Self-Tracking for Health and the Quantified Self: Re-Articulating Autonomy, Solidarity, and Authenticity in an Age of Personalized Healthcare

by | Apr 18, 2016 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Sharon, Tamar

Abstract:

Self-tracking devices point to a future in which individuals will be more involved in the management of their health and will generate data that will benefit clinical decision making and research. They have thus attracted enthusiasm from medical and public health professionals as key players in the move toward participatory and personalized healthcare. Critics, however, have begun to articulate a number of broader societal and ethical concerns regarding self-tracking, foregrounding their disciplining, and disempowering effects. This paper has two aims: first, to analyze some of the key promises and concerns that inform this polarized debate. I argue that far from being solely about health outcomes, this debate is very much about fundamental values that are at stake in the move toward personalized healthcare, namely, the values of autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity. The second aim is to provide a framework within which an alternative approach to self-tracking for health can be developed. I suggest that a practice-based approach, which studies how values are enacted in specific practices, can open the way for a new set of theoretical questions. In the last part of the paper, I sketch out how this can work by describing various enactments of autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity among self-trackers in the Quantified Self community. These examples show that shifting attention to practices can render visible alternative and sometimes unexpected enactments of values. Insofar as these may challenge both the promises and concerns in the debate on self-tracking for health, they can lay the groundwork for new conceptual interventions in future research.

Document:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs13347-016-0215-5

References:
  1. ABI research (2013) Wearable computing devices, like Apple’s iWatch, will exceed 485 million annual shipments by 2018. Retrieved from https://www.abiresearch.com/press/wearable-computing-devices-like-apples-iwatch-will. Accessed 25.2.2015.
  2. Abrugar, V. (2014) Quantified self: how self-tracking technology can improve your life. http://blog.goalmap.com/quantified-self-how-self-tracking-technology-can-improve-your-life/. Accessed 13.3.15.
  3. Andrejevic, M. (2014). The big data divide. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1673–1689. Google Scholar 
  4. Armstrong, D. (1995). The rise of surveillance medicine. Sociology of Health & Illness, 17(3), 393–404.Article  Google Scholar 
  5. Ayo, N. (2012). Understanding health promotion in a neoliberal climate and the making of health conscious citizens. Critical Public Health, 22(1), 99–105.Article  Google Scholar 
  6. Basulto, D. (2012) Meet the urban datasexual. Retrieved from http://bigthink.com/endless-innovation/meet-the-urban-datasexual. Accessed 13.2.2015.
  7. Bauman, Z. (2013). Solidarity: a word in search of flesh. Eurozine, May 8. http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2013-05-08-bauman-en.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2015.
  8. Boam, E. & Webb, J. (2014) The qualified self: going beyond quantification. Retrieved from http://designmind.frogdesign.com/2014/05/qualified-self-going-beyond-quantification/. Accessed 20.3.2015.
  9. Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.Article  Google Scholar 
  10. Burrows, R., Nettleton, S., & Bunton, S. (1995). Sociology and health promotion: health, risk and consumption under late modernism. In R. Bunton, S. Nettleton, & R. Burrows (Eds.), The sociology of health promotion: critical analyses of consumption, lifestyle and risk. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar 
  11. Byrne, D. & Brand, H. (2013) Meeting the challenge: special supplement on personalized medicine. Parliament Magazine September.
  12. Campbell, D. (2012) Doctors back denial of treatment for smokers and the obese. The Guardian http://www.theguardian.com/society/2012/apr/28/doctors-treatment-denial-smokers-obese.
  13. Cesuroglo, T., et al. (2012). Public health perspective: from personalized medicine to personalized health. Personalized Medicine, 9(2), 115–119.Article  Google Scholar 
  14. Cheney-Lippold, J. (2011). A new algorithmic identity: soft biopolitics and the modulation of control. Theory, Culture and Society 28(6), 164–181.
  15. Clarke, J., Newman, J., Smith, N., Vidler, E., & Westmarland, L. (2007). Creating citizen-consumers: changing publics and changing public services. London: Sage. Google Scholar 
  16. Coggi, P. T. (2011). A European view on the future of personalized medicine in the EU. European Journal of Public Health, 1, 6–7.Article  Google Scholar 
  17. Crawford, R. (1980). Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services, 10(3), 365–388.Article  Google Scholar 
  18. Crawford, R. (2006). Health as a meaningful social practice. Health, 10(4), 401–420.Article  Google Scholar 
  19. Davis, J. (2013). The qualified self. Available at: https://thesocietypages.org/cyborgology/2013/03/13/the-qualified-self/. Accessed 31 Mar 2016.
  20. De Corde, C. & Rolvink Couzy, F. (2015) Achmea geeft premiskroting aan klant die data levert. Finacieele Dagblad. http://www.expatica.com/nl/news/country-news/DN-Dutch-Insurance-giant-to-link-premium-discounts-to-customer-behaviour_509426.html. Accessed 2.2.2016.
  21. De Groot, M. (2012) Knowledge is power, know thyself! Retrieved from http://www.qsinstitute.org/?p=2067. Accessed 20.3.2015.
  22. Dhar, V. (2014). Healthcare and data: an interview with Peter Szolovits. Big Data, 2(4), 182–184.Article  Google Scholar 
  23. Dickenson, D. (2013). Me medicine vs. We medicine: reclaiming biotechnology for the common good. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar 
  24. Dormehl, L. (2014). The formula: how algorithms solve all our problems …and create more. New York: Penguin. Google Scholar 
  25. Dunn, R. (2013) Science reveals why calorie counts are all wrong. Scientific American (April 20) 309(3). http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/science-reveals-why-calorie-counts-are-all-wrong/?page=3. Accessed 11.2.15.
  26. EAPM (European Alliance for Personalised Medicine) (2012) Personalised medicine: new perspectives for patients in Europe. http://www.phgen.eu/typo3/fileadmin/downloads/EAPM_Manifesto.pdf. Accessed 2.19.2015.
  27. EC (European Commission) (2012) eHealth action plan 2012–2020—innovative healthcare for the 21st century. Brussels.
  28. EC (2013) Use of ‘-omics’ technologies in the development of personalized medicine, working document
  29. EC (2014a) GREEN PAPER on mobile health, COM (2014) 219. Brussels.
  30. EC (2014b) COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT on the existing EU legal framework applicable to lifestyle and wellbeing apps SWD (2014) 135. Brussels.
  31. EC (2014c) Healthcare in your pocket: unlocking the potentials of mHealth, IP/14/394. Brussels.
  32. European Science Foundation (ESF) (2012). Personalized Medicine for the European Citizen – towards more precise medicine for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of disease. Strasbourg: ESF. http://www.esf.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&g=0&t=1459438535&hash=46a03100e3aae993941fc0aa6cbd319d2492334f&file=fileadmin/be_user/CEO_Unit/Forward_Look/iPM/FL_2012_iPM.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2016.
  33. Feiler, B. (2014) The United States of metrics. New York Times http://nyti.ms/1nXqSvP. Accessed 13.3.15.
  34. Flores, M., et al. (2013). P4 medicine: how systems medicine will transform the healthcare sector and society. Personalized Medicine, 10(6), 565–576.Article  Google Scholar 
  35. Foreman, A., et al. (2011). Just text me: using SMS technology for collaborative patient mood charting. Journal of Participatory Medicine, 3, e45. Google Scholar 
  36. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison (Translated by A. Sheridan). London: Allen Lane. Google Scholar 
  37. Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2013). Tracking for health. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Google Scholar 
  38. Gitelman, L. (2013). “Raw data” is an oxymoron. Boston: MIT Press. Google Scholar 
  39. Groves, P., Kayyali, B., Knott, D., Van Kuiken, S. (2013) The ‘Big Data’ revolution in healthcare: accelerating value and innovation. Report published by the Center for US Health System Reform.
  40. Harris, R., Wathen, N., & Wyatt, S. (2010). Configuring health consumers: health work and the imperative of personal responsibility. New York: Palgrave. Google Scholar 
  41. Harrison, V., et al. (2011). Mobile mental health: review of the emerging field and proof of concept study. Journal of Mental Health, 20(6), 509–524.Article  Google Scholar 
  42. Health Data Exploration Network (2016). http://hdexplore.calit2.net/. Accessed 31 Mar 2016.
  43. Hill, K. (2011) Adventures in self-surveillance, aka the quantified self, aka extreme navel-gazing. Forbes, Jul. 4 http://www.forbes.com/sites/kashmirhill/2011/04/07/adventures-in-self-surveillance-aka-the-quantified-self-aka-extreme-navel-gazing/ Accessed 6.3.2015.
  44. Horning, R. (2013) Google alert for the soul. The New Inquiry. http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/google-alert-for-the-soul/ Accessed 26.2.2016.
  45. Houtepen, R., & ter Meulen, R. (2000). New types of solidarity in the European welfare state. Healthcare Analysis, 8(4), 329–340.Article  Google Scholar 
  46. Jain, S., et al. (2015). The digital phenotype. Nature Biotechnology, 33(5), 462–463.Article  Google Scholar 
  47. Kelly, K. (2012) The quantified century. Retrieved from http://quantifiedself.com/conference/Palo-Alto-2012.
  48. Laakso, E., Armstrong, K., & User, W. (2011). Cyber-management of people with chronic disease: a potential solution to eHealth challenges. Health Education Journal, 5(3), 1–8. Google Scholar 
  49. Lupton, D. (2012). M-health and health promotion: the digital cyborg and surveillance society. Social Theory & Health, 10(3), 229–244.Article  Google Scholar 
  50. Lupton, D. (2013). Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23(August), 393–403.Article  Google Scholar 
  51. Lupton, D. (2014) Self-tracking modes: reflexive self-monitoring and data practices. In Immanent Citizenships workshop, Canberra, AU, 27 August. Unpublished paper.
  52. Lupton, D. (2015). Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 17(4), 1–14.Article  Google Scholar 
  53. McGregor, J. (2014) Fitness trackers chase after the corporate market. The Washington Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-leadership/wp/2014/12/18/fitness-trackers-chase-after-the-corporate-market/. Accessed 3.3.2015.
  54. Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press. Google Scholar 
  55. Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything Click Here. London: Allen Lane
  56. Nafus, D., & Sherman, J. (2014). This one does not go up to 11: the quantified self movement as an alternative big data practice. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1784–1794. Google Scholar 
  57. National Academy of Sciences (NAS). (2011). Toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease. Washington, DC: NAS. Google Scholar 
  58. NHS Department of Health (2011) Innovation health and wealth, accelerating adoption and diffusion in the NHS. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130107105354/http:/www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/documents/digitalasset/dh_134597.pdf. Accessed 26 Feb 2015.
  59. NHS (2015). Technology enabled care services. NHS commissioning assembly. https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/qual-clin-lead/tecs/. Accessed 23.3.2015.
  60. Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar 
  61. Norris, J. (2012) Self-tracking may become key element of personalized medicine. UCSF News http://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/10/12913/self-tracking-may-become-key-element-personalized-medicine. Accessed 18.02.2015.
  62. Olson, P. (2014a) Wearable tech is plugging into health insurance. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2014/06/19/wearable-tech-health-insurance/. Accessed 03.03.2015.
  63. Olson, P. (2014b) The quantified other: Nest and Fitbit chase a lucrative side business. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2014/04/17/the-quantified-other-nest-and-fitbit-chase-a-lucrative-side-business/. Accessed 03.03.2015.
  64. Paquet, J., Kawinska, A., & Carrier, J. (2007). Wake detection capacity of actigraphy during sleep. Sleep, 30(10), 1362–1369.Article  Google Scholar 
  65. Pols, J. (2012). Care at a distance: on the closeness of technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar 
  66. Prainsack, B. (2014). Personhood and solidarity: what kind of personalized medicine do we want? Personalized Medicine, 11(7), 651–657.Article  Google Scholar 
  67. Prainsack, B., & Buyx, A. (2012). Solidarity in contemporary bioethics—towards a new approach. Bioethics, 26(7), 343–350.Article  Google Scholar 
  68. Prainsack, B., & Vayena, E. (2013). Beyond the clinic: ‘direct-to-consumer’ genomic profiling services and pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics, 14(4), 403–412.Article  Google Scholar 
  69. Rabin, C., & Bock, R. (2011). Desired features of smartphone applications promoting physical activity. Telemedicine and e-Health, 17(10), 801–803.Article  Google Scholar 
  70. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Towards a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.Article  Google Scholar 
  71. Research2Guidance (2013) Mobile health market report, 2013–2017. http://www.research2guidance.com/shop/index.php/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/262/.
  72. Rettner, R. (2014) Quantified self movement: how data-obsessed self-trackers push toward healthier lives. Live Science. http://www.livescience.com/44618-quantified-self-culture.html. Accessed 30.04.2015.
  73. Ritter, S. (2015). Apple’s research kit development framework for Iphone apps enables innovative approaches to medical research data collection. Clinical Trials, 5(2), e120. Google Scholar 
  74. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: reframing political thought. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar 
  75. Ruckenstein, M. (2014). Visualized and interacted life: personal analytics and engagements with data doubles. Societies, 4, 68–84.Article  Google Scholar 
  76. Schatzki, T., Knorr Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge. Google Scholar 
  77. Scrinis, G. (2013). Nutritionism: the science and politics of dietary advice. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar 
  78. Sharon, T. (2015). Healthy citizenship beyond autonomy and discipline: tactical engagements with genetic testing. Biosocieties, 10(3), 295–316.
  79. Sharon, T. & Zandbergen, D. (2016). From data fetishism to quantifying selves: self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444816636090.
  80. Soreon Research (2014). The wearable health revolution: how smart wearables disrupt the healthcare sector. Switzerland.
  81. Steinhubl, S., Muse, E., & Topol, E. (2013). Can mobile health technologies transform health care? JAMA, 310(22), 2395–2396.Article  Google Scholar 
  82. Swan, M. (2009). Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6, 492–525.Article  Google Scholar 
  83. Swan, M. (2012). Health 2050: the realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2, 93–118.Article  Google Scholar 
  84. Swan, M. (2013). The quantified self: fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data, 2(1), 85–98.Article  Google Scholar 
  85. Swierstra, T. (2013). Nanotechnology and techno-moral change. Ethics & Politics, 15(1), 200–219. Google Scholar 
  86. ter Meulen, R. (2000). The expectation(s) of solidarity: matters of justice, responsibility and identity in the reconstruction of the health care system. Health Care Analysis, 8, 355–376.Article  Google Scholar 
  87. ter Meulen, R., & Jotterand, F. (2008). Individual responsibility and solidarity in European health care. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 33(3), 191–197.Article  Google Scholar 
  88. Terranova, T. (2000). Free labor: producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33–58.
  89. Till, C. (2014). Exercise as labour: quantified self and the transformation of exercise into labour. Societies, 4(3), 446–462.Article  Google Scholar 
  90. Topol, E. (2015). The patient will see you now: the future of medicine is in your hands. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar 
  91. Traynor, M. (2003). A brief history of empowerment: response to discussion with Julianne Cheek. Primary Health Care Research and Development, 4, 129–136.Article  Google Scholar 
  92. Turner, F. (2006). From counterculture to cyberculture. Stewart Brand, the whole earth network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar 
  93. Tutton, R. (2012). Personalized medicine: futures present and past. Social Science and Medicine, 75(10), 1721–1728.Article  Google Scholar 
  94. Walhof, D. (2006). Friendship, otherness, and Gadamer’s politics of solidarity. Political Theory, 34(5), 569–593.Article  Google Scholar 
  95. Weber, G., et al. (2014). Finding the missing link for big biomedical data. JAMA, 311(24), 1–2. Google Scholar 
  96. Whitson, J. (2013). Gaming the quantified self. Surveillance & Society, 11(1/2), 163–176. Google Scholar 
  97. Wicks, et al. (2011). Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm. Nature Biotechnology, 29(5), 411–414.Article  Google Scholar 
  98. Wiederhold, B. (2012). Self-tracking: better medicine through pattern recognition. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(5), 235–236.Article  Google Scholar 
  99. Wolf, G. (2009) Know thyself: tracking every facet of life, from sleep to mood to pain, 24/7/365. Wired, June 22 http://archive.wired.com/medtech/health/magazine/17-07/lbnp_knowthyself?currentPage=all. Accessed 20.3.2015.
  100. Wolf, G. (2010) The data-driven life. The New York Times Magazine, April 28. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/02/magazine/02self-measurement-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.
  101. Zandbergen D. (2011) New edge. Technology and spirituality in the San Francisco Bay area. PhD dissertation.