Author(s):

  • Koivisto, Jonna
  • Hamari, Juho

Abstract:

Today, our reality and lives are increasingly game-like, not only because games have become a pervasive part of our lives, but also because activities, systems and services are increasingly gamified. Gamification refers to designing information systems to afford similar experiences and motivations as games do, and consequently, attempting to affect user behavior. In recent years, popularity of gamification has skyrocketed and manifested in growing numbers of gamified applications, as well as a rapidly increasing amount of research. However, this vein of research has mainly advanced without an agenda, theoretical guidance or a clear picture of the field. To make the picture more coherent, we provide a comprehensive review of the gamification research (N = 819 studies) and analyze the research models and results in empirical studies on gamification. While the results in general lean towards positive findings about the effectiveness of gamification, the amount of mixed results is remarkable. Furthermore, education, health and crowdsourcing as well as points, badges and leaderboards persist as the most common contexts and ways of implementing gamification. Concurrently, gamification research still lacks coherence in research models, and a consistency in the variables and theoretical foundations. As a final contribution of the review, we provide a comprehensive discussion, consisting of 15 future research trajectories, on future agenda for the growing vein of literature on gamification and gameful systems within the information system science field.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013

References:
  1. Agarwal and Karahanna, 2000R. Agarwal, E. KarahannaTime flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usageMIS Quarterly, 24 (4) (2000), pp. 665-694CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajzen, 1988I. AjzenAttitudes, personality, and behaviourDorsey Press, Chicago, IL (1988)Google Scholar
  3. Ajzen, 1991I. AjzenThe theory of planned behaviourOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2) (1991), pp. 179-211ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  4. Alahäivälä and Oinas-Kukkonen, 2016T. Alahäivälä, H. Oinas-KukkonenUnderstanding persuasion contexts in health gamification: A systematic analysis of gamified health behavior change support systems literatureInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 96 (2016), pp. 62-70ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  5. Alcivar and Abad, 2016I. Alcivar, A.G. AbadDesign and evaluation of a gamified system for ERP trainingComputers in Human Behavior, 58 (2016), pp. 109-118ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  6. Allam et al., 2015A. Allam, Z. Kostova, K. Nakamoto, P.J. SchulzThe effect of social support features and gamification on a web based intervention for rheumatoid arthritis patients: Randomized controlled trialJournal of Medical Internet Research, 17 (1) (2015), p. e14CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  7. Araújo and Pestana, 2017J. Araújo, G. PestanaA framework for social well-being and skills management at the workplaceInternational Journal of Information Management, 37 (6) (2017), pp. 718-725ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  8. Atkinson and Kydd, 1997M.A. Atkinson, C. KyddIndividual characteristics associated with world wide web use: An empirical study of playfulness and motivationData Base for Advances in Information Systems, 28 (2) (1997), pp. 53-62View Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarAttali and Arieli-Attali, 2014Y. Attali, M. Arieli-AttaliGamification in assessment: Do points affect test performance?Computers & Education, 83 (2014), pp. 57-63Google ScholarBista et al., 2014S.K. Bista, S. Nepal, C. Paris, N. ColineauGamification for online c
  9. ommunities: A case study for delivering government servicesInternational Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 23 (2) (2014)Google Scholar
  10. Bittner and Schipper, 2014J.V. Bittner, J. SchipperMotivational effects and age differences of gamification in product advertisingThe Journal of Consumer Marketing, 31 (5) (2014), pp. 391-400View Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarBlohm and Leimeister, 2013I. Blohm, J.M. LeimeisterGamification – design of IT-Based enhancing services for motivational support and behavioral changeBusiness & Information Systems Engineering, 5 (4) (2013), pp. 275-278CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonde et al., 2014M.T. Bonde, G. Makransky, J. Wandall, M.V. Larsen, M. Morsing, H. Jarmer, et al.Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulationsNature Biotechnology, 32 (7) (2014), pp. 694-697CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  12. Buisman and van Eekelen, 2014A.L.D. Buisman, M.C.J.D. van EekelenGamification in educational software developmentProceedings of the Computer Science Education Research Conference, (Berlin, Germany, November 5-6, 2014) (2014), pp. 9-20CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  13. Burke, 2014B. BurkeGamify: How gamification motivates people to do extraordinary thingsBibliomotion, Inc. (2014)Google Scholar
  14. Butler, 2014C. ButlerA framework for evaluating the effectiveness of gamification techniques by personality typeInternational Conference on HCI in Business (Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22-27, 2014) (2014), pp. 381-389CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarCafazzo et al., 2012J.A. Cafazzo, M. Casselman, N. Hamming, D.K. Katzman, M.R. PalmertDesign of an mHealth app for the self-management of adolescent type 1 diabetes: A pilot studyJournal of Medical Internet Research, 14 (3) (2012), p. e70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caillois, 1961R. CailloisMan, play and gamesUniversity of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL (1961)Google Scholar
  16. Cechanowicz et al., 2013J. Cechanowicz, C. Gutwin, B. Brownell, L. GoodfellowEffects of gamification on participation and data quality in a real-world market research domainProceedings of Gamif
  17. ication’ 13 Stratford (Ontario, Canada, October 2–4, 2013) (2013), pp. 58-65CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen and Pu, 2014Y. Chen, P. PuHealthyTogether: Exploring social incentives for mobile fitness applicationsProceedings of Chinese CHI’ 14 (Toronto, Ontario, Canada, April 26–27) (2014), pp. 25-34CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen et al., 2008C.H. Chen, C.T. Sun, J. HsiehPlayer guild dynamics and evolution in massively multiplayer online gamesCyberPsychology & Behavior, 11 (3) (2008), pp. 293-301CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen et al., 2014Y. Chen, J. Zhang, P. PuExploring social accountability in pervasive fitness appsProceeding of the UBICOMM2014 (Rome, Italy, August 24–28, 2014) (2014), pp. 221-226CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  21. Choi et al., 2014J. Choi, H. Choi, W. So, J. Lee, J. YouA study about designing reward for gamified crowdsourcing systemProceedings of 3rd International Conference on Design, User Experience, and Usability: User Experience Design for Diverse Interaction Platforms and Environments, (Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22-27) (2014), pp. 678-687CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  22. Christy and Fox, 2014K.R. Christy, J. FoxLeaderboards in a virtual classroom: A test of stereotype threat and social comparison explanations for women’s math performanceComputers & Education, 78 (2014), pp. 66-77ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  23. Cole and Griffiths, 2007H. Cole, M.D. GriffithsSocial interactions in massively multiplayer online role-playing gamersCyberPsychology & Behavior, 10 (4) (2007), pp. 575-583CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  24. Csíkszentmihályi, 1975M. CsíkszentmihályiBeyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and playJossey-Bass, San Francisco (1975)Google Scholar
  25. Csíkszentmihályi, 1990M. CsíkszentmihályiFlow: The psychology of optimal experienceHarper and Row, New York (1990)Google ScholarDavis, 1989F.D. DavisPerceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologyMIS Quarterly, 13 (3) (1989), pp. 319-340CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis et al., 1992F.D. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi, P.R. WarshawExtrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplaceJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 22 (1992), pp. 1111-1132CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  27. Deci and Ryan, 1985E.L. Deci, R.M. RyanSelf-determinationJohn Wiley and Sons Inc, New Jersey (1985)Google Scholar
  28. Deci and Ryan, 2000E.L. Deci, R.M. RyanThe ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviorPsychological Inquiry, 11 (4) (2000), pp. 227-268CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  29. de-Marcos et al., 2014L. de-Marcos, A. Domínguez, J. Saenz-de-Navarrete, C. PagésAn empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learningComputers & Education, 75 (2014), pp. 82-91ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  30. Denny, 2013P. DennyThe effect of virtual achievements on student engagement, Proceedings of CHI 2013: Changing perspectives (Paris, France, April 27–May 2, 2013)(2013), pp. 763-772CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  31. Deterding, 2015S. DeterdingThe lens of intrinsic skill atoms: A method for gameful designHuman-Computer Interaction, 30 (3-4) (2015), pp. 294-335CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  32. Deterding et al., 2011S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, L. NackeFrom game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamificationProceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future media Environments (Tampere, Finland, September 28–30, 2011) (2011), pp. 9-15CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  33. Domínguez et al., 2013A. Domínguez, J. Saenz-de-Navarrete, L. de-Marcos, L. Fernández-Sanz, C. Pagés, J.-J. Martínez-HerráizGamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomesComputers & Education, 63 (2013), pp. 380-392ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  34. Eickhoff et al., 2012C. Eickhoff, C.G. Harris, A.P. de Vries, P. SrinivasanQuality through flow and immersion: Gamifying crowdsourced relevance assessmentsProceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in InformaTion Retrieval (Portland, Oregon, USA, August 12–16, 2012)(2012), pp. 871-880CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  35. Elliot and Harackiewicz, 1994A.J. Elliot, J.M. HarackiewiczGoal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysisJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66 (5) (1994), pp. 968-980View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  36. Farzan and Brusilovsky, 2011R. Farzan, P. BrusilovskyEncouraging user participation in a course recommender system: An impact on user behaviorComputers in Human Behavior, 27 (1) (2011), pp. 276-284ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  37. Farzan et al., 2008aR. Farzan, J.M. DiMicco, D.R. Millen, B. Brownholtz, W. Geyer, C. DuganWhen the experiment is over: Deploying an incentive system to all the usersSymposium on persuasive technology (Aberdeen, Scotland, April, 2008) (2008)Google Scholar
  38. Farzan et al., 2008bR. Farzan, J.M. DiMicco, D.R. Millen, B. Brownholtz, W. Geyer, C. DuganResults from deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterpriseProceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy, April 5–10, 2008) (2008), pp. 563-572CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  39. Festinger, 1954L. FestingerA theory of social comparison processesHuman Relations, 7 (2) (1954), pp. 117-140CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  40. Filsecker and Hickey, 2014M. Filsecker, D.T. HickeyA multilevel analysis of the effects of external rewards on elementary students’ motivation, engagement and learning in an educational gameComputers & Education, 75 (2014), pp. 136-148ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  41. Fishbein, 1979M. FishbeinA theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implicationsNebraska Symposium on Motivation Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 27 (1979), pp. 65-116View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  42. Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975M. Fishbein, I. AjzenBelief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to the theory and researchAddison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1975)Google Scholar
  43. Freund et al., 2010A.M. Freund, M. Hennecke, M. RiedigerAge-related differences in outcome and process goal focusThe European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7 (2) (2010), pp. 198-222CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  44. Gartner, 2011GartnerGartner says by 2015, more than 50 percent of organizations that manage innovation processes will gamify those processes [WWW document](2011)(Accessed 14th of February 2017)http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=1629214Google Scholar
  45. Gerow et al., 2013J.E. Gerow, R. Ayyagari, J.B. Thatcher, P.L. RothCan we have fun @ work? The role of intrinsic motivation for utilitarian systemsEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 22 (3) (2013), pp. 360-380CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  46. Hackel et al., 2016T.S. Hackel, M.H. Jones, K.J. Carbonneau, C.E. MuellerRe-examining achievement goal instrumentation: Convergent validity of AGQ and PALSContemporary Educational Psychology, 46 (2016), pp. 73-80ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  47. Hakulinen et al., 2013L. Hakulinen, T. Auvinen, A. KorhonenEmpirical study on the effect of achievement badges in TRAKLA2 online learning environmentProceedings of Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE) Conference (Macau, March 21–24, 2013) (2013), pp. 47-54View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  48. Hakulinen et al., 2015L. Hakulinen, T. Auvinen, A. KorhonenThe effect of achievement badges on students’ behavior: An empirical study in a university-level computer science courseInternational Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 10 (1) (2015), pp. 18-29CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  49. Hall et al., 2013M. Hall, S. Glanz, S. Caton, C. WeinhardtMeasuring your Best you: A gamification framework for Well-being measurementProceedings of 2013 International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing (Karlsruhe, Germany, September 30-October 2, 2013) (2013), pp. 277-282CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  50. Hamari et al., 2018J. Hamari, L. Hassan, A. DiasGamification, quantified-self or social networking? Matching users’ goals with motivational technologyUser Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, 28 (1) (2018), pp. 35-74CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  51. Hamari, 2013J. HamariTransforming homo economicus into homo ludens: A field experiment on gamification in a utilitarian peer-to-peer trading serviceElectronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12 (4) (2013), pp. 236-245ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  52. Hamari, 2017J. HamariDo badges increase user activity? A field experiment on effects of gamificationComputers in Human Behavior, 71 (2017), pp. 469-478ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  53. Hamari, 2015J. HamariWhy do people buy virtual goods? Attitude towards virtual good purchases versus game enjoymentInternational Journal of Information Management, 35 (3) (2015), pp. 299-308ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  54. Hamari et al., 2015J. Hamari, K. Huotari, J. TolvanenGamification and economicsS.P. Walz, S. Deterding (Eds.), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2015), pp. 139-161View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  55. Hamari and Keronen, 2017J. Hamari, L. KeronenWhy do people play games? A meta-analysisInternational Journal of Information Management, 37 (3) (2017), pp. 125-141ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  56. Hamari and Koivisto, 2015aJ. Hamari, J. KoivistoWorking out for likes”: An empirical study on social influence in exercise gamific
  57. ationComputers in Human Behavior, 50 (2015), pp. 333-347ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  58. Hamari and Koivisto, 2015bJ. Hamari, J. KoivistoWhy do people use gamification services?International Journal of Information Management, 35 (4) (2015), pp. 419-431ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  59. Hamari et al., 2014J. Hamari, J. Koivisto, H. SarsaDoes gamification work? – A literature review of empirical studies on gamificationProceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Hawaii, USA, JanUary 6–9, 2014) (2014), pp. 3025-3034View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  60. Hamari and Tuunanen, 2014J. Hamari, J. TuunanenPlayer types: A meta-synthesisTransactions of the Digital Games Research Association, 1 (2) (2014), pp. 29-53View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  61. Hanus and Fox, 2015M.D. Hanus, J. FoxAssessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performanceComputers & Education, 80 (2015), pp. 152-161ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  62. Hassan and Hamari, 2019L. Hassan, J. HamariGamification of e-participation: A literature reviewProceedings of the 52nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), (Hawaii, USA, January 8–11, 2019) (2019)Google ScholarHerzig et al., 2012P. Herzig, S. Strahringer, M. AmelingGamification of ERP systems – exploring gamification effects on user acceptance constructs, in Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik 2012: Tagungsband der MKWI 2012Gito Verlag, Berlin (2012), pp. 599-612View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  63. Hirschheim and Klein, 2012R. Hirschheim, H.K. KleinA glorious and not-so-Short history of the information systems fieldJournal of the Association for Information Systems, 13 (4) (2012)Article 5Google Scholar
  64. Hirschman and Holbrook, 1982E.C. Hirschman, M.B. HolbrookHedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositionsJournal of Marketing, 46 (1982), pp. 92-101CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  65. Huang et al., 2018H.-C. Huang, T.C.E. Cheng, W.-F. Huang, C.-I. TengImpact of online gamers’ personality traits on interdependence, network convergence, and continuance intention: Perspective of social exchange theoryInternational Journal of Information Management, 38 (1) (2018), pp. 232-242ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  66. Huizinga, 1955J. HuizingaHomo ludens: A study of the play element in cultureBeacon Press, Boston, MA (1955)Google Scholar
  67. Huotari and Hamari, 2012K. Huotari, J. HamariDefining gamification – A service marketing perspectiveProceedings of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference (Tampere, Finland, 3–5 October, 2012) (2012), pp. 17-22CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  68. Huotari and Hamari, 2017K. Huotari, J. HamariA definition for gamification: Anchoring gamification in the service marketing literatureElectronic Markets, 27 (1) (2017), pp. 21-31CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle ScholarIEEE, 2014IEEEEveryone’s a gamer – IEEE experts predict gaming will be integrated into more than 85 percent of daily tasks by 2020 [WWW document](2014)(Accessed 14th of February 2017)http://www.ieee.org/about/news/2014/25_feb_2014.htmlGoogle Scholar
  69. Ipeirotis and Gabrilovich, 2014P.G. Ipeirotis, E. GabrilovichQuizz: Targeted crowdsourcing with a billion (potential) usersProceedings of WWW’ 14 (Seoul, Korea, April 7–11, 2014) (2014), pp. 143-154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Jones et al., 2014B.A. Jones, G.J. Madden, H.J. WengreenThe FIT game: Preliminary evaluation of a gamification approach to increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in schoolPreventive Medicine, 68 (2014), pp. 76-79ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  71. Kallio et al., 2010K.P. Kallio, F. Mäyrä, K. KaipainenAt least nine ways to play: Approaching gamer mentalitiesGames and Culture (2010)1555412010391089Google Scholar
  72. Koivisto and Hamari, 2014J. Koivisto, J. HamariDemographic differences in perceived benefits from gamificationComputers in Human Behavior, 35 (2014), pp. 179-188ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  73. Landers, 2015R.N. LandersDeveloping a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learningSimulation & Gaming, 45 (2015), pp. 752-768Google Scholar
  74. Landers and Armstrong, 2015R.N. Landers, M.B. ArmstrongEnhancing instructional outcomes with gamification: An empirical test of the Technology-Enhanced Training Effectiveness ModelComputers in Human Behavior (2015)Google Scholar
  75. Landers et al., 2015R.N. Landers, K.N. Bauer, R.C. CallanGamification of task performance with leaderboards: A goal setting experimentComputers in Human Behavior (2015)Google Scholar
  76. Landers and Landers, 2015R.N. Landers, A.K. LandersAn empirical test of the theory of gamified learning: The effect of leaderboards on time-on-task and academic performanceSimulation & Gaming, 45 (6) (2015), pp. 769-785Google Scholar
  77. Laureyssens et al., 2014T. Laureyssens, T. Coenen, L. Claeys, P. Mechant, J. Criel, A. Vande MoereZWERM: A modular component network approach for an urban participation gameProceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI’ 14 (Toronto, ON, Canada, April 26-May 1, 2014) (2014), pp. 3259-3268CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  78. Lee et al., 2013J.J. Lee, P. Ceyhan, W. Jordan-Cooley, W. SungGREENIFY: A real world action game for climate change educationSimulation & Gaming, 44 (2–3) (2013), pp. 349-365CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  79. Liu et al., 2017D. Liu, R. Santhanam, J. WebsterTowards meaningful engagement: A framework for design and research of gamified information systemsMIS Quarterly, 41 (4) (2017), pp. 1011-1034CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  80. Liu et al., 2013D. Liu, L. Xun, R. SanthanamDigital games and beyond? What happens when player compete?MIS Quarterly, 37 (1) (2013), pp. 111-124CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  81. Locke and Latham, 2002E.A. Locke, G.P. LathamBuilding a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odysseyThe American Psychologist, 57 (9) (2002), pp. 705-717View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  82. Long and Aleven, 2014Y. Long, V. AlevenGamification of joint student/system control over problem selection in a linear equation tutorProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, (Honolulu, HI, USA, June 5-9, 2014) (2014), pp. 378-387CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  83. Lounis et al., 2014S. Lounis, K. Pramatari, A. TheotokisGamification is all about fun: The role of incentive type and community collaborationProceedings of ECIS 2014 (Tel Aviv, Israel, June 9–11, 2014) (2014), pp. 1-14View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  84. Lunenburg, 2011F.C. LunenburgGoal-setting theory of motivationInternational Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 15 (1) (2011)Google Scholar
  85. Majuri et al., 2018J. Majuri, J. Koivisto, J. HamariGamification of education and learning: A review of empirical literatureProceedings of the 2nd International GamiFIN conference, (Pori, Finland, May 21-23, 2018) (2018), pp. 11-19View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  86. Malaby, 2007T.M. MalabyBeyond play: A new approach to gamesGames and Culture, 2 (2) (2007), pp. 95-113CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  87. Mann et al., 2013T. Mann, D. De Ridder, K. FujitaSelf-regulation of health behavior: Social psychological approaches to goal setting and goal strivingHealth Psychology, 32 (5) (2013), pp. 487-498CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  88. Mekler et al., 2013E.D. Mekler, F. Brühlmann, K. Opwis, A.N. TuchDo points, levels and leaderboards harm intrinsic motivation?Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications – Gamification ’13, (Stratford, Ontario, Canada, October 2-4, 2013) (2013), pp. 66-73CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  89. Mekler et al., 2015E.D. Mekler, F. Brühlmann, A.N. Tuch, K. OpwisTowards understanding the effects of individual gamification elements on intrinsic motivation and performanceComputers in Human Behavior (2015)Google Scholar
  90. Moon and Kim, 2001J.-W. Moon, Y.-G. KimExtending the TAM for a world-wide-Web contextInformation & Management, 38 (4) (2001), pp. 217-230ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  91. Morschheuser et al., 2016B. Morschheuser, J. Hamari, J. KoivistoGamification in crowdsourcing: A reviewProceedings of the 49th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (Hawaii, USA, January 5-8, 2016) (2016), pp. 4375-4384CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  92. Morschheuser and Hamari, et al., 2018B. Morschheuser, J. Hamari, A. MaedcheCooperation or competition–When do people contribute more? A field experiment on gamification of crowdsourcingInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2018)Google Scholar
  93. Morschheuser and Hassan, et al., 2018B. Morschheuser, L. Hassan, K. Werder, J. HamariHow to design gamification? A method for engineering gamified softwareInformation & Software Technology, 95 (2018), pp. 219-237ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  94. Morschheuser et al., 2017B. Morschheuser, J. Hamari, J. Koivisto, A. MaedcheGamified crowdsourcing: Conceptualization, literature review, and future agendaInternational Journal of Human-computer Studies, 106 (2017), pp. 26-43ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  95. Mäntymäki et al., 2014M. Mäntymäki, J. Merikivi, T. Verhagen, F. Feldberg, R. RajalaDoes a contextualized theory of planned behavior explain why teenagers stay in virtual worlds?International Journal of Information Management, 34 (5) (2014), pp. 567-576ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  96. Mäntymäki and Riemer, 2014M. Mäntymäki, K. RiemerDigital natives in social virtual worlds: A multi-method study of gratifications and social influences in Habbo HotelInternational Journal of Information Management, 34 (2) (2014), pp. 210-220ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  97. Mäntymäki and Salo, 2013M. Mäntymäki, J. SaloPurchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo HotelInternational Journal of Information Management, 33 (2) (2013), pp. 282-290ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  98. Mäntymäki and Salo, 2015M. Mäntymäki, J. SaloWhy do teens spend real money in virtual worlds? A consumption values and developmental psychology perspective on virtual consumptionInternational Journal of Information Management, 35 (1) (2015), pp. 124-134ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  99. Mäyrä, 2008F. MäyräIntroduction to game studies: Games in cultureSage Publications, London & NY (2008)Google Scholar
  100. Panigrahi et al., 2018R. Panigrahi, P.R. Srivastava, D. SharmaOnline learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literatureInternational Journal of Information Management, 43 (2018), pp. 1-14ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  101. Paré et al., 2015G. Paré, M.C. Trudel, M. Jaana, S. KitsiouSynthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviewsInformation & Management, 52 (2) (2015), pp. 183-199ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  102. Reitz et al., 2016L. Reitz, A. Sohny, G. LochmannVR-based gamification of communication training and oral examination in a second languageInternational Journal of Game-Based Learning, 6 (2) (2016), pp. 46-61View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  103. Rigby and Ryan, 2011S. Rigby, R.M. RyanGlued to games: How video games draw us in and hold us spellboundPraeger, Santa Barbara, CA (2011)Google Scholar
  104. Riva et al., 2014S. Riva, A.L. Camerini, A. Allam, P.J. SchulzInteractive sections of an internet-based intervention increase empowerment of chronic back pain patients: Randomized controlled trialJournal of Medical Internet Research, 16 (8) (2014)Google Scholar
  105. Ryan and Deci, 2000R.M. Ryan, E.L. DeciSelf-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-beingThe American Psychologist, 55 (1) (2000), pp. 68-78CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  106. Ryan et al., 2006R.M. Ryan, C.S. Rigby, A. PrzybylskiThe motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approachMotivation and Emotion, 30 (4) (2006), pp. 344-360CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  107. Sanchez-Nielsen and Lee, 2013E. Sanchez-Nielsen, D. LeeeParticipation in practice in Europe: The case of “puzzled by policy: Helping you Be part of EU”Proceedings of the 46th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) (Hawaii, USA, January 7-10, 2013 (2013), pp. 1870-1879View Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  108. Santhanam et al., 2016R. Santhanam, D. Liu, W.C.M. ShenResearch note – gamification of technology-mediated training: Not all competitions are the sameInformation Systems Research, 27 (2) (2016), pp. 453-465CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  109. Scharkow et al., 2015M. Scharkow, R. Festl, J. Vogelgesang, T. QuandtBeyond the “core-gamer”: Genre preferences and gratifications in computer gamesComputers in Human Behavior, 44 (2015), pp. 293-298ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  110. Seaborn and Fels, 2015K. Seaborn, D.I. FelsGamification in theory and action: A surveyInternational Journal of Human-computer Studies, 74 (2015), pp. 14-31ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  111. Seffah and Taleb, 2012A. Seffah, M. TalebTracing the evolution of HCI patterns as an interaction design toolInnovations in Systems and Software Engineering, 8 (2) (2012), pp. 93-109CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  112. Simões et al., 2013J. Simões, R. Díaz Redondo, A. Fernández VilasA social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platformComputers in Human Behavior, 29 (2) (2013), pp. 345-353ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  113. Sun and Zhang, 2006H. Sun, P. ZhangCausal relationships between perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use: An alternative approachJournal of the Association for Information Systems, 7 (9) (2006), pp. 618-645CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  114. Sørensen et al., 2016J.J.W. Sørensen, M.K. Pedersen, M. Munch, P. Haikka, J.H. Jensen, T.Planke, M.G. Andreasen, M. Gajdacz, K. Mølmer, A. Lieberoth, J.F. ShersonExploring the quantum speed limit with computer gamesNature, 532 (2016), pp. 210-213CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  115. Talaei-Khoei and Daniel, 2018A. Talaei-Khoei, J. DanielHow younger elderly realize usefulness of cognitive training video games to maintain their independent livingInternational Journal of Information Management, 42 (2018), pp. 1-12ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  116. Tavinor, 2009G. TavinorThe art of videogamesWiley-Blackwell, Malden, MA (2009)Google Scholar
  117. Teng, 2017C.-I. TengImpact of avatar identification on online gamer loyalty: Perspectives of social identity and social capital theoriesInternational Journal of Information Management, 37 (6) (2017), pp. 601-610ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  118. Teng and Chen, 2014C.I. Teng, W.W. ChenTeam participation and online gamer loyaltyElectronic Commerce Research and Applications, 13 (1) (2014), pp. 24-31ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  119. Terlutter and Capella, 2013R. Terlutter, M.L. CapellaThe gamification of advertising: Analysis and research directions of in-game advertising, advergames, and advertising in
  120. social network gamesJournal of Advertising, 42 (2-3) (2013), pp. 95-112CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  121. Thom et al., 2012J. Thom, D. Millen, J. DiMiccoRemoving gamification from an enterprise SNS, in proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Seattle, Washington, USA, February 11–15, 2012)(2012), pp. 1067-1070CrossRefView Rcord in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  122. Tolmie et al., 2014P. Tolmie, A. Chamberlain, S. BenfordDesigning for reportability: Sustainable gamification, public engagement, and promoting environmental debatePersonal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18 (7) (2014), pp. 1763-1774CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  123. Tuomela, 1995R. TuomelaThe importance of us: A philosophy study of basic social notionsStanford University Press, Stanford, CA (1995)Google Scholar
  124. van der Heijden, 2004H. van der HeijdenUser acceptance of hedonic information systemsMIS Quarterly, 28 (4) (2004), pp. 695-704CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  125. Venkatesh, 1999V. VenkateshCreation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivationMIS Quarterly, 23 (2) (1999), pp. 239-260CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  126. Vesa et al., 2017M. Vesa, J. Hamari, J.T. Harviainen, H. WarmelinkComputer games and organization studiesOrganization Studies, 38 (2) (2017), pp. 273-284CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  127. Wang et al., 2015X. Wang, C. Schneider, J.S. ValacichEnhancing creativity in group collaboration: How performance targets and feedback shape perceptions and idea generation performanceComputers in Human Behavior, 42 (2015), pp. 187-195ArticleDownload PDFView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  128. Warmelink et al., 2018H. Warmelink, J. Koivisto, I. Mayer, M. Vesa, J. HamariGamification of production and logistics operations: Status quo and future directionsJournal of Business Research (2018)https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296318304594Google Scholar
  129. Watson et al., 2013D. Watson, R.L. Mandryk, K.G. StanleyThe design and evaluation of a classroom exergameProceedings of Gamification’ 13 (Stratford, ON, Canada, October 02–04, 2013) (2013), pp. 34-41CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  130. Webster and Martocchio, 1992J. Webster, J.J. MartocchioMicrocomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implicationsMIS Quarterly, 16 (2) (1992), pp. 201-226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Webster and Watson, 2002J. Webster, R.T. WatsonAnalyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature reviewMIS Quarterly, 26 (2) (2002), pp. xiii-xxiiiView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  132. Williams et al., 2009D. Williams, M. Consalvo, S. Caplan, N. YeeLooking for gender: Gender roles and behaviors among onli
  133. ne gamersThe Journal of Communication, 59 (4) (2009), pp. 700-725CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  134. Williams et al., 2008D. Williams, N. Yee, S.E. CaplanWho plays, how much, and why? Debunking the stereotypical gamer profileJournal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (4) (2008), pp. 993-1018CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  135. Wu and Lu, 2013J. Wu, X. LuEffects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivators on using utilitarian, hedonic, and dual-purposed information systems: A meta-analysisJournal of the Association for Information Systems, 14 (3) (2013), pp. 153-191CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  136. Xi and Hamari, 2019N. Xi, J. HamariThe relationship between gamification, brand engagement and brand equityProceedings of the 52nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), (Hawaii, USA, January 8-11, 2019) (2019)Google Scholar
  137. Yates et al., 2016M. Yates, A. Kelemen, C. Sik LanyiVirtual reality gaming in the rehabilitation of the upper extremities post-strokeBrain Injury, 30 (7) (2016), pp. 855-863CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  138. Yee, 2006N. YeeMotivations for play in online gamesCyberPsychology & Behavior, 9 (6) (2006), pp. 772-775CrossRefView Record in ScopusGoogle Scholar
  139. Zagal et al., 2005J.P. Zagal, M. Mateas, C. Fernandez-Vara, B. Hochhalter, N. LichtiTowards an ontological language for game analysisProceedings of Int
  140. ernational DiGRA Conference: Changing Views – Worlds in Play (Vancouver, Canada, June 16–20, 2005) (2005)3e14Google Scholar