Author(s):
- Federico Sarzotti
Abstract:
Nowadays Personal Informatics (PI) devices are used for sensing and saving personal data, everywhere and at any time, helping people improve their lives by highlighting areas of good and bad performances and providing a general awareness of different levels of conduct. However, not all these data are suitable to be automatically collected. This is especially true for emotions and mood. Moreover, users without experience in self-tracking may have a misperception of PI applications’ limits and potentialities. We believe that current PI tools are not designed with enough understanding of such users’ needs, desires, and problems they may encounter in their everyday lives. We designed and prototype the Mood TUI (Tangible User Interface), a PI tool that supports the self-reporting of mood data using a tangible interface. The platform is able to gather six different mood states and it was tested through several participatory design sessions in a secondary/high school. The solution proposed allows gathering mood values in an amusing, simple, and appealing way. Users appreciated the prototypes, suggesting several possible improvements as well as ideas on how to use the prototype in similar or totally different contexts, and giving us hints for future research.
Documentation:
https://doi.org/10.3390/computers7010007
References:
1.Marcengo, A.; Rapp, A. Visualization of human behavior data: The quantified self. InInnovative Approachesof Data Visualization and Visual Analytics; Huang, M.L., Huang, W., Eds.; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2014;pp. 236–265. ISBN 9781466643093.
2.Rapp, A.; Tirassa, M. Know Thyself: A Theory of the Self for Personal Informatics.Hum.-Comput. Interact.2017,32, 335–380. [CrossRef]
3.Fox, S.; Duggan, M.Health Online 2012; Pew Internet & American Life Project: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
4.Jimison, H.; Gorman, P.; Woods, S.; Nygren, P.; Walker, M.; Norris, S.; Hersh, W. Barriers and drivers ofhealth information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved.Evid. Rep./Technol. Assess.2008,1, 1–1422.
5.Fox, S.The Social Life of Health Information, 2011; Pew Internet & American Life Project: Washington,DC, USA, 2011.
6.Fox, S. Is There Hope for SMS Health Alerts. Available online: http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/12/17/is-there-hope-for-sms-health-alerts/ (accessed on 4 January 2018).
7. Rapp, A.; Cena, F.; Kay, J.; Kummerfeld, B.; Hopfgartner, F.; Plumbaum, T.; Larsen, J.E. New frontiers ofquantified self: Finding new ways for engaging users in collecting and using personal data. In Proceedingsof the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedingsof the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Osaka, Japan, 7–11 September 2015;ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 969–972.
8.Rapp, A.; Cena, F.; Kay, J.; Kummerfeld, B.; Hopfgartner, F.; Plumbaum, T.; Larsen, J.E.; Epstein, D.A.;Gouveia, R. New frontiers of quantified self 2: Going beyond numbers. In Proceedings of the 2016ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, Heidelberg, Germany,12–16 September 2016; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 506–509.
9.Rapp, A.; Cena, F.; Kay, J.; Kummerfeld, B.; Hopfgartner, F.; Plumbaum, T.; Larsen, J.E.; Epstein, D.A.;Gouveia, R. New frontiers of quantified self 3: Exploring understudied categories of users. In Proceedings ofthe 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings ofthe 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Maui, HI, USA, 11–15 September 2017;ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2017; pp. 861–864.
10.Cena, F.; Likavec, S.; Rapp, A. Quantified self and modeling of human cognition. In Proceedings of the2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Osaka, Japan, 7–11 September 2015; ACM:New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 1021–1026.
11.Rapp, A.; Cena, F. Self-monitoring and Technology: Challenges and Open Issues in Personal Informatics.InUniversal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Design for All and Accessibility Practice, Part IV, Proceedingsof the 8th International Conference, UAHCI 2014, Held as Part of HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete,Greece, 22–27 June 2014; Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 613–622,ISBN 978-3-319-07509-9.
12.Rapp, A.; Cena, F. Personal informatics for everyday life: How users without prior self-tracking experienceengage with personal data.Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud.2016,94, 1–17. [CrossRef]
13.Matassa, A.; Rapp, A.; Simeoni, R. Wearable accessories for cycling: Tracking memories in urban spaces.In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication,Zurich, Switzerland, 8–12 September 2013; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 415–424.
14.Banaee, H.; Ahmed, M.U.; Loutfi, A. Data mining for wearable sensors in health monitoring systems:A review of recent trends and challenges.Sensors2013,13, 17472–17500. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
15.Cena, F.; Likavec, S.; Rapp, A.; Marcengo, A. An ontology for quantified self: Capturing the concepts behindthe numbers. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and UbiquitousComputing, Heidelberg, Germany, 12–16 September 2016; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 602–604.
16.Hilviu, D.; Rapp, A. Narrating the quantified self. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International JointConference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2015 ACM InternationalSymposium on Wearable Computers, Osaka, Japan, 7–11 September 2015; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2015;pp. 1051–1056.
17.Nafus, D.; Denman, P.; Durham, L.; Florez, O.; Nachman, L.; Sahay, S.; Savage, E.; Sharma, S.; Strawn, D.;Wouhaybi, R.H. As simple as possible but no simpler: Creating flexibility in personal informatics.In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems,San Jose, CA, USA, 7–12 May 2016; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 1445–1452.
18.Rapp, A.; Cena, F. Affordances for self-tracking wearable devices. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM InternationalSymposium on Wearable Computers, Osaka, Japan, 7–11 September 2015; ACM:New York, NY, USA, 2015;pp. 141–142.
19.Rapp, A.; Cena, F.; Hilviu, D.; Tirassa, M. Human body and smart objects. In Proceedings of the 2015ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Osaka, Japan, 7–11 September 2015; ACM:New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 939–943.20.Cena, F.; Rapp, A.; Likavec, S.; Marcengo, A. Envisioning the Future of Personalization through PersonalInformatics: A User Study.Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. (IJMHCI)2018,10, 52–66. [CrossRef]21.Cabanac, M. What is emotion?Behav. Process.2002,60, 69–83. [CrossRef]22.Schacter, D.L.; Gilbert, D.T.; Wegner, D.M.Psychology, 2nd ed.; Worth: New York, NY, USA, 2011.Computers2018,7, 725 of 28
23.Brave, S.; Nass, C. Emotion in human-computer interaction. InThe Human-Computer Interaction Handbook;L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2002; pp. 81–96.
24.Clore, G.L.; Robinson, M.D. Knowing our emotions: How do we know what we feel.Handb. Self-Knowl.2012,1, 194–209.
25.Affectiva. Available online: http://www.affectiva.com/technology/ (accessed on 13 August 2017).
26.Emotient. Available online: http://www.emotient.com (accessed on 13 August 2016).
27.Marcengo, A.; Rapp, A.; Cena, F.; Geymonat, M. The Falsified Self: Complexities in Personal Data Collection.In Proceedings of the HCI International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction,Toronto, ON, Canada, 17–22 July 2016; Methods, Techniques, and Best Practices, Lecture Notes in ComputerScience. Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; Volume 9737, pp. 351–358.
28.Wallbott, H.G.; Scherer, K.R. Assessing emotion by questionnaire.Emot. Theory Res. Exp.1989,4, 55–82.
29.Lorr, M. Models and methods for measurement of mood. InEmotion: Theory, Research, and Experience;The Measurement of Emotions; Plutchik, R., Kellerman, H., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA,1989; Volume 4, pp. 37–53.
30.Lang, P.J. The emotion probe: Studies of motivation and attention.Am. Psychol.1995,50, 372. [CrossRef][PubMed]
31.Plutchik, R. Measuring emotions and their derivatives.Emot. Theory Res. Exp.1989,4, 1.
32.McCurdie, T.; Taneva, S.; Casselman, M.; Yeung, M.; McDaniel, C.; Ho, W.; Cafazzo, J. mHealth ConsumerApps: The Case for User-Centered Design.Biomed. Instrum. Technol.2012,46, 49–56. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
33.Kay, M.; Santos, J.; Takane, M. mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies.World Health Organ.2011,3, 66–71.34.Bartlett, F.C.; Burt, C. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology.Br. J. Educ. Psychol.1933,3, 187–192. [CrossRef]
35.Cardillo, D.; Rapp, A.; Benini, S.; Console, L.; Simeoni, R.; Guercio, E.; Leonardi, R. The art of video MashUp:Supporting creative users with an innovative and smart application.Multimed. Tools Appl.2011,53, 1–23.[CrossRef]
36.Console, L.; Antonelli, F.; Biamino, G.; Carmagnola, F.; Cena, F.; Chiabrando, E.; Cuciti, V.; Demichelis, M.;Fassio, F.; Franceschi, F.; et al. Interacting with social networks of intelligent things and people in the worldof gastronomy.ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst.2013,3, 1–38. [CrossRef]
37.Simeoni, R.; Etzler, L.; Guercio, E.; Perrero, M.; Rapp, A.; Montanari, R.; Tesauri, F. Innovative TV: Froman old standard to a new concept of Interactive TV—An Italian job. In Proceedings of the InternationalConference on Human-Computer Interaction, Beijing, China, 22–27 July 2007; HCI Intelligent MultimodalInteraction Environments, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007;Volume 4552, pp. 971–980. [CrossRef]
38.Simeoni, R.; Geymonat, M.; Guercio, E.; Perrero, M.; Rapp, A.; Tesauri, F.; Montanari, R. Where Have YouEnded Up Today? Dynamic TV and the Inter-tainment Paradigm. In Proceedings of the European Conferenceon Interactive Television, Salzburg, Austria, 3–4 July 2008; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008;pp. 238–247.
39.Vellar, A.; Simeoni, R.; Montanari, R.; Rapp, A. A parasocial navigation concept for movie discovery.In Proceedings of the Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction (IHCI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands,25–27 July 2008; pp. 291–296.
40.Rapp, A.; Marcengo, A.; Console, L.; Simeoni, R. Playing in the wild: Enhancing user engagementin field evaluation methods. In Proceedings of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference,Tampere, Finland, 3–5 October 2012; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 227–228.
41.Rapp, A. A Qualitative Investigation of Gamification: Motivational Factors in Online Gamified Services andApplications.Int. J. Technol. Hum. Interact.2015,11, 67–82. [CrossRef]
42.Rapp, A.; Cena, F.; Gena, C.; Marcengo, A.; Console, L. Using game mechanics for field evaluation ofprototype social applications: A novel methodology.Behav. Inf. Technol.2016,35, 184–195. [CrossRef]
43.Rapp, A. Beyond Gamification: Enhancing User Engagement through Meaningful Game Elements.In Proceedings of the Foundation of Digital Games, Chania, Greece, 14–17 May 2013; Society for theAdvancement of the Science of Digital Games; ISBN 978-0-9913982-0-1.Computers2018,7, 726 of 28
44.Rapp, A.; Cena, F.; Hopfgartner, F.; Hamari, J.; Linehan, C. Fictional game elements: Critical perspectives ongamification design. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction inPlay Companion Extended Abstracts (CHI PLAY Companion 2016), Austin, Texas, USA, 16–19 October 2016;ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 373–377.
45.Rapp, A. Designing interactive systems through a game lens: An ethnographic approach.Comput. Hum. Behav.2017,71, 455–468. [CrossRef]
46.Rapp, A. Drawing inspiration from World of Warcraft: Gamification design elements for behavior changetechnologies.Interact. Comput.2017,29, 648–678. [CrossRef]
47.Rapp, A. From games to gamification: A classification of rewards in World of Warcraft for the design ofgamified systems.Simul. Gaming2017,48, 381–401. [CrossRef]
48.Rapp, A. Meaningful game elements for personal informatics. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM InternationalSymposium on Wearable Computers: Adjunct Program, Seattle, WA, USA, 13–17 September 2014; ACM:New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 125–130.
49.Shaer, O.; Hornecker, E. Tangible user interfaces: Past, present, and future directions.Found. Trends Hum.-Comput.Interact.2010,3, 1–137. [CrossRef]
50.Ishii, H.; Ullmer, B. Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings ofthe ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,Atlanta, GA, USA,22–27 March 1997;ACM: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 234–241.
51.Mugellini, E.; Rubegni, E.; Gerardi, S.; Khaled, O.A. Using personal objects as tangible interfaces for memoryrecollection and sharing. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and EmbeddedInteraction, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, 15–17 February 2007; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 231–238.
52.Xie, L.; Antle, A.N.; Motamedi, N. Are tangibles more fun?: Comparing children’s enjoyment andengagement using physical, graphical and tangible user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2nd InternationalConference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, BatBonn, Germany, 18–20 February 2008; ACM:New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 191–198.
53.Zuckerman, O.; Gal-Oz, A. To TUI or not to TUI: Evaluating performance and preference in tangible vs.graphical user interfaces.Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud.2013,71, 803–820. [CrossRef]
54.Christensen, P.; Mikkelsen, M.R.; Nielsen, T.A.S.; Harder, H. Children, mobility, and space: Using GPS andmobile phone technologies in ethnographic research.J. Mix. Methods Res.2011,5, 227–246. [CrossRef]
55.Track Your Happiness. Available online: https://www.trackyourhappiness.org/ (accessed on 5 July 2016).
56.Happy Factor. Available online: http://howhappy.dreamhosters.com/ (accessed on 13 August 2017).
57.Mood Panda. Available online: http://www.moodpanda.com/ (accessed on 13 August 2016).
58.Matthews, M.; Doherty, G. In the mood: Engaging teenagers in psychotherapy using mobile phones.In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada,7–12 May 2011; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 2947–2956.
59.Mood 24/7. Available online: https://www.mood247.com/ (accessed on 13 August2017).
60.Mood Scope. Available online: https://www.moodscope.com// (accessed on 13 August 2016).
61.Mood Tracker. Available online: https://www.moodtracker.com/ (accessed on 13 August 2016).
62.Gotta Feeling. Available online: http://gottafeeling.com// (accessed on 13 August 2017).
63.Mappiness. Available online: http://www.mappiness.org.uk/ (accessed on 13 August 2016).64.StressEraser. Available online: http://www.stresseraser.com (accessed on 5 July 2016).
65.T2 Mood Tracker. Available online: http://www.t2.health.mil/apps/t2-mood-tracker (accessed on 5 July 2016).
66.Med Help Mood Tracker. Available online: http://www.medhelp.org/user-trackers/gallery/mood/(accessed on 13 August 2016).
67.Feelytics. Available online: Http://feelytics.me/index.php (accessed on 13 August 2016).
68.Li, I. Designing personal informatics applications and tools that facilitate monitoring of behaviors.In Proceedings of the UIST 2009, Victoria, BC, Canada, 4–7 October 2009.
69.Valenza, G.; Gentili, C.; Lanatà, A.; Scilingo, E.P. Mood recognition in bipolar patients through the PSYCHEplatform: Preliminary evaluations and perspectives.Artif. Intell. Med.2013,57, 49–58. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
70.Fractal. Available online: http://www.design.philips.com/about/design/designportfolio/design-futures/fractal.page (accessed on 13 August 2016).Computers2018,7, 727 of 28
71.Davis, F.; Roseway, A.; Carroll, E.; Czerwinski, M. Actuating mood: Design of the textile mirror.In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction,Barcelona, Spain, 10–13 February 2013; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 99–106.
72.BodyMonitor. Available online: http://bodymonitor.de (accessed on 13 August 2017).
73.Rationalizer. Available online: http://www.mirrorofemotions.com/ (accessed on 5 July 2016).
74.Bretl, D. Emotish. Available online: https://www.appfutura.com/app/emotish-dj (accessed on 4 January 2018).
75.Ouellet, S. Real-time emotion recognition for gaming using deep convolutional network features.arXiv2014.
76.Yu, Z.; Zhang, C. Image based static facial expression recognition with multiple deep network learning.In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, Seattle, WA, USA,9–13 November 2015; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 435–442.
77.Kim, B.-K.; Roh, J.; Dong, S.-Y.; Lee, S.-Y. Hierarchical committee of deep convolutional neural networks forrobust facial expression recognition.J. Multimodal User Interfaces2016,10, 173–189. [CrossRef]
78.Knapton, S. Bad mood?New app senses emotion and suggests food to lift spirits.The Telegraph,27 November 2016.
79.Lathia, N.; Pejovic, V.; Rachuri, K.K.; Mascolo, C.; Musolesi, M.; Rentfrow, P.J. Smartphones for Large-ScaleBehavior Change Interventions.IEEE Pervasive Comput.2013,12, 66–73. [CrossRef]
80.Hornecker, E.; Buur, J. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space andsocial interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,Montréal, QC, Canada, 22–27 April 2006; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2006; p. 437.
81.Klemmer, S.R.; Landay, J.A. Tangible User Interface Input: Tools and Techniques. Ph.D. Thesis, University ofCalifornia, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2004.
82.Klemmer, S.R.; Li, J.; Lin, J.; Landay, J.A. Papier-Mache: Toolkit support for tangible input. In Proceedings ofthe SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vienna, Austria, 24–29 April 2004; ACM:New York, NY, USA, 2004; pp. 399–406.
83.Kimura, H.; Tokunaga, E.; Okuda, Y.; Nakajima, T. CookieFlavors: Easy Building Blocks for Wireless TangibleInput. In Proceedings of the CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHIEA 2006), Montréal, QC, Canada, 22–27 April 2006; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2006; pp. 965–970.
84.Jacquemin, C. Pogany: A Tangible Cephalomorphic Interface for Expressive Facial Animation. In Proceedingsof the Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction: Second International Conference, ACII 2007,Lisbon, Portugal, 12–14 September 2007; Paiva, A.C.R., Prada, R., Picard, R.W., Eds.; Springer:Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 558–569.
85.Cohen, J.; Withgott, M.; Piernot, P. Logjam: A Tangible Multi-person Interface for Video Logging. In Proceedingsof the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 1999),Pittsburgh, PA, USA,15–20 May 1999; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 1999; pp. 128–135.
86.Terrenghi, L.; Kranz, M.; Holleis, P.; Schmidt, A. A Cube to Learn: A Tangible User Interface for the Designof a Learning Appliance.Pers. Ubiquitous Comput.2006,10, 153–158. [CrossRef]
87.Camarata, K.; Do, E.Y.-L.; Johnson, B.R.; Gross, M.D. Navigational Blocks: Navigating Information Spacewith Tangible Media. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces(IUI 2002), San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–16 January 2002; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 31–38.
88.Van Laerhoven, K.; Villar, N.; Schmidt, A.; Kortuem, G.; Gellersen, H. Using an Autonomous Cube forBasic Navigation and Input. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces(ICMI 2003), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5–7 November 2003; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2003; pp. 203–210.
89.Huron, S.; Carpendale, S.; Thudt, A.; Tang, A.; Mauerer, M. Constructive Visualization. In Proceedings ofthe 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS 2014), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 21–25 June 2014;ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 433–442.
90.Emotional Tactile Map. Available online: http://vis4me.com/portfolio/emotional-tactile-map/ (accessedon 16 December 2017).
91.Inca Quipus. Available online: http://dataphys.org/list/peruvian-quipus/ (accessed on 16 December 2017).
92.Pulse: Animated Heart Shows Sentiments. Available online: http://dataphys.org/list/pulse-showing-emotional-responses-on-the-web/ (accessed on 16 December 2017).
93.What Made Me. Available online: http://dataphys.org/list/what-made-me-interactive-public-installation/(accessed on 16 December 2017).Computers2018,7, 728 of 28
94.Physical Visual Sedimentation. Available online: http://dataphys.org/list/physical-visual-sedimentation/(accessed on 16 December 2017).
95.Physical Bar Charts. Available online: http://www.lucykimbell.com/LucyKimbell/PhysicalBarCharts.html(accessed on 16 December 2017).
96.The Happy Show. Available online: https://sagmeisterwalsh.com/work/all/the-happy-show/ (accessedon 16 December 2017).
97.Arduino. Available online: http://www.arduino.cc (accessed on 13 August 2017).
98.Sarzotti, F.; Lombardi, I.; Rapp, A.; Marcengo, A.; Cena, F. Engaging Users in Self-Reporting Their Data:A Tangible Interface for Quantified Self. InInternational Conference on Universal Access in Human-ComputerInteraction; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 518–527.
99.Cena, F.; Lombardi, I.; Rapp, A.; Sarzotti, F. Self-Monitoring of Emotions: A Novel Personal InformaticsSolution for an Enhanced Self-Reporting. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference on User Modeling,Adaptation and Personalization UMAP 2014, Aalborg, Denmark, 7–11 July 2014; CEUR WorkshopProceedings; 2014; Volume 1181.
100. D3.js. Available online: https://d3js.org/ (accessed on 18 December 2017).101. Mapbox. Available online: https://www.mapbox.com/ (accessed on 18 December 2017).
102. Varesano, F. FreeIMU: An open hardware framework for orientation and motion sensing.arXiv2013.
103.Ishii, H. Tangible User Interfaces. InHuman-Computer Interaction: Design Issues, Solutions, and Applications;CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2007; p. 469.
104.Howe, N.; Strauss, W.Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069; HarperCollins:New York, NY, USA, 1992; ISBN 978-0-688-11912-6.
105. Howe, N.; Strauss, W.Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation; Vintage: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
106. Twenge, J.M.Generation Me-Revised and Updated: Why Today’s Young Americans Are More Confident, Assertive,Entitled—And More Miserable than Ever Before; Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 2014.
107.Strauss, W.; Howe, N.Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069, 1st Quill ed.; Quill:New York, NY, USA, 1991; ISBN 978-0-688-11912-6.
108.Woodman, D.; Wyn, J.Youth and Generation: Rethinking Change and Inequality in the Lives of Young People; Sage:Thousand Oaks, CA, USA; London, UK, 2014.
109.Takahashi, T. Japanese youth and mobile media. InDeconstructing Digital Natives; Routledge:New York, NY, USA;London, UK, 2011; pp. 67–82.
110.Thomas, M.Deconstructing Digital Natives: Young People, Technology, and the New Literacies; Routledge:New York, NY, USA; London, UK, 2011; ISBN 978-0-415-88993-3.
111.Guest, G.; MacQueen, K.M.; Namey, E.E.Applied Thematic Analysis; Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA;London, UK, 2011.
112.Rapp, A.; Marino, A.; Simeoni, R.; Cena, F. An ethnographic study of packaging-free purchasing: Designingan interactive system to support sustainable social practices.Behav. Inf. Technol.2017,36, 1193–1217.[CrossRef]
113.Sarzotti, F. A Tangible Personal Informatics System for an Amusing Self-reporting. In Proceedings of the2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings ofthe 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, (UbiComp/ISWC 2015), Osaka, Japan,7–11 September 2015; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 1033–1038.