Life-Swap: How Discussions Around Personal Data Can Motivate Desire for Change

by | Feb 10, 2020 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Rowanne Fleck,
  • Marta E. Cecchinato,
  • Anna L. Cox,
  • Daniel Harrison,
  • Paul Marshall,
  • Jea Hoo Na
  • Anya Skatova

Abstract:

Personal informatics technologies support the collection of and reflection on personal data, but enabling people to learn from and act on this data is still an on-going challenge. Sharing and discussing data is one way people can learn from it, but as yet, little research explores how peer discourses around data can shape understandings and promote action. We ran 3 workshops with 5-week follow-ups, giving 18 people the opportunity to swap their data and discuss it with another person. We found that these workshops helped them to recontextualise and to better understand their data, identify new strategies for changing their behaviour and motivated people to commit to changes in the future. These findings have implications for how personal informatics tools could help people identify opportunities for change and feel motivated to try out new strategies.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01372-9

References:
  1. Elsden C, Nissen B, Garbett A, et al (2016) Metadating: exploring the romance and future of personal data. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 685–698
  2. 2.Gartenberg C (2018) How do Apple’s screen time and Google digital wellbeing stack up? In: The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2018/6/5/17426922/apple-digital-health-vs-google-wellbeing-time-well-spent-wwdc-2018. Accessed 21 Sep 2018
  3. 3.Li I, Dey AK, Forlizzi J (2011) Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with Ubicomp technologies. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on ubiquitous computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 405–414
  4. 4.Fleck R, Fitzpatrick G (2009) Teachers’ and tutors’ social reflection around SenseCam images. Int J Human-Computer Studies 67:1024–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.004Article  Google Scholar 
  5. 5.Ploderer B, Smith W, Howard S, et al (2012) Things you don’t want to know about yourself: ambivalence about tracking and sharing personal information for behaviour change. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australian computer-human interaction conference. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 489–492
  6. 6.Lupton D (2014) Self-tracking cultures: towards a sociology of personal informatics. In: proceedings of the 26th Australian computer-human interaction conference on designing futures: the future of design. ACM, pp 77–86
  7. 7.Cox AL, Bird J, Fleck R (2013) Digital epiphanies: how self-knowledge can change habits and our attitudes towards them. In: Presented at: The 27th International British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference: The Internet of things, Brunel University, London, UK. (2013). Brunel University, London, UK
  8. 8.Epstein DA, Jacobson BH, Bales E, et al (2015) From nobody cares to way to go!: a design framework for social sharing in personal informatics. In: proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, pp 1622–1636
  9. 9.Rooksby J, Rost M, Morrison A, Chalmers M (2014) Personal tracking as lived informatics. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 1163–1172
  10. 10.Ploderer B, Reitberger W, Oinas-Kukkonen H, van Gemert-Pijnen J (2014) Social interaction and reflection for behaviour change. Pers Ubiquit Comput 18:1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-014-0779-yArticle  Google Scholar 
  11. 11.Dolan P, Hallsworth M, Halpern D, et al (2010) MINDSPACE: Influencing behaviour through public policy
  12. 12.Kalnikaitė V, Bird J, Rogers Y (2013) Decision-making in the aisles: informing, overwhelming or nudging supermarket shoppers? Pers Ubiquit Comput 17:1247–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-012-0589-zArticle  Google Scholar 
  13. 13.Consolvo S, Everitt K, Smith I, Landay JA (2006) Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 457–466
  14. 14.Tolmie P, Crabtree A, Rodden T, et al (2016) “This has to be the cats”: personal data legibility in networked sensing systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 491–502
  15. 15.Graham L, Tang A, Neustaedter C (2016) Help me help you: shared reflection for personal data. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on supporting group work. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 99–109
  16. 16.Skatova A, Bedwell B, Shipp V, et al (2016) The role of ICT in office work breaks. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 3049–3060
  17. 17.Boud D, Keogh R, Walker D (1985) Reflection: turning experience into learning. London: Kogan
  18. 18.Fleck R (2012) Rating reflection on experience: a case study of teachers’ and tutors’ reflection around images. Interact Comput 24:439–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2012.07.003Article  Google Scholar 
  19. 19.Kwasnicka D, Dombrowski SU, White M, Sniehotta FF (2015) Data-prompted interviews: using individual ecological data to stimulate narratives and explore meanings. Health Psychol 34:1191Article  Google Scholar 
  20. 20.Ruckenstein M (2014) Visualized and interacted life: personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies 4:68–84. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068Article  Google Scholar 
  21. 21.Gouveia R, Karapanos E, Hassenzahl M (2015) How do we engage with activity trackers?: a longitudinal study of Habito. In: proceedings of the 2015 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, pp 1305–1316
  22. 22.Twidale MB (2005) Over the shoulder learning: supporting brief informal learning. Comput Supported Coop Work 14:505–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-005-9007-7Article  Google Scholar 
  23. 23.Mercer K, Li M, Giangregorio L, Burns C, Grindrod K (2016) Behavior change techniques present in wearable activity trackers: a critical analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 4:e40. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4461Article  Google Scholar 
  24. 24.Cecchinato M, Cox AL, Bird J (2017) Always on(line)? User experience of smartwatches and their role within multi-device ecologies. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025538. Accessed 21 Sep 2018
  25. 25.Cecchinato ME, Cox AL, Bird J (2015) Working 9-5?: professional differences in email and boundary management practices. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 3989–3998
  26. 26.Ciolfi L, Lockley E (2018) From work to life and Back again: examining the digitally-mediated work/life practices of a Group of Knowledge Workers. Computer Supported Coop Work (CSCW) 27:803–839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9315-3Article  Google Scholar 
  27. 27.Fleck R (2012) Designing for reflection, Sustainability and Simplicity
  28. 28.Moon JA (2000) Reflection in learning and professional development: theory and practice, new Ed edition. Routledge, London Google Scholar