Author(s):
Connor, Steven
Corby, Tom
Nafus, Dawn
Hawes, Hannah Redler
Smith, Marquard
Teasley, Sarah
Abstract:
This Roundtable on Numbers/Data began life as a live, public event on the power and influence of numbers in contemporary visual, material, immaterial, and media cultures.1 To imagine such an ambitious event, and to do it justice, the event’s programme brought together academics, industry professionals, and practitioners. Taking Steven Connor’s recently published book Living by Numbers: In Defence of Quantity (2016) as a springboard, each contributor to the event was invited to deliver a 10-minute presentation, an opening statement to set the scene, and to raise fundamental questions to be considered in the ensuing discussion. The authors retain this structure here, along with some of the informality that live conversation affords.
By way of these four presentations and the conversation between the event’s speakers and audience, the Roundtable raises a series of pressing concerns around data and big data, life tracking, digital health studies, and the quantifiable self; the quantitative and the qualitative; data forms and flows; climate change data and social media; the bleed between private and public computational infrastructures; labour, productivity, and accountability; time, money, and economies; and the contemporary intensification of surveillance, audit culture, marketization, and outcomes-based performance management.
Notwithstanding data dystopia’s numerical sublime, the contributors are always looking to keep an eye out for reasons to be optimistic in their discussions around: numbers in education and numeric literacies; the materiality of numbers and numbers as artifacts; data’s flexibility and manipulability; sensors, sensor data, and everyday life; the rise of amateurism and citizen scientists; data and numbers vis-à-vis experiences, embodiment, emotions, intensities, and their affective powers; and the contributors’ absolute delight (or abject horror) at the very arbitrary nature of numbers, all of which offer hope towards more democratic, creative, imaginative, and personalized futures …
Interested in the Quantified Self community? Ever wondered what role numbers played in the UK’s Referendum to leave the EU? Intrigued by the idea of an exhibition about odd and even? Curious about what folk data might be? Read on!
Document:
https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412917742083
References:
| Briggs, J., with Leeds Creative Timebank (2016) Creative Temporal Costings: A Proto-Publics Research Project with Leeds Creative Timebank. Reports and summary available at: https://protopublics.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/protopublicsreportfinal1.pdf (accessed 1 August 2017). Google Scholar | |
| Connor, S (2016) Living by Numbers: In Defence of Quantity. London: Reaktion Books. Google Scholar | |
| Corby, T, Baily, G, Mackenzie, J (2011) The Southern Ocean Studies (Climate data driven moving image installation). London: Ambika P3. Google Scholar | |
| Deleuze, G (1992[1990]) Postscript on the societies of control. October 59: 3–7. Google Scholar | |
| Everett, C (2017) Numbers and the Making of Us: Counting and the Course of Human Cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Henley, D (2016) The Arts Dividend: Why Investment in Culture Pays. London: Elliott & Thompson. Google Scholar | |
| Kimball, L, Julier, G (2016) Co-Producing Social Futures through Design Research. University of Brighton. Available at: https://protopublics.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/protopublicsreportfinal1.pdf (accessed 30 October 2017). Google Scholar | |
| Kitchin, R, Lauriault, TP (2014) Towards critical data studies: Charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2474112 (accessed 30 October 2017). Google Scholar | |
| Lorde, A (1983) The Master’s Tools Will Never Dismantle the Master’s House. In: Moraga, C, Anzaldúa, G (eds) This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Colour. New York: Kitchen Table Press, 94–101. Google Scholar | |
| Lupton, D (2016) The Quantified Self. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press. Google Scholar | |
| Moorish, L (nd) WordPress blog. Available at: https://academicirregularities.wordpress.com (accessed 1 April 2017). Google Scholar | |
| Nafus, D (2014) Stuck data, dead data, and disloyal data: The stops and starts in making numbers into social practices. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Justice 15(2): 208–222. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Nafus, D (ed.) (2016) Quantified: Biosensing Technologies in Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Readings, B (1997) The University in Ruins. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Shannon, C (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423, 623–656, July, October. Available at: http://math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/others/shannon/entropy/entropy.pdf (accessed 1 April 2017) Google Scholar | |
| Sorrell, J, Roberts, P, Henley, D (2014) The Virtuous Circle: Why Creativity and Cultural Education Count. London: Elliott & Thompson. Google Scholar | |
| Sontag, S (1978) Illness as Metaphor. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Google Scholar | |
| Verran, H (2001) Science and an African Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar |