Self-Quantification and the Datapreneurial Consumer Identity

Author(s):

Beth Leavenworth DuFault
John W. Schouten

Abstract:

This study delivers a clearer understanding of the constitution of the datapreneurial consumer, the role of the market in that construction, and the implications for consumer identity projects in the age of Big Data and an increasingly data- and surveillance-driven society. The study uses a theoretical framework of the “quantified self” (QS) to examine consumers (re)building creditworthiness. In the context of a major online credit-user forum, it employs creative-nonfiction methodology to protect forum-member privacy. To the literature on creditworthiness, the study contributes a process model of the construction of the datapreneurial credit consumer identity. To the QS literature, it offers insight into how consumers may embrace quantification and self-tracking, even in areas where they are nudged or pushed into it. To the sociology of quantification literature, it adds empirics to explain how consumers may embrace market-provided self-quantification resources in attempts to liberate themselves from the structural control of that very quantification.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1519489

References:

Aalbers, Manuel B. 2005. “The Quantified Customer’, or How Financial Institutions Value Risk.” Home Ownership: Getting In, Getting from, Getting Out 2005: 33–57. [Google Scholar]
Allen, Gove N., Dan L. Burk, and Gordon B. Davis. 2006. “Academic Data Collection in Electronic Environments: Defining Acceptable Use of Internet Resources.” MIS Quarterly 30 (3): 599–610. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Amoore, Louise, and Volha Piotukh. 2015. “Life Beyond Big Data: Governing with Little Analytics.” Economy and Society 44 (3): 341–366. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Ball, Kirstie. 2017. “All Consuming Surveillance: Surveillance as Marketplace Icon.” Consumption Markets & Culture 20 (2): 95–100. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Barone, Tom. 2008. “Creative Nonfiction and Social Research.” Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research 1:105–116. [Google Scholar]
Beer, David. 2016. Metric Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Belliger, Andréa, and David J. Krieger. 2016. “From Quantified to Qualified Self–A Fictional Dialogue at the Mall.” Digital Culture & Society 2 (1): 25–41. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Berman, Elizabeth Popp, and Daniel Hirschman. 2018. “The Sociology of Quantification: Where are We Now?” Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews American Sociological Association, 47: 257–266. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Bernthal, Matthew J., David Crockett, and Randall L. Rose. 2005. “Credit Cards as Lifestyle Facilitators.” Journal of Consumer Research 32 (1): 130–145. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Botsman, Rachel. 2017. “Big Data Meets Big Brother as China Moves to Rate its Citizens.” Wired. UK, October 21. [Google Scholar]
Bruckman, Amy. 2002. “Studying the Amateur Artist: A Perspective on Disguising Data Collected in Human Subjects Research on the Internet.” Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3): 217–231. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Bruney, Gabrielle. 2018 (March 17). “A Black Mirror Episode is Coming to Life in China.” Downloaded June 1, 2018 at https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a19467976/black-mirror-social-credit-china/. [Google Scholar]
Burton, Dawn. 2008. Credit and Consumer Society. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Burton, Dawn. 2012. “Credit Scoring, Risk, and Consumer Lendingscapes in Emerging Markets.” Environment and Planning A 44 (1): 111–124. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Calder, Lendol. 2009. Financing the American Dream: A Cultural History of Consumer Credit. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Campbell-Verduyn, Malcolm, Marcel Goguen, and Tony Porter. 2017. “Big Data and Algorithmic Governance: The Case of Financial Practices.” New Political Economy 22 (2): 219–236. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Cheney-Lippold, John. 2011. “A New Algorithmic Identity: Soft Biopolitics and the Modulation of Control.” Theory, Culture & Society 28 (6): 164–181. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Choe, Eun Kyoung, Nicole B. Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2014. “Understanding Quantified-Selfers’ Practices in Collecting and Exploring Personal Data.” In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1143–1152. Toronto, ON: ACM. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Cornock, Marc. 2018. “General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Implications for Research.”. [Google Scholar]
Coughlin, Joseph F. 2014. “What Health and Finance Can Learn from the Quantified Self Movement and Each Other.” Downloaded 12/5/2017 at https://www.huffingtonpost.com/joseph-f-coughlin/what-health-finance-can-learn-from-each-other_b_5774810.html. [Google Scholar]
Deville, Joe. 2014. “Consumer Credit Default and Collections: The Shifting Ontologies of Market Attachment.” Consumption Markets & Culture 17 (5): 468–490. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Deville, Joe. 2016. “Debtor Publics: Tracking the Participatory Politics of Consumer Credit.” Consumption Markets & Culture 19 (1): 38–55. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Didžiokaitė, Gabija, Paula Saukko, and Christian Greiffenhagen. 2018. “The Mundane Experience of Everyday Calorie Trackers: Beyond the Metaphor of Quantified Self.” New Media & Society 20 (4): 1470–1487. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Dymek, Mikolaj. 2017. “Expanding the Magic Circle–Gamification as a Marketplace Icon.” Consumption Markets & Culture 38: 1–13. [Google Scholar]
Equifax. 2018. “Equifax Risk Score 2.0.” Accessed June 1, 2018. https://www.consumer.equifax.ca/business/equifax-risk-score. [Google Scholar]
Erol, Alkım. 2018. “Philosophizing Through ‘Nosedive’: Imprisonment by Consent”. In Current Debates in Media Studies, edited by E. En Dogan, and E. Dogan, Chap. 15. London: IJOPEC. [Google Scholar]
Espeland, Wendy Nelson, Michael Sauder, and Wendy Espeland. 2016. Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. [Google Scholar]
Espeland, Wendy Nelson, and Mitchell L. Stevens. 2008. “A Sociology of Quantification.” European Journal of Sociology 49 (3): 401–436. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Experian. 2018. “Bankruptcy PLUS: Predict Potential Bankruptcies.” Accessed June 1, 2018. http://www.experian.com/consumer-information/predict-potential-bankruptcy.html. [Google Scholar]
Experian Decision Analytics. 2018. “Bust Out Fraud: Knowing What to Look for Can Safeguard the Bottom Line.” An Experian white paper. Accessed June 1, 2018. https://www.experian.com/assets/decision-analytics/white-papers/bust-out-fraud-white-paper.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Faber, Ronald J., and Thomas C. O’Guinn. 1988. “Compulsive Consumption and Credit Abuse.” Journal of Consumer Policy 11 (1): 97–109. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Giesler, Markus, and Ela Veresiu. 2014. “Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity.” Journal of Consumer Research 41 (3): 840–857. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Gilbert, Sophie. 2016 (October 21). Black Mirror’s ‘Nosedive’ Skewers Social Media. Accessed June 1, 2018. https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/10/black-mirror-nosedive-review-season-three-netflix/504668/. [Google Scholar]
Humphreys, Lee. 2018. The Qualified Self: Social Media and the Accounting of Everyday Life. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Hvstendahl, Mara. 2017. “Inside China’s Vast New Experiment in Social Ranking.” Wired Magazine, December 17. [Google Scholar]
Hyman, Louis. 2011. Debtor Nation: The History of America in Red ink. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Kantanen, Helena, and Jyri Manninen. 2016. “Hazy Boundaries: Virtual Communities and Research Ethics.” Media and Communication 4 (4): 86–96. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Kara, Helen. 2015. Creative Research Methods in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Bristol: Policy Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Kear, Mark. 2017. “Playing the Credit Score Game: Algorithms, ‘Positive’ Data and the Personification of Financial Objects.” Economy and Society 46 (3-4): 346–368. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Kiviat, Barbara. 2017. “The Art of Deciding with Data: Evidence from How Employers Translate Credit Reports Into Hiring Decisions.” Socio-Economic Review. doi:10.1093/ser/mwx030. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Kozinets, Robert V. 2002. “The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities.” Journal of Marketing Research 39 (1): 61–72. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Kozinets, Robert V. 2015. Netnography. Thousand Oaks: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Langer, Roy, and Suzanne C. Beckman. 2005. “Sensitive Research Topics: Netnography Revisited.” Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 8 (2): 189–203. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Langley, Paul. 2014. “Equipping Entrepreneurs: Consuming Credit and Credit Scores.” Consumption Markets & Culture 17 (5): 448–467. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Lauer, Josh. 2010. “The Good Consumer: Credit Reporting and the Invention of Financial Identity in the United States, 1840–1940.” Enterprise & Society 11 (4): 686–694. [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Lauer, Josh. 2017. Creditworthy: A History of Consumer Surveillance and Financial Identity in America. New York: Columbia University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Leyshon, Andrew, and Nigel Thrift. 1999. “Lists Come Alive: Electronic Systems of Knowledge and the Rise of Credit-Scoring in Retail Banking.” Economy and Society 28 (3): 434–466. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Locker, Melissa. 2018 (April 24). “China’s Terrifying ‘Social Credit’ System is Expanding”. Accessed June 1, 2018. https://www.fastcompany.com/40563225/chinas-terrifying-social-credit-surveillance-system-is-expanding. [Google Scholar]
Lupton, Deborah. 2016a. “The Diverse Domains of Quantified Selves: Self-Tracking Modes and Dataveillance.” Economy and Society 45 (1): 101–122. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Lupton, Deborah. 2016b. The Quantified Self: A Sociology of Self-Tracking. Cambridge: Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
Lupton, Deborah. 2016c. “You are Your Data: Self-Tracking Practices and Concepts of Data.” In Lifelogging: Digital Self-Tracking and Lifelogging – Between Disruptive Technology and Cultural Transformation, edited by S. Selke, 61–79. Munich: Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Lupton, D., S. Pink, C. H. Labond, and S. Sumartojo. 2017. “Personal Data Contexts, Data Sense and Self-Tracking Cycling.” International Journal of Communications. [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Lupton, Deborah, and Gavin JD Smith. 2017. “‘A Much Better Person’: The Agential Capacities of Self-Tracking Practices.”. [Google Scholar]
Lynch, Rebecca, and Simon Cohn. 2016. “In the Loop: Practices of Self-monitoring from Accounts by Trial Participants.” Health 20 (5): 523–538. [Google Scholar]
Markham, Annette. 2012. ““Fabrication as Ethical Practice: Qualitative Inquiry in Ambiguous Internet Contexts.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (3): 334–353. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Markham, Annette, Elizabeth Buchanan, and AoIR Ethics Working Committee. 2012. Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Version 2.0.” Association of Internet Researchers. [Google Scholar]
Marron, Donncha. 2009. Consumer Credit in the United States: A Sociological Perspective from the Nineteenth Century to the Present. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
McAlexander, James H, Beth Leavenworth DuFault, Diane M. Martin, and John W. Schouten. 2014. “The Marketization of Religion: Field, Capital, and Consumer Identity.” Journal of Consumer Research 41 (3): 858–875. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
McClanahan, Annie. 2018. Dead Pledges: Debt, Crisis, and Twenty-First-Century Culture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. “The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.” Big Data & Society 3 (2). doi:10.1177/2053951716679679. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Nafus, Dawn, and Jamie Sherman. 2014. “Big Data, Big Questions: This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice.” International Journal of Communication 8 (11). [Google Scholar]
Narayan, Kirin. 2007. “Tools to Shape Texts: What Creative Nonfiction Can Offer Ethnography.” Anthropology and Humanism 32 (2): 130–144. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Neff, Gina, and Dawn Nafus. 2015. Self-tracking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
Neil, David, and Husain Sumra. 2017. “The Best Wearable Payment Devices: Put the Bank Card Down and Pay with Your Body.” https://www.wareable.com/wearable-tech/the-best-wearable-payment-devices-976. [Google Scholar]
O’Brien, Rourke L., and Barbara Kiviat. 2018. “Disparate Impact? Race, Sex, and Credit Reports in Hiring.” Socius. doi:10.1177/2378023118770069. Downloaded June 1-2018 at. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
O’Neill, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Allen Lane. [Google Scholar]
Pantzar, Mika, and Minna Ruckenstein. 2015. “The Heart of Everyday Analytics: Emotional, Material and Practical Extensions in Self-Tracking Market.” Consumption Markets & Culture 18 (1): 92–109. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Pasquale, Frank. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Payne, Alice. 2015. “Credit Score Systems Across the World.” Graydon. Accessed 17 June, 2018. https://www.graydon.co.uk/blog/credit-score-systems-across-world. [Google Scholar]
Pentland, Alex Sandy. 2013. “The Data-Driven Society.” Scientific American 309 (4): 78–83. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Peñaloza, Lisa, and Michelle Barnhart. 2011. “Living US Capitalism: The Normalization of Credit/Debt.” Journal of Consumer Research 38 (4): 743–762. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Piras, Enrico Maria, and Francesco Miele. 2017. “Clinical Self-tracking and Monitoring Technologies: Negotiations in the ICT-mediated Patient–Provider Relationship.” Health Sociology Review 26 (1): 38–53. [Google Scholar]
Poon, Martha. 2007. “Scorecards as Devices for Consumer Credit: The Case of Fair, Isaac & Company Incorporated.” The Sociological Review 55 (s2): 284–306. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Richardson, Laurel, and Elizabeth St Pierre. 2008. “A Method of Inquiry.” Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials 3 (4): 473–492. [Google Scholar]
Rollet. 2018 (June 5). “The Odd Reality of Life Under China’s All-Seeing Credit Score System.” Accessed June 10, 2018. http://www.wired.co.uk/article/china-social-credit. [Google Scholar]
Ruckenstein, Minna. 2015. “Uncovering Everyday Rhythms and Patterns: Food Tracking and New Forms of Visibility and Temporality in Health Care.” Studies in health technology and informatics 215: 28–40. [Google Scholar]
Ruckenstein, Minna, and Mika Pantzar. 2017. “Beyond the Quantified Self: Thematic Exploration of a Dataistic Paradigm.” New Media & Society 19 (3): 401–418. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Saatcioglu, Bige, and Julie L. Ozanne. 2013. “Moral Habitus and Status Negotiation in a Marginalized Working-Class Neighborhood.” Journal of Consumer Research 40 (4): 692–710. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Smith, Brett. 2013. “Sporting Spinal Cord Injuries, Social Relations, and Rehabilitation Narratives: An Ethnographic Creative Non-fiction of Becoming Disabled Through Sport.” Sociology of Sport Journal 30 (2): 132–152. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Smith, Brett, Kerry R. McGannon, and Toni L. Williams. 2015. “Ethnographic Creative Nonfiction.” In Ethnographies in Sport and Exercise Research, edited by Molnar Gyozo, and Laura Purdy, 49–73. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
Swan, M. 2013. “The Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery.” Big Data 1 (2): 85–99. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
Van Dijck, José. 2014. “Datafication, Dataism and Dataveillance: Big Data Between Scientific Paradigm and Ideology.” Surveillance & Society 12 (2): 197–208. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Whitson, Jennifer R. 2013. “Gaming the Quantified Self.” Surveillance & Society 11 (1/2): 163–176. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
Wolf, Gary. 2010. “The Quantified Self” Ted@Cannes Ted Talk. Accessed 11, 2017. https://www.ted.com/talks/gary_wolf_the_quantified_self. [Google Scholar]
Zimmer, Michael. 2010. “‘But the Data is Already Public’: On the Ethics of Research in Facebook.” Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4): 313–325. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]