• Alcoff, L. M. (2018). Rape and resistance. Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
• Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology. Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
• Bobel, C. (2010). New blood: Third-wave feminism and the politics of menstruation. Rutgers University Press. [Google Scholar]
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods of psychology. Vol. 2 research designs (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Buchwald, E., Fletcher, P. R., & Roth, M. (2005). Transforming a rape culture (2nd ed.). Milkweed Editions. Preamble. [Google Scholar]
• Budgeon, S. (2015). Individualized femininity and feminist politics of choice. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 22(3), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506815576602 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Charmaz, K. (2011). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 359–380). Sage. [Google Scholar]
• Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs, 38(4), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/669608 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Collins, P. H. (2019). Intersectionality as critical social theory. Duke University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Corbin, B. (2020). Digital micro-aggressions and discrimination: FemTech and the ‘othering’ of women. Nova Law Review, 44(3), 1–28. [Google Scholar]
• Cosgrove, L., & Caplan, P. J. (2004). Medicalizing menstrual distress. In P. J. Caplan & L. Cosgrove (Eds.), Bias in psychiatric diagnosis (pp. 221–232). Jason Aronson. [Google Scholar]
• Crabbe, J. (1976). Menstruation as stigma. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36(8), 4148–4149. [Google Scholar]
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Das, R. (2019). Is technology pink? Investments in Femtech to cross the $1.3 Billion mark in 2020. Forbes. Retrieved September 30, 2020, from https://www.forbes.com/sites/reenitadas/2019/09/24/is-technology-pink-investments-in-femtech-to-cross-the-13-billion-mark-in-2020/#491691a65205 [Google Scholar]
• Epstein, D., Lee, N., Kang, J., Agapie, E., Schroeder, J., Pina, L., Fogarty, J., Kientz, J., & Munson, S. D. A. (2017). Examining menstrual tracking to inform the design of personal informatics tools. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI Conference 2017 (pp. 6876–6888). [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press. [Google Scholar]
• Farhal, K. (2014). ‘We love make-up, romance, high heels and men, of course’: The contradictions of pop feminism. In M. Kiraly & T. Meagan (Eds.), Freedom fallacy: The limits of liberal feminism (pp. 95–104). Connor Court Publishing. [Google Scholar]
• Fox, S., & Epstein, D. A. (2020). Monitoring menses: Design-based investigations of menstrual tracking applications. In C. Bobel, I. T. Winkler, B. Fahs, K. A. Hasson, E. Arveda Kissling, & T.-A. Roberts (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies (pp. 733–749). Palgrave Macmillan. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Fraser, N. (2016). Progressive neoliberalism versus reactionary populism: A choice that feminists should refuse. NORA – Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 24(4), 281–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2016.1278263 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Freis, A., Freundl-Schütt, T., Wallwiener, L.-M., Baur, S., Strowitzki, T., Freundl, G., & Frank-Herrmann, P. (2018). Plausibility of menstrual cycle apps claiming to support conception. Frontiers in Public Health, 3(96). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00098 [Google Scholar]
• Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Frost & Sullivan. (2018). Femtech: Digital revolution in women’s health. Retrieved November 11, 2019, from https://ww2.frost.com/files/1015/2043/3691/Frost__Sullivan_Femtech.pdf [Google Scholar]
• Gupta, A. E., Zimmerman, T. S., & Fruhauf, C. A. (2008). Relationship Advice in the Top Selling Women’s Magazine, Cosmopolitan: A Content Analysis. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 7(3), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332690802237987 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Gregg, M., & Andrijasevic, R. (2019). Virtually absent: The gendered histories and economies of digital labour. Feminist Review, 123(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141778919878929 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Gregor, A., & Grzebalska, W. (2016). Thoughts on the contested relationship between neoliberalism and feminism. In E. Kováts (Ed.), Solidarity in struggle. Feminist perspectives on neoliberalism in east-central Europe (pp. 11–20). Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. [Google Scholar]
• Guidone, H. C. (2020). The womb wanders not: Enhancing endometriosis education in a culture of menstrual misinformation. In C. Bobel, I. T. Winkler, B. Fahs, K. A. Hasson, E. Arveda Kissling, & T.-A. Roberts (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies (pp. 269–286). Palgrave Macmillan. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Harwell, D. (2019). Is your pregnancy app sharing your intimate data with your boss? The Washington Post. Retrieved November 11, 2019, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/04/10/tracking-your-pregnancy-an-app-may-be-more-public-than-you-think/?arc404=true [Google Scholar]
• Häyry, H. (1991). The limits of medical paternalism. Routledge. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Hendl, T., Jansky, B., & Wild, V. (2019). From design to data handling: Why mHealth needs a feminist perspective. In J. Loh & M. Coeckelbergh (Eds.), Feminist philosophy of technology (pp. 77–103). J.B. Metzler. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Herzog, L., Kellmeyer, P., & Wild, V. (2021). Digital behavioral technology, vulnerability and justice: Towards an integrated approach. Review of Social Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2021.1943755 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Johnson, S., Marriott, L., & Zinaman, M. (2018). Can apps and calendar methods predict ovulation with accuracy? Current Medical Research and Opinion, 39(9), 1587–1594. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2018.1475348 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Johnston-Robledo, I., & Chrisler, J. (2013). The menstrual mark: Menstruation as social stigma. Sex Roles, 68(1–2), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0052-z [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Khader, S. (2018). Passive empowerment: How women’s agency became women doing it all. Philosophical Topics, 46(2), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics201846216 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Kisslinger, E. (2006). Capitalizing on the curse: The business of menstruation. Lynne Rienner Publishing. [Google Scholar]
• Kóczé, A. (2009). Missing intersectionality: Race/ethnicity, gender, and class in current research and policies on Romani women in Europe, with contribution from Raluca Maria Popa. Policy Papers, CEU Center for Policy Studies. CEU Press. [Google Scholar]
• Kreitmair, K. V. (2019). Dimensions of ethical direct-to-consumer neurotechnologies. The American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience, 10(4), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2019.1665120. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Kressbach, M. (2019). Period hacks: Menstruating in the big data paradigm. Television & New Media, 22(3), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419886389 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Kressbach, M. (2021). Period hacks: Menstruating in the big data paradigm. Television & New Media, 22(3), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419886389 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Kristensen, D. B., & Ruckenstein, M. (2018). Co-evolving with self-tracking technologies. New Media + Society, 20(10), 3624–3640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818755650 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Levy, K. (2019). Intimate surveillance. Idaho Law Review, 51(3), 679–693. [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2014). Critical perspectives on digital health technologies. Sociology Compass, 8(12), 1344–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12226 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self. A sociology of self-tracking cultures. Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2017). Feeling your data: Touch and making sense of personal digital data. New Media & Society, 9(10), 1599–1614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817717515 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2013). Digitized health promotion: Personal responsibility for health in the web 2.0 era. In J. E. Davis & A. M. Gonzalez (Eds.), To fix or to heal: Patient care, public health, and the limits of biomedicine (pp. 152–176). New York University Press. [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D., & Jutel, A. (2015). ‘It’s like having a physician in your pocket!’ A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps. Social Science & Medicine, 133, 128–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.004 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2013). Digitized health promotion: Personal responsibility for health in the web 2.0 era. The Sydney Health & Society Group. [Google Scholar]
• Maharaj, T., & Winkler, I. T. (2020). Transnational engagements: Cultural and religious practices related to menstruation. In C. Bobel, I. T. Winkler, B. Fahs, K. A. Hasson, E. Arveda Kissling, & T.-A. Roberts (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies (pp. 163–174). Palgrave Macmillan. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Mahdawi, A. (2019). There’s a dark side to women’s health apps: ‘Menstrual Surveillance’. The Guardian. Retrieved November 11, 2019, from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/13/theres-a-dark-side-to-womens-health-apps-menstrual-surveillance [Google Scholar]
• Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital feminist activism: Girls and women fight back against rape culture. Oxford University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Moglia, M. L., Nguyen, H. V., Chyjek, K., Chen, K., & Castaño, P. (2016). Evaluation of smartphone menstrual cycle tracking applications using an adapted applications scoring system. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 127(6), 1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001444 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Moran, C., & Lee, C. (2010). On his terms: representations of sexuality in women’s magazines and the implications for negotiating safe sex. Psychology & Sexuality, 2(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2010.534489 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression. How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Patterson, A. (2014). The social construction and resistance of menstruation as a public spectacle. In N. Farris, M. A. Davis, & D. Compton (Eds.), Illuminating how identities, stereotypes and inequalities matter through gender studies (pp. 91–108). Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Punzi, M. C., & Werner, M. (2020). Challenging the menstruation taboo one sale at a time: The role of social entrepreneurs in the period revolution. In C. Bobel, I. T. Winkler, B. Fahs, K. A. Hasson, E. Arveda Kissling, & T.-A. Roberts (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of critical menstruation studies (pp. 833–850). Palgrave Macmillan. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2016). Teen feminist killjoys? Mapping girls’ affective encounters with femininity, sexuality, and feminism at school. In C. Mitchell & C. Rentschler (Eds.), Girlhood and the politics of place (pp. 104–121). Berghahn. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Rosas, C. (2019). The future is Femtech: Privacy and data security issues surrounding Femtech applications. Hastings business Law Journal, 15(2), 319–368. [Google Scholar]
• Rowland-Serdar, B., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (1991). Empowering women: Self, autonomy, and responsibility. The Western Political Quarterly, 44(3), 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299104400307 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Ruckenstein, M., & Dow Schüll, N. (2017). The datafication of health. The Annual Review of Anthropology, 46(1), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041244 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Sacchetto, D., & Andrijasevic, R. (2015). Beyond China: Foxconn’s assembly plants in Europe. South Atlantic Quarterly, 114(1), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-2831654 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Sándor, J., Vicsek, L., & Bauer, Z. (2018). Let us talk about eggs! Professional resistance to elective egg vitrification and gendered medical paternalism. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 21(3), 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9805-y [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Schechner, Sam, Secada, Mrak (2019). You give apps sensitive personal information. Then they tell Facebook. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved February 22, 2019, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/you-give-apps-sensitive-personal-information-then-they-tell-facebook-11550851636 [Google Scholar]
• Schrape, J.-F., & Siri, J. (2019). Facebook und andere soziale medien. In B. Nina & B. Jörg (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung (pp. 1053–1064). Springer VS. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Shemtob, L., & Littlewood, R. (2019). Fertility awareness based contraceptive apps: A case study in the digital age. British Journal of General Practice, 69(1). https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp19X704177 [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
• Sherwin, S. (1992). No longer patient: Feminist ethics and health care. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
• Sherwin, S. (1996). Feminism and bioethics. In S. M. Wolf (Ed.), Feminism and bioethics: Beyond reproduction (pp. 47–66). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
• Smith, G., & Vonthethoff, B. (2015). Health by numbers? Exploring the practice and experience of datafied health. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1196600 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Steinhubl, S. R., Muse, E. D., & Topol, E. J. (2015). The emerging field of mobile health. Science Translational Medicine, 7(283), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3487 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Swan, M. (2012). Health 2050: The realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the quantified self, and the participatory biocitizen. Journal of Personal Medicine, 2(3), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm2030093 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
• Taj, F., Klein, M. C. A., & van Halteren, A. (2019). Digital health behavior change technology: Bibliometric and scoping review of two decades of research. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(12), e13311. https://doi.org/10.2196/13311 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Tilburg, M., Lieven, T., Herrmann, A., & Townsend, C. (2015). Beyond ‘pink it and shrink it’ perceived product gender. Aesthetics, and Product Evaluation. Psychology & Marketing, 32(4), 422–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20789 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Walby, S. (1989). Theorising patriarchy. Sociology, 23(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038589023002004 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Wiederhold, B. (2012). Self-tracking: Better medicine through pattern recognition. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(5), 235–236. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.1545 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Wild, V. (2019). Digitalisierte gesundheit: Eine ethische Reflexion. In C. Dockweiler & F. Fischer (Eds.), ePublic health (pp. 43–56). Hogrefe. [Google Scholar]