• Ajana, B. (2017). Digital health and the biopolitics of the Quantified Self. Digital Health, 3, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616689509 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Ajana, B. (2018a). Communal self-tracking: Data philantropy, solidarity and privacy. In B. Ajana (Ed.), Self-tracking: Empirical and philosophical investigations (pp. 125–141). Palgrave Macmillan. http://link.springer.com/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65379-2 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Apple, Apple Watch Series 6 delivers breakthrough wellness and fitness capabilities [press release]. (2020, September 15). . https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2020/09/apple-watch-series-6-delivers-breakthrough-wellness-and-fitness-capabilities/ [Google Scholar]
• Aristotle. (2004). Nicomachean ethics (R. Crisp, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
• Arora, C. (2019). Digital health fiduciaries: Protecting user privacy when sharing health data. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(3), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-019-09499-x [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Baker, D. A. (2020). Four ironies of self-quantification: Wearable technologies and the Quantified Self. Science & Engineering Ethics, 26(3), 1477–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00181-w [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Barassi, V. (2017). BabyVeillance? Expecting parents, online surveillance and the cultural specificity of pregnancy apps. Social Media + Society, 3(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707188 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Barta, K., & Neff, G. (2016). Technologies for sharing: Lessons from Quantified Self about the political economy of platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 19(4), 518–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1118520 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Bell, G., & Gemmell, J. (2009). Total recall: How the E-memory revolution will change everything. Penguin Books. [Google Scholar]
• Bohn, D. (2020, August 27). Amazon announces Halo, a fitness band and app that scans your body and voice. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2020/8/27/21402493/amazon-halo-band-health-fitness-body-scan-tone-emotion-activity-sleep [Google Scholar]
• Borthwick, A. C., Anderson, C. L., Finsness, E. S., & Foulger, T. S. (2015). Special article personal wearable technologies in education: Value or villain? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(3), 85–92. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2015.1021982 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Brey, P. A. E. (2012). Anticipatory ethics for emerging technologies. NanoEthics, 6(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-012-0141-7 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Business Wire. (2020). Worldwide wearables market forecast to maintain double-digit growth in 2020 and through 2024, according to IDC. https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20200925005409/en/Worldwide-Wearables-Market-Forecast-to-Maintain-Double-Digit-Growth-in-2020-and-Through-2024-According-to-IDC [Google Scholar]
• Cederström, C., & Spicer, A. (2015). The wellness syndrome. Polity. [Google Scholar]
• Challa, N., Yu, S., & Kunchakarra, S. (2017). Wary about wearables: Potential for the exploitation of wearable health technology through employee discrimination and sales to third parties. Intersect, 10(3), 13. https://ojs.stanford.edu/ojs/index.php/intersect/article/view/1003. [Google Scholar]
• Chee, F. Y. (2020, December 17). Google wins EU antitrust nod for $2.1 billion fitbit deal. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/fitbit-m-a-alphabet-eu-idUSKBN28R1ZS [Google Scholar]
• Crawford, K., Lingel, J., & Karppi, T. (2015). Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415584857 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Daly, A. (2015). The law and ethics of `self-quantified’ health information: An Australian perspective. International Data Privacy Law, 5(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipv001 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Danaher, J., Nyholm, S., & Earp, B. D. (2018a). The benefits and risks of quantified relationship technologies: Response to open peer commentaries on “The quantified relationship.” The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(2), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1409823 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Danaher, J., Nyholm, S., & Earp, B. D. (2018b). The quantified relationship. The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(2), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1409823 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59 Winter 1992 , 3–7 https://www.jstor.org/stable/778828. [Google Scholar]
• Deloitte. (2017). The future awakens: Life sciences and health predictions 2022. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/cz/Documents/life-sciences-health-care/cz-lshc-predictions-2022.pdf [Google Scholar]
• Duus, R., Cooray, M., & Page, N. C. (2018). Exploring human-tech hybridity at the intersection of extended cognition and distributed agency: A focus on self-tracking devices. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1432. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01432 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
• Floridi, L., & Strait, A. (2020). Ethical foresight analysis: What it is and why it is needed? Minds and Machines, 30(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09521-y [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Fotopoulou, A., & O’Riordan, K. (2017). Training to self-care: Fitness tracking, biopedagogy and the healthy consumer. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1184582 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). The University of Massachusetts Press. [Google Scholar]
• Fowler, G. A., & Kelly, H. (2020, December 10). Review | Amazon’s new health band is the most invasive tech we’ve ever tested. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/12/10/amazon-halo-band-review/ [Google Scholar]
• Frank, L., & Klincewicz, M. (2018). Swiping left on the quantified relationship: Exploring the potential soft impacts. The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(2), 27–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1409833 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Franklin, B. (2005). The autobiography of Benjamin Franklin (P. Conn, Ed.). University of Pennsylvania Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Friesen, N. (2017). Confessional technologies of the self: From Seneca to social media. First Monday, 22(6). Article 6. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i6.6750 [Google Scholar]
• Gabriels, K., & Moerenhout, T. (2018). Exploring entertainment medicine and professionalization of self-care: Interview study among doctors on the potential effects of digital self-tracking. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(1), e10. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8040 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Gabriels, K., & Coeckelbergh, M. (2019). ‘Technologies of the self and other’: How self-tracking technologies also shape the other. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 17(2), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-12-2018-0094 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Gartenberg, C. (2019, November 1). Google buys fitbit for $2.1 billion. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2019/11/1/20943318/google-fitbit-acquisition-fitness-tracker-announcement [Google Scholar]
• Gertenbach, L., & Mönkeberg, S. (2016). Lifelogging and vital normalism: Sociological reflections on the cultural impact of the reconfiguration of body and self Selke, Stefan. In Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and lifelogging—Between disruptive technology and cultural transformation (pp. 25–42). Springer VS; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13137-1_2 [Google Scholar]
• Gimbert, C., & Lapointe, F.-J. (2015). Self-tracking the microbiome: Where do we go from here? Microbiome, 3(1), Article 70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-015-0138-x [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Ha, D. (2017). Scripts and re-scriptings of self-tracking technologies: Health and labor in an age of hyper-connectivity. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Law & Ethics, 10(3), 67–86. [Google Scholar]
• Heehs, P. (2013). Writing the self: Diaries, memoirs, and the history of the self. Bloomsbury Academic. [Google Scholar]
• Hill, D. W. (2019). Speed and pessimism: Moral experience in the work of Paul Virilio. Journal for Cultural Research, 23(4), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2020.1716141 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Hoy, M. B. (2016). Personal activity trackers and the Quantified Self. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 35(1), 94–100. a9h. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2016.1117300 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Hull, G. (2018). The politics of quantified relationships. The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(2), 29–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1409831 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Jacquemard, T., Novitzky, P., O’Brolchain, F., Smeaton, A. F., & Gordijn, B. (2014). Challenges and opportunities of lifelog technologies: A literature review and critical analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20(2), 379–409. SPRINGER. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9456-1 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Jalali, S., & Wohlin, C. (2012). Systematic literature studies: Database searches vs. backward snowballing. In Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement – ESEM ’12. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). (p. 29). https://doi.org/10.1145/2372251.2372257 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Kahrass, H., Borry, P., Gastmans, C., Ives, J., Graaf van der, R., Strech, D., & Mertz, M. (2021). PRISMA-ethics – Reporting guideline for systematic reviews on ethics literature: Development, explanations and examples [OSF Preprints]. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/g5kfb [Google Scholar]
• Klauser, F. R., & Albrechtslund, A. (2014). From self-tracking to smart urban infrastructures: Towards an interdisciplinary research agenda on big data. Surveillance and Society, 12(2), 273–286. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4605 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Kleinpeter, E. (2017). Four ethical issues of “E-health.” IRBM, 38(5), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2017.07.006 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Klugman, C., Dunn, L. B., Schwartz, J., & Cohen, I. G. (2018). The ethics of smart pills and self-acting devices: Autonomy, truth-telling, and trust at the dawn of digital medicine. The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(9), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1498933 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Klugman, C. (2018). I, my love, and apps. The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(2), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2018.1423793 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Kreitmair, K., & Cho, M. K. (2017). The neuroethical future of wearable and mobile health technology. In J. Illes (Ed.), Neuroethics: Anticipating the future (pp. 80–107). Oxford University Press; Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198786832.003.0005 [Google Scholar]
• Kreitmair, K. (2018). Phenomenological considerations of sex tracking technology. The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(2), 31–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1409842 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Kristensen, D. B., & Ruckenstein, M. (2018). Co-Evolving with self-tracking technologies. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3624–3640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818755650 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Lanzing, M. (2016). The transparent self. Ethics and Information Technology, 18(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9396-y [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Lanzing, M. (2019). “Strongly recommended” revisiting decisional privacy to judge hypernudging in self-tracking technologies. Philosophy & Technology, 32(3), 549–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0316-4 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Li, N., & Hopfgartner, F. (2016). To log or not to log? SWOT analysis of self-tracking. In S. Selke (Ed.), Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and lifelogging—Between disruptive technology and cultural transformation (pp. 305–325). Springer VS. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Lifkova, A. (2019). Digital power: Self-tracking technologies through Michel Foucault lens. Politické Vedy, 22(4), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.24040/politickevedy.2019.22.4.81-101 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Lomborg, S., Langstrup, H., & Andersen, T. O. (2020). Interpretation as luxury: Heart patients living with data doubt, hope, and anxiety. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720924436 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2013). Quantifying the body: Monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23(4), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.794931 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2015a). Lively data, social fitness and biovalue: The intersections of health self-tracking and social media. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2666324 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2015b). Quantified sex: A critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 17(4), 440–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2014.920528 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2016a). Quantified Self. Polity Press. [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2016b). The diverse domains of quantified selves: Self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Society, 45(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2016.1143726 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D., & Smith, G. J. D. (2018). A much better person’: The agential capacities of self-tracking practices. In B. Ajana (Ed.), Metric culture (pp. 57–75). Emerald Publishing Limited. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Martens, H., & Brown, T. E. (2018). Relational autonomy and the quantified relationship. The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(2), 39–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1409835 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Maturo, A., & Setiffi, F. (2015). The gamification of risk: How health apps foster self-confidence and why this is not enough. Health, Risk & Society, 17(7–8), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2015.1136599 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Mertz, M., Kahrass, H., & Strech, D. (2016). Current state of ethics literature synthesis: A systematic review of reviews. BMC Medicine, 14(1), 152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0688-1 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Mertz, M., Strech, D., & Kahrass, H. (2017). What methods do reviews of normative ethics literature use for search, selection, analysis, and synthesis? In-depth results from a systematic review of reviews. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0661-x [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Moore, P., & Robinson, A. (2016). The Quantified Self: What counts in the neoliberal workplace. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2774–2792. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604328 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Moore, P. (2017). The Quantified Self in precarity: Work, technology and what counts in the Neoliberal workplace (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315561523 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Moore, P., & Piwek, L. (2017). Regulating wellbeing in the brave new quantified workplace. Employee Relations, 39(3), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-06-2016-0126 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Morgan, H. (2016). ‘Pushed’ self-tracking using digital technologies for chronic health condition management: A critical interpretive synthesis. Digital Health, 2 January 2016 , 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207616678498 [Google Scholar]
• Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: Technology, solutionism, and the urge to fix problems that don’t exist. PublicAffairs. [Google Scholar]
• Neff, G., & Nafus, D. (2016). Self-tracking. The MIT Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Nissenbaum, H., & Patterson, H. (2016). Biosensing in context: Health privacy in a connected world. In D. Nafus (Ed.), Quantified: Biosensing technologies in everyday life (pp. 79–100). The MIT Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Oravec, J. A. (2020). Digital iatrogenesis and workplace marginalization: Some ethical issues involving self-tracking medical technologies. Information, Communication & Society, 23(14), 2030–2046. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1718178 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Owens, J., & Cribb, A. (2019). My fitbit thinks I can do better!’ Do health promoting wearable technologies support personal autonomy? Philosophy and Technology, 32(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0266-2 Scopus [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Piwek, L., Ellis, D. A., Andrews, S., & Joinson, A. (2016). The rise of consumer health wearables: Promises and barriers. PLOS Medicine, 13(2), e1001953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001953 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Ramirez, E. (2013, January 27). Pew Internet research: 21% self-track with technology. Quantified Self. https://quantifiedself.com/blog/pew-internet-research-the-state-of-self-tracking/ [Google Scholar]
• Richardson, S., & Mackinnon, D. (2018). Becoming your own device: Self-tracking challenges in the workplace. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 43(3), 265–290. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29173/cjs28974 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Sanders, R. (2017). Self-tracking in the digital era: Biopower, patriarchy, and the new biometric body projects. Body & Society, 23(1), 36–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X16660366 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Schulz, P. (2016). Lifelogging: A project of liberation or a source of reification. In S. Selke (Ed.), Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and lifelogging—between disruptive technology and cultural transformation (pp. 43–59). Springer VS. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Selke, S. (2016a). Introduction. In S. Selke (Ed.), Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and lifelogging—Between disruptive technology and cultural transformation (pp. 1–21). Springer VS. [Google Scholar]
• Selke, S. (2016b). Rational discrimination and lifelogging: The expansion of the combat zone and the new taxonomy of the social. In S. Selke (Ed.), Lifelogging: Digital self-tracking and lifelogging—Between disruptive technology and cultural transformation (pp. 345–372). Springer VS. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Sharon, T., & Zandbergen, D. (2017). From data fetishism to quantifying selves: Self-tracking practices and the other values of data. New Media & Society, 19(11), 1695–1709. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816636090 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Sharon, T. (2017). Self-tracking for health and the Quantified Self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Sharon, T. (2018). Let’s move beyond critique—but please, let’s not depoliticize the debate. The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(2), 20–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1409836 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Sofaer, N., & Strech, D. (2012). The need for systematic reviews of reasons. Bioethics, 26(6), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01858.x [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Swirsky, E. S., & Boyd, A. D. (2018). Love in the time of quantified relationships. The American Journal of Bioethics, 18(2), 35–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2017.1409828 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Till, C. (2014). Exercise as labour: Quantified Self and the transformation of exercise into labour. Societies, 4(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc4030446 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Till, C. (2018). Commercialising bodies: Action, subjectivity and the new corporate health ethic. In R. Lynch & C. Farrington (Eds.), Quantified lives and vital data: Exploring health and technology through personal medical devices (pp. 229–249). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95235-9_10 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Toner, J. (2018). Exploring the dark-side of fitness trackers: Normalization, objectification and the anaesthetisation of human experience. Performance Enhancement and Health, 6(2), 75–81. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2018.06.001 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Wohlin, C. (2014). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering (EASE’14). (pp. 1–10). https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]