Author(s):

  • Clara Caldeira
  • Matthew Bietz
  • Yunan Chen

Abstract:

Self-tracking applications for health management have become popular both in industry and in academia. Half of older adults in the U.S. track health indicators, but they rarely use technology for that purpose. We conduct a qualitative study to investigate older adults’ self-tracking practices in order to understand their needs as potential users of self-tracking technology. Our data indicates that monitoring the onset of abnormal changes in health is a primary reason for tracking for this population. This finding suggests that self-tracking technology that targets elderly users must assist them to identify changes in health condition.

Documentation:

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3021319.3021354

References:
  1. Philip Burnard. 1991. A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse education today 11, 6 (1991), 461–466.
  2. Elizabeth Cyarto, Anita Myers, and Catrine Tudor-Locke. 2004. Pedometer accuracy in nursing home and community-dwelling older adults. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 36, 2 (2004), 205–209.
  3. Julie Doyle, Lorcan Walsh, Antonella Sassu, and Teresa McDonagh. 2014. Designing a wellness self-management tool for older adults: results from a field trial of YourWellness. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 134–141.
  4. Susannah Fox and Maeve Duggan. 2013. Tracking for health. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.
  5. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 557–566.
  6. Rosemery Nelson and Steven Hayes. 1981. Theoretical explanations for reactivity in self-monitoring. Behavior Modification 5, 1 (1981), 3–14.
  7. Amon Rapp and Federica Cena. 2014. Self-monitoring and Technology: Challenges and Open Issues in Personal Informatics. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design for All and Accessibility Practice. Springer, 613–622.