Author(s):
- Btihaj Ajana
Abstract:
Self-tracking is becoming a prominent and ubiquitous feature in contemporary practices of health and wellness management. Over the last few years, we have witnessed a rapid development in digital tracking devices, apps and platforms, together with the emergence of health movements such as the Quantified Self. As the world is becoming increasingly ruled by metrics and data, we are becoming ever more reliant on technologies of tracking and measurement to manage and evaluate various spheres of our lives including work, leisure, performance, and health. In this article, I begin by briefly outlining some of the key theoretical approaches that have been informing the scholarly debates on the rise of self-tracking. I then move on to discuss at length the findings of an international survey study I conducted with users of self-tracking technologies to discuss the ways in which they perceive and experience these practices, and the various rationales behind their adoption of self-tracking in the first place. The article also addresses participants’ attitudes towards issues of privacy and data sharing and protection. These attitudes seem to be dominated by a lack of concern regarding the use and sharing of self-tracking data with third parties. Some of the overarching sentiments vis-à-vis these issues can be roughly categorized according to feelings of ‘trust’ towards companies and how they handle data, a sense of ‘resignation’ in the face of what is perceived as an all-encompassing and ubiquitous data use, feelings of ‘self-insignificance’ which translates into the belief that one’s data is of no value to others, and the familiar expression of ‘the innocent have nothing to hide’. Overall, this article highlights the benefits and risks of self-tracking practices as experienced and articulated by the participants, while providing a critical reflection on the rise of personal metrics and the culture of measurement and quantification.
Documentation:
https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018420959522
References:
| Ajana, B (2017) Digital health and the biopolitics of the Quantified Self. Digital Health 3(1): 1–18. Google Scholar | |
| Ajana, B (ed.) (2018) Metric Culture: Ontologies of Self-Tracking Practices. Bingley: Emerald Publishing. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Banner, O (2014) ‘Treat us right!’ Digital publics, emerging biosocialities, and the female complaint. In: Poletti, A, Rak, J (eds) Identity Technologies: Constructing the Self Online. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 198–216. Google Scholar | |
| Belk, R (2014) Sharing versus pseudo-sharing in Web 2.0. Anthropologist 18(1): 7–23. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Boltanski, L, Chiapello, E (2005) The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Boltanski, L, Thévenot, L (2006) On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Brokow, CJ (1991) Ledgers of Merit and Demerit. Oxford: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Brown, A (2016) What tracking metric do you care about? Wearable Technologies. Available at: http://www.wearable-technologies.com/2016/04/what-tracking-metric-do-you-care-about Google Scholar | |
| Carmichael, A (2010) Self tracking: The quantified life is worth living. H+ Magazine. Available at: http://hplusmagazine.com/2010/02/08/self-tracking-quantified-life-worth-living/ Google Scholar | |
| Charitsis, V (2019) Survival of the (data) fit: Self-surveillance, corporate wellness, and the platformization of healthcare. Surveillance & Society 17(1/2): 139–144. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Charitsis, V, Yngfalk, AF, Skålén, P (2019) ‘Made to run’: Biopolitical marketing and the making of the self-quantified runner. Marketing Theory 19(3): 347–366. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Cooper, BB (2013) Is 10,000 steps really the best measurement of our health? TNW. Available at: http://thenextweb.com/apps/2013/11/29/10000-steps-really-best-measurement-health/#gref Google Scholar | |
| Diaz-Bone, R (2018) Economics of convention and its perspective on knowledge and institutions. In: Glückler, J, Suddaby, R, Lenz, R (eds) Knowledge and Institutions. Cham: Springer, 69–88. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Elias, AS, Gill, R (2017) Beauty surveillance: The digital self-monitoring cultures of neoliberalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies 21(1): 59–77. DOI: 10.1177/1367549417705604 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Esmonde, K (2019) Training, tracking, and traversing: Digital materiality and the production of bodies and/in space in runners’ fitness tracking practices. Leisure Studies 38(6): 804–817. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Esmonde, K (2020) ‘There’s only so much data you can handle in your life’: Accommodating and resisting self-surveillance in women’s running and fitness tracking practices. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 12(1): 76–90. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Esmonde, K, Jette, S (2018) Assembling the ‘Fitbit subject’: A Foucauldian-sociomaterialist examination of social class, gender and self-surveillance on Fitbit community message boards. Health. DOI: 10.1177/1363459318800166 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Farr, C (2019) Fitbit has a new health tracker, but you can only get it through your employer or insurer. CNBC. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/08/fitbit-releases-insprire-for-employers.html Google Scholar | |
| Fogg, BJ (2002) Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=763957 Google Scholar | |
| Fotopoulou, A (2018) From networked to quantified self: Self tracking and the moral economy of data sharing. In: Papacharissi, Z (ed.) A Networked Self: Platforms, Stories, Connections. New York: Routledge, pp. 144–159. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Foucault, M (1979) History of Sexuality: The Will to Knowledge. London: Allen Lane. Google Scholar | |
| Foucault, M (1997) Technologies of the self. In: Rabinow, P (ed.) Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. New York: The New Press, 223–252. Google Scholar | |
| Fox, N (2017) Personal health technologies, micropolitics and resistance: A new materialist analysis. Health 21(2): 136–153. Google Scholar | Abstract | |
| GfK (2016) A third of people track their health or fitness. Who are they and why are they doing it? Available at: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/a-third-of-people-track-their-health-or-fitness-who-are-they-and-why-are-they-doing-it-595221791.html Google Scholar | |
| Goodyear, VA, Kerner, C, Quennerstedt, M (2019) Young people’s uses of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies: Surveillance, self-surveillance and resistance. Sport, Education and Society 24(3): 212–225. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Habermas, J (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action, vol. 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functional Reason. Boston: Beacon Press Books. Google Scholar | |
| Holten, E (2017) In: Ajana, B (dir) Quantified Life, documentary film. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qI75kMqctik Google Scholar | |
| Ihde, D (1993) Postphenomenology: Essays in the Postmodern Context. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Ihde, D (2001) Bodies in Technology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar | |
| Kaltheuner, F (2018) I asked an online tracking company for all of my data and here’s what I found. Privacy International. Available at: https://privacyinternational.org/long-read/2433/i-asked-online-tracking-company-all-my-data-and-heres-what-i-found Google Scholar | |
| Kent, R (2018) Social media and self-tracking: Representing the ‘health self’. In: Ajana, B (ed.) Self-Tracking. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 61–76. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Kon, G (n.d) Does anyone read privacy notices? The facts. Linklaters. Available at: https://www.linklaters.com/en/insights/blogs/digilinks/does-anyone-read-privacy-notices-the-facts Google Scholar | |
| Kristensen, DB, Prigge, C (2018) Human/technology associations in self-tracking practices. In: Ajana, B (ed.) Self-Tracking: Empirical and Philosophical Investigations. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 43–60. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Kristensen, DB, Ruckenstein, M (2018) Co-evolving with self-tracking technologies. New Media and Society 20(10): 3624–3640. DOI: 10.1177/1461444818755650 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Lupton, D (2013) Digitized health promotion: Personal responsibility for health in the Web 2.0 era. Sydney Health & Society Group Working Paper 5. Available at: https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/9190 Google Scholar | |
| Lupton, D (2014) Self-tracking modes: Reflexive self-monitoring and data practices. Paper: Imminent citizenships: Personhood and identity politics in the informatics age. Workshop, 27 August 2014, ANU, Canberra, Australia. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2483549 Google Scholar | |
| Lupton, D (2015) Lively data, social fitness and biovalue: The intersections of health self-tracking and social media. Preprint chapter, Burgess, J , et al. (eds) The Sage Handbook on Social Media. London and New York: Sage. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2666324 Google Scholar | |
| Lupton, D (2016) The diverse domains of quantified selves: Self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Society 45(1): 101–122. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Lupton, D (2017) Data thing-power: How do personal digital data come to matter? SSRN. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2998571 Google Scholar | |
| Lupton, D (2019) Toward a more-than-human analysis of digital health: Inspirations from feminist new materialism. Qualitative Health Research 29(14): 1998–2009. DOI: 10.1177/1049732319833368 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Lynskey, D (2019) The tech industry’s disregard for privacy relies on the consent of its customers. New Statesman. Available at: https://www.newstatesman.com/science-tech/social-media/2019/06/tech-industry-s-disregard-privacy-relies-consent-its-customers Google Scholar | |
| Maturo, A, Setiffi, F (2016) The gamification of risk: How health apps foster self-confidence and why this is not enough. Digitised Health, Medicine and Risk 17(7/8): 477–494. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Mobius, MD (2019) 11 surprising mobile health statistics. Available at: https://www.mobius.md/blog/2019/03/11-mobile-health-statistics/ Google Scholar | |
| Moore, P (2018) The Quantified Self in Precarity: Work, Technology and What Counts. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Moore, P, Piwek, L, Roper, I (2018) The quantified workplace: A study in self-tracking, agility and change management. In: Ajana, B (ed.) Self-Tracking. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 93–110. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Moore, P, Robinson, A (2016) The quantified self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society 18(11): 2774–2792. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Mulder, T (2019) Health apps, their privacy policies and the GDPR. European Journal of Law and Technology 10(1): 1–20. Google Scholar | |
| Neff, G (2017) Exploring the world of self-tracking: Who wants our data and why? The Oxford Internet Institute. Available at: https://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/blog/exploring-the-world-of-self-tracking-who-wants-our-data-and-why/ Google Scholar | |
| Neff, G, Nafus, D (2016) Self-Tracking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Oppenheim, S (2019) How the corporate wellness market has exploded: Meet the latest innovators in the space. Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/serenaoppenheim/2019/06/11/how-the-corporate-wellness-market-has-exploded-meet-the-latest-innovators-in-the-space/ Google Scholar | |
| Peckham, J (2020) Best fitness tracker 2020: The top 10 activity bands on the planet. Techradar. Available at: https://www.techradar.com/uk/news/wearables/10-best-fitness-trackers-1277905 Google Scholar | |
| Pitts, FH, Jean, E, Clarke, Y (2019) Sonifying the quantified self: Rhythmanalysis and performance research in and against the reduction of life-time to labour-time. Capital and Class 44(2): 219–240. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Rabinow, P (1996) Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Rand Corporation (2013) Workplace wellness programs study: Final report. Available at: https://aspe.hhs.gov/system/files/pdf/76661/rpt_wellness.pdf Google Scholar | |
| Rowse, LM (2015) Statistics of the self: Shaping the self through quantified self-tracking. Scripps Senior Theses. Paper 695. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1656&context=scripps_theses Google Scholar | |
| Ruckenstein, M (2014) Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies 4(1): 68–84. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Ruckenstein, M, Granroth, J (2020) Algorithms, advertising and the intimacy of surveillance. Journal of Cultural Economy 13(1): 12–24. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Sanders, R (2017) Self-tracking in the digital era: Biopower, patriarchy, and the new biometric body projects. Body & Society 23(1): 36–63. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Shin, G, Jarrahi, M (2014) Studying the role of wearable health-tracking devices in raising users’ self-awareness and motivating physical activities. Available at: https://wish2014.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/sub-12-shin_jarrahi_wish_workshop_paper_2014.pdf Google Scholar | |
| Singer, N (2015) Technology that prods you to take action, not just collect data. New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/19/technology/technology-that-prods-you-to-take-action-not-just-collect-data.html?_r=0 Google Scholar | |
| Sützl, W (2016) Being with one another: Towards a media phenomenology of sharing. APRJA. Available at: https://aprja.net//article/view/116036 Google Scholar | |
| Sysling, F (2019) Measurement, self-tracking and the history of science: An introduction. History of Science 58(2): 103–116. DOI: 10.1177/0073275319865830 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Takahashi, D (2012) Quantifying our lives will be a top trend of 2012. In: VB. Available at: http://venturebeat.com/2012/01/21/quantifying-our-lives-will-be-a-top-trend-of-2012/ Google Scholar | |
| Till, C (2016) Why do companies want us to be healthy? Corporate wellness, self-tracking and philanthrocapitalism. This is not a Sociology Blog. Available at: https://christopherharpertill.wordpress.com/2016/04/06/why-do-companies-want-us-to-be-healthy-corporate-wellness-self-tracking-and-philanthrocapitalism/ Google Scholar | |
| Till, C (2019) Creating ‘automatic subjects’: Corporate wellness and self-tracking. Health 23(4): 418–435. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Timan, T, Albrechtslund, A (2018) Surveillance, self and smartphones: Tracking practices in the nightlife. Science and Engineering Ethics 24: 853–870. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
| Valle, CG, Gibbon, S (2015) Introduction: Health/illness, biosocialities and culture. SciELO.org. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412015000100067 Google Scholar | |
| Van Den Eede, Y (2015) Tracing the tracker: A postphenomenological inquiry into self-tracking technologies. In: Rosenberger, R, Verbeek, PP (eds) Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human–Technology Relations. Lanham: Lexington Books, 143–158. Google Scholar | |
| Verbeek, PP (2005) What Things Do – Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Penn State: Penn State University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Verbeek, PP (2008) Cyborg intentionality: Rethinking the phenomenology of human–technology relations. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7(3): 387–395. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Verbeek, PP (2011) Moralising Technology, Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Verbeek, PP (2015) Beyond interaction: A short introduction to mediation theory. Interactions 22(3): 26–31. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Wadyka, S (2020) Are workplace wellness programs a privacy problem? In: Consumer Reports. Available at: https://www.consumerreports.org/health-privacy/are-workplace-wellness-programs-a-privacy-problem/ Google Scholar | |
| Wenger-Trayner, E, Wenger-Trayner, B (2015) Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Available at: https://wenger-trayner.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/07-Brief-introduction-to-communities-of-practice.pdf Google Scholar | |
| Whitson, JR (2013) Gaming the quantified self. Surveillance and Society 11(1/2): 163–176. Available at: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/gaming/gaming Google Scholar | |
| Williams, S (2016) Fitbit’s dominance in wearables market remains unchallenged, Apple suffers decline. In: Channel Life. Available at: https://channellife.co.nz/story/fitbits-dominance-wearables-market-remains-unchallenged-apple-suffers-decline Google Scholar | |
| Wolf, G (2010) The data-driven life. New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/magazine/02self-measurement-t.html?_r=0 Google Scholar |