The ‘Privacy Paradox’ in the Social Web: The Impact of Privacy Concerns, Individual Characteristics, and the Perceived Social Relevance on Different Forms of Self-Disclosure

by | Jan 1, 2014 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Taddicken, Monika

Abstract:

Given the diffusion of the Social Web and increased disclosure of personal information online, the ‘privacy paradox’ suggests that while Internet users are concerned about privacy, their behaviors do not mirror those concerns. This study investigates the potential influence of privacy concerns, psychological traits, attitudes to the Social Web and age on self-disclosure. Using an online survey of a representative sample of German Internet users (n = 2, 739), the variety and quality of self-disclosure as well as access were measured. The findings indicate that privacy concerns hardly impact self-disclosure, but different variables moderate this relation. Perceived social relevance and the number of applications used proved important. Users’ general willingness to disclose is most important when providing sensitive information.

Document:

https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/19/2/248/4067550

References:
  1. Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006, June). Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Paper presented at the 6th “Privacy Enhancing Technologies,” workshop Cambridge, England.Altman, I. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, crowding. Monterey: Brooks/Cole Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  3. Archer, R. L. (1979). Role of personality and the social situation. In G. J. Chelune (Ed.), Origins, patterns and implications of openness in interpersonal relationships (pp. 28–58). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Barak, A., & Gluck-Ofri, O. (2007). Degree and reciprocity of self-disclosure in online forums. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 407–417.Google ScholarCrossref
  5. Barnes, S. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11 (9). firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_9/barnes/index.html (June 6th, 2011). Bellman, S., Johnson, E. J., & Kobrin, S. J. (2004). International differences in information privacy concerns: A global survey of consumers. Information Society, 20(5), 313–324. Google ScholarCrossref
  6. Boyd, D. (2008). Taken out of context. American teen sociality in networked publics. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. http://www.danah.org/papers/TakenOutOfContext.pdf (June 6th, 2011).
  7. Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. Google ScholarCrossref
  8. Boyd, D., & Hargittai, E. (2010). Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? First Monday, 15(8). http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3086/2589 (June 6th, 2011). 
  9. Buchanan, T., Paine, C., Joinson, A. N., & Reips, U.-D. (2007). Development of measures of online privacy concern and protection for use on the internet. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(2), 157–165. Google ScholarCrossref
  10. Buss, A. (2001). Psychological dimensions of the self. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Cho, S. H. (2007). Effects of motivations and gender on adolescents’ self-disclosure in online chatting. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 339–345. Google ScholarCrossref
  12. Cho, V., & Hung, H. (2011). The effectiveness of Short Message Service for communication with concerns of privacy protection and conflict avoidance. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(2), 250–270. Google ScholarCrossref
  13. Christofides, E., Muise, A., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or two different processes? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(3), 341–345. Google ScholarCrossref
  14. Cong, L. (2007). Online chatters‘ self-marketing in cyberspace. CyperPsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 131–132.
  15. Google ScholarCrossref
  16. Cozby, P. C. (1973). Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin, 79(2), 73–91. Google ScholarCrossrefPubMed
  17. Debatin, B., Lovejoy, J. P., Horn, A.-K., & Hughes, B. N. (2009). Facebook and online privacy: Attitudes, behaviors, and unintended consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(1), 83–108. Google ScholarCrossref
  18. Derlega, V. J., Durham, B., Gockel, B., & S holis, D. (1981). Sex differences in self-disclosure: Effects of topic content, friendship, and partner’s sex. Sex Roles, 7(4), 433–447. Google ScholarCrossref
  19. Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self disclosure: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 106–124. Google ScholarCrossrefPubMed
  20. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. Google ScholarCrossref
  21. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2011). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 13(6), 873–892. Google ScholarCrossref
  22. Fogel, J., & Nehmad, E. (2009). Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 153–160. Google ScholarCrossref
  23. Harper, V. B., & Harper, E. J. (2006). Understanding student self-disclosure typology through blogging. The Qualitative Report, 251–261. Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125–147. Google ScholarCrossref
  24. Herring, S. C., Scheidt, L. A., Wright, E., & Bonus, S. (2005). Weblogs as a bridging genre. Information Technology & People, 18(2), 142–171. Google ScholarCrossref
  25. Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Personal information of adolescents on the Internet: A quantitative content analysis of MySpace. Journal of Adolescence, 31(1), 125–146. Google ScholarCrossrefPubMed
  26. Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36(6), 620–630. Google ScholarCrossref
  27. Joinson, A., Reips, U.-D., Buchanan, T., & Paine Schofield, C. B. (2010). Privacy, trust and self-disclosure online. Human Computer Interaction, 25(1), 1–24. Google ScholarCrossref
  28. Jourard, S. M. (1959). Self-disclosure and other-cathexis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59 (3), 428–431.
  29. Google ScholarCrossrefPubMed
  30. Jourard, S. M. (1971): Self-disclosure: An experimental investigation of the transparent self. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Laurenceau, J.-P., Feldman Barrett, L., & Pietromonaco, P. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1238–1251.
  32. Google ScholarCrossrefPubMed
  33. Lenhart, A., & Fox, S. (2006). Bloggers: A portrait of the internet’s new storytellers. Washington, D.C.: Pew Internet & American Life Project.Google Scholar
  34. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A. R., & Smith, A. (2007). Teens and social media. http://pewinternet.org/˜/media//Files/Reports/2007/PIP_Teens_Social_Media_Final.pdf.pdf (November 29th, 2011).
  35. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  36. Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., & Christakis, N. (2008). The taste for privacy: An analysis of college student privacy settings in an online social network. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 79–100. Google ScholarCrossref
  37. Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers‘ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393–411. Google ScholarCrossref
  38. Marwick, A. E., & boyd, d. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133. Google ScholarCrossref
  39. Milne, G. R., & Culnan, M. J. (2004). Strategies for reducing online privacy risks: Why consumers read (or don’t read) online privacy notices. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18, 15–29. Google ScholarCrossref
  40. Morgan, B. S . (1976). Intimacy of disclosure topics and sex differences in self-disclosure. Sex Roles, 2(2), 161–166.
  41. Papacharissi, Z., & Gibson, P. L. (2011). 15 minutes of privacy: Privacy, sociality, and publicity on social network sites. In S. Trepte, & L. Reinecke (Eds.): Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web (pp. 75–89). Heidelberg and New York: Springer.Parker, R., & Parrott, R. (1995). Patterns of self-disclosure across social support networks: Elderly, middle-aged, and young adults. The International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 41, 281–297. Google ScholarCrossref
  42. Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011). Adolescents’ online privacy: Toward a developmental perspective. In S. Trepte, & L. Reinecke (Eds.): Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web (pp. 221–234). Heidelberg and New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Petronio, S. (2002): Boundaries of privacy. Dialectics of disclosure. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google ScholarRideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation. http://www.kff.org/entmedia/upload/8010.pdf (November 29th, 2011).
  44. Qian, H., & Scott, C. R. (2007). Anonymity and self-disclosure on weblogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (4), 1428–1451. Google ScholarCrossref
  45. Stefanone, M. A., & Jang, C.-Y. (2008). Writing for friends and family: The interpersonal nature of blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 123–140. Google ScholarCrossref
  46. Taddicken, M. (2010). Measuring Online Privacy Concern and Protection in the (Social) Web: Development of the APCP and APCP-18 Scale. Paper presented at the 60th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Singapore.
  47. Taddicken, M. (2012). Privacy, surveillance, and self-disclosure in the social web: Exploring the user’s perspective via focus groups In C. Fuchs, K. Boersma, A. Albrechtslund & M. Sandoval (Eds.), Internet and surveillance: The challenges of web 2.0 and social media. New York: Routledge Google Scholar
  48. Thelwall, M. (2008). Social networks, gender, and friending: An analysis of MySpace member profiles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(8), 1321–1330. Google ScholarCrossref
  49. Tufekci, Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 20–36.Google Scholar
  50. Viegas, F. B. (2005). Bloggers’ expectations of privacy and accountability: An initial survey. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), article 12.Westin, A. F. (1967). Privacy and freedom. New York: Atheneum. Google Scholar
  51. Wheeless, L. R. (1976): Self-disclosure and interpersonal solidarity: Measurement, validation, and relationships. Human Communication Research, 3(1), 47–61. Google ScholarCrossref
  52. Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2(4), 338–346. Google ScholarCrossref
  53. Yao, M. Z., Rice, R. E., & Wallis, K. (2007). Predicting user concerns about online privacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(5), 710–722. Google ScholarCrossref
  54. Yao, M. Z., & Zhang, J. (2008). Predicting user concerns about online privacy in Hongkong. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 779–781. Google ScholarCrossref
  55. Youn, S., & Hall, K. (2008). Gender and online privacy among teens: Risk perception, privacy concerns, and protection behaviors. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 763–765. Google ScholarCrossref