Young People’s Perspectives on and Experiences of Health-Related Social Media, Apps, and Wearable Health Devices

by | Aug 13, 2018 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Victoria A. Goodyear
  • Kathleen M. Armour

Abstract:

It has been reported from numerous international and socio-economic contexts that young people are becoming increasingly interested in and/or using social media, apps, and wearable devices for their health. Yet, there are few robust empirical accounts on the types of health-related information young people find, select, and use, the reasons for their choices, and how young people use these technologies in a way that influences their health-related knowledge and behaviors. This paper synthesizes findings from three separate projects that investigated over 1600 young people’s (age 13–19) perspectives on and experiences of health-related social media, apps, and wearable health devices. The findings show that young people are both critical and vulnerable users and generators of digital health technologies. Many young people experience a range of positive benefits for their physical activity, diet/nutritional, and body image related behaviors. Yet there are a number of risks, and young people report on the power of digital health technologies to shape, influence, and change their health-related behaviors. The paper concludes by providing new and evidence-based direction and guidance on how relevant adults (including teachers, parents/guardians, health professionals/practitioners, policy-makers, and researchers) can better understand and support young people’s engagement with digital health technologies

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7080137

References:
  1. Anderson, Monica, and Jingjing Jiang. 2018. Teens, SOCIAL MEDIA and Technology 2018. Pew Research Centre. Available online: http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2018/05/31102617/PI_2018.05.31_TeensTech_FINAL.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2018).
  2. Andersson, Erik, and Maria Olson. 2014. Political participation as public pedagogy—The educational situation in young people’s political conversations in social media. Journal of Social Science Education 13: 115–26. [Google Scholar]
  3. Armour, Kathleen M. 2014. Pedagogical Cases in Physical Education and Youth Sport. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  4. boyd, danah. 2014. It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. London: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Casey, Ashley, Victoria A. Goodyear, and Kathleen M. Armour. 2016. Digital Technologies and Learning in Physical Education: Pedagogical Cases. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  6. Casey, Ashley, Victoria A. Goodyear, and Kathleen M. Armour. 2017. Rethinking the relationship between pedagogy, technology and learning in health and physical education. Sport, Education and Society 22: 288–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Depper, Annaleise, and David P. Howe. 2017. Are we fit yet? English adolescent girls’ experiences of health and fitness apps. Health Sociology Review 26: 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  8. Englund, Tomas. 2006. Deliberative communication: A pragmatist proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies 38: 503–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Foucault, Michel. 2008. “Panopticism” from discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts 2: 1–12. First published 1977. [Google Scholar]
  10. Freishtat, Richard L., and Jennifer A. Sandlin. 2010. Shaping youth discourse about technology: Technological colonization, manifest destiny, and the frontier myth in Facebook’s public pedagogy. Educational Studies 46: 503–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fullagar, Simone, Emma Rich, and Jessica Francombe-Webb. 2017. New kinds of (ab)normal?: Public pedagogies, affect and youth mental health in the digital age. Social Sciences 6: 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gardner, Howard, and Katie Davis. 2014. The App Generation. Yale: Yale University Press. [Google Scholar]
  13. Giroux, Howard A. 2004. Public pedagogy and the politics of neo-liberalism: Making the political more pedagogical. Policy Futures in Education 2: 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Goodyear, Victoria A., and Kathleen Armour. Forthcoming. Young People, Social Media and Health. London: Routledge, In press. [Google Scholar]
  15. Goodyear, Victoria A., Charlotte Kerner, and Mikael Quennerstedt. 2017. Young people’s uses of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies: Surveillance, self-surveillance and resistance. Sport, Education and Society 22: 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Goodyear, Victoria A., Kathleen M. Armour, and Hannah Wood. 2018a. Young people and their engagement with health-related social media: New perspectives. Sport, Education and Society. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goodyear, Victoria A., Kathleen M. Armour, and Hannah Wood. 2018b. The Impact of Social Media on Young People’s Health and Wellbeing: Evidence, Guidelines and Actions. Birmingham: University of Birmingham. [Google Scholar]
  18. Goodyear, Victoria A., Kathleen M. Armour, and Hannah Wood. 2018c. “There’s an App for That!”: An Exploratory Study into Digital Technologies and Health/Wellbeing Education in Schools, Report submitted to the Society for Educational Studies.
  19. Handyside, Sarah, and Jessica Ringrose. 2017. Snapchat memory and youth digital sexual cultures: Mediated temporality, duration and affect. Journal of Gender Studies 26: 347–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hausmann, Jonathon S., Currie Touloumtzis, Matthew T. White, James A. Colbert, and Holly C. Golding. 2017. Adolescent and young adult use of social media for health and its implications. Journal of Adolescent Health 60: 714–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Holmberg, Christopher, John E. Chaplin, Thomas Hillman, and Christina Berg. 2016. Adolescents’ presentations of food in social media: An explorative study. Appetite 99: 121–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Holt, Nicholas L., Martin Camiré, Katherine A. Tamminen, Kurtis Pankow, Shannon R. Pynn, Leisha Strachan, Dany J. MacDonald, and Jessica Fraser-Thomas. 2017. PYDSportNET: A knowledge translation project bridging gaps between research and practice in youth sport. Journal of Sport Psychology in Action 9: 132–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ito, Mizuko, Sonja Baumer, Matteo Bittanti, danah boyd, Rachel Cody, Becky Herr Stephenson, Heather A. Horst, Patricia G. Lange, Dilan Mahendran, Katynka Z. Martínez, and et al. 2010. Hanging Out, Messing around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  24. James, Carrie. 2014. Disconnected: Youth, New Media and the Ethics Gap. London: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kerner, Charlotte, and Victoria A. Goodyear. 2017. The motivational impact of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies: A self-determination perspective on Fitbits with adolescents. American Journal of Health Education48: 287–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Koekoek, Jeroen, and Ivo V. Hilvoorde. 2018. Digital Technology in Physical Education: Global Perspectives. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  27. Lahman, Maria K. E., Monica R. Geist, Katrina L. Rodriguez, Pamela Graglia, and Kathryn K. DeRoche. 2011. Culturally responsive relational reflexive ethics in research: The three rs. Quality & Quantity 45: 1397–414. [Google Scholar]
  28. Livingstone, Sonia, Giovanna Mascheroni, and Elisabeth Staksrud. 2018. European research on children’s internet use: Assessing the past and anticipating the future. New Media & Society 20: 1103–22. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lomborg, Stine. 2017. Social Media, Social Genres. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lupton, Deborah. 2017. Lively Data, Social Fitness and Biovalue: The Intersections of Health Self-Tracking and Social Media. In The Sage Handbook of Social Media. Edited by J. Burgess, A. Marwick and T. Poell. London: Sage. [Google Scholar]
  31. Maclssac, Sarah, J. Kelly, and S. Gray. 2018. ‘She has like 4000 followers!’: The celebrification of self within school social networks. Journal of Youth Studies 21: 816–35. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mascheroni, Giovanna, Ana Jorge, and Lorleen Farrugia. 2014. Media representations and children’s discourses on online risks: Findings from qualitative research in nine European countries. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research in Cyberspace 8: 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. McCuaig, Lousise, Mikael Quennerstedt, and Doune Macdonald. 2013. A salutogenic, strengths-based approach as a theory to guide HPE curriculum change. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education 4: 109–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Miller, Daniel, Costa Elisabetta, Nell Haynes, Tom McDonald, Razvan Nicolescu, Sinanan Jolynna, Xinyuan Wang, Spyer Juliano, and Venkatraman Shriram. 2016. How the World Changed Social Media. London: UCL Press. [Google Scholar]
  35. Millington, Brad. 2017. Fitness, Technology and Society: Amusing Ourselves to Life. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ofcom. 2017. Children and Parents: Media Use and Attitudes Report. Available online: https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/108182/children-parents-media-use-attitudes-2017.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2018).
  37. Oliver, Kimberley L., and David Kirk. 2016. Toward an activist approach to research and advocacy for girls and physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 21: 313–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  38. Patton, George C., Susan M. Sawyer, John S. Santelli, David A. Ross, Rima Afifi, Nicholas B. Allen, Monika Arora, Peter Azzopardi, Wendy Baldwin, Christopher Bonell, and et al. 2016. Our future: A Lancet commission on adolescent health and wellbeing. Lancet 387: 2423–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rich, Emma, and Andy Miah. 2014. Understanding digital health as public pedagogy: A critical framework. Societies 4: 296–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rich, Emma, and Andy Miah. 2017. Mobile, wearable and ingestible health technologies: Towards a critical research agenda. Health Sociology Review 26: 84–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Royal Society of Public Health (RPSH). 2017. #Status on Mind: Social Media and Young People’s Mental Health and Wellbeing. London: Royal Society for Public Health. [Google Scholar]
  42. Shaw, Julie M., Creina A. Mitchell, Anthony J. Welch, and Moira J. Williamson. 2015. Social media used as a health intervention in adolescent health: A systematic review of the literature. Digital Health 1: 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Smith, Brett, and Kerry R. McGannon. 2018. Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology 11: 101–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sparkes, Andrew, and Brett Smith. 2014. Ethical issues in qualitative research. In Qualitative Research Methods in Sport, Exercise and Health: From Process to Product. Edited by Andrew Sparkes and Brett Smith. London: Routledge, pp. 206–37. [Google Scholar]
  45. Swist, Teresa, Philippa Collin, Jane McCormack, and Amanda Third. 2015. Social Media and the Wellbeing of Children and Young People: A Literature Review. Perth: Commissioner for Children and Young People. [Google Scholar]
  46. Third, Amanda, Delphine Bellerose, Urszula Dawkins, Emma Keltie, and Kari Pihl. 2014. Children’s Rights in the Digital Age: A Download from Children around the World. Melbourne: Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre. [Google Scholar]
  47. Third, Amanda, Delphine Bellerose, Juliano D. D. Oliveira, Girish Lala, and Georgina Theakstone. 2017. Young and Online: Children’s Perspectives on Life in the Digital Age. Sydney: Western Sydney University. [Google Scholar]
  48. Turkle, Sherry. 2017. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other, 3rd ed. New York: Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
  49. Walsh, Jill. 2017. Adolescents and Their Social Media Narratives. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wartella, Ellen, Vicky Rideout, Heather Montague, Leanne Beaudoin-Ryan, and Alexis Lauricella. 2016. Teens, health, and technology: A national survey. Media and Communications 4: 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]