Young people’s uses of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies; surveillance, self-surveillance and resistance

by | Sep 22, 2017 | Research Publications

Author(s):

  • Goodyear, Victoria A.
  • Kerner, Charlotte
  • Quennerstedt, Mikael

Abstract:

An international evidence-base demonstrates that healthy lifestyle digital technologies, like exergames, health-related mobile applications (‘apps’) and wearable health devices are being used more and more within educational settings. Despite this, there is a lack of in-depth empirical evidence on young people’s experiences and uses of healthy lifestyle technologies. In this article we focus on young people’s uses of a wearable health device–Fitbit–and the associated health app. Informed by the work of Foucault, the purpose is to investigate the surveillance, self-surveillance and resistance that occur by young people. One hundred 13–14 years olds (53 females, 47 males), from five physical education classes in two UK schools participated. Data were generated through 8 focus group interviews, and the nominal interview group technique was applied. Data were analyzed using key concepts from Foucault’s theoretical framework. The results demonstrated that, the daily 10,000 step and calorie burning targets set by the Fitbit device encouraged the young people to do more physical activity. Increases in physical activity occurred because of the self-surveillant practices promoted by the Fitbit through; (i) the monitoring and recording of steps and calories burned, and (ii) peer comparison (or monitoring). Surveillance and self-surveillance practices, however, were clearly connected to health equating to fitness and being ‘fit’ or not being ‘fat’. These narrow interpretations of health, equally, underpinned resistance. Daily step and calorie burning targets, (i) did not sustain young people’s engagement with the device beyond a few weeks, (ii) promoted negative feelings, and (iii) the device was resisted because it did not record physical activity accurately as part of young people’s daily lives. In turn, the young people resisted the educational value of the Fitbit and demonstrated a sceptical stance toward introducing health devices in school and physical education settings.

Document:

https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2017.1375907

References:
  1. Albrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3), Retrieved August 15, 2017, from http://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2142/1949 [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  2. Armour, K. M. (2014). Pedagogical cases in physical education and youth sport. London: Routledge. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  3. Best, K. (2010). Living in the control society: Surveillance, users and digital screen technologies. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(1), 5–24. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  4. Burrows, L. (2010). Push play every day: New Zealand children’s constructions of health and physical activity. In M. O’Sullivan & A. MacPhail (Eds.), Young people’s voices in physical education and sport (pp. 145–162). Oxon: Routledge. [Google Scholar]
  5. Burrows, L., & Wright, J. (2004). The good life: New Zealand children’s perspectives on health and self. Sport, Education and Society, 9(2), 193–205. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  6. Casey, A., Goodyear, V. A., & Armour, K. M. (2017). Rethinking the relationship between pedagogy, technology and learning in health and physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 22(2), 288–304. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  7. Dennison, L., Morrison, L., Conway, G., & Yardley, L. (2013). Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behaviour change: Qualitative study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(4), e86. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  8. Depper, A., & Howe, P. D. (2017). Are we fit yet? English adolescent girls’ experiences of health and fitness apps. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 98–112. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  9. Dudley, D., Goodyear, V. A., & Baxter, D. (2016). Quality and health-optimizing physical education: Using assessment at the health and education nexus. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 35(4), 324–336. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  10. Dute, D. J., Bemelmans, W. J. E., & Breda, J. (2016). Using mobile apps to promote a healthy lifestyle among adolescents and students: A review of the theoretical basis and lessons learned. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 4(2), e39. [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  11. Englund, T. (2006). Deliberative communication: A pragmatist proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(5), 503–520. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault, M. (1977/2008). “Panopticism” from discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts, 2(1), 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  13. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777–795. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  14. Galič, M., Timan, T., & Koops, B. J. (2017). Bentham, deleuze and beyond: An overview of surveillance theories from the panopticon to participation. Philosophy & Technology, 30(1), 9–37. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  15. Gallagher, M. (2010). Are schools panoptic? Surveillance & Society, 7(3/4), 262–272. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  16. Gard, M. (2014). eHPE: A history of the future. Sport, Education and Society, 19(6), 827–845. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  17. Goodyear, V. A. (2017). Social media, apps, and wearable technologies: Navigating ethical dilemmas and procedures. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 9(3), 285–302. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  18. Gordon, J., & Patterson, J. A. (2013). Response to tracy’s under the “big tent” establishing universal criteria for evaluating qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 19(9), 689–695. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  19. Harris, J., Cale, L., Duncombe, R., & Musson, H. (2017). Young people’s knowledge and understanding of health, fitness and physical activity: Issues, divides and dilemmas. Sport, Education and Society, 38, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  20. HM Government. (2015). Sporting future: A new strategy for an active nation. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/486622/Sporting_Future_ACCESSIBLE.pdf [Google Scholar]
  21. Kerner, C., & Goodyear, V. A. (2017). The motivational impact of wearable healthy lifestyle technologies: A self-determination perspective on FitBits with adolescents. American Journal of Health Education, iFirst. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  22. Lewallen, J., & Behm-Morawitz, E. (2016). Pinterest or Thinterest?: Social comparison and body image on social media. Social Media + Society, January–March, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lupton, D. (2016). The diverse domains of quantified selves: Self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Society, 45(1), 101–122. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  24. Luton, D. (2015). Data assemblages, sentient schools and digitised health and physical education (response to Gard). Sport, Economy and Society, 20(1), 122–132. [Google Scholar]
  25. Macphail, A. (2001). Nominal group technique: A useful method for working with young people. British Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 161–170. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  26. Petherick, L. (2015). Shaping the child as a healthy child: Health surveillance, schools, and biopedagogies. Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, 15(5), 361–370. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  27. Pink, S., & Fors, V. (2017). Self-tracking and mobile media: New digital materialities. Mobile Media & Communication, doi: 10.1177/2050157917695578 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  28. Powell, D., & Fitzpatrick, K. (2015). ‘Getting fit basically just means, like, nonfat’: Children’s lessons in fitness and fatness. Sport, Education and Society, 20(4), 463–484. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  29. Quennerstedt, M., Burrows, L., & Maivorsdotter, N. (2010). From teaching young people to be healthy to learning health. Utbildning och Demokrati, 19(2), 97–112. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rich, E., & Miah, A. (2017). Mobile, wearable and ingestible health technologies: Towards a critical research agenda. Health Sociology Review, 26(1), 84–97. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  31. Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power, and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  32. Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2017). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  33. Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. (2016). Interviews: Qualitative interviewing in the sport and exercise sciences. In B. Smith & A. Sparkes (Eds.), Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise (pp. 103–123). London: Routledge. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  34. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  35. Vaz, P., & Bruno, F. (2003). Types of self-surveillance: From abnormality to individuals ‘at risk’. Surveillance & Society, 1(3), 272–291. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  36. Wartella, E., Rideout, V., Montague, H., Beaudoin-Ryan, L., & Lauricella, A. (2016). Teens, health and technology: A national survey. Media and Communication, 4(3), 13–23. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  37. Webb, L., & Quennerstedt, M. (2010). Risky bodies: Health surveillance and teachers’ embodiment of health. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(7), 785–802. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar]
  38. Whitson, J. R. (2013). Gaming the quantified self. Surveillance & Society, 11(1/2), 163–176. [Crossref], [Google Scholar]
  39. Williamson, B. (2015). Algorithmic skin: Health-tracking technologies, personal analytics and the biopedagogies of digitized health and physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 20(1), 133–151. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]
  40. World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). Mhealth: New horizons for health through technologies. Global observatory series, 3. Geneva: World Health Organisation. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wright, J., & Halse, C. (2014). The healthy child citizen: Biopedagogies and web-based health promotion. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35(6), 837–855. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar]