Author(s):
- Enric Senabre Hidalgo
- Mad P. Ball,
- Morgane Opoix
- Bastian Greshake Tzovaras
Abstract:
Some individuals do not limit their self-tracking efforts to passively collecting and observing gathered data about themselves, but rather develop it into forms of self-research and self-experimentation, also called “personal science”. This type of N-of-1 research is relevant to the fields of personal informatics, patient-led research and social studies of science, but as a knowledge generation practice is still poorly understood. To fill this gap, we conducted 22 semi-structured interviews to investigate the intrinsic and extrinsic motivations of individuals engaging in personal science activities, as well as shared goals and values present in self-research communities. Our analysis is based on a conceptual framework that integrates previous approaches in self-research, as well as in connection with citizen science, the scientific ethos and cooperation in peer production. We identify how self-researchers seek to go beyond personal metrics about their health and wellbeing regarding data provided by wearables, are engaged over time by individual involvement in technology and scientific-related activity, and collaborate following similar goals and values when learning and sharing empirical knowledge with peers. In this sense, personal science can be understood as a specific type of citizen science and an example of a more participatory and inclusive scientific culture driven by self-reflection, critical thinking and openness.
Documentation: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01199-0
References:
Ajana B (2017) Digital health and the biopolitics of the quantified self. Digit Health 3:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616689509Article Google Scholar
Ajana B (2021) Personal science and the quantified self guru. In: Lawrence S (ed) “I am your guru”: situating Digital Guru Media amidst the neoliberal imperative of self-health management and the ‘post-Truth’ Society. Routledge, London
Almalki M, Gray K, Sanchez FM (2015) The use of self-quantification systems for personal health information: big data management activities and prospects. Health Inf Sci Syst. 3:S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2501-3-S1-S1Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Benkler, Y. (2004). Commons-based strategies and the problems of patents. Science, 305(5687), 1110–1111
Burnside M, Crocket H, Mayo M, Pickering J, Tappe A, de Bock M (2020) Do-it-yourself automated insulin delivery: a leading example of the democratization of medicine. J Diabetes Sci Technol 14:878–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819890623Article PubMed Google Scholar
Chiodo S (2021) From je ne sais quoi to quantified self. A philosophical agenda. Studi Estet
Choe EK, Lee NB, Lee B, Pratt W, Kientz JA (2014) Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in computing systems, CHI ’14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1143–1152
Chrisinger BW (2020) The quantified self-in-place: opportunities and challenges for place-based N-of-1 datasets. Front Comput Sci 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.00038
Christiansen TB, Kristensen DB, Larsen JE (2018) The 1-person laboratory of the quantified self community. In: Ajana B (ed) Metric culture. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 97–115
Christine DI, Thinyane M (2021) Citizen science as a data-based practice: a consideration of data justice. Patterns 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2021.100224
Couldry, N., & Powell, A (2014). Big data from the bottom up. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 2053951714539277
De Groot M, Drangsholt M, Martin-Sanchez F, Wolf G (2017) Single subject (N-of-1) research design, data processing, and personal science. Methods Inf Med 56:416–418. https://doi.org/10.3414/ME17-03-0001Article PubMed Google Scholar
Dijk ETK, IJsselsteijn WA (2016) Design beyond the numbers: sharing, comparing, storytelling and the need for a Quantified Us. Interact Des Archit 2016:121–135 Google Scholar
Dijk ETK, Westerink JHDM, Beute F, IJsselsteijn WA (2017) Personal informatics, self-insight, and behavior change: a critical review of current literature. Hum–Comput Interact 32:268–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2016.1276456Article Google Scholar
Dolejšová M, Kera D (2017) Soylent diet self-experimentation: design challenges in extreme citizen science projects. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW ’17. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 2112–2123
Dulong de Rosnay, M., & Le Crosnier, H (2012). An introduction to the digital commons: From common-pool resources to community governance. Building Institutions for Sustainable Scientific, Cultural and genetic Resources Commons. Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique: International Association for the Study of the Commons. https://halshs. archivesouvertes. fr/halshs-00736920
Eikey EV, Caldeira CM, Figueiredo MC, Chen Y, Borelli JL, Mazmanian M, Zheng K (2021) Beyond self-reflection: introducing the concept of rumination in personal informatics. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01573-w
Epstein DA, Caldeira C, Figueiredo MC, Lu X, Silva LM, Williams L, Lee JH, Li Q, Ahuja S, Chen Q, Dowlatyari P, Hilby C, Sultana S, Eikey EV, Chen Y (2020) Mapping and taking stock of the personal informatics literature. Proc ACM Interact Mob Wearable Ubiquitous Technol 4:1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432231Article Google Scholar
Esmonde K (2020) ‘There’s only so much data you can handle in your life’: accommodating and resisting self-surveillance in women’s running and fitness tracking practices. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 12:76–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1617188Article Google Scholar
Ferretti F (2019) Mapping do-it-yourself science. Life Sci Soc Policy 15:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-018-0090-1Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fricker M (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University PressGavrila V, Garrity A, Hirschfeld E, Edwards B, Lee JM (2019) Peer support through a diabetes social media community. J Diabetes Sci Technol 13:493–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296818818828Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gimpel H, Nißen M, Görlitz, R (2013). Quantifying the quantified self: A study on the motivations of patients to track their own health
Grant AD, Wolf GI, Nebeker C (2019) Approaches to governance of participant-led research: a qualitative case study. BMJ Open 9:e025633. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025633Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Haklay M (2013) Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: overview and typology of participation. In: Sui D, Elwood S, Goodchild M (eds) Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp. 105–122
Hecker S, Haklay M, Bowser A, Makuch Z, Vogel J, Bonn A (eds) (2018) Citizen Science: innovation in open science, society and policy. UCL Press.
Heyen NB (2016) Self-tracking as knowledge production: quantified self between prosumption and citizen science. In: Selke S (Ed.) Lifelogging: digital self-tracking and lifelogging—between disruptive technology and cultural transformation. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, pp. 283–301
Heyen NB (2020) From self-tracking to self-expertise: the production of self-related knowledge by doing personal science. Public Underst. Sci 29:124–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519888757Article PubMed Google Scholar
Heyen NB, Dickel S (2019) Was Ist personal health science? In: Heyen NB, Dickel S, Brüninghaus A (Eds.) Personal health science: Persönliches Gesundheitswissen zwischen Selbstsorge und Bürgerforschung, Öffentliche Wissenschaft und gesellschaftlicher Wandel. Springer Fachmedien, Wiesbaden, pp. 1–19
Jarrahi MH, Gafinowitz N, Shin G (2018) Activity trackers, prior motivation, and perceived informational and motivational affordances. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 22:433–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-017-1099-9Article Google Scholar
Jennett C, Kloetzer L, Schneider D, Iacovides I, Cox A, Gold M, Fuchs B, Eveleigh A, Mathieu K, Ajani Z, Talsi Y (2016) Motivations, learning and creativity in online citizen science. J Sci Commun 15:A05. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15030205Article Google Scholar
Jethani S (2015). Mediating the body: Technology, politics and epistemologies of self. Communication, Politics & Culture, 47(3), 34–43
Jethani S (2021). The Politics and Possibilities of Self-tracking Technology: Data, Bodies and Design. Emerald Group PublishingJin H, Peng Y, Chen J, Park ST (2022) Research on the connotation and dimension of consumers’ quantified-self consciousness. Sustainability 14:1504. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031504Article Google Scholar
Kaziunas E, Lindtner S, Ackerman MS, Lee JM (2018) Lived data: tinkering with bodies, code, and care work. Hum–Comput Interact 33:49–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1307749Article Google Scholar
Kempner J, Bailey J (2019) Collective self-experimentation in patient-led research: How online health communities foster innovation. Soc Sci Med 238:112366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112366Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kristensen DB, Ruckenstein M (2018) Co-evolving with self-tracking technologies. New Media Soc 20:3624–3640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818755650Article Google Scholar
Li I, Dey A, Forlizzi J (2010) A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 557–566
Lupton D (2019) ‘It’s made me a lot more aware’: a new materialist analysis of health self-tracking. Media Int Aust. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X19844042
Lupton D, Smith GJD (2018) ‘A much better person’: the agential capacities of self-tracking practices. In: Ajana B (ed) Metric culture. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 57–75
Lupton D (2014). Self-Tracking Modes: Reflexive Self-Monitoring and Data Practices Paper for the ‘Imminent Citizenships: Personhood and Identity Politics in the Informatic Age’workshop, 27 August 2014. ANU, Canberra
Lyall B, Robards B (2018) Tool, toy and tutor: subjective experiences of digital self-tracking. J Sociol 54:108–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783317722854Article Google Scholar
Marres N, Stark D (2020) Put to the test: For a new sociology of testing. The British Journal of Sociology 71:423–443Article Google Scholar
Merton RK (1973) The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Google Scholar
Moore P, Robinson A (2016) The quantified self: what counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media Soc 18:2774–2792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604328Article Google Scholar
Munson SA, Schroeder J, Karkar R, Kientz JA, Chung C-F, Fogarty J (2020) The importance of starting with goals in N-of-1 studies. Front Digit Health 2 https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2020.00003
Nafus D (2019) Data Aggregation as Social Relations: Making Datasets from Self-Tracking Data European Review 27:440–454Article Google Scholar
Neff G, Nafus D (2016) Self-tracking. MIT PressO’Neil, M, Toupin, S, Pentzold, C (2020). The Duality of Peer Production: Infrastructure for the Digital Commons, Free Labor for Free‐Riding Firms. The Handbook of Peer Production, 1–17
Pantzar M, Ruckenstein M (2017) Living the metrics: self-tracking and situated objectivity. Digit Health 3:2055207617712590. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207617712590Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Piras EM (2019) Beyond self-tracking: Exploring and unpacking four emerging labels of patient data work Health informaticsjournal 25:598–607Article Google Scholar
Rampin R, Steeves V, DeMott S (2021) Taguette. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5111814
Rapp A, Tirassa M (2017) Know thyself: a theory of the self for personal informatics. Hum–Comput Interact 32:335–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2017.1285704Article Google Scholar
Rapp A, Cena F, Marcengo A (2018) Editorial of the special issue on quantified self and personal informatics. Computers 7:14. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers7010014Article Google Scholar
Régnier F (2018) «Goût de liberté» et self-quantification. Reseaux n° 208-209:95–120 Google Scholar
Riggare S, Hägglund M, Bredenoord AL, de Groot M, Bloem BR (2021) Ethical aspects of personal science for persons with Parkinson’s disease: what happens when self-tracking goes from selfcare to publication? J Parkinson Dis 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3233/JPD-212647
Riggare S, Scott Duncan T, Hvitfeldt H, Hägglund M (2019) “You have to know why you’re doing this”: a mixed methods study of the benefits and burdens of self-tracking in Parkinson’s disease. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 19, 175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0896-7
Riggare-Södergren S (2022) Personal science in Parkinson’s disease—a patient-led research study. [S.l.]: [S.n.]Roberts S (2004) Self-experimentation as a source of new ideas: ten examples about sleep, mood, health, and weight. Behav Brain Sci. 27:227–288PubMed Google Scholar
Rooksby J, Rost M, Morrison A, Chalmers M (2014) Personal tracking as lived informatics. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in computing systems, CHI ’14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp. 1163–1172
Rotman D, Preece J, Hammock J, Procita K, Hansen D, Parr C, … & Jacobs D (2012, February). Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on computer supported cooperative work (pp. 217–226)
Ruckenstein M (2014) Visualized and interacted life: Personal analytics and engagements with data doubles Societies 4:68–84Article Google Scholar
Ruckenstein M, Schüll ND (2017) The datafication of health. Annu Rev Anthropol 46:261–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041244Article Google Scholar
Ruckenstein M, Pantzar M (2017) Beyond the quantified self: thematic exploration of a dataistic paradigm. New Media Soc 19:401–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815609081Article Google Scholar
Schüll, ND (2018). Self in the loop: Bits, patterns, and pathways in the quantified self. In A networked self and human augmentics, artificial intelligence, sentience (pp. 25–38). Routledge
Sharon T (2017) Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philos Technol 30:93–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5Article Google Scholar
Sharon T, Zandbergen D (2017) From data fetishism to quantifying selves: self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media Soc 19:1695–1709. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816636090Article Google Scholar
Shevchenko SY, Petrov KA, Filatova AA (2021) Biohacking: changing yourself to reformat science. Chelovek 32:58–73. https://doi.org/10.31857/S023620070018008-5Article Google Scholar
Spaeth S, Niederhöfer S (2020) User motivations in peer production. In: The handbook of peer production. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 123–136
Trace CB, Zhang Y (2019) The quantified-self archive: documenting lives through self-tracking data. J Doc 76:290–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-04-2019-0064Article Google Scholar
van de Belt TH, de Croon A, Freriks F, Christiansen TB, Larsen JE, de Groot M (2022) Barriers to and facilitators of using a one button tracker and web-based data analytics tool for personal science: exploratory study. JMIR Form Res 6:e32704. https://doi.org/10.2196/32704Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Vayena E, Brownsword R, Edwards SJ, Greshake B, Kahn JP, Ladher N, Montgomery J, O’Connor D, O’Neill O, Richards MP, Rid A, Sheehan M, Wicks P, Tasioulas J (2016) Research led by participants: a new social contract for a new kind of research. J Med Ethics 42:216–219. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-102663Article PubMed Google Scholar
Vuolanto P, Bergroth H, Nurmi J, Salmenniemi S (2020) Reconfiguring health knowledges? Contemporary modes of self-care as ‘everyday fringe medicine. Public Underst Sci 29:508–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520934752Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Weisse AB (2012) Self-experimentation and its role in medical research. Tex Heart Inst J 39:51–54PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
West S, Dyke A, Pateman R (2021) Variations in the motivations of environmental citizen scientists. Citiz Sci Theory Pract 6:14. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.370Article Google Scholar
Wolf GI, De Groot M (2020) A conceptual framework for personal science. Front Comput Sci 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.00021
Zhao J, Wang T, Fan X (2015) Patient value co-creation in online health communities: social identity effects on customer knowledge contributions and membership continuance intentions in online health communities. J Serv Manag 26:72–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-12-2013-0344Article Google Scholar