Author(s):
- Simona Chiodo
Abstract:
The phenomenon of the quantified self, which is especially addressed by sociology and medical humanities, is still quite disregarded by philosophy. Yet, the philosophical issues it raises are various and meaningful, from the realm of epistemology to the realm of ethics. Moreover, it may be read as a key symptom to investigate the complex technological era in which we live, starting from the meaning of contemporary technology itself from a philosophical perspective. I shall focus on one of the epistemological issues raised by the phenomenon of the quantified self by arguing that it may be read in terms of epistemological anarchism, which also leads to other epistemological issues, such as a possibly detectable crisis of the notions of knowledge in general and science in particular as founded on the relationship between particularity and universality, as well as between reality and ideality. I shall select cases that are peculiarly representative of the founding epistemological stance I shall focus on. Yet, the reason why they deserve special attention is that they are also representative of an increasingly widespread attitude characterising not only the community of the quantified self but also, at least to some extent, anyone of us who may happen to use technologies (from apps to self-track symptoms to google to search symptoms) to try to self-diagnose.
Documentation:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-022-00483-2
References:
Belli, J. (2016). Unhappy? There’s an app for that, Tracking well-being through the quantified self. “Digital Culture and Society”, 2/1, 89–103
Berlin, I. (1988). The pursuit of the ideal. “The New York Review of Books”. March 17
Berlin, I. (1990). The crooked timber of humanity. Chapters in the history of ideas. London: Murray
Berlin, I. (1996). The sense of reality. Studies in ideas and their history. London: Chatto & Windus
Blomseth Christiansen, T., Debugging my allergy, https://quantifiedself.com/show-and-tell/?project=563
Brady, M. (2013). Emotional insight. The epistemic role of emotional experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Carmichael, A. (2010). Why I stopped tracking, https://quantifiedself.com/blog/why-i-stopped-tracking/
Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011). A new algorithmic identity. Soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. “Theory, Culture and Society”, 28/6, 164–181
Chiodo, S. (2016). Che cos’è un ideale. Da Platone alla filosofia contemporanea. Roma: Carocci
Chiodo, S. (2020a). Technology and anarchy. A reading of our era. Lanham-Boulder-New York-London: Lexington Books-The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group
Chiodo, S. (2020b). The greatest epistemological externalisation. Reflecting on the puzzling direction we are heading to through algorithmic automatisation, “AI & society. Journal of knowledge, culture and communication”, 35/2: 431–440
Collins, H. M. (2014). Are we all scientific experts now?. Cambridge-Malden: Polity Press
Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies. Studies of expertise and experience. “Social Studies of Science”, 32(2), 235–296
Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2007). Rethinking expertise. Chicago-London: The University of Chicago Press
De Groot, M., Drangsholt, M., Martin-Sanchez, F. J., & Wolf, G. I. (2017). Single subject (N-of-1) research design, data processing, and personal science. “Methods of Information in Medicine”, 56/6, 416–418
Dickenson, D. (2013). Me medicine vs. we medicine. Reclaiming biotechnology for the common good. New York: Columbia University Press
Ferretti, F. (2019). Mapping do-it-yourself science. “Life Sciences, Society and Policy”, 15/1, 1–23
Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: NLB
Feyerabend, P. K. (1987). Farewell to reason. London: Verso
Heyen, N. B. (2020). From self-tracking to self-expertise. The production of self-related knowledge by doing personal science. “Public Understanding of Science”, 29(2), 124–138
Jullien, F. (2009). L’invention de l’ideal et le destin de l’Europe. Paris: Seuil
Kant, I. (2005). 1781 Critique of pure reason, ed. by P. Guyer and A.W. Wood, Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press
Kant, I. (2000). 1790 Critique of the power of judgment, ed. by P. Guyer, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kelly, K. (2012). The quantified century, http://quantifiedself.com/conference/Palo-Alto-2012 (not accessible)
Levy, N., & Alfano, M. (2020). Knowledge from vice. Deeply social epistemology. “Mind”, 515/129, 887–915
Lupton, D. (2012). M-health and health promotion. The digital cyborg and surveillance society. “Social Theory & Health”, 10/3, 229–244
Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self. A sociology of self-tracking. Cambridge: Polity Press
Lupton, D. (2018). How do data come to matter? Living and becoming with personal data. “Big Data & Society”, 2, 1–11
Martin, B., & Brouwer, W. (1993). Exploring personal science. “Science Education”, 77(4), 441–459
Mirza, R. D., Punja, S., Vohra, S., & Guyatt, G. (2017). The history and development of N-of-1 trials. “Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine”, 110/8, 330–340
Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything click here. London: Allen Lane
Morton, A. (2010). Epistemic emotions. In P. Goldie (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of emotion (pp. 385–399). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Murray, J. (1833). A classical manual, being a mythological, historical, and geographical commentary on Pope’s Homer and Dryden’s Virgil. London: Murray
Nafus, D., & Sherman, J. (2014). This one does not go up to 11. The quantified self movement as an
alternative big data practice,“International Journal of Communication”, 8:1784–1794
Neff, G., & Nafus, D. (2016). Self-tracking. Cambridge: MIT Press
Nozick, R. (1989). What is wisdom and why do philosophers love it so?, in The examined life (pp. 267–278). New York: Touchstone Press
Paruchuri, V., Happsee, https://quantifiedself.com/show-and-tell/?project=723
Plato (1969). Respublica, ed. by P. Shorey, Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers. The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Roberts, S., QS + paleo = ?, https://quantifiedself.com/show-and-tell/?project=206
Ruckenstein, M., & Pantzar, M. (2017). Beyond the quantified self. Thematic exploration of a dataistic paradigm. “New Media & Society”, 19/3, 401–418
Selke, S. (Ed.). (2016). Lifelogging. Digital self-tracking and lifelogging – between disruptive technology and cultural transformation. Wiesbaden: Springer
Sharon, T. (2017). Self-tracking for health and the quantified self. Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. “Philosophy and Technology”, 30, 93–121
Sharon, T., & Zandbergen, D. (2017). From data fetishism to quantifying selves. Self-tracking practices and the other values of data. “New Media & Society”, 19/11, 1695–1709
Shellabarger, N., 28 years of tracking, but what have I learned?, https://quantifiedself.com/show-and-tell/?project=815
Smarr, L., Where there’s data there’s hope, https://quantifiedself.com/show-and-tell/?project=390
Smith, W. (Ed.). (1867). Dictionary of Greek and Roman biography and mythology. Boston: Little Brown & Co
Swan, M. (2013). The quantified self. Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. “Big Data”, 2/1, 85–98
Timmer, J., My life in 40 variables, https://quantifiedself.com/show-and-tell/?project=847
of digital utopianism, Chicago:University of Chicago Press
Tzara, T. (2001). Dada manifesto. In M. A. Caws (Ed.), Manifesto. A century of isms (pp. 297–304). Lincoln-London: University of Nebraska Press
Walker Rettberg, J. (2014). Seeing ourselves through technology. How we use selfies, blogs and wearable devices to see and shape ourselves. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
Williams, K. (2013). The weight of things lost. Self-knowledge and personal informatics, CHI: 1–4
Wolf, G. I. (2009). Know thyself. Tracking every facet of life, from sleep to mood to pain, 24/7/365, “Wired”, http://archive.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/17-07/lbnp_knowthyself?currentPage=all
Wolf, G. I. (2010). The data-driven life, “The New York Times Magazine”, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/magazine/02self-measurement-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Wolf, G. I., & De Groot, M. (2020). A conceptual framework for personal science. “Frontier in Computer Science”, 21(2), 1–5