On Track to Biopower? Toward a Conceptual Framework for User Compliance in Digital Self-Tracking

Author(s):

Kateryna Maltseva Reibya

Alexander Buhmann

Christian Fieseler

Abstract:

Digital self-tracking technologies, such as mobile applications and wearables have become commonplace, mediating users’ fitness and health management efforts by providing performance recommendations. While digital self-tracking technologies have been welcomed by some as useful tools in users’ pursuit of healthier and happier lives, they have also drawn criticisms, especially regarding body surveillance and control stemming from their embedded performance standards. In this article, we present our study of the experiences of users who regularly but casually engage with digital self-tracking technologies in order to identify factors that affect compliance with performance standards. Based on these data we propose a conceptual framework that brings together domain involvement, domain expertise, data literacy, and the tendency to anthropomorphize technology with performance standards and discuss possible relationships between these factors.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.2014610

References:

Ajana, B. 2017. Digital health and the biopolitics of the quantified self. Digital Health 3 (1):2055207616689509–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616689509. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Baron, K. G., S. Abbott, N. Jao, N. Manalo, and R. Mullen. 2017. Orthosomnia: Are some patients taking the quantified self too far? Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 13 (2):351–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.6472. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Barta, K., and G. Neff. 2016. Technologies for sharing: Lessons from quantified self about the political economy of platforms. Information, Communication & Society 19 (4):518–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1118520. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Berg, M. 2017. Making sense with sensors: Self-tracking and the temporalities of wellbeing. Digital Health 3:2055207617699767–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617699767. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Bode, M., and D. B. Kristensen. 2016. The digital doppelgänger within: A study on self-tracking and the quantified self movement. In Assembling consumption: Researching actors, networks and markets, eds. R. Canniford and D. Bajde, 119–35. New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Canhoto, A. I., and S. Arp. 2017. Exploring the factors that support adoption and sustained use of health and fitness wearables. Journal of Marketing Management 33 (1–2):32–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1234505. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Charitsis, V. 2019. The quantification paradox: Exploring consumer ambivalence towards self-tracking. Kulutustutkimus Nyt 13 (1):31–46. https://journal.fi/kulutustutkimus/article/view/84376 [Google Scholar]
Charitsis, V., A. F. Yngfalk, and P. Skålén. 2019. Made to run”: Biopolitical marketing and the making of the self-quantified runner. Marketing Theory 19 (3):347–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593118799794. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Cho, W. C., K. Y. Lee, and S. B. Yang. 2019. What makes you feel attached to smartwatches? The stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) perspectives. Information Technology & People 32 (2):319–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-05-2017-0152. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Choe, E. K., N. B. Lee, B. Lee, W. Pratt, and J. A. Kientz. 2014. Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In CHI ‘14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1143–1152. New York: ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557372. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Davis, K., and S. Fullerton. 2016. Connected learning in and after school: Exploring technology’s role in the learning experiences of diverse high school students. The Information Society 32 (2):98–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2016.1130498. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Depper, A., and P. D. Howe. 2017. Are we fit yet? English adolescent girls’ experiences of health and fitness apps. Health Sociology Review 26 (1):98–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1196599. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Didžiokaitė, G., P. Saukko, and C. Greiffenhagen. 2018. The mundane experience of everyday calorie trackers: Beyond the metaphor of quantified self. New Media & Society 20 (4):1470–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817698478. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
D’Ignazio, C., and R. Bhargava. 2016. DataBasic: Design principles, tools and activities for data literacy learners. The Journal of Community Informatics 12 (3):83–107. doi: https://doi.org/10.15353/joci.v12i3.3280. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
En, B., and M. Pöll. 2016. Are you (self-) tracking? Risks, norms and optimisation in self-quantifying practices. Graduate Journal of Social Science 12 (2):37–57. http://www.gjss.org/sites/default/files/issues/chapters/papers/GJSS%20Vol%2012-2%202%20En%20and%20Po%CC%88ll_0.pdf [Google Scholar]
Epley, N., A. Waytz, S. Akalis, and J. T. Cacioppo. 2008. When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition 26 (2):143–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2008.26.2.143. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Epley, N., A. Waytz, and J. T. Cacioppo. 2007. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114 (4):864–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Fotopoulou, A., and K. O’Riordan. 2017. Training to self-care: Fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review 26 (1):54–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1184582. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Foucault, M. 1990. The history of sexuality: An introduction. New York, NY: Vintage Books. [Google Scholar]
Foucault, M. 2007. Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–8. Berlin, Germany: Springer. [Google Scholar]
Goodyear, V. A., C. Kerner, and M. Quennerstedt. 2019. Young people’s uses of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies; surveillance, self-surveillance and resistance. Sport, Education and Society 24 (3):212–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1375907. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Gorm, N., and I. Shklovski. 2019. Episodic use: Practices of care in self-tracking. New Media & Society 21 (11–12):2505–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819851239. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Jonassen, D. 2009. Reconciling a human cognitive architecture. In Constructivist instruction: Success or failure, eds. S. Tobias and T. M. Duffy, 25–45. New York, NY: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Jung, Y., S. Kim, and B. Choi. 2016. Consumer valuation of the wearables: The case of smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior 63:899–905. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.040. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Kallinikos, J. 2004. Deconstructing information packages. Information Technology & People 17 (1):8–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840410522152. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Karakayali, N., and B. Alpertan. 2021. Mood playlists, biopower, and the “functional turn” in online media: What happens when a pre-digital social control technology is transferred to the internet? The Information Society 37 (1):20–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2020.1826616. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Klauser, F. R., and A. Albrechtslund. 2014. From self-tracking to smart urban infrastructures: Towards an interdisciplinary research agenda on Big Data. Surveillance & Society 12 (2):273–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4605. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Lazar, A., C. Koehler, T. J. Tanenbaum, and D. H. Nguyen. 2015. Why we use and abandon smart devices. In UbiComp ‘15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 635–46. New York: ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804288. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Li, I., A. Dey, and J. Forlizzi. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In CHI ‘10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 557–66. New York: ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753409. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Li, I., A. K. Dey, and J. Forlizzi. 2011. Understanding my data, myself: Supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. In UbiComp ‘11: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 405–14. New York: ACM [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Lomborg, S., and K. Frandsen. 2016. Self-tracking as communication. Information, Communication & Society 19 (7):1015–27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1067710. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Lupton, D. 2013. Quantifying the body: Monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health 23 (4):393–403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.794931. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Lupton, D. 2014. Self-tracking cultures: Towards a sociology of personal informatics. In OzCHI ‘14: Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: The Future of Design, 77–86. New York: ACM. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Lupton, D. 2015. Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality 17 (4):440–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.920528. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Lupton, D. 2016. You are your data: Self-tracking practices and concepts of data. In Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and lifelogging – between disruptive technology and cultural transformation, eds. S. Tobias and T. M. Duffy, 61–79. Weisbaden, Germany: Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Lupton, D. 2019. It’s made me a lot more aware”: A new materialist analysis of health self-tracking. Media International Australia 171 (1):66–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X19844042. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Lupton, D., and S. Maslen. 2019. How women use digital technologies for health: Qualitative interview and focus group study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21 (1):e11481–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/11481. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Lupton, D., and G. J. Smith. 2018. A much better person”: The agential capacities of self-tracking practices. In Metric culture: Ontologies of self-tracking practices, ed. B. Ajnana, 57–5. Bingley: Emerald. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Lyall, B. 2019. Fitness for sale: The value of self-tracking in secondhand exchange. The Information Society 35 (3):109–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2019.1582569. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Lyall, B., and B. Robards. 2018. Tool, toy and tutor: Subjective experiences of digital self-tracking. Journal of Sociology 54 (1):108–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783317722854. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Maltseva, K., and C. Lutz. 2018. A quantum of self: A study of self-quantification and self-disclosure. Computers in Human Behavior 81:102–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.006. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Moore, P. V., and A. Robinson. 2016. The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society 18 (11):2774–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604328. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Morozov, E. 2013. To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. New York, NY: PublicAffairs. [Google Scholar]
Neff, G., and D. Nafus. 2016. Self-tracking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Nelson, E. C., T. Verhagen, and M. L. Noordzij. 2016. Health empowerment through activity trackers: An empirical smart wristband study. Computers in Human Behavior 62:364–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.065. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
O’Neill, C., and B. Nansen. 2019. Sleep mode: Mobile apps and the optimisation of sleep-wake rhythms. First Monday 24 (6) https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/9574/8045 (accessed November 21, 2021). [Google Scholar]
Park, E., K. J. Kim, and S. J. Kwon. 2016. Understanding the emergence of wearable devices as next-generation tools for health communication. Information Technology & People 29 (4):717–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2015-0096. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Pink, S., S. Sumartojo, D. Lupton, and C. Heyes La Bond. 2017. Mundane data: The routines, contingencies and accomplishments of digital living. Big Data & Society 4 (1):205395171770092–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717700924. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Presset, B., J. N. Kramer, T. Kowatsch, and F. Ohl. 2021. The social meaning of steps: User reception of a mobile health intervention on physical activity. Critical Public Health 31 (5):605–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2020.1725445. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
QS. 2019. What is quantified self? https://quantifiedself.com/about/what-is-quantified-self/ (accessed November 21, 2021). [Google Scholar]
QS. 2021. QS. Get started. https://quantifiedself.com/get-started/ (accessed November 21, 2021). [Google Scholar]
Rettberg, J. W. 2018. Apps as companions: How quantified self apps become our audience and our companions. In Self-tracking: Empirical and philosophical investigations, ed. B. Ajana, 27–42. Berlin, Germany: Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Rooksby, J., M. Rost, A. Morrison, and M. Chalmers. 2014. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In CHI ‘14: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1163–1172. New York: ACM. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557039. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Ross, A. A. 2018. Tracking health and fitness: A cultural examination of self-quantification, biomedicalization, and gender. In eHealth: Current evidence, promises, perils and future directions, eds. T. M. Hale, W-Y. S. Chou, S. R. Cotton, and A. Khilnani, 123–51. Bingley: Emerald. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Ruckenstein, M. 2014. Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies 4 (1):68–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4010068. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Sanders, R. 2017. Self-tracking in the digital era: Biopower, patriarchy, and the new biometric body projects. Body & Society 23 (1):36–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X16660366. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Sharon, T., and D. Zandbergen. 2017. From data fetishism to quantifying selves: Self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media & Society 19 (11):1695–709. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816636090. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Shin, D. H., and F. Biocca. 2017. Health experience model of personal informatics: The case of a quantified self. Computers in Human Behavior 69:62–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.019. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Stiglbauer, B., S. Weber, and B. Batinic. 2019. Does your health really benefit from using a self-tracking device? Evidence from a longitudinal randomized control trial. Computers in Human Behavior 94:131–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.018. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Swan, M. 2013. The quantified self: Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data 1 (2):85–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2012.0002. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Till, C. 2019. Creating ‘automatic subjects’: Corporate wellness and self-tracking. Health (London, England: 1997) 23 (4):418–35. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459319829957. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Yngfalk, C. 2016. Bio-politicizing consumption: Neo-liberal consumerism and disembodiment in the food marketplace. Consumption Markets & Culture 19 (3):275–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2015.1102725. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Yngfalk, C., and A. Fyrberg Yngfalk. 2015. Creating the cautious consumer: Marketing managerialism and bio-power in health consumption. Journal of Macromarketing 35 (4):435–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146715571459. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Zaichkowsky, J. L. 1985. Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research 12 (3):341–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/208520. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]