday factors such as personal behaviours, diet, sleep and stress, thereby enacting what I call situated health. By foregrounding people’s sensory and affective engagements with their data and their bodies through self-tracking, this study contributes to understanding how reproductive self-tracking may be meaningful to users as well as encourages a move beyond the hierarchical opposition between ‘objective’ numerical data and embodied, lived experiences.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13570

References:

• Austad, K., Chary, A., Colom, A., Barillas, R., Luna, D., Menjivar, C., Metz, B., Petrocy, A., Ruch, A., & Rohloff, P. (2016). Fertility awareness methods are not modern contraceptives: Defining contraception to reflect our priorities. Global Health, Science and Practice, 4(2), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00044 CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartlett, R., & Milligan, C. (2015). What is diary method? Bloomsbury Publishing. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Chen, I. (2017). The digital turn, a corporeal return: Sensory self-tracking with the contraceptive app natural cycles. Lund University. Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M. (1981). Son of seven sexes: The social destruction of a physical phenomenon. Social Studies of Science, 11(1), 33–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631278101100103 CrossrefWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Della Bianca, L. (2021). The cyclic self: Menstrual cycle tracking as body politics. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience, 7(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v7i1.34356 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Ford, A., De Togni, G., & Miller, L. (2021). Hormonal health: Period tracking apps, wellness, and self-management in the era of surveillance capitalism. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 7(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2021.655 CrossrefWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Grenfell, P., Tilouche, N., Shawe, J., & French, R. S. (2020). Fertility and digital technology: Narratives of using smartphone app “natural cycles” while trying to conceive. Sociology of Health & Illness, 43(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13199 CrossrefPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Hamper, J. (2020). “Catching ovulation”: Exploring women’s use of fertility tracking apps as a reproductive technology. Body & Society, 26(3), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X19898259 CrossrefPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Harris, A. (2020). A sensory education. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003084341 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Heyen, N. B. (2016). Self-tracking as knowledge production: Quantified self between prosumption and citizen science. In S. Selke (Ed.), Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and lifelogging – Between disruptive technology and cultural transformation (pp. 283–301). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13137-1 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Kressbach, M. (2021). Period hacks: Menstruating in the big data paradigm. Television & New Media, 22(3), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419886389 CrossrefWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 205–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2015). Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 17(4), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.920528 CrossrefPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2016). “Mastering your fertility”: The digitised reproductive citizen. In A. McCosker, S. Vivienne, & A. Johns (Eds.), Negotiating digital citizenship: Control, contest and culture (pp. 81–94). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. (2018). “I just want it to be done, done, done!” food tracking apps, affects, and agential capacities. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2020029 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Lupton, D., & Maslen, S. (2018). The more-than-human sensorium: Sensory engagements with digital self-tracking technologies. The Senses & Society, 13(2), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2018.1480177 CrossrefWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Maslen, S. (2017). Layers of sense: The sensory work of diagnostic sensemaking in digital health. Digital Health, 3, 205520761770910. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617709101 CrossrefWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Maslen, S. (2021). (Dis)connected parenting: Other-tracking in the more-than-human sensorium. The Senses & Society, 16(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2020.1852722 CrossrefWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Maslen, S., & Harris, A. (2021). Becoming a diagnostic agent: A collated ethnography of digital-sensory work in caregiving intra-actions. Social Science & Medicine, 277(February), 113927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113927 CrossrefPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press. CrossrefWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Mopas, M. S., & Huybregts, E. (2020). Training by feel: Wearable fitness-trackers, endurance athletes, and the sensing of data. The Senses and Society, 15(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17458927.2020.1722421 CrossrefWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Nafus, D., & Sherman, J. (2014). This one does not go up to 11: The quantified self movement as an alternative big data practice. International Journal of Communication, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4309-3.ch012 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Novotny, M., & Hutchinson, L. (2019). Data our bodies tell: Towards critical feminist action in fertility and period tracking applications. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 332–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1607907 CrossrefWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Ruckenstein, M. (2014). Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies, 4(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Scholtes, U. (2022). Feeling techniques: Making methods to articulate bodily practices. University of Amsterdam. Google Scholar
• Sharon, T. (2016). Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• Smith, G. J. D., & Vonthethoff, B. (2016). Health by numbers? Exploring the practice and experience of datafied health. Health Sociology Review, 26(July), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1196600 CrossrefWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Weiner, K., Will, C., Henwood, F., & Williams, R. (2020). Everyday curation? Attending to data, records and record keeping in the practices of self-monitoring. Big Data and Society, 7(1), 205395172091827. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720918275 CrossrefWeb of Science®Google Scholar
• Zampino, L. (2019). Self-tracking technologies and the menstrual cycle: Embodiment and engagement with lay and expert knowledge. Tecnoscienza, Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 10(2), 31–52. Web of Science®Google Scholar