Author(s):
Yli-Kauhaluoma, Sari
Pantzar, Mika
Abstract:
Objective
Self-tracking technologies have created high hopes, even hype, for aiding people to govern their own health risks and promote optimal wellness. High expectations do not, however, necessarily materialize due to connective gaps between personal experiences and self-tracking data. This study examines situations when self-trackers face difficulties in engaging with, and reflecting on, their data with the aim of identifying the specificities and consequences of such connective gaps in self-tracking contexts.
Methods
The study is based on empirical analyses of interviews of inexperienced, experienced and extreme self-trackers (in total 27), who participated in a pilot study aiming at promoting health and wellness.
Results
The study shows that people using self-tracking devices actively search for constant connectivity to their everyday experiences and particularly health and wellness through personal data but often become disappointed. The results suggest that in connective gaps the personal data remains invisible or inaccurate, generating feelings of confusion and doubt in the users of the self-tracking devices. These are alarming symptoms that may lead to indifference when disconnectivity becomes solidified and data ends up becoming dead, providing nothing useful for the users of self-tracking technologies.
Conclusions
High expectations which are put on wearables to advance health and wellness may remain unmaterialised due to connective gaps. This is problematic if individuals are increasingly expected to be active in personal data collection and interpretation regarding their own health and wellness.
Document:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29942640/
References:
| 1. | Lupton D. Self-tracking modes: Reflexive self-monitoring and data practices, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2483549 (2014, accessed 17 November, 2017). Google Scholar |
| 2. | Pantzar, M, Ruckenstein, M. The heart of everyday analytics: Emotional, material and practical extensions in self-tracking market. Consump Mark Cult 2015; 18: 92–109. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 3. | Swan, M . Sensor mania! The internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. J. Sens. Actuator Netw 2012; 1: 217–253. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 4. | Wolf G. The data-driven life, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/magazine/02self-measurement-t.html (28 April 2010, accessed 13 February 2018). Google Scholar |
| 5. | Kelly K. Self-tracking? You will, http://kk.org/thetechnium/self-tracking-y/ (25 March 2011, accessed 14 February 2018). Google Scholar |
| 6. | Wyatt, S, Harris, A, Adams, S Illness online: Self-reported data and questions of trust in medical and social research. Theory Cult Soc 2013; 30: 131–150. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 7. | Hood, L, Friend, SH. 2011. Predictive, personalized, preventive, participatory (P4) cancer medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2011; 8: 184–187. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 8. | Brown, N . 2003. Hope against hype – accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Sci Stud 2003; 16: 3–21. Google Scholar |
| 9. | Lury, C . Going live: Towards an amphibious sociology. Sociol Rev 2012; 60: 184–197. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 10. | Kolb, DG . Exploring the metaphor of connectivity: Attributes, dimensions and duality. Organ Stud 2008; 29: 127–144. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 11. | Kolb, DG, Caza, A, Collins, PD. 2012. States of connectivity: New questions and new directions. Organ Stud 2012; 33: 267–273. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 12. | Dery, K, Kolb, D, MacCormick, J. 2014. Working with connective flow: How smartphone use is evolving in practice. Eur J Inf Syst 2014; 23: 559–670. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 13. | Symon, G, Pritchard, K. Performing the responsive and committed employee through the sociomaterial mangle of connection. Organ Stud 2015; 36: 241–263. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 14. | Kolb, DG, Collins, PD, Lind, EA. Requisite connectivity: Finding flow in a not-so-flat world. Organ Dyn 2008; 37: 181–189. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 15. | Wajcman, J, Rose, E. Constant connectivity: Rethinking interruptions at work. Organ Stud 2011; 32: 941–961. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 16. | Castells, M, Fernández-Ardèvol, M, Qiu, JL Mobile communication and society: A global perspective, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2007. Google Scholar |
| 17. | Mayer-Schönberger, V, Cukier, K. Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013. Google Scholar |
| 18. | Van Dijck, J . Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveill Soc 2014; 12: 197–208. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 19. | Lynch, R, Cohn, S. In the loop: Practices of self-monitoring from accounts by trial participants. Health 2016; 20: 523–538. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 20. | Nafus, D . Stuck data, dead data, and disloyal data: the stops and starts in making numbers into social practices. Distinktion: Scand. J. Soc. Theory 2014; 15: 208–222. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 21. | Borup, M, Brown, N, Konrad, K The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technol Anal Strateg 2006; 18: 285–298. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 22. | Lunde, M, Røpke, I, Heiskanen, E. Smart grid: Hope or hype? Energ Effic 2016; 9: 545–562. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 23. | Alvial-Palavicino, C . The future as practice. A framework to understand anticipation in science and technology. TECNOSCIENZA, Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies 2015; 6: 135–172. Google Scholar |
| 24. | Konrad, K . The social dynamics of expectations: The interaction of collective and actor-specific expectations on electronic commerce and interactive television. Technol Anal Strateg 2006; 18: 429–444. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 25. | Pantzar, M, Shove, E. Understanding innovation in practice: A discussion of the production and re-production of Nordic Walking. Technol Anal Strateg 2010; 22: 447–461. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 26. | Wolf G. Know thyself: Tracking every facet of life, from sleep to mood to pain, 24/7/365, https://www.wired.com/2009/06/lbnp-knowthyself/ (2009, accessed 17 November, 2017). Google Scholar |
| 27. | Swan, M . Emerging patient-driven health care models: An examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2009; 6: 492–525. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 28. | Swan, M . Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. J Pers Med 2012; 2: 93–118. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 29. | Scitovsky, T . The joyless economy, New York: Oxford University Press, 1976. Google Scholar |
| 30. | Douglas, M, Isherwood, B. The world of goods: Towards an anthropology of consumerism, London: Routledge, 1996. Google Scholar |
| 31. | Pantzar, M . Domestication of everyday life technology: Dynamic views on the social histories of artifacts. Design Issues 1997; 13: 52–65. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 32. | Shove, E, Pantzar, M, Watson, M. The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes, London: Sage, 2012. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 33. | Rooksby J, Rost M, Morrison A, et al. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Canada, 26 April–1 May 2014, pp.1163–1172. New York: ACM. Google Scholar |
| 34. | Li I, Dey AK and Forlizzi J. Understanding my data, myself: Supporting self-reflection with Ubicomp technologies. In: Proc. of the 13th Int. Conf. on Ubiquitous Computing, Beijing, China, 17-21 September 2011, pp.405–414. New York: ACM. Google Scholar |
| 35. | Lupton, D . The quantified self, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2016. Google Scholar |
| 36. | Preuveneers D and Berbers Y. Mobile phones assisting with health self-care: A diabetes case study. In: Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 2–5 September 2008, pp.177–186. New York: ACM. Google Scholar |
| 37. | Davis J. The qualified self, https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2013/03/13/the-qualified-self/ (13 March 2013, accessed 16 February 2018). Google Scholar |
| 38. | Lupton D. You are your data: Self-tracking practices and concepts of data, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2534211 (2014, accessed 17 November 2017). Google Scholar |
| 39. | Rapp, A, Cena, F. Personal informatics for everyday life: How users without prior self-tracking experience engage with personal data. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2016; 94: 1–17. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 40. | Graham, S, Thrift, N. Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance. Theory Cult Soc 2007; 24: 1–25. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 41. | Hargittai, E, Hinnant, A. Digital inequality: Differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communic Res 2008; 35: 602–621. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 42. | Baum, F, Newman, L, Biedrzycki, K. Vicious cycles: Digital technologies and determinants of health in Australia. Health Promot Int 2014; 29: 349–360. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 43. | Choe EK, Lee NB, Lee B, et al. Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Canada, 26 April–1 May 2014, pp.1143–1152. New York: ACM. Google Scholar |
| 44. | Ledger D and McCaffrey D. Inside wearables: How the science of human behavior change offers the secret to long-term engagement, https://blog.endeavour.partners/inside-wearable-how-the-science-of-human-behavior-change-offers-the-secret-to-long-term-engagement-a15b3c7d4cf3 (2014, accessed 17 November, 2017). Google Scholar |
| 45. | Lazar A, Koehler C, Tanenbaum J, et al. Why we use and abandon smart devices. In: Proc. of the 2015 ACM Int. Joint Conf. on Pervasive Ubiquitous Computing, Osaka, Japan, 7–11 September 2015, pp.635–646. New York: ACM. Google Scholar |
| 46. | Withings. Withings Activité Pop activity tracker – sleep analyzer installation and operating instructions, https://images-eu.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/91IVGccIuLL.pdf (2015, accessed 28 February 2018). Google Scholar |
| 47. | Zöllner M, Zapf A, Truong ND, et al. Okinesio – the development of open hardware for quantified self. In: Proc. of the 3rd Int. Workshop on Sensor-based Activity Recognition and Interaction, Rostock, Germany, 23–24 June 2016, paper no. 3, pp.1–5. New York: ACM. Google Scholar |
| 48. | Eriksson, P, Kovalainen, A. Qualitative methods in business research, London: Sage, 2008. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 49. | Pantzar, M, Ruckenstein, M. Living the metrics: Self-tracking and situated objectivity. Digit Health 2017; 3: 1–10. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
| 50. | Locke, K, Golden-Biddle, K, Feldman, MS. Making doubt generative. Rethinking the role of doubt in the research process. Organ Sci 2008; 19: 907–918. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 51. | Paasonen, S . As networks fail: Affect, technology, and the notion of the use. Telev New Media 2015; 16: 701–716. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 52. | van Dijck, J . ‘You have one identity’: Performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media Cult Soc 2013; 35: 199–215. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 53. | Fenn, J, Raskino, M. Mastering the hype cycle: How to choose the right innovation at the right time, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2008. Google Scholar |