Author(s):

  • Pallud, Jessie
  • De Moya, Jean-Francois

Abstract:

Over the last decade, increasing scholarly interest has been demonstrated by the exponential growth of published studies on the topic of Quantified-Self (QS). After 10 years of existence, it seems important to review the knowledge accumulated on QS in order to identify potential gaps and avenues for future research, especially in the IS field. We rely on a systematic literature review in the field of Information Systems with the approach recommended by Okoli and Schabram (2010). In addition, we use the paradigm funnel (Berthon et al., 2003) to structure our analysis. We find that the literature on QS covers three main domains. The technological domain has studied data mining, visualization and user behaviour. The medical domain has focused on the benefits of QS especially for health management and the social domain is more critical about the implications of QS in people’s life. Also, our analysis of the literature reveals a concentration of empirical and critical articles and few theoretical and methodological papers. Future research should fill in these gaps.

Document:

https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2017_rp/108/?utm_source=aisel.aisnet.org%2Fecis2017_rp%2F108&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

References:
  1. Ajzen, Icek. (1991). “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Hu-man Decision Processes50 (2): 179–211.
  2. Almalki, Manal, Kathleen Gray, and Fernando Martin-Sanchez. (2016). “Activity Theory as a Theoretical Framework for Health Self-Quantification:A Systematic Review of Empiri-cal Studies.” Journal of Medical Internet Research18 (5): e131–47.
  3. Almalki, Manal, Kathleen Gray, and Fernando Martin Sanchez. (2015a). “The Use of Self-Quantification Systems for Personal Health Information: Big Data Management Activi-ties and Prospects.” Health Information Science and Systems3 (Suppl 1): S1.
  4. Almalki, Manal, Fernando Martin Sanchez, and Kathleen Gray. (2015b). “Quantifying the Activities of Self-Quantifiers: Management of Data, Time and Health.” Studies in HealthTechnology and Informatics216: 333–37.
  5. Andrieu, Bernard. (2015). “L’osmose technique avec son corps viv@nt : une auto-santé con-nectée du patient immersif.” L’Évolution Psychiatrique, September.
  6. Barrett, Meredith A., Olivier Humblet, Robert A. Hiatt, andNancy E. Adler. (2013). “BIG DATA AND DISEASE PREVENTION: From Quantified Self to Quantified Communi-ties.” Big Data1 (3): 168–75.
  7. Barta, Kristen, and Gina Neff. (2016). “Technologies for Sharing: Lessons from Quantified Self about the Political Economy of Platforms.” Information, Communication & Society19 (4): 518–31.
  8. Berthon, Pierre, Agnes Nairn, and Arthur Money. (2003). “Through the Paradigm Funnel: A Conceptual Tool for Literature Analysis.” Marketing Education Review13 (2): 55–66.
  9. Bietz, G. R. Hayes, M. E. Morris, H. Patterson, and L. Stark. (2016). “Creating Meaning in a World of Quantified Selves.” IEEE Pervasive Computing15 (2): 82–85.Boesel, W. (2013). What Is the Quantified Self Now? Cyborgology.
  10. Choe, Eun Kyoung, Bongshin Lee, and m.c. schraefel. (2015). “Characterizing Visualization Insights from Quantified Selfers’ Personal Data Presentations.” IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications35 (4):28–37.
  11. Clawson, James, Jessica A. Pater, Andrew D. Miller, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, and Lena Mamykina. (2015). “No Longer Wearing: Investigating the Abandonment of Personal Health-Tracking Technologies on Craigslist.” In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Interna-tional Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 647–658. ACM.
  12. Crawford, Kate, Jessa Lingel, and Tero Karppi. (2015). “Our Metrics, Ourselves: A Hundred Years of Self-Tracking from the Weight Scale to the Wrist Wearable Device.” European Journal of Cultural Studies18 (4–5): 479–496.
  13. Davis, F. (1986). “A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results.”
  14. Deci, Edward L., and Richard M. Ryan. (2011). “Self-Determination Theory.” Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology1: 416–433.
  15. En, Boka, and Mercedes Pöll. (2016). “Are You (Self-)Tracking? Risks, Norms and Optimi-sation in Self-Quantifying Practices.” Graduate Journal of Social Science12 (2): 37–57.
  16. Fawcett, Tom. (2015). “Mining the Quantified Self: Personal Knowledge Discovery as a Challenge for Data Science.” Big Data3 (4): 249–66.
  17. Fink, Arlene. (2013). Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. SAGE Publications.
  18. Foucault, Michel, Luther H. Martin, Huck Gutman, and Patrick H. Hutton. (1988). Technolo-gies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. Univ of Massachusetts Press.De Moya & Pallud/ Quantified self: Literature reviewTwenty-Fifth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães,Portugal, 2017 1692
  19. Foucault, Michel. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979. Springer.
  20. Fox, Susannah, and Maeve Duggan. (2013). “Tracking for Health.” Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. January 28. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/28/tracking-for-health/.
  21. Gimbert, Carine, and Francois-Joseph Lapointe. (2015). “Self-Tracking the Microbiome: Where Do We Go from Here?” Microbiome3 (December): UNSP 70.
  22. Hammarfelt, Björn, Sarah de Rijcke, and Alexander D. Rushforth. (2016). “Quantified Aca-demic Selves: The Gamification of Research through Social Networking Services.” In-formation Research21 (2): 1–1.
  23. Hermsen, Sander, Jeana Frost, Reint Jan Renes, and Peter Kerkhof. (2016). “Using Feedback through Digital Technology to Disrupt and Change Habitual Behavior: A Critical Re-view of Current Literature.” Computers in Human Behavior57 (April): 61–74.
  24. Hoy, Matthew B. (2016). “Personal Activity Trackers and the Quantified Self.” Medical Ref-erence Services Quarterly35 (1): 94–100.
  25. IMS Institute. (2015). “More than 165,000 Mobile Health Apps Now Available.” iMedi-calApps. September 17.
  26. Jain R., and Jalali L. (2014). “Objective Self.” IEEE MultiMedia21 (4): 100–110.
  27. Kim, Jeongeun. (2014a). “A Qualitative Analysis of User Experiences With a Self-Tracker for Activity, Sleep, and Diet.” Journal of Medical Internet Research16 (3): 1–1.
    1. ———. 2014b. “Analysis of Health Consumers’ Behavior Using Self-Tracker for Activity, Sleep, and Diet.” Telemedicine and E-Health20 (6): 552–58.
  28. Kim, Jeongeun, and Hyeoun-Ae Park. (2012). “Development of a Health Information Tech-nology Acceptance Model Using Consumers’ Health Behavior Intention.” Journal of Medical Internet Research14 (5): e133.
  29. Lanzing, Marjolein. (2016). “The Transparent Self.” Ethics and Information Technology18 (1): 9–16.
  30. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte A. (2010), “Un regard critique sur l’approche structurationniste en si : une comparaison avec l’approche foucaldienne”, Systèmes d’information & management, vol. 15, n°1, p.p. 35.
  31. Levy, Yair, and Timothy J. Ellis. (2006). “A Systems Approach to Conduct an Effective Lit-erature Review in Support of Information Systems Research.” Informing Science: Inter-national Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline9 (1): 181–212.
  32. Li, Ian, Anind K. Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. (2012). “Using Context to Reveal Factors That Af-fect Physical Activity.” Acm Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction19 (1):7.
  33. Li, Yang, and Yike Guo. (2016). “Wiki-Health: From Quantified Self to Self-Understanding.” Future Generation Computer Systems56 (March): 333–59.
  34. Lupton, Deborah. (2013a). “Quantifying the Body: Monitoring and Measuring Health in the Age of mHealth Technologies.” Critical Public Health23 (4): 393–403
    1. .———. (2013b). “Understanding the Human Machine [Commentary].” IEEE Technology & Society Magazine32 (4): 25–30.
    2. ———. (2015). “Quantified Sex: A Critical Analysis of Sexual and Reproductive Self-Tracking Using Apps.” Culture Health & Sexuality17 (4): 440–53.
    3. ———. (2016). “The Diverse Domains of Quantified Selves: Self-Tracking Modes and Dataveillance.” Economy and Society, 1–22.
  35. Majmudar, Maulik D., Lina Avancini Colucci, and Adam B. Landman. (2015). “The Quanti-fied Patient of the Future: Opportunities and Challenges.” Healthcare3 (3): 153–56.
  36. Mamykina,Lena, Arlene M. Smaldone, and Suzanne R. Bakken. (2015). “Adopting the Sensemaking Perspective for Chronic Disease Self-Management.” Journal of Biomedical Informatics56 (August): 406–17.
  37. Martin, S., B. Schneider, L. Heinemann, V. Lodwig, H.-J. Kurth, H. Kolb, W. A. Scherbaum, and for the ROSSO Study Group. (2006). “Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Type 2 Diabetes and Long-Term Outcome: An Epidemiological Cohort Study.” Diabetologia49 (2): 271–78.
  38. Mueller, Lars, Monica Divitini, Simone Mora, Veronica Rivera-Pelayo, and Wilhelm Stork. (2015). “Context Becomes Content: Sensor Data for Computer-Supported Reflective Learning.” Ieee Transactions on Learning Technologies8 (1): 111–23.
  39. Nafus, Dawn, and Jamie Sherman. (2014). “This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice.” International Journal of Communi-cation8: 1784–94.
  40. Nelson, Jonathan K., and Patrick C. Shih. (2016). “CompanionViz: Mediated Platform for Gauging Canine Health and Enhancing Human–pet Interactions.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.
  41. Okoli, Chitu, and Kira Schabram. (2010). “A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research.” Sprouts Work. Pap. Inf. Syst10: 26.
  42. Ouellet, Maxime, Marc Menard, Maude Bonenfant, and Andre Mondoux. (2015). “Big Data and Self Quantification: The Algorthmic Governmentality in the Digitally Administered World.” Canadian Journal of Communication40 (4): 597–613.
  43. Pfeiffer, Jurij, Matthias von Entress-Fuersteneck, Nils Urbach, and Arne Buchwald. (2016). “Quantify-Me: Consumer Acceptance of Wearable Self-Tracking Devices.” In Twenty-Fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS).
  44. Pharabod, Anne-Sylvie, Véra Nikolski, and Fabien Granjon. (2013). “La mise en chiffresde soi.” Réseaux, no. 177(April): 97–129.
  45. Poushter, Jacob. (2016). “Smartphone Ownership and Internet Usage Continues to Climb in Emerging Economies.” Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project. February 22.
  46. Prochaska, James O., and Wayne F. Velicer.(1997). “The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change.” American Journal of Health Promotion12 (1): 38–48.
  47. Rapp, Amon, and Federica Cena. (2016). “Personal Informatics for Everyday Life: How Us-ers without Prior Self-Tracking Experience Engage with Personal Data.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies94 (October): 1–17.
  48. Reigeluth, Tyler. (2014). “Why Data Is Not Enough: Digital Traces as Control of Self and Self-Control.” Surveillance & Society12 (2): 243–54.
  49. Riley, William T, Daniel E Rivera, Audie A Atienza, Wendy Nilsen, Susannah M Allison, and Robin Mermelstein. (2011). “Health Behavior Models in the Age of Mobile Inter-ventions: Are Our Theories up to the Task?” Translational Behavioral Medicine1 (1): 53–71.
  50. Rivera-Pelayo, Verónica, Valentin Zacharias, Lars Müller, and Simone Braun. (2012). “Ap-plying Quantified Self Approaches to Support Reflective Learning.” In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 111–114. ACM.
  51. Roberts, Seth. (2012).“The Reception of My Self-Experimentation.” Journal of Business Re-search65 (7): 1060–66.
  52. Ruckenstein, Minna. (2015). “Uncovering Everyday Rhythms and Patterns: Food Tracking and New Forms of Visibility and Temporality in Health Care.” Studies in Health Tech-nology and Informatics215: 28–40.
  53. Smarr, Larry. (2012). “Quantifying Your Body: A How-to Guide from a Systems Biology Perspective.” Biotechnology Journal7 (8): 980–991.
  54. Stragier, Jeroen, Tom Evens, and Peter Mechant. (2015). “Broadcast Yourself: An Explorato-ry Study of Sharing Physical Activity on Social Networking Sites.” Media International Australia, no. 155(May): 120–29.
  55. Stragier, Jeroen, Mariek Vanden Abeele, Peter Mechant, and Lieven De Marez. (2016). “Un-derstanding Persistence in the Use of Online Fitness Communities: Comparing Novice and Experienced Users.” Computers in Human Behavior64 (November): 34–42.
  56. Swan, Melanie. (2009). “Emerging Patient-Driven Health Care Models: An Examination of Health Social Networks, Consumer Personalized Medicine and Quantified Self-Tracking.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health6 (2): 492–525.
    1. ———. (2012). “Sensor Mania! The Internet of Things, Wearable Computing, Objective Metrics, and the Quantified Self 2.0.” Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks1 (3): 217–253.
    2. ———. (2013). “The Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Bio-logical Discovery.” Big Data1 (2): 85–99.
  57. Thornquist, Eline, and Anna Luise Kirkengen. (2015). “The Quantified Self: Closing the Gap between General Knowledge and Particular Case?” Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice21 (3):398–403.
  58. Verdezoto, Nervo, and Erik Gronvall. (2016). “On Preventive Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring at Home.” Cognition Technology & Work18 (2): 267–85.Williams, Simon J.,
  59. Catherine Coveney, and Robert Meadows. (2015). “‘M-Apping’ Sleep? Trends and Transformations in the Digital Age.” Sociology of Health & Illness37 (7): 1039–54.
  60. Williamson, Ben. (2015). “Algorithmic Skin: Health-Tracking Technologies, Personal Ana-lytics and the Biopedagogies of Digitized Health and Physical Education.” Sport, Educa-tion & Society20 (1): 133–51.