Author(s):
- Rebecca Eynon
Documentation:
https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1100797
References:
- Beach, D., and M. Dovemark. 2009. “Making ‘Right’ Choices? An Ethnographic Account of Creativity, Performativity and Personalised Learning Policy, Concepts and Practices.” Oxford Review of Education 35 (6): 689–704. doi:10.1080/03054980903122267. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Harfield, T. D. 2014. “Teaching the Unteachable: On the Compatibility of Learning Analytics and Humane Education.” Proceeding LAK ’14, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 241–245. New York: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2567607. [Google Scholar]
- Prain, V., P. Cox, C. Deed, J. Dorman, D. Edwards, C. Farrelly, M. Keeffe, et al. 2013. “Personalised Learning: Lessons to be Learnt.” British Educational Research Journal 39: 654–676. doi:10.1080/01411926.2012.669747. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Rivera-Pelayo, V., V. Zacharias, L. Müller, and S. Braun. 2012. “Applying Quantified Self Approaches to Support Reflective Learning.” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 111–114. New York: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2330631. [Google Scholar]
- Selwyn, N. 2015. “Data Entry: Towards the Critical Study of Digital Data and Education.” Learning, Media and Technology 40 (1): 64–82. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.921628. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Williamson, B. 2015. “Governing Software: Networks, Databases and Algorithmic Power in the Digital Governance of Public Education.” Learning, Media and Technology 40 (1): 83–105. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.924527. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
- Wise, A. F., Y. Zhao, and S. N. Hausknecht. 2013. April. “Learning Analytics for Online Discussions: A Pedagogical Model for Intervention with Embedded and Extracted Analytics.” Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 48–56. New York: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2460308. [Google Scholar]