• Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.3.19.66363 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Almalki, M., Gray, K., & Sanchez, F. M. (2015). The use of self-quantification systems for personal health information: Big data management activities and prospects. Health Information Science and Systems, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2501-3-S1-S1 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Alsop, T. (2020). Fitbit- Statistics & facts. Statista. https://www.statista.com/topics/2595/fitbit/ [Google Scholar]
• Amyx, S. (2015, February 6). Can wearables help you reach immortality? Wired. https://www.wired.com/insights/2015/02/can-wearables-help-you-reach-immortality/ [Google Scholar]
• Arnould, E. J., & Price, L. L. (1993). River magic: Extraordinary experience and the extended service encounter. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1086/209331 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Baeva, L. V. (2018). Cyborgization: Pros and Cons. In S. J. Thompson (Ed.), Androids, cyborgs, and robots in contemporary culture and society (pp. 138–150). IGI Global. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Baker, D. A. (2020). Four ironies of self-quantification: Wearable technologies and the quantified self. Science and Engineering Ethics 26(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00111-5 [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
• Batin, M., Turchin, A., Sergey, M., Zhila, A., & Denkenberger, D. (2017). Artificial intelligence in life extension: From deep learning to superintelligence. Informatica, 41(4), 401–418. http://informatica.si/index.php/informatica/article/view/1797 [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Belk, R. W. (1988). Extended self and extending paradigmatic perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1086/209202 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Belk, R.W. (1989) Extended self and extending paradigmatic perspective. Journal of Consumer Researc 16 (1), 129–132 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in a digital world. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(3), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1086/671052 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Belk, R. W. (2016). Anthropomorphism and anthropocentrism. In ACR North American Advances Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
• Beloff, L. (2013). A Ménage of art, technology, and science. In M. More & N. Vita-More (Eds.), The transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future (pp. 83). John Wiley & Sons. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Bettany, S., & Kerrane, B. (2011). The (post-human) consumer, the (post-avian) chicken and the (post-object) Eglu. European Journal of Marketing, 45(11/12), 1746–1756. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111167388 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Bettany, S., & Kerrane, B. (2016). The socio-materiality of parental style. European Journal of Marketing, 50(11), 2041–2066. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2015-0437 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Boase, J., Horrigan, J. B., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2006). The strength of Internet ties. Pew Internet & American Life Project. [Google Scholar]
• Borgerson, J. L. (2005). Materiality, agency, and the constitution of consuming subjects: Insights for consumer research. Advances in Consumer Research, 32 , 439–443. [Google Scholar]
• Bostrom, N. (2005). Transhumanist values. Journal of Philosophical Research, 30(Supplement), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2005_26 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Bostrom, N. (2014). Introduction—The transhumanist FAQ: A general introduction. In D. F. Maher & C. Mercer (Eds.), Transhumanism and the body: The world religions speak (pp. 1–17). Palgrave MacMillan. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Botez, A., Hietanen, J., & Tikkanen, H. (2020). Mapping the absence: A theological critique of posthumanist influences in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(15–16), 1391–1416. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2020.1805491 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Bottazzi, D., Montanari, R., & Toninelli, A. (2007). Context-aware middleware for anytime, anywhere social networks. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(5), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.4338491 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2584525 [Google Scholar]
• Bradford, T. W., Grier, S. A., & Henderson, G. R. (2017). Weight loss through virtual support communities: A role for identity-based motivation in public commitment. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 40(Nov), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.06.002 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Brailovskaia, J., Magraf, J., & Köllner, V. (2019). Addicted to Facebook? Relationship between Facebook addiction disorder, duration of Facebook use and narcissism in an inpatient sample. Psychiatry Research, 273(March), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.01.016 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Google Scholar]
• Breitsohl, J., Kunz, W. H., & Dowell, D. (2015). Does the host match the content? A taxonomical update on online consumption communities. Journal of Marketing Management, 31(9–10), 1040–1064. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1036102 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Cappellini, B., & Yen, D. A. (2016). A space of one’s own: Spatial and identity liminality in an online community of mothers. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(13–14), 1260–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1156725 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C., & Gronhaug, K. (2001). Qualitative research in marketing. Sage Publications Ltd. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Castelo, N., Fitz, N., Schmitt, B., & Sarvary, M. (2016). Cyborg consumers: When human enhancement technologies are dehumanizing. In ACR North American Advances Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
• Celsi, R. L., Rose, R. L., & Leigh, T. W. (1993). An exploration of high-risk leisure consumption through skydiving. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1086/209330 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Charitsis, V., Yngfalk, A. F., & Skalén, P. (2019). ‘Made to run’: Biopolitical marketing and the making of the self-quantified runner. Marketing Theory, 19(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593118799794 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Chatzidakis, A., Maclaran, P., & Bradshaw, A. (2012). Heterotopian space and the utopics of ethical and green consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 494–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.668922 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Clark, A. (2015). Surfing uncertainty: Prediction, action, and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
• Clement, J. (2020). Facebook: Number of monthly active users worldwide 2008-2020. Statista Inc. [Google Scholar]
• Cooke, A. D., & Zubcsek, P. P. (2017). The connected consumer: Connected devices and the evolution of customer intelligence. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1086/690941 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Coorevits, L., & Coenen, T. (2016). The rise and fall of wearable fitness trackers. In Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings California, USA. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications. [Google Scholar]
• Costello, L., McDermott, M.-L., & Wallace, R. (2017). Netnography: Range of practices, misperceptions, and missed opportunities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917700647 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Cova, B., & White, T. (2010). Counter-brand and alter-brand communities: The impact of Web 2.0 on tribal marketing approaches. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(3–4), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02672570903566276 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Creswell John, W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar]
• Danter, S. (2020). Command and control: The quantified self and biomedical transhumanism. In U. Reichardt & R. Schober (Eds.), Laboring bodies and the quantified self (pp. 15–40). transcript Verlag. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Dehghani, M. (2018). Exploring the motivational factors on continuous usage intention of smartwatches among actual users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1424246 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. SAGE Publications. [Google Scholar]
• Diaz, H. (2020, June 18). How the NBA’s smart rings are supposed to detect coronavirus. SBNation.Com. https://www.sbnation.com/nba/2020/6/18/21296076/nba-return-to-play-oura-smart-ring-detect-covid-19-early [Google Scholar]
• Dolbec, P.-Y., & Fischer, E. (2015). Refashioning a field? Connected consumers and institutional dynamics in markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1447–1468. https://doi.org/10.1086/680671 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• DuFault, B. L., & Schouten, J. W. (2020). Self-quantification and the datapreneurial consumer identity. Consumption Markets & Culture, 23(3), 290–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1519489 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Elman, J. P. (2018). “Find Your Fit”: Wearable technology and the cultural politics of disability. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3760–3777. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818760312 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Epp, A. M., & Price, L. L. (2009). The storied life of singularized objects: Forces of agency and network transformation. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 820–837. https://doi.org/10.1086/603547 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Etkin, J. (2016). The hidden cost of personal quantification. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(6), 967–984. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv095 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Eynon, R. (2015). The quantified self for learning: Critical questions for education. Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar]
• Fillard, J. (2020). Transhumanism: A realistic future? World Scientific. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Flanagan, P., & Frankjær, R. (2019). Cyborganic wearables: Sociotechnical misbehavior and the evolution of nonhuman agency. In S. Karkulehto, A.-K. Koistinen, & E. Varis (Eds.), Reconfiguring human, nonhuman and posthuman in literature and culture (pp. 236–259). Routledge. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Fukuyama, F. (2003). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Google Scholar]
• Furnham, A., & Boo, H. C. (2011). A literature review of the anchoring effect. Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2010.10.008 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Gilmore, J. N. (2016). Everywear: The quantified self and wearable fitness technologies. New Media & Society, 18(11), 2524–2539. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815588768 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Gramlich, J. (2019). 10 facts about Americans and Facebook. Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. [Google Scholar]
• Hamilton, K., & Hewer, P. (2010). Tribal mattering spaces: Social-networking sites, celebrity affiliations, and tribal innovations. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(3–4), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02672571003679894 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Hansell, G. R., & Grassie, W. (Eds.). (2010). H± transhumanism and its critics. Metanexus Institute. [Google Scholar]
• Hansen, S., & Baroody, A. J. (2020). Electronic health records and the logics of care: Complementarity and conflict in the US healthcare system. Information Systems Research, 31(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0875 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Hoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (2018). Consumer and object experience in the Internet of Things: An assemblage theory approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(6), 1178–1204. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx105 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (Eds.). (1993). Group motivation: Social psychological perspectives. Harvester Wheatsheaf. [Google Scholar]
• Hollebeek, L. D. (2011). Demystifying customer brand engagement: Exploring the loyalty nexus. Journal of Marketing Management, 27(7–8), 785–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2010.500132 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Hong, J.-C., Lin, P.-H., & Hsieh, P.-C. (2017). The effect of consumer innovativeness on perceived value and continuance intention to use smartwatch. Computers in Human Behavior, 67(Feb), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.001 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Houston, H. R. (2004). Other mothers: Framing the cybernetic construction (s) of the postmodern family. Consumption Markets & Culture, 7(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1025386042000271333 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Hughes, J. J. (2004). Citizen cyborg: Why democratic societies must respond to the redesigned human of the future. Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
• Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
• Huxley, J. (1968). Transhumanism. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 8(1), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/002216786800800107 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Jayanti, R. K. (2010). A netnographic exploration: Listening to online consumer conversations. Journal of Advertising Research, 50(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849910091348 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Johnson, D. S., & Lowe, B. (2015). Emotional support, perceived corporate ownership and skepticism toward out-groups in virtual communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 29(Feb), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2014.07.002 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Karamanou, M., Papaioannou, T. G., Soulis, D., & Tousoulis, D. (2017). Engineering ‘Posthumans’: To be or not to be? Trends in Biotechnology, 35(8), 677–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.04.011 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (2001). Understanding individual motivation in groups: The collective effort model In: M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 113–142). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
• Klein, L. (2014). What do we actually mean by ‘sociotechnical’? On values, boundaries and the problems of language. Applied Ergonomics, 45(2, Part A), 137–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.027 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Knappett, C., & Malafouris, L. (2008). Material and nonhuman agency: An introduction. In C. Knappett, and L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency: Towards a non-anthropocentric approach (p. x). Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Kortuem, G., & Segall, Z. (2003). Wearable communities: Augmenting social networks with wearable computers. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 2(1), 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2003.1186728 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-tribalized marketing?: The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal, 17(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00004-3 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Kozinets, R. V. (2006). Click to connect: Netnography and tribal advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 46(3), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0021849906060338 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Kozinets, R., Patterson, A., & Ashman, R. (2016). Networks of desire: How technology increases our passion to consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 659–682. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw061 [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Kozinets, R., Wojnicki, A. C., Wilner, S. J., & De Valck, K. (2010). Networked narratives: Understanding word-of-mouth marketing in online communities. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.74.2.71 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Kozinets, R. (2015). Netnography redefined. Sage. [Google Scholar]
• Kozinets, R. (2020). Netnography: The essential guide to qualitative social media research. SAGE. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Kumar Kaliyamurthy, A., Luri, I., & Schau, H. (2019). Quantification, algorithms and agency. In ACR North American Advances Georgia, USA. [Google Scholar]
• Kurzweil, R. (2006, September 26). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. Penguin Books. [Google Scholar]
• Laput, G., Xiao, R., & Harrison, C. (2016). ViBand: High-fidelity bio-acoustic sensing using commodity smartwatch accelerometers. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology Tokyo, Japan (pp. 321–333). https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984582 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Leckie, C., Nyadzayo, M. W., & Johnson, L. W. (2016). Antecedents of consumer brand engagement and brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(5–6), 558–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1131735 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Materiality, sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? Do we need them. In P. M. Leonardi, B. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 25–48). Oxford University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Lupton, D. (2016). The quantified self. John Wiley & Sons. [Google Scholar]
• Manzocco, R. (2019). Transhumanism: Engineering the human condition. Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Mathwick, C., Wiertz, C., & De Ruyter, K. (2008). Social capital production in a virtual P3 community. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), 832–849. https://doi.org/10.1086/523291 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.1.38.18451 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• McCann, J., & Bryson, D. (Eds.). (2009). Smart clothes and wearable technology. Woodhouse Publishing. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• McCracken, G. (1988). The long interview (Vol. 13). Sage. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• McKibben, B. (2004). Enough: Staying human in an engineered age. Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
• Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
• Menychtas, A., Doukas, C., Tsanakas, P., & Maglogiannis, I. (2017). A versatile architecture for building IoT quantified-self applications. In Proceedings of the 30th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS) Thessaloniki, Greece (pp. 500–505). [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Milburn, C. (2008). The singularity of nanovision. In Nanovision: Engineering the future (pp. 1–18). Duke University Press. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• More, M., & Vita-More, N. (Eds.). (2013). The transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the science, technology, and philosophy of the human future. John Wiley & Sons. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (2001). Socialization in organizations and work groups. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 69–112). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
• Muñiz, A. M., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1086/319618 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Muñiz, A. M., & Schau, H. J. (2005). Religiosity in the abandoned apple newton brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1086/426607 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Neis, S. M., & Blackstun, M. I. (2016). Feasibility analysis of wearables for use by airline crew. In IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) California, USA (pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2016.7778023 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Nguyen, B., & Simkin, L. (2017). The Internet of Things (IoT) and marketing: The state of play, future trends and the implications for marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(1–2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1257542 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. Routledge. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Paura, R. (2016). Singularity believers and the new utopia of transhumanism. Im@go: A Journal of the Social Imaginary, 5(7), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.7413/22818138056 [Google Scholar]
• Pearson, K. A. (1997). Life becoming body: On the ‘meaning’of post human evolution. Journal for Cultural Research, 1(2), 219–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797589709367145. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Pickering, A. (2010). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. University of Chicago Press. [Google Scholar]
• Pickering, A. (2013). Living in the material world. In F.-X. de Vaujany & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and space (pp. 25–40). Palgrave MacMillan. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Pilsch, A. (2017). Transhumanism: Evolutionary futurism and the human technologies of utopia. University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]
• Polanyi, M. (2009). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago press. [Google Scholar]
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and schuster. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Rainie, L., Smith, A., & Duggan, M. (2013). Coming and going on Facebook. ew Research Center’s Internet and American Life Project. [Google Scholar]
• Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00919275 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Ratner, R. K., & Hamilton, R. W. (2015). Inhibited from bowling alone. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(2), 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv012 [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Reilly, M. (2021). Humans+. MIT Technology Review, 124(2), 72–77. [Google Scholar]
• Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Finding commection in a computerized world. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. [Google Scholar]
• Richter, F. (2019). Consumer spending on wearables to double by 2021. Statista. https://www.google.com/search?q=wearable+market+share+by+2021&rlz=1C1CHBD_enUS863US863&oq=wearable+market+share+by+2021&aqs=chrome.69i57.10820j0j7&sourceid=chrome¡UTF-8 [Google Scholar]
• Ricks, R. (2016). Mediating the body: Wearable tech and disembodier reality. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 35(4), 44–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2016.2618730 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Rokka, J. (2015). Self-transformation and performativity of social media images. In ACR North American Advances Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
• Ropohl, G. (1999). Philosophy of socio-technical systems. Society for Philosophy and Technology Quarterly Electronic Journal, 4(3), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne19994311 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Rosenbloom, C. (2019, January 28). Who decided we should all take 10,000 steps a day, anyway? Washington Post. [Google Scholar]
• Ruckenstein, M., & Pantzar, M. (2017). Beyond the quantified self: Thematic exploration of a dataistic paradigm. New Media & Society, 19(3), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815609081 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Scaraboto, D., & Fischer, E. (2012). Frustrated fatshionistas: An institutional theory perspective on consumer quests for greater choice in mainstream markets. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1234–1257. https://doi.org/10.1086/668298 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Schau, H. J., & Gilly, M. C. (2003). We are what we post? Self-presentation in personal web space. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1086/378616 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., Jr, & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Schembri, S., & Latimer, L. (2016). Online brand communities: Constructing and co-constructing brand culture. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(7–8), 628–651. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2015.1117518 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Seraj, M. (2012). We create, we connect, we respect, therefore we are: Intellectual, social, and cultural value in online communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2012.03.002 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Seregina, A., & Weijo, H. A. (2016). Play at any cost: How cosplayers produce and sustain their ludic communal consumption experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw077 [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Sharma, V. (2019). Transhumanism is the idea of man merging with technology. In N. Lee (Ed.), The transhumanism handbook (pp. 667–673). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16920-6_51 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Sharon, T. (2017). Self-tracking for health and the quantified self: Re-articulating autonomy, solidarity, and authenticity in an age of personalized healthcare. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0215-5 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Shin, D.-H., & Biocca, F. (2017). Health experience model of personal informatics: The case of a quantified self. Computers in Human Behavior, 69(April), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.019 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Shoham, A. (2004). Flow experiences and image making: An online chat-room ethnography. Psychology & Marketing, 21(10), 855–882. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20032 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Silverman, D. (2006). Credible qualitative research. In Interpreting qualitative data (pp. 271–314). SAGE. [Google Scholar]
• Šimůnková, K. (2019). Being hybrid: A conceptual update of consumer self and consumption due to online/offline hybridity. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(1–2), 40–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1573844 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Swan, M. (2012). Sensor mania! The internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 1(3), 217–253. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan1030217 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Swan, M. (2013). The quantified self: Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data, 1(2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2012.0002 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Swan, M. (2015). Connected car: Quantified self becomes quantified car. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 4(1), 2–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan4010002 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Swan, M. (2019). Transhuman crypto cloudminds. In N. Lee (Ed.), The transhumanism handbook (pp. 513–527). Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Takhar, J., & Pemberton, K. (2019). Reproducing “rhetrickery” in online fertility marketing: Harnessing the “rhetoric of the possible”. Consumption Markets & Culture, 22(4), 314–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1512239 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Tankovska, H. (2020). Wearables market share companies 2014-2020. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/435944/quarterly-wearables-shipments-worldwide-market-share-by-vendor/ [Google Scholar]
• Thompson, C. J. (2019). The ‘big data’myth and the pitfalls of ‘thick data’opportunism: On the need for a different ontology of markets and consumption. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(3–4), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1579751 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Thompson, S. A., & Sinha, R. K. (2008). Brand communities and new product adoption: TheInfluence and limits of oppositional loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 72(6), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.6.65 [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Tirosh-Samuelson, H. (2010). Engaging Transhumanism. In G. R. Hansell & W. Grassie (Eds.), H±: Transhumanism and its critics (pp. 19–52). Metanexus Institute. [Google Scholar]
• Trist, E. L. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems (Vol. 2). Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre. [Google Scholar]
• Turkle, S. (2017). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
• Turner, F. (2005). Where the counterculture met the new economy: The WELL and the origins of virtual community. Technology and Culture, 46(3), 485–512. https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2005.0154 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations, and leadership. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 25–66). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
• Veloutsou, C., & Moutinho, L. (2009). Brand relationships through brand reputation and brand tribalism. Journal of Business Research, 62(3), 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.05.010 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Venkatesh, A., & Akdevelioglu, D. (2017). Social media consumer as digital avatar. In M. Keller, B. Halkier, T.-A. Wilska, & M. Truninger (Eds.), Routledge handbook of consumption (pp. 453–465). Routledge. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Verhoef, P. C., Stephen, A. T., Kannan, P. K., Luo, X., Abhishek, V., Andrews, M., Bart, Y., Datta, H., Fong, N., & Hoffman, D. L. (2017). Consumer connectivity in a complex, technology-enabled, and mobile-oriented world with smart products. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 40(November), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.06.001 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Vita-More, N. (2019). History of transhumanism. In N. Lee (Ed.), The transhumanism handbook (pp. 49–61). Springer. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Warmbier, A. (2018). The idea of excellence and human enhancement. Peter Lang GmbH. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
• Wei, J. (2014). How wearables intersect with the cloud and the Internet of Things: Considerations for the developers of wearables. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 3(3), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2014.2317895 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Díaz, I., & Miyata, K. (2003). The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 8(3), JCMC834. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x [Google Scholar]
• Wilson, T. D., Houston, C. E., Etling, K. M., & Brekke, N. (1996). A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(4), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.125.4.387 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Wong, P., Hogg, M. K., & Vanharanta, M. (2012). Consumption narratives of extended possessions and the extended self. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(7–8), 936–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.698632 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
• Wright, L. T., Cova, B., & Pace, S. (2006). Brand community of convenience products: New forms of customer empowerment–the case “my nutella the community”. European Journal of Marketing, 40(9/10), 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610681023. [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Yang, S., Lin, S., Carlson, J. R., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (2016). Brand engagement on social media: Will firms’ social media efforts influence search engine advertising effectiveness? Journal of Marketing Management, 32(5–6), 526–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2016.1143863 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications. [Google Scholar]
• Yngfalk, C., & Fyrberg Yngfalk, A. (2015). Creating the cautious consumer: Marketing managerialism and bio-power in health consumption. Journal of Macromarketing, 35(4), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146715571459 [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Yurkiewicz, I. R., Simon, P., Liedtke, M., Dahl, G., & Dunn, T. (2018). Effect of Fitbit and iPad wearable technology in health-related quality of life in adolescent and young adult cancer patients. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, 7(5), 579–583. https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2018.0022 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Zaglia, M. E. (2013). Brand communities embedded in social networks. Journal of Business Research, 66(2), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.07.015 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
• Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(5), 725–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00930023 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]